- 27 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
commit 678cce4019d746da6c680c48ba9e6d417803e127 upstream. The x86_64 implementation of Poly1305 produces the wrong result on some inputs because poly1305_4block_avx2() incorrectly assumes that when partially reducing the accumulator, the bits carried from limb 'd4' to limb 'h0' fit in a 32-bit integer. This is true for poly1305-generic which processes only one block at a time. However, it's not true for the AVX2 implementation, which processes 4 blocks at a time and therefore can produce intermediate limbs about 4x larger. Fix it by making the relevant calculations use 64-bit arithmetic rather than 32-bit. Note that most of the carries already used 64-bit arithmetic, but the d4 -> h0 carry was different for some reason. To be safe I also made the same change to the corresponding SSE2 code, though that only operates on 1 or 2 blocks at a time. I don't think it's really needed for poly1305_block_sse2(), but it doesn't hurt because it's already x86_64 code. It *might* be needed for poly1305_2block_sse2(), but overflows aren't easy to reproduce there. This bug was originally detected by my patches that improve testmgr to fuzz algorithms against their generic implementation. But also add a test vector which reproduces it directly (in the AVX2 case). Fixes: b1ccc8f4 ("crypto: poly1305 - Add a four block AVX2 variant for x86_64") Fixes: c70f4abe ("crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.3+ Cc: Martin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
commit 2060e284e9595fc3baed6e035903c05b93266555 upstream. The x86 MORUS implementations all fail the improved AEAD tests because they produce the wrong result with some data layouts. The issue is that they assume that if the skcipher_walk API gives 'nbytes' not aligned to the walksize (a.k.a. walk.stride), then it is the end of the data. In fact, this can happen before the end. Also, when the CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP flag is given, they can incorrectly sleep in the skcipher_walk_*() functions while preemption has been disabled by kernel_fpu_begin(). Fix these bugs. Fixes: 56e8e57f ("crypto: morus - Add common SIMD glue code for MORUS") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+ Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
commit 3af349639597fea582a93604734d717e59a0e223 upstream. gcmaes_crypt_by_sg() dereferences the NULL pointer returned by scatterwalk_ffwd() when encrypting an empty plaintext and the source scatterlist ends immediately after the associated data. Fix it by only fast-forwarding to the src/dst data scatterlists if the data length is nonzero. This bug is reproduced by the "rfc4543(gcm(aes))" test vectors when run with the new AEAD test manager. Fixes: e8455207 ("crypto: aesni - Update aesni-intel_glue to use scatter/gather") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.17+ Cc: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
commit ba6771c0a0bc2fac9d6a8759bab8493bd1cffe3b upstream. The x86 AEGIS implementations all fail the improved AEAD tests because they produce the wrong result with some data layouts. The issue is that they assume that if the skcipher_walk API gives 'nbytes' not aligned to the walksize (a.k.a. walk.stride), then it is the end of the data. In fact, this can happen before the end. Also, when the CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP flag is given, they can incorrectly sleep in the skcipher_walk_*() functions while preemption has been disabled by kernel_fpu_begin(). Fix these bugs. Fixes: 1d373d4e ("crypto: x86 - Add optimized AEGIS implementations") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+ Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 14 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mikulas Patocka 提交于
commit a788848116454d753b13a4888e0e31ada3c4d393 upstream. This patch fixes gcmaes_crypt_by_sg so that it won't use memory allocation if the data doesn't cross a page boundary. Authenticated encryption may be used by dm-crypt. If the encryption or decryption fails, it would result in I/O error and filesystem corruption. The function gcmaes_crypt_by_sg is using GFP_ATOMIC allocation that can fail anytime. This patch fixes the logic so that it won't attempt the failing allocation if the data doesn't cross a page boundary. Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 14 9月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
It turns out OSXSAVE needs to be checked only for AVX, not for SSE. Without this patch the affected modules refuse to load on CPUs with SSE2 but without AVX support. Fixes: 877ccce7 ("crypto: x86/aegis,morus - Fix and simplify CPUID checks") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.18 Reported-by: NZdenek Kaspar <zkaspar82@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 25 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Watson 提交于
A regression was reported bisecting to 1476db2d "Move HashKey computation from stack to gcm_context". That diff moved HashKey computation from the stack, which was explicitly aligned in the asm, to a struct provided from the C code, depending on AESNI_ALIGN_ATTR for alignment. It appears some compilers may not align this struct correctly, resulting in a crash on the movdqa instruction when attempting to encrypt or decrypt data. Fix by using unaligned loads for the HashKeys. On modern hardware there is no perf difference between the unaligned and aligned loads. All other accesses to gcm_context_data already use unaligned loads. Reported-by: NMauro Rossi <issor.oruam@gmail.com> Fixes: 1476db2d ("Move HashKey computation from stack to gcm_context") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 07 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
