1. 19 5月, 2015 40 次提交
    • I
      x86/fpu: Split out fpu/signal.h from fpu/internal.h for signal frame handling functions · fcbc99c4
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Most of the FPU does not use them, so split it out and include
      them in signal.c and ia32_signal.c
      
      Also fix header file dependency assumption in fpu/core.c.
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      fcbc99c4
    • I
      x86/fpu: Merge fpu__reset() and fpu__clear() · fbce7782
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      With recent cleanups and fixes the fpu__reset() and fpu__clear()
      functions have become almost identical in functionality: the only
      difference is that fpu__reset() assumed that the fpstate
      was already active in the eagerfpu case, while fpu__clear()
      activated it if it was inactive.
      
      This distinction almost never matters, the only case where such
      fpstate activation happens if if the init thread (PID 1) gets exec()-ed
      for the first time.
      
      So keep fpu__clear() and change all fpu__reset() uses to
      fpu__clear() to simpify the logic.
      
      ( In a later patch we'll further simplify fpu__clear() by making
        sure that all contexts it is called on are already active. )
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      fbce7782
    • I
      x86/fpu: Move fpu__clear() to 'struct fpu *' parameter passing · 04c8e01d
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Do it like all other high level FPU state handling functions: they
      only know about struct fpu, not about the task.
      
      (Also remove a dead prototype while at it.)
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      04c8e01d
    • I
      x86/fpu: Move all the fpu__*() high level methods closer to each other · 6ffc152e
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The fpu__*() methods are closely related, but they are defined
      in scattered places within the FPU code.
      
      Concentrate them, and also uninline fpu__save(), fpu__drop()
      and fpu__reset() to save about 5K of kernel text on 64-bit kernels:
      
         text            data    bss     dec        filename
         14113063        2575280 1634304 18322647   vmlinux.before
         14108070        2575280 1634304 18317654   vmlinux.after
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6ffc152e
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename restore_fpu_checking() to copy_fpstate_to_fpregs() · 0e75c54f
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      fpu_restore_checking() is a helper function of restore_fpu_checking(),
      but this is not apparent from the naming.
      
      Both copy fpstate contents to fpregs, while the fuller variant does
      a full copy without leaking information.
      
      So rename them to:
      
          copy_fpstate_to_fpregs()
        __copy_fpstate_to_fpregs()
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      0e75c54f
    • I
      x86/fpu: Synchronize the naming of drop_fpu() and fpu_reset_state() · 50338615
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      drop_fpu() and fpu_reset_state() are similar in functionality
      and in scope, yet this is not apparent from their names.
      
      drop_fpu() deactivates FPU contents (both the fpregs and the fpstate),
      but leaves register contents intact in the eager-FPU case, mostly as an
      optimization. It disables fpregs in the lazy FPU case. The drop_fpu()
      method can be used to destroy FPU state in an optimized way, when we
      know that a new state will be loaded before user-space might see
      any remains of the old FPU state:
      
           - such as in sys_exit()'s exit_thread() where we know this task
             won't execute any user-space instructions anymore and the
             next context switch cleans up the FPU. The old FPU state
             might still be around in the eagerfpu case but won't be
             saved.
      
           - in __restore_xstate_sig(), where we use drop_fpu() before
             copying a new state into the fpstate and activating that one.
             No user-pace instructions can execute between those steps.
      
           - in sys_execve()'s fpu__clear(): there we use drop_fpu() in
             the !eagerfpu case, where it's equivalent to a full reinit.
      
      fpu_reset_state() is a stronger version of drop_fpu(): both in
      the eagerfpu and the lazy-FPU case it guarantees that fpregs
      are reinitialized to init state. This method is used in cases
      where we need a full reset:
      
           - handle_signal() uses fpu_reset_state() to reset the FPU state
             to init before executing a user-space signal handler. While we
             have already saved the original FPU state at this point, and
             always restore the original state, the signal handling code
             still has to do this reinit, because signals may interrupt
             any user-space instruction, and the FPU might be in various
             intermediate states (such as an unbalanced x87 stack) that is
             not immediately usable for general C signal handler code.
      
