of_io_request_and map returns an error pointer, but the current code assumes
that on error the returned pointer will be NULL.

Obviously, that makes the check completely useless. Change the test to actually
check for the proper error code.
Signed-off-by: NMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430579006-32702-4-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Today the number of bits of the broadcast masks that is output into
/proc/timer_list is sizeof(unsigned long). This means that on machines
with a larger number of CPUs, the bitmasks of CPUs beyond this range do
not appear.

Fix this by using bitmap printing through "%*pb" instead, so as to
output the broadcast masks for the range of nr_cpu_ids into
/proc/timer_list.
Signed-off-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150428084520.3314.62668.stgit@preeti.in.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Simplify the oneshot logic by avoiding the reprogramming loops. That
also allows to call the cpu local handler outside of the
broadcast_lock held region.
Tested-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

With the removal of the hrtimer softirq the switch to highres/nohz
mode happens in the tick interrupt. That leads to a livelock when the
per cpu event handler is directly called from the broadcast handler
under broadcast lock because broadcast lock needs to be taken for the
highres/nohz switch as well.

Solve this by calling the cpu local handler outside the broadcast_lock
held region.

Fixes: c6eb3f70 "hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq"
Reported-and-tested-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Reported-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The return value of hrtimer_start() tells whether the timer was
inactive or active already when hrtimer_start() was called.

The code emits a bogus warning if the timer was active already
claiming that the timer could not be started.

Remove it along with the bogus comment in the else path.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NFrans Klaver <frans.klaver@xsens.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org

The struct member is gone.

Reported-by: fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150422200000.GA122603@lkp-sb04Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Thomas stumbled over the hrtimer_forward_now() in
perf_event_mux_interval_ms_store() and noticed its broken-ness.

You cannot just change the expiry time of an active timer, it will
destroy the red-black tree order and cause havoc.

Change it to (re)start the timer instead, (re)starting a timer will
dequeue and enqueue a timer and therefore preserve rb-tree order.

Since we cannot enqueue remotely, wrap the thing in
cpu_function_call(), this however mandates that we restrict ourselves
to online cpus. Also serialize the entire setting so we don't get
multiple concurrent threads trying to update to different values.

Also fix a problem in perf_mux_hrtimer_restart(), checking against
hrtimer_active() can actually loose us the timer when timer->state ==
HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK and the callback has already decided NORESTART.

Furthermore it doesn't make any sense to test
hrtimer_callback_running() when we already tested hrtimer_active(),
but with the above change, we explicitly must call it when
callback_running.

Lastly, rename a few functions:

  s/perf_cpu_hrtimer_/perf_mux_hrtimer_/ -- because I could not find
                                            the mux timer function

  s/\<hr\>/timer/ -- because that's the normal way of calling things.

Fixes: 62b85639 ("perf: Add sysfs entry to adjust multiplexing interval per PMU")
Reported-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.863052571@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Roman reported a 3 cpu lockup scenario involving __start_cfs_bandwidth().

The more I look at that code the more I'm convinced its crack, that
entire __start_cfs_bandwidth() thing is brain melting, we don't need to
cancel a timer before starting it, *hrtimer_start*() will happily remove
the timer for you if its still enqueued.

Removing that, removes a big part of the problem, no more ugly cancel
loop to get stuck in.

So now, if I understand things right, the entire reason you have this
cfs_b->lock guarded ->timer_active nonsense is to make sure we don't
accidentally lose the timer.

It appears to me that it should be possible to guarantee that same by
unconditionally (re)starting the timer when !queued. Because regardless
what hrtimer::function will return, if we beat it to (re)enqueue the
timer, it doesn't matter.

Now, because hrtimers don't come with any serialization guarantees we
must ensure both handler and (re)start loop serialize their access to
the hrtimer to avoid both trying to forward the timer at the same
time.

Update the rt bandwidth timer to match.

This effectively reverts: 09dc4ab0 ("sched/fair: Fix
tg_set_cfs_bandwidth() deadlock on rq->lock").
Reported-by: NRoman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415095011.804589208@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Because we drop cpu_base->lock around calling hrtimer::function, it is
possible for hrtimer_start() to come in between and enqueue the timer.

If hrtimer::function then returns HRTIMER_RESTART we'll hit the BUG_ON
because HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED will be set.

Since the above is a perfectly valid scenario, remove the BUG_ON and
make the enqueue_hrtimer() call conditional on the timer not being
enqueued already.

NOTE: in that concurrent scenario its entirely common for both sites
to want to modify the hrtimer, since hrtimers don't provide
serialization themselves be sure to provide some such that the
hrtimer::function and the hrtimer_start() caller don't both try and
fudge the expiration state at the same time.

To that effect, add a WARN when someone tries to forward an already
enqueued timer, the most common way to change the expiry of self
restarting timers. Ideally we'd put the WARN in everything modifying
the expiry but most of that is inlines and we don't need the bloat.