It turns out I had misunderstood how the x86_match_cpu() function works. It evaluates a logical OR of the matching conditions, not logical AND. This caused the CPU feature checks for AEGIS to pass even if only SSE2 (but not AES-NI) was supported (or vice versa), leading to potential crashes if something tried to use the registered algs. This patch switches the checks to a simpler method that is used e.g. in the Camellia x86 code. The patch also removes the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE declarations which actually seem to cause the modules to be auto-loaded at boot, which is not desired. The crypto API on-demand module loading is sufficient. Fixes: 1d373d4e ("crypto: x86 - Add optimized AEGIS implementations") Fixes: 6ecc9d9f ("crypto: x86 - Add optimized MORUS implementations") Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Tested-by: NMilan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 09 7月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Some ahash algorithms set .cra_type = &crypto_ahash_type. But this is redundant with the C structure type ('struct ahash_alg'), and crypto_register_ahash() already sets the .cra_type automatically. Apparently the useless assignment has just been copy+pasted around. So, remove the useless assignment from all the ahash algorithms. This patch shouldn't change any actual behavior. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Acked-by: NGilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Many ahash algorithms set .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_AHASH. But this is redundant with the C structure type ('struct ahash_alg'), and crypto_register_ahash() already sets the type flag automatically, clearing any type flag that was already there. Apparently the useless assignment has just been copy+pasted around. So, remove the useless assignment from all the ahash algorithms. This patch shouldn't change any actual behavior. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Acked-by: NGilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Many shash algorithms set .cra_flags = CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_SHASH. But this is redundant with the C structure type ('struct shash_alg'), and crypto_register_shash() already sets the type flag automatically, clearing any type flag that was already there. Apparently the useless assignment has just been copy+pasted around. So, remove the useless assignment from all the shash algorithms. This patch shouldn't change any actual behavior. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
With all the crypto modules enabled on x86, and with a CPU that supports AVX-2 but not SHA-NI instructions (e.g. Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake), the "multibuffer" implementations of SHA-1, SHA-256, and SHA-512 are the highest priority. However, these implementations only perform well when many hash requests are being submitted concurrently, filling all 8 AVX-2 lanes. Otherwise, they are incredibly slow, as they waste time waiting for more requests to arrive before proceeding to execute each request. For example, here are the speeds I see hashing 4096-byte buffers with a single thread on a Haswell-based processor: generic avx2 mb (multibuffer) ------- -------- ---------------- sha1 602 MB/s 997 MB/s 0.61 MB/s sha256 228 MB/s 412 MB/s 0.61 MB/s sha512 312 MB/s 559 MB/s 0.61 MB/s So, the multibuffer implementation is 500 to 1000 times slower than the other implementations. Note that with smaller buffers or more update()s per digest, the difference would be even greater. I believe the vast majority of people are in the boat where the multibuffer code is much slower, and only a small minority are doing the highly parallel, hashing-intensive, latency-flexible workloads (maybe IPsec on servers?) where the multibuffer code may be beneficial. Yet, people often aren't familiar with all the crypto config options and so the multibuffer code may inadvertently be built into the kernel. Also the multibuffer code apparently hasn't been very well tested, seeing as it was sometimes computing the wrong SHA-256 digest. So, let's make the multibuffer algorithms low priority. Users who want to use them can either request them explicitly by driver name, or use NETLINK_CRYPTO (crypto_user) to increase their priority at runtime. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