           - __restore_xstate_sig() uses fpu_reset_state() when the signal
             frame has no FP context. Since the signal handler may have
             modified the FPU state, it gets reset back to init state.
      
           - in another branch __restore_xstate_sig() uses fpu_reset_state()
             to handle a restoration error: when restore_user_xstate() fails
             to restore FPU state and we might have inconsistent FPU data,
             fpu_reset_state() is used to reset it back to a known good
             state.
      
           - __kernel_fpu_end() uses fpu_reset_state() in an error branch.
             This is in a 'must not trigger' error branch, so on bug-free
             kernels this never triggers.
      
           - fpu__restore() uses fpu_reset_state() in an error path
             as well: if the fpstate was set up with invalid FPU state
             (via ptrace or via a signal handler), then it's reset back
             to init state.
      
           - likewise, the scheduler's switch_fpu_finish() uses it in a
             restoration error path too.
      
      Move both drop_fpu() and fpu_reset_state() to the fpu__*() namespace
      and harmonize their naming with their function:
      
          fpu__drop()
          fpu__reset()
      
      This clearly shows that both methods operate on the full state of the
      FPU, just like fpu__restore().
      
      Also add comments to explain what each function does.
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      50338615
    • I
      x86/fpu: Better document fpu__clear() state handling · 2e85591a
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So prior to this fix:
      
        c88d4748 ("x86/fpu: Always restore_xinit_state() when use_eager_cpu()")
      
      we leaked FPU state across execve() boundaries on eagerfpu systems:
      
      	$ /host/home/mingo/dump-xmm-regs-exec
      	# XMM state before execve():
      	XMM0 : 000000000000dede
      	XMM1 : 000000000000dedf
      	XMM2 : 000000000000dee0
      	XMM3 : 000000000000dee1
      	XMM4 : 000000000000dee2
      	XMM5 : 000000000000dee3
      	XMM6 : 000000000000dee4
      	XMM7 : 000000000000dee5
      	XMM8 : 000000000000dee6
      	XMM9 : 000000000000dee7
      	XMM10: 000000000000dee8
      	XMM11: 000000000000dee9
      	XMM12: 000000000000deea
      	XMM13: 000000000000deeb
      	XMM14: 000000000000deec
      	XMM15: 000000000000deed
      
      	# XMM state after execve(), in the new task context:
      	XMM0 : 0000000000000000
      	XMM1 : 2f2f2f2f2f2f2f2f
      	XMM2 : 0000000000000000
      	XMM3 : 0000000000000000
      	XMM4 : 00000000000000ff
      	XMM5 : 00000000ff000000
      	XMM6 : 000000000000dee4
      	XMM7 : 000000000000dee5
      	XMM8 : 0000000000000000
      	XMM9 : 0000000000000000
      	XMM10: 0000000000000000
      	XMM11: 0000000000000000
      	XMM12: 0000000000000000
      	XMM13: 000000000000deeb
      	XMM14: 000000000000deec
      	XMM15: 000000000000deed
      
      Better explain what this function is supposed to do and why.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2e85591a
    • I
      x86/fpu: Clarify ancient comments in fpu__restore() · be7436d5
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So this function still had ancient language about 'saving current
      math information' - but we haven't been doing lazy FPU saves for
      quite some time, we are doing lazy FPU restores.
      
      Also remove IRQ13 related comment, which we don't support anymore
      either.
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      be7436d5
    • I
      x86/fpu: Pass 'struct fpu' to fpstate_sanitize_xstate() · 36e49e7f
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Currently fpstate_sanitize_xstate() has a task_struct input parameter,
      but it only uses the fpu structure from it - so pass in a 'struct fpu'
      pointer only and update all call sites.
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      36e49e7f
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename sanitize_i387_state() to fpstate_sanitize_xstate() · d0903193
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So the sanitize_i387_state() function has the following purpose:
      on CPUs that support optimized xstate saving instructions, an
      FPU fpstate might end up having partially uninitialized data.
      
