- 16 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
IPv6 routes currently lack nexthop flags as in IPv4. This has several implications. In the forwarding path, it requires us to check the carrier state of the nexthop device and potentially ignore a linkdown route, instead of checking for RTNH_F_LINKDOWN. It also requires capable drivers to use the user facing IPv6-specific route flags to provide offload indication, instead of using the nexthop flags as in IPv4. Add nexthop flags to IPv6 routes in the 40 bytes hole and use it to provide offload indication instead of the RTF_OFFLOAD flag, which is removed while it's still not part of any official kernel release. In the near future we would like to use the field for the RTNH_F_{LINKDOWN,DEAD} flags, but this change is more involved and might not be ready in time for the current cycle. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Acked-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 8月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
Due to limited ASIC resources the maximum number of routes is limited by the nexthop resource. In order to improve the routing scale nexthop consolidation should be performed. This patch adds support for IPv6 neighbor consolidation. The hash value is calculated based on the nexthop set, by performing bitwise xor on the ifindexs of the nexthops, in a similar way to IPv4's kernel implementation. In case of collision a full match is performed between the sets which include address and ifindex comparison. Non gateway nexthop groups are not inserted to the hash table due to lack of nexthop device (ifindex). Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
This patch does preparation before introducing IPv6 nexthop group consolidation. Currently the nexthop group hash table is used only by IPv4 and uses fixed key size. In order to support the IPv6's variable length key the current table is changed. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The number of LPM trees available for lookup is much smaller than the number of virtual routers, which are used to implement VRFs. In addition, an LPM tree can only be used by one protocol - either IPv4 or IPv6. Therefore, in order to increase the number of supported virtual routers to the maximum we need to be able to share LPM trees across virtual routers instead of trying to find an optimized tree for each. Do that by allocating one LPM tree for each protocol, but make sure it will only include prefixes that are actually used, so as to not perform unnecessary lookups. Since changing the structure of a bound tree isn't recommended, whenever a new tree it required, it's first created and then bound to each virtual router, replacing the old one. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Instead of relying on the LPM tree to be assigned to the virtual router before binding the two, lets pass it explicitly. This will later allow us to return upon binding error instead of having to perform a rollback of the assignment. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
There is no point in returning a value from function whose return value is never checked. Even if the return value was checked, there wouldn't be anything to do about it, as these functions are either called from error or deletion paths. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 8月, 2017 8 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We now have all the necessary IPv6 infrastructure in place, so stop ignoring these notifications. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Without resorting to ACLs, the device performs route lookup solely based on the destination IP address. In case source-specific routing is needed, an error is returned and the abort mechanism is activated, thus allowing the kernel to take over forwarding decisions. Instead of aborting, we can trap specific destination prefixes where source-specific routes are present, but this will result in a lot more code that is unlikely to ever be used. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In case we got a replace event, then the replaced route must exist. If the route isn't capable of multipath, then replace first matching non-multipath capable route. If the route is capable of multipath and matching multipath capable route is found, then replace it. Otherwise, replace first matching non-multipath capable route. The new route is inserted before the replaced one. In case the replaced route is currently offloaded, then it's overwritten in the device's table by the new route and later deleted, thus not impacting routed traffic. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Allow directly connected and remote unicast IPv6 routes to be programmed to the device's tables. As with IPv4, identical routes - sharing the same destination prefix - are ordered in a FIB node according to their table ID and then the metric. While the kernel doesn't share the same trie for the local and main table, this does happen in the device, so ordering according to table ID is needed. Since individual nexthops can be added and deleted in IPv6, each FIB entry stores a linked list of the rt6_info structs it represents. Upon the addition or deletion of a nexthop, a new nexthop group is allocated according to the new configuration and the old one is destroyed. Identical groups aren't currently consolidated, but will be in a follow-up patchset. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We only allow FIB offload in the presence of default rules or an l3mdev rule. In a similar fashion to IPv4 FIB rules, sanitize IPv6 rules. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The FIB notification block currently only handles IPv4 events, but we want to start handling IPv6 events soon, so lay the groundwork now. Do that by preparing the work item and process it according to the notified address family. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We're about to add IPv6 notifications in the FIB notification chain, but the driver currently doesn't support these, so ignore them. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The FIB notification chain is currently soley used by IPv4 code. However, we're going to introduce IPv6 FIB offload support, which requires these notification as well. As explained in commit c3852ef7 ("ipv4: fib: Replay events when registering FIB notifier"), upon registration to the chain, the callee receives a full dump of the FIB tables and rules by traversing all the net namespaces. The integrity of the dump is ensured by a per-namespace sequence counter that is incremented whenever a change to the tables or rules occurs. In order to allow more address families to use the chain, each family is expected to register its fib_notifier_ops in its pernet init. These operations allow the common code to read the family's sequence counter as well as dump its tables and rules in the given net namespace. Additionally, a 'family' parameter is added to sent notifications, so that listeners could distinguish between the different families. Implement the common code that allows listeners to register to the chain and for address families to register their fib_notifier_ops. Subsequent patches will implement these operations in IPv6. In the future, ipmr and ip6mr will be extended to provide these notifications as well. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 8月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Now that we provide offload indication using the nexthop's flags we must refresh the offload indication whenever the offload state within the group changes. This didn't matter until now, as offload indication was provided using the FIB info flags and multipath routes were marked as offloaded as long as one of the nexthops was offloaded. