- 27 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
For 64bits arguments gcc caused that put_user macro works with wrong value because of optimalization. Adding volatile caused that gcc not optimized it. It is possible to use (as Blackfin do) two put_user macros with 32bits arguments but there is one more instruction which is due to duplication zero return value which is called put_user_asm macro. Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 26 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 21 5月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
This function was actually causing harm, by hiding errors about invalid sized get_user/put_user accesses. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-
- 27 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Simek 提交于
Reviewed-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: NStephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com> Acked-by: NJohn Linn <john.linn@xilinx.com> Acked-by: NJohn Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
-