1. 22 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 15 7月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      i40e/i40evf: Fix i40e_rx_checksum · 858296c8
      Alexander Duyck 提交于
      There are a couple of issues I found in i40e_rx_checksum while doing some
      recent testing.  As a result I have found the Rx checksum logic is pretty
      much broken and returning that the checksum is valid for tunnels in cases
      where it is not.
      
      First the inner types are not the correct values to use to test for if a
      tunnel is present or not.  In addition the inner protocol types are not a
      bitmask as such performing an OR of the values doesn't make sense.  I have
      instead changed the code so that the inner protocol types are used to
      determine if we report CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY or not.  For anything that does
      not end in UDP, TCP, or SCTP it doesn't make much sense to report a
      checksum offload since it won't contain a checksum anyway.
      
      This leaves us with the need to set the csum_level based on some value.
      For that purpose I am using the tunnel_type field.  If the tunnel type is
      GRENAT or greater then this means we have a GRE or UDP tunnel with an inner
      header.  In the case of GRE or UDP we will have a possible checksum present
      so for this reason it should be safe to set the csum_level to 1 to indicate
      that we are reporting the state of the inner header.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>
      Tested-by: NAndrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
      858296c8
  3. 21 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  4. 14 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 06 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  8. 26 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 14 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 07 4月, 2016 3 次提交
  11. 06 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  12. 05 4月, 2016 4 次提交
  13. 20 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 19 2月, 2016 16 次提交
  15. 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交