1. 21 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 28 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  3. 19 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: try to avoid blowing out the transaction reservation when bunmaping a shared extent · e1a4e37c
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      In a pathological scenario where we are trying to bunmapi a single
      extent in which every other block is shared, it's possible that trying
      to unmap the entire large extent in a single transaction can generate so
      many EFIs that we overflow the transaction reservation.
      
      Therefore, use a heuristic to guess at the number of blocks we can
      safely unmap from a reflink file's data fork in an single transaction.
      This should prevent problems such as the log head slamming into the tail
      and ASSERTs that trigger because we've exceeded the transaction
      reservation.
      
      Note that since bunmapi can fail to unmap the entire range, we must also
      teach the deferred unmap code to roll into a new transaction whenever we
      get low on reservation.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      [hch: random edits, all bugs are my fault]
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      e1a4e37c
  4. 19 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 10 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 06 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: store in-progress CoW allocations in the refcount btree · 174edb0e
      Darrick J. Wong 提交于
      Due to the way the CoW algorithm in XFS works, there's an interval
      during which blocks allocated to handle a CoW can be lost -- if the FS
      goes down after the blocks are allocated but before the block
      remapping takes place.  This is exacerbated by the cowextsz hint --
      allocated reservations can sit around for a while, waiting to get
      used.
      
      Since the refcount btree doesn't normally store records with refcount
      of 1, we can use it to record these in-progress extents.  In-progress
      blocks cannot be shared because they're not user-visible, so there
      shouldn't be any conflicts with other programs.  This is a better
      solution than holding EFIs during writeback because (a) EFIs can't be
      relogged currently, (b) even if they could, EFIs are bound by
      available log space, which puts an unnecessary upper bound on how much
      CoW we can have in flight, and (c) we already have a mechanism to
      track blocks.
      
      At mount time, read the refcount records and free anything we find
      with a refcount of 1 because those were in-progress when the FS went
      down.
      Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      174edb0e
  7. 04 10月, 2016 4 次提交