      This function initializes that data.
      
      Note that the function name is a misnomer and confusing on two levels,
      not only is it not i387 specific at all, but it is the exact opposite:
      it only matters on xstate CPUs.
      
      So rename sanitize_i387_state() and __sanitize_i387_state() to
      fpstate_sanitize_xstate() and __fpstate_sanitize_xstate(),
      to clearly express the purpose and usage of the function.
      
      We'll further clean up this function in the next patch.
      
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d0903193
    • I
      x86/fpu: Optimize fpu_copy() some more on lazy switching systems · b1652900
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The current fpu_copy() code on lazy switching CPUs always saves
      into the current fpstate and then copies it over into the child
      context:
      
      		preempt_disable();
      		if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(src_fpu))
      			fpregs_deactivate(src_fpu);
      		preempt_enable();
      		memcpy(&dst_fpu->state, &src_fpu->state, xstate_size);
      
      That memcpy() can be avoided on all lazy switching setups except
      really old FNSAVE-only systems: change fpu_copy() to directly save
      into the child context, for both the lazy and the eager context
      switching case.
      
      Note that we still have to do a memcpy() back into the parent
      context in the FNSAVE case, but this won't be executed on the
      majority of x86 systems that got built in the last 10 years or so.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      b1652900
    • I
      x86/fpu: Optimize fpu_copy() · 68271c6a
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Optimize fpu_copy() a bit by expanding the ->fpstate_active == 1
      portion of fpu__save() into it.
      
      ( The main purpose of this change is to enable another, larger
        optimization that will be done in the next patch. )
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      68271c6a
    • I
      x86/fpu: Optimize fpu__save() · 48c4717f
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So fpu__save() does this currently:
      
      		copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(fpu);
      		if (!use_eager_fpu())
      			fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
      
      ... which deactivates the FPU on lazy switching systems unconditionally.
      
      Both usecases of fpu__save() use this function to save the
      FPU state into a fpstate: fork()/clone() and math error signal handling.
      
      The unconditional disabling of FPU registers in the lazy switching
      case is probably a mistaken conversion of old FNSAVE code (that had
      to disable FPU registers).
      
      So speed up this code by only disabling FPU registers when absolutely
      necessary: when indicated by the copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() return
      code:
      
      		if (!copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(fpu))
      			fpregs_deactivate(fpu);
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      48c4717f
    • I
      x86/fpu: Simplify fpu__save() · fea435a2
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Factor out a common call.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      fea435a2
    • I
      x86/fpu: Eliminate __save_fpu() · 9f876d67
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The current implementation of __save_fpu():
      
      	if (use_xsave()) {
      		xsave_state(&fpu->state.xsave);
      	} else {
      		fpu_fxsave(fpu);
      	}
      
      Is actually a simplified version of copy_fpregs_to_fpstate(),
      if use_eager_fpu() is true.
      
      But all call sites of __save_fpu() call it only it when use_eager_fpu()
      is true.
      
      So we can eliminate __save_fpu() altogether and use the standard
      copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() function. This cleans up the code
      by making it use fewer variants of FPU register saving.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      9f876d67
    • I
      x86/fpu: Simplify __save_fpu() · 72ee6f87
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      __save_fpu() has this pattern:
      
      		if (unlikely(system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING))
      			xsave_state_booting(&fpu->state.xsave);
      		else
      			xsave_state(&fpu->state.xsave);
      
      ... but it does not actually get called during system bootup.
      
      So remove the complication and always call xsave_state().
      
      To make sure this assumption is correct, add a WARN_ONCE()
      debug check to xsave_state().
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      72ee6f87
    • I
      x86/fpu: Factor out FPU hw activation/deactivation · 32b49b3c
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      We have repeat patterns of:
      
      	if (!use_eager_fpu())
      		clts();
      
      ... to activate FPU registers, and:
      
      	if (!use_eager_fpu())
      		stts();
      
      ... to deactivate them.
      