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Previous patch removed the reliance on the counter in the FIB info to set the offload indication, so we no longer need to keep an offload state on each FIB entry and can just set or unset the RTNH_F_OFFLOAD flag in each nexthop. This is also necessary because we're going to need to refresh the offload indication whenever the nexthop group associated with the FIB entry is refreshed. Current check would prevent us from marking a newly resolved nexthop as offloaded if the FIB entry is already marked as offloaded. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In a similar fashion to previous patch, use the nexthop flags to provide offload indication instead of the FIB info's flags. In case a nexthop in a multipath route can't be offloaded (gateway's MAC can't be resolved, for example), then its offload flag isn't set. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Tested-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 8月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Express the same logic more succinctly. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Prefer logical operator that expresses the intent to bitwise one that happens to give the same result. Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Petr Machata 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 7月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When IPv6 isn't enabled the following error is generated: ERROR: "nd_tbl" [drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/mlxsw_spectrum.ko] undefined! Fix it by replacing 'arp_tbl' and 'nd_tbl' with 'tbl->family' wherever possible and reference 'nd_tbl' only when IPV6 is enabled. Fixes: d5eb89cf ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Reflect IPv6 neighbours to the device") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Current firmware supported by the driver doesn't support batch deletion of IPv6 neighbours on a given router interface (RIF). Until a new version that supports this functionality is made available, delete neighbours one by one. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Each FIB node holds a linked list of routes sharing the same prefix and length. In the case of IPv4 it's ordered according to table ID, metric and TOS and only the first route in the list is actually programmed to the device. In case a gatewayed route is added somewhere in the list, then after its nexthop group will be refreshed and become valid (due to the resolution of its gateway), it'll mistakenly overwrite the existing entry. Example: 192.168.200.0/24 dev enp3s0np3 scope link metric 1000 offload 192.168.200.0/24 via 192.168.100.1 dev enp3s0np3 metric 1000 offload Both routes are marked as offloaded despite the fact only the first one should actually be present in the device's table. When refreshing the nexthop group, don't write the route to the device's table unless it's the first in its node. Fixes: 9aecce1c ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Correctly handle identical routes") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 7月, 2017 16 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The number of possible prefix lengths for IPv6 is 129 and not 128. Fixes following warning from UBSAN when /128 routes are offloaded: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c:2510:27 index 128 is out of range for type 'long unsigned int [128]' Fixes: 5e9c16cc ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement private fib") Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
These functions aren't specific to IPv4 and can be re-used for IPv6. Drop the '4' designation from their name. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Functions that take as argument a FIB entry don't need to take FIB node as well, as it can be extracted from the entry. Remove unnecessary FIB node parameter. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The functions to create and destroy a nexthop group are IPv4 specific and should be renamed accordingly, so that they won't be confused with the IPv6 specific functions in follow-up patches. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Some of the parameters stored in the FIB entry structure are specific to IPv4 and therefore better placed in an IPv4 specific structure. Create an IPv4 specific structure that encapsulates the common FIB entry structure and contains IPv4 specific parameters. In a follow-up patchset an IPv6 specific structure will be introduced. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When we fail to insert a route we invoke the abort mechanism which flushes all the tables and inserts a default route in each, so that all packets incoming to the router will be trapped to the CPU. Upon abort, add an IPv6 default route to the IPv6 tables. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Take advantage of previous patch and allow the RALUE register to be called with IPv6 routes. In order to re-use as much code as possible between IPv4 and IPv6, only the lowest-level function that actually does the register packing is demuxed based on the passed protocol. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
A Virtual Router (VR) is an entity which corresponds to a VRF and performs FIB lookup in an LPM tree according to the {VR, IP Proto} -> Tree binding. Extend the virtual router data structure towards IPv6 FIB offload. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
A FIB node is an entity which stores routes sharing the same prefix and length. The data structure itself is already family agnostic, but we make some of its operations agnostic as well and thus re-use them for IPv6 offload. Instead of passing an IPv4-specific structure to fib4_node_get(), pass general routing parameters and rename the function accordingly. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When looking up a FIB entry we shouldn't create the FIB node where it's supposed to be linked in case the node doesn't already exist. Instead, lookup the node and fail if it doesn't exist. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Thankfully, the neighbour subsystem is agnostic to the upper protocol and used by both IPv4 and IPv6. By removing assumptions regarding the neighbour type we can thus re-use much of the neighbour-related code for both IPv4 and IPv6. For each nexthop, store its gateway IP and for nexthop group store the neighbour table used by its nexthops. Use this information throughout the code and remove assumption about the neighbour type. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
The neighbours' activity is currently dumped according to the ARP table's DELAY_PROBE time, but with the introduction of IPv6 offload we should set the interval according to the minimum between the ARP and ndisc tables. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshvesky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
In addition to IPv4, periodically dump IPv6 neighbours and update the kernel about them. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
As with IPv4, listen to NEIGH_UPDATE events from the ndisc table and program relevant neighbours to the device's neighbour table. Note that neighbours with a link-local IP address aren't programmed, as packets with a link-local destination IP are trapped after LPM lookup and never reach the neighbour table. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arkadi Sharshevsky 提交于
When a netdev is configured with an IP address a router interface (RIF) should be configured for it in the device. Allow configuration of RIFs based on IPv6 address notifications as well as IPv4. Note that the RIF exists as long as an IP address is configured on the netdev, regardless of the address family. Signed-off-by: NArkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now we only flooded broadcast packets to the router when an L3 interface was configured on top of a bridge. However, IPv6 Neighbour Discovery packets are trapped to the CPU inside the router and these can be sent with a multicast address. Flood unregistered multicast packets to the router port, so that relevant packets could be trapped there. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-