There is a copy-paste error where sha256_mb_mgr_get_comp_job_avx2() copies the SHA-256 digest state from sha256_mb_mgr::args::digest to job_sha256::result_digest. Consequently, the sha256_mb algorithm sometimes calculates the wrong digest. Fix it. Reproducer using AF_ALG: #include <assert.h> #include <linux/if_alg.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/socket.h> #include <unistd.h> static const __u8 expected[32] = "\xad\x7f\xac\xb2\x58\x6f\xc6\xe9\x66\xc0\x04\xd7\xd1\xd1\x6b\x02" "\x4f\x58\x05\xff\x7c\xb4\x7c\x7a\x85\xda\xbd\x8b\x48\x89\x2c\xa7"; int main() { int fd; struct sockaddr_alg addr = { .salg_type = "hash", .salg_name = "sha256_mb", }; __u8 data[4096] = { 0 }; __u8 digest[32]; int ret; int i; fd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0); bind(fd, (void *)&addr, sizeof(addr)); fork(); fd = accept(fd, 0, 0); do { ret = write(fd, data, 4096); assert(ret == 4096); ret = read(fd, digest, 32); assert(ret == 32); } while (memcmp(digest, expected, 32) == 0); printf("wrong digest: "); for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) printf("%02x", digest[i]); printf("\n"); } Output was: wrong digest: ad7facb2000000000000000000000000ffffffef7cb47c7a85dabd8b48892ca7 Fixes: 172b1d6b ("crypto: sha256-mb - fix ctx pointer and digest copy") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+ Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 03 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Beulich 提交于
Some Intel CPUs don't recognize 64-bit XORs as zeroing idioms. Zeroing idioms don't require execution bandwidth, as they're being taken care of in the frontend (through register renaming). Use 32-bit XORs instead. Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> Cc: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Cc: pavel@ucw.cz Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5B39FF1A02000078001CFB54@prv1-mh.provo.novell.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 01 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Borislav Petkov 提交于
Add explicit RETs to the tail calls of AEGIS and MORUS crypto algorithms otherwise they run into INT3 padding due to ("x86/asm: Pad assembly functions with INT3 instructions") leading to spurious debug exceptions. Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> took care of all the remaining callsites. Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 31 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The x86 assembly implementations of Salsa20 use the frame base pointer register (%ebp or %rbp), which breaks frame pointer convention and breaks stack traces when unwinding from an interrupt in the crypto code. Recent (v4.10+) kernels will warn about this, e.g. WARNING: kernel stack regs at 00000000a8291e69 in syzkaller047086:4677 has bad 'bp' value 000000001077994c [...] But after looking into it, I believe there's very little reason to still retain the x86 Salsa20 code. First, these are *not* vectorized (SSE2/SSSE3/AVX2) implementations, which would be needed to get anywhere close to the best Salsa20 performance on any remotely modern x86 processor; they're just regular x86 assembly. Second, it's still unclear that anyone is actually using the kernel's Salsa20 at all, especially given that now ChaCha20 is supported too, and with much more efficient SSSE3 and AVX2 implementations. Finally, in benchmarks I did on both Intel and AMD processors with both gcc 8.1.0 and gcc 4.9.4, the x86_64 salsa20-asm is actually slightly *slower* than salsa20-generic (~3% slower on Skylake, ~10% slower on Zen), while the i686 salsa20-asm is only slightly faster than salsa20-generic (~15% faster on Skylake, ~20% faster on Zen). The gcc version made little difference. So, the x86_64 salsa20-asm is pretty clearly useless. That leaves just the i686 salsa20-asm, which based on my tests provides a 15-20% speed boost. But that's without updating the code to not use %ebp. And given the maintenance cost, the small speed difference vs. salsa20-generic, the fact that few people still use i686 kernels, the doubt that anyone is even using the kernel's Salsa20 at all, and the fact that a SSE2 implementation would almost certainly be much faster on any remotely modern x86 processor yet no one has cared enough to add one yet, I don't think it's worthwhile to keep. Thus, just remove both the x86_64 and i686 salsa20-asm implementations. Reported-by: syzbot+ffa3a158337bbc01ff09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
Commit 56e8e57f ("crypto: morus - Add common SIMD glue code for MORUS") accidetally consiedered the glue code to be usable by different architectures, but it seems to be only usable on x86. This patch moves it under arch/x86/crypto and adds 'depends on X86' to the Kconfig options and also removes the prompt to hide these internal options from the user. Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 27 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
AEGIS-256 key is two blocks, not one. Fixes: 1d373d4e ("crypto: x86 - Add optimized AEGIS implementations") Reported-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 19 5月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
This patch adds optimized implementations of MORUS-640 and MORUS-1280, utilizing the SSE2 and AVX2 x86 extensions. For MORUS-1280 (which operates on 256-bit blocks) we provide both AVX2 and SSE2 implementation. Although SSE2 MORUS-1280 is slower than AVX2 MORUS-1280, it is comparable in speed to the SSE2 MORUS-640. Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
This patch adds optimized implementations of AEGIS-128, AEGIS-128L, and AEGIS-256, utilizing the AES-NI and SSE2 x86 extensions. Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 05 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in module description text Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 09 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Fixes: 09c0f03b ("crypto: x86/des3_ede - convert to skcipher interface") Signed-off-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