      Encapsulate these in:
      
      	__fpregs_activate_hw();
      	__fpregs_activate_hw();
      
      and use them accordingly.
      
      Doing this synchronizes the idiom with the fpu->fpregs_active
      software-flag's handling functions, creating clear patterns of:
      
      	__fpregs_activate_hw();
      	__fpregs_activate(fpu);
      
      etc., which improves readability.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      32b49b3c
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpu__unlazy_stopped() to fpu__activate_stopped() · 67ee658e
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      In line with the fpstate_activate() change, name
      fpu__unlazy_stopped() in a similar fashion as well: its purpose
      is to make the fpstate of a stopped task the current and active FPU
      context, which may require unlazying and initialization.
      
      The unlazying is just part of the job, the main concept is to make
      the fpstate active.
      
      Also clarify the function's description to clarify its exact
      usage and the background behind it all.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      67ee658e
    • I
      x86/fpu: Simplify fpstate_init_curr() usage · c4d72e2d
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Now that fpstate_init_curr() is not doing implicit allocations
      anymore, almost all uses of it involve a very simple pattern:
      
      	if (!fpu->fpstate_active)
      		fpstate_init_curr(fpu);
      
      which is basically activating the FPU fpstate if it was not active
      before.
      
      So propagate the check into the function itself, and rename the
      function according to its new purpose:
      
      	fpu__activate_curr(fpu);
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c4d72e2d
    • I
      x86/fpu: Simplify fpu__unlazy_stopped() error handling · 2fb29fc7
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Now that FPU contexts are always allocated, fpu__unlazy_stopped()
      cannot fail. Remove its error return and propagate the changes to
      the callers.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2fb29fc7
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpstate_alloc_init() to fpstate_init_curr() · e62bb3d8
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Now that there are no FPU context allocations, rename fpstate_alloc_init()
      to fpstate_init_curr(), to signal that it initializes the fpstate and
      marks it active, for the current task.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      e62bb3d8
    • I
      x86/fpu: Remove failure return from fpstate_alloc_init() · 91d93d0e
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Remove the failure code and propagate this down to callers.
      
      Note that this function still has an 'init' aspect, which must be
      called.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      91d93d0e
    • I
      x86/fpu: Remove failure paths from fpstate-alloc low level functions · c4d6ee6e
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Now that we always allocate the FPU context as part of task_struct there's
      no need for separate allocations - remove them and their primary failure
      handling code.
      
      ( Note that there's still secondary error codes that have become superfluous,
        those will be removed in separate patches. )
      
      Move the somewhat misplaced setup_xstate_comp() call to the core.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      c4d6ee6e
    • I
      x86/fpu: Simplify FPU handling by embedding the fpstate in task_struct (again) · 7366ed77
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So 6 years ago we made the FPU fpstate dynamically allocated:
      
        aa283f49 ("x86, fpu: lazy allocation of FPU area - v5")
        61c4628b ("x86, fpu: split FPU state from task struct - v5")
      
      In hindsight this was a mistake:
      
         - it complicated context allocation failure handling, such as:
      
      		/* kthread execs. TODO: cleanup this horror. */
      		if (WARN_ON(fpstate_alloc_init(fpu)))
      			force_sig(SIGKILL, tsk);
      
         - it caused us to enable irqs in fpu__restore():
      
                      local_irq_enable();
                      /*
                       * does a slab alloc which can sleep
                       */
                      if (fpstate_alloc_init(fpu)) {
                              /*
                               * ran out of memory!
                               */
                              do_group_exit(SIGKILL);
                              return;
                      }
                      local_irq_disable();
      
         - it (slightly) slowed down task creation/destruction by adding
           slab allocation/free pattens.
      
         - it made access to context contents (slightly) slower by adding
           one more pointer dereference.
      