Fixes: 2d44ae4d ("hrtimer: clean up cpu->base locking tricks")
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150415113105.GT5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

do_usleep_range() and schedule_hrtimeout_range() are __sched as
well. So it makes no sense to have the exported function in a
different section.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.833709502@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The only user ignores it anyway and rightfully so.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.756060258@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We can do a lockless check for hrtimer_active before actually taking
the lock in hrtimer[_try_to]_cancel. This is useful for hotpath users
like nanosleep as they avoid the lock dance when the timer has
expired.

This is safe because active is true when the timer is enqueued or the
callback is running. Taking the hrtimer base lock does not protect
against concurrent hrtimer_start calls, the callsite has to do the
proper serialization itself.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.580273114@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No user was ever interested whether the timer was active or not when
it was started. All abusers of the return value are gone, so get rid
of it.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.483556394@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The assignment of bc_moved in the conditional construct relies on the
fact that in the case of hrtimer_start() invocation the return value
is always 0. It took me a while to understand it.

We want to get rid of the hrtimer_start() return value. Open code the
logic which makes it readable as well.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.404751457@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We want to get rid of the hrtimer_start() return value and the alarm
timer return value is nowhere used. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.243910615@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The check for hrtimer_active() after starting the timer is
pointless. If the timer is inactive it has expired already and
therefor the task pointer is already NULL.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.165258315@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The check for hrtimer_active() after starting the timer is
pointless. If the timer is inactive it has expired already and
therefor the task pointer is already NULL.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203503.081830481@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The check for hrtimer_active() after starting the timer is
pointless. If the timer is inactive it has expired already and
therefor the task pointer is already NULL.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.985825453@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The check for hrtimer_active() after starting the timer is
pointless. If the timer is inactive it has expired already and
therefor the task pointer is already NULL.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.907149271@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No point for an extra export just to set the extra argument of
hrtimer_start_range_ns() to 0.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.808544539@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No more callers. Remove the leftovers.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.707871492@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.627353666@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() now enforces a timer interrupt when an already expired
timer is enqueued.

Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocations and the loops
around it.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.531131739@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.452104213@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.360555157@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() does not longer defer already expired timers to the
softirq. Get rid of the __hrtimer_start_range_ns() invocation.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.260487331@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The evaluation of the next timer in the nohz code is based on jiffies
while all the tick internals are nano seconds based. We have also to
convert hrtimer nanoseconds to jiffies in the !highres case. That's
just wrong and introduces interesting corner cases.

Turn it around and convert the next timer wheel timer expiry and the
rcu event to clock monotonic and base all calculations on
nanoseconds. That identifies the case where no timer is pending
clearly with an absolute expiry value of KTIME_MAX.

Makes the code more readable and gets rid of the jiffies magic in the
nohz code.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.184198593@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Get rid of one indentation level. Preparatory patch for a major
rework. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.101563235@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We already got rid of the hrtimer reprogramming loops and hoops as
hrtimer now enforces an interrupt if the enqueued time is in the past.

Do the same for the nohz non highres mode. That gets rid of the need
to raise the softirq which only serves the purpose of getting the
machine out of the inner idle loop.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203502.023464878@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer_start() enforces a timer interrupt if the timer is already
expired. Get rid of the checks and the forward loop.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.943658239@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimer softirq is a leftover from the initial implementation and
serves only the purpose to handle the enqueueing of already expired
timers in the high resolution timer mode. We discussed whether we
change the return value and force all start sites to handle that the
timer is already expired, but that would be a Herculean task and I'm
not sure whether its a good idea to enforce that handling on
everyone.

A simpler solution is to enforce a timer interrupt instead of raising
and scheduling a softirq. Just use the existing infrastructure to do
so and remove all the softirq leftovers.

The HRTIMER softirq enum is now unused, but kept around because trace
parsers rely on the existing numbering.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.840834708@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

__remove_hrtimer() needs to evaluate the expiry time to figure out
whether the timer which is removed is eventually the first expiring
timer on the cpu. Keep a pointer to it, which is lazily updated, so we
can avoid the evaluation dance and retrieve the information from there.

Generates slightly better code.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.752838019@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Use the return value instead of reevaluating the information.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.658152945@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The hrtimer code is interested whether the added timer is the first
one to expire and whether the removed timer was the last one in the
tree. The add/del routines have that information already. So we can
return it right away instead of reevaluating it at the call site.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.579063647@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We don't use cacheline_align here because that might waste lot of
space on 32bit machine with 64 bytes cachelines and on 64bit machines
with 128 bytes cachelines.

The size of struct hrtimer_clock_base is 64byte on 64bit and 32byte on
32bit machines. So we utilize the cache lines proper.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.498165771@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

We really want that data structure to start at a cache line boundary.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.417597627@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The active_bases field is guaranteed to be in sync with the timerqueue
of the corresponding clock base. So we can use it for iterating over
the clock bases. This allows to break out early if no more active
clock bases are available and avoids touching the cache lines of
inactive clock bases.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NPreeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.322887675@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

No point in wasting 12 byte storage space. Generates better code as well.

Text size reduction:
       x8664 -64, i386 -16, ARM -132, ARM64 -0, power64 -48
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150414203501.227955358@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>