- 03 3月, 2018 18 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
There are no users of the original glue_fpu_begin() anymore, so rename glue_skwalk_fpu_begin() to glue_fpu_begin() so that it matches glue_fpu_end() again. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Now that all glue_helper users have been switched from the blkcipher interface over to the skcipher interface, remove the versions of the glue_helper functions that handled the blkcipher interface. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Now that all users of lrw_crypt() have been removed in favor of the LRW template wrapping an ECB mode algorithm, remove lrw_crypt(). Also remove crypto/lrw.h as that is no longer needed either; and fold 'struct lrw_table_ctx' into 'struct priv', lrw_init_table() into setkey(), and lrw_free_table() into exit_tfm(). Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the AESNI AVX and AESNI AVX2 implementations of Camellia from the (deprecated) ablkcipher and blkcipher interfaces over to the skcipher interface. Note that this includes replacing the use of ablk_helper with crypto_simd. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the x86 asm implementation of Camellia from the (deprecated) blkcipher interface over to the skcipher interface. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The XTS template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic XTS code themselves via xts_crypt(). Remove the xts-camellia-asm algorithm which did this. Users who request xts(camellia) and previously would have gotten xts-camellia-asm will now get xts(ecb-camellia-asm) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The LRW template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic LRW code themselves via lrw_crypt(). Remove the lrw-camellia-asm algorithm which did this. Users who request lrw(camellia) and previously would have gotten lrw-camellia-asm will now get lrw(ecb-camellia-asm) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The LRW template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic LRW code themselves via lrw_crypt(). Remove the lrw-camellia-aesni-avx2 algorithm which did this. Users who request lrw(camellia) and previously would have gotten lrw-camellia-aesni-avx2 will now get lrw(ecb-camellia-aesni-avx2) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The LRW template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic LRW code themselves via lrw_crypt(). Remove the lrw-camellia-aesni algorithm which did this. Users who request lrw(camellia) and previously would have gotten lrw-camellia-aesni will now get lrw(ecb-camellia-aesni) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the x86 asm implementation of Triple DES from the (deprecated) blkcipher interface over to the skcipher interface. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the x86 asm implementation of Blowfish from the (deprecated) blkcipher interface over to the skcipher interface. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the AVX implementation of CAST6 from the (deprecated) ablkcipher and blkcipher interfaces over to the skcipher interface. Note that this includes replacing the use of ablk_helper with crypto_simd. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The LRW template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic LRW code themselves via lrw_crypt(). Remove the lrw-cast6-avx algorithm which did this. Users who request lrw(cast6) and previously would have gotten lrw-cast6-avx will now get lrw(ecb-cast6-avx) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the AVX implementation of CAST5 from the (deprecated) ablkcipher and blkcipher interfaces over to the skcipher interface. Note that this includes replacing the use of ablk_helper with crypto_simd. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
With ecb-cast5-avx, if a 128+ byte scatterlist element followed a shorter one, then the algorithm accidentally encrypted/decrypted only 8 bytes instead of the expected 128 bytes. Fix it by setting the encryption/decryption 'fn' correctly. Fixes: c12ab20b ("crypto: cast5/avx - avoid using temporary stack buffers") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.8+ Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the AVX implementation of Twofish from the (deprecated) ablkcipher and blkcipher interfaces over to the skcipher interface. Note that this includes replacing the use of ablk_helper with crypto_simd. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
The LRW template now wraps an ECB mode algorithm rather than the block cipher directly. Therefore it is now redundant for crypto modules to wrap their ECB code with generic LRW code themselves via lrw_crypt(). Remove the lrw-twofish-avx algorithm which did this. Users who request lrw(twofish) and previously would have gotten lrw-twofish-avx will now get lrw(ecb-twofish-avx) instead, which is just as fast. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
由 Eric Biggers 提交于
Convert the 3-way implementation of Twofish from the (deprecated) blkcipher interface over to the skcipher interface. Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-