      The motivation for the dynamic allocation was two-fold:
      
         - reduce memory consumption by non-FPU tasks
      
         - allocate and handle only the necessary amount of context for
           various XSAVE processors that have varying hardware frame
           sizes.
      
      These days, with glibc using SSE memcpy by default and GCC optimizing
      for SSE/AVX by default, the scope of FPU using apps on an x86 system is
      much larger than it was 6 years ago.
      
      For example on a freshly installed Fedora 21 desktop system, with a
      recent kernel, all non-kthread tasks have used the FPU shortly after
      bootup.
      
      Also, even modern embedded x86 CPUs try to support the latest vector
      instruction set - so they'll too often use the larger xstate frame
      sizes.
      
      So remove the dynamic allocation complication by embedding the FPU
      fpstate in task_struct again. This should make the FPU a lot more
      accessible to all sorts of atomic contexts.
      
      We could still optimize for the xstate frame size in the future,
      by moving the state structure to the last element of task_struct,
      and allocating only a part of that.
      
      This change is kept minimal by still keeping the ctx_alloc()/free()
      routines (that now do nothing substantial) - we'll remove them in
      the following patches.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      7366ed77
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpu_save_init() to copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() · 4f836347
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So fpu_save_init() is a historic name that got its name when the only
      way the FPU state was FNSAVE, which cleared (well, destroyed) the FPU
      state after saving it.
      
      Nowadays the name is misleading, because ever since the introduction of
      FXSAVE (and more modern FPU saving instructions) the 'we need to reload
      the FPU state' part is only true if there's a pending FPU exception [*],
      which is almost never the case.
      
      So rename it to copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() to make it clear what's
      happening. Also add a few comments about why we cannot keep registers
      in certain cases.
      
      Also clean up the control flow a bit, to make it more apparent when
      we are dropping/keeping FP registers, and to optimize the common
      case (of keeping fpregs) some more.
      
      [*] Probably not true anymore, modern instructions always leave the FPU
          state intact, even if exceptions are pending: because pending FP
          exceptions are posted on the next FP instruction, not asynchronously.
      
          They were truly asynchronous back in the IRQ13 case, and we had to
          synchronize with them, but that code is not working anymore: we don't
          have IRQ13 mapped in the IDT anymore.
      
          But a cleanup patch is obviously not the place to change subtle behavior.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      4f836347
    • I
      x86/fpu: Uninline the irq_ts_save()/restore() functions · 91066588
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Especially the irq_ts_save() function is pretty bloaty, generating
      over a dozen instructions, so uninline them.
      
      Even though the API is used rarely, the space savings are measurable:
      
         text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
         13331995        2572920 1634304 17539219        10ba093 vmlinux.before
         13331739        2572920 1634304 17538963        10b9f93 vmlinux.after
      
      ( This also allows the removal of an include file inclusion from fpu/api.h,
        speeding up the kernel build slightly. )
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      91066588
    • I
      x86/fpu: Uninline kernel_fpu_begin()/end() · d63e79b1
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Both inline functions call an inline function unconditionally, so we
      already pay the function call based clobbering cost. Uninline them.
      
      This saves quite a bit of code in various performance sensitive
      code paths:
      
         text            data    bss     dec             hex     filename
         13321334        2569888 1634304 17525526        10b6b16 vmlinux.before
         13320246        2569888 1634304 17524438        10b66d6 vmlinux.after
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d63e79b1
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename __thread_fpu_end() to fpregs_deactivate() · 66af8e27
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Propagate the 'fpu->fpregs_active' naming to the high level function that
      clears it.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      66af8e27
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename __thread_fpu_begin() to fpregs_activate() · 232f62cd
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Propagate the 'fpu->fpregs_active' naming to the high level
      function that sets it.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      232f62cd
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpu->has_fpu to fpu->fpregs_active · d5cea9b0
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So the current code uses fpu->has_cpu to determine whether a given
      user FPU context is actively loaded into the FPU's registers [*] and
      that those registers represent the task's current FPU state.
      
      But this term is not unambiguous: especially the distinction between
      fpu->has_fpu, PF_USED_MATH and fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx is not clear.
      
      Increase clarity by unambigously signalling that it's about
      hardware registers being active right now, by renaming it to
      fpu->fpregs_active.
      
      ( In later patches we'll use more of the 'fpregs' naming, which will
        make it easier to grep for as well. )
      
      [*] There's the kernel_fpu_begin()/end() primitive that also
          activates FPU hw registers as well and uses them, without
          touching the fpu->fpregs_active flag.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      d5cea9b0
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename regset FPU register accessors · 678eaf60
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Rename regset accessors to prefix them with 'regset_', because we
      want to start using the 'fpregs_active' name elsewhere.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      678eaf60
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename xsave.header::xstate_bv to 'xfeatures' · 400e4b20
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      'xsave.header::xstate_bv' is a misnomer - what does 'bv' stand for?
      
      It probably comes from the 'XGETBV' instruction name, but I could
      not find in the Intel documentation where that abbreviation comes
      from. It could mean 'bit vector' - or something else?
      
      But how about - instead of guessing about a weird name - we named
      the field in an obvious and descriptive way that tells us exactly
      what it does?
      
      So rename it to 'xfeatures', which is a bitmask of the
      xfeatures that are fpstate_active in that context structure.
      
      Eyesore like:
      
                 fpu->state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xstate_bv |= XSTATE_FP;
      
      is now much more readable:
      
                 fpu->state->xsave.header.xfeatures |= XSTATE_FP;
      
      Which form is not just infinitely more readable, but is also
      shorter as well.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      400e4b20
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename 'xsave_hdr' to 'header' · 3a54450b
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Code like:
      
                 fpu->state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xstate_bv |= XSTATE_FP;
      
      is an eyesore, because not only is the words 'xsave' and 'state'
      are repeated twice times (!), but also because of the 'hdr' and 'bv'
      abbreviations that are pretty meaningless at a first glance.
      
      Start cleaning this up by renaming 'xsave_hdr' to 'header'.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      3a54450b
    • I
      x86/fpu: Clean up regset functions · 8dcea8db
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Clean up various regset handlers: use the 'fpu' pointer which
      is available in most cases.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      8dcea8db
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename 'pcntxt_mask' to 'xfeatures_mask' · 614df7fb
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      So the 'pcntxt_mask' is a misnomer, it's essentially meaningless to anyone
      who doesn't know what it does exactly.
      
      Name it more descriptively as 'xfeatures_mask'.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      614df7fb
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpu-internal.h to fpu/internal.h · 78f7f1e5
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      This unifies all the FPU related header files under a unified, hiearchical
      naming scheme:
      
       - asm/fpu/types.h:      FPU related data types, needed for 'struct task_struct',
                               widely included in almost all kernel code, and hence kept
                               as small as possible.
      
       - asm/fpu/api.h:        FPU related 'public' methods exported to other subsystems.
      
       - asm/fpu/internal.h:   FPU subsystem internal methods
      
       - asm/fpu/xsave.h:      XSAVE support internal methods
      
      (Also standardize the header guard in asm/fpu/internal.h.)
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      78f7f1e5
    • I
      x86/fpu: Clean up fpu__clear() a bit · e11267c1
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      e11267c1
    • I
      x86/fpu: Rename fpu__flush_thread() to fpu__clear() · 2e8a3102
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      The primary purpose of this function is to clear the current task's
      FPU before an exec(), to not leak information from the previous task,
      and to allow the new task to start with freshly initialized FPU
      registers.
      
      Rename the function to reflect this primary purpose.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2e8a3102
    • I
      x86/fpu: Use 'struct fpu' in fpu__unlazy_stopped() · cc08d545
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Migrate this function to pure 'struct fpu' usage.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      cc08d545
    • I
      x86/fpu: Use 'struct fpu' in fpstate_alloc_init() · db2b1d3a
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Migrate this function to pure 'struct fpu' usage.
      Reviewed-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      db2b1d3a