- 01 6月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
We currently have a separate function just to set this, but I think it makes more sense to set it at the same time as the other values in nfs4_init_sequence() Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Rather than doing this in the generic NFS client code. Let's put this with the other v4 stuff so it's all in one place. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
This doesn't really need to be in the generic NFS client code, and I think it makes more sense to keep the v4 code in one place. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
There are three places that walk all delegation for an nfs_client and restart whenever they find something interesting - potentially resulting in a quadratic search: If there are 10,000 uninteresting delegations followed by 10,000 interesting one, then the code skips over 100,000,000 delegations, which can take a noticeable amount of time. Of these nfs_delegation_reap_unclaimed() and nfs_reap_expired_delegations() are only called during unusual events: a server reboots or reports expired delegations, probably due to a network partition. Optimizing these is not particularly important. The third, nfs_client_return_marked_delegations(), is called periodically via nfs_expire_unreferenced_delegations(). It could cause periodic problems on a busy server. New delegations are added to the end of the list, so if there are 10,000 open files with delegations, and 10,000 more recently opened files that received delegations but are now closed, then nfs_client_return_marked_delegations() can take seconds to skip over the 10,000 open files 10,000 times. That is a waste of time. The avoid this waste a place-holder (an inode) is kept when locks are dropped, so that the place can usually be found again after taking rcu_readlock(). This place holder ensure that we find the right starting point in the list of nfs_servers, and makes is probable that we find the right starting point in the list of delegations. We might need to occasionally restart at the head of that list. It might be possible that the place_holder inode could lose its delegation separately, and then get a new one using the same (freed and then reallocated) 'struct nfs_delegation'. Were this to happen, the new delegation would be at the end of the list and we would miss returning some other delegations. This would have the effect of unnecessarily delaying the return of some unused delegations until the next time this function is called - typically 90 seconds later. As this is not a correctness issue and is vanishingly unlikely to happen, it does not seem worth addressing. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
In three places we walk the list of delegations for an nfs_client until an interesting one is found, then we act of that delegation and restart the walk. New delegations are added to the end of a list and the interesting delegations are usually old, so in many case we won't repeat a long walk over and over again, but it is possible - particularly if the first server in the list has a large number of uninteresting delegations. In each cache the work done on interesting delegations will often complete without sleeping, so this could loop many times without giving up the CPU. So add a cond_resched() at an appropriate point to avoid hogging the CPU for too long. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
There are 3 places where we walk the list of delegations for an nfs_client. In each case there are two nested loops, one for nfs_servers and one for nfs_delegations. When we find an interesting delegation we try to get an active reference to the server. If that fails, it is pointless to continue to look at the other delegation for the server as we will never be able to get an active reference. So instead of continuing in the inner loop, break out and continue in the outer loop. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We can optimise away any lookup for a rename target, unless we're being asked to revalidate a dentry that might be in use. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If nfs_lookup_revalidate() is called with LOOKUP_REVAL because a previous path lookup failed, then we ought to force a full lookup of the component name. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
NFSv4 should not need to perform an extra close-to-open GETATTR as part of the process of looking up a regular file, since the OPEN call will do that for us. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 11 4月, 2018 28 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Sorenson 提交于
In nfs[34]_decode_dirent, the cookie is advanced as soon as it is read, but decoding may still fail later in the function, returning an error. Because the cookie has been advanced, the failing entry is not re-requested from the server, resulting in a missing directory entry. In addition, nfs v3 and v4 read the cookie at different locations in the xdr_stream, so the behavior of the two can be inconsistent. Fix these by reading the cookie into a temporary variable, and only advancing the cookie once the entire entry has been decoded from the xdr_stream successfully. Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 chendt 提交于
Sync of ACL with std permissions fail,We need to forget the ACL cache after setattr. Reproduction: #!/bin/bash touch testfile cat <<EOF >testfile #!/bin/bash echo "Test was executed" EOF chmod u=rwx testfile chmod g=rw- testfile chmod o=r-- testfile chacl u::r--,g::rwx,o:rw- testfile chmod u+w testfile ls -l testfile chacl -l testfile Output: -rw-rwxrw- 1 root root 0 Mar 28 05:29 testfile testfile [u::r--,g::rwx,o::rw-] Signed-off-by: Nchendt.fnst <chendt.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kinglong Mee <Kinglong Mee> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we use EXCLUSIVE4_1 mode, the server returns an attribute mask where all the bits indicate which attributes were set, and where the verifier was stored. In order to figure out which attribute we have to resend, we need to clear out the attributes that are set in exclcreat_bitmask. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> [Anna: Fixed typo NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4 -> NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE] Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we've changed the file size, then ensure we declare it to be up to date in the inode attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Allocate the owner_id when we allocate the state and free it when we free the state. That lets us get rid of a gnarly ida_pre_get() / ida_get_new() loop. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Neither nfs_inode_set_delegation() nor nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() are generic code. They have no business delving into NFSv4 OPEN xdr structures, so let's replace the "struct nfs_openres" parameter. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Replace the open coded bitmap implementation with a generic one. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we hold a delegation, then the results of the ACCESS call are protected anyway. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Don't bother even recording an invalid change attribute if we hold a delegation since we already know the state of our attribute cache. We can rely on the fact that we will pick up a copy from the server when we return the delegation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, if the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag is set, for instance by a call to nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(), then it will not be cleared until all the attributes have been revalidated. This means, for instance, that NFSv4 writes will always force a full attribute revalidation. Track the ctime, mtime, size and change attribute separately from the other attributes so that we can have nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked() set them correctly, and later have the cache consistency bitmask be able to clear them. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we managed to revalidate all the attributes, then there is no reason to mark them as invalid again. We do, however want to ensure that we set nfsi->attrtimeo correctly. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we received weak cache consistency data from the server, then those attributes are up to date, and there is no reason to mark them as dirty in the attribute cache. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Even if the change attribute is missing, it is still OK to mark the other attributes as being up to date. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Starting with NFSv4.1, the server is able to deduce the client id from the SEQUENCE op which means it can always figure out whether or not the client is holding a delegation on a file that is being changed. For that reason, RFC5661 does not require a delegation to be unconditionally recalled on operations such as SETATTR, RENAME, or REMOVE. Note that for now, we continue to return READ delegations since that is still expected by the Linux knfsd server. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that when we do finally delete the file, then we return the delegation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation recall out of the generic code, and into the NFSv4 specific callback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation return out of generic code and down into the NFSv4 specific unlink code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the delegation return out of generic code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The 'fmode' argument can take an FMODE_EXEC value, which we want to filter out before comparing to the delegation type. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
If we have a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with a populated cl_lock_waitq, then that implies that a reconnect has occurred. Since we can't expect a CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callback at that point, just wake up the entire queue so that all the tasks can re-poll for their locks. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
The task is expected to sleep for a while here, and it's possible that a new EXCHANGE_ID has occurred in the interim, and we were assigned a new clientid. Since this is a per-client list, there isn't a lot of value in vetting the clientid on the incoming request. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We may get a notification and lose the race to another client. Ensure that we wait again for a notification in that case. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 06 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Pass the object size in to fscache_acquire_cookie() and fscache_write_page() rather than the netfs providing a callback by which it can be received. This makes it easier to update the size of the object when a new page is written that extends the object. The current object size is also passed by fscache to the check_aux function, obviating the need to store it in the aux data. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com> Tested-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Attach copies of the index key and auxiliary data to the fscache cookie so that: (1) The callbacks to the netfs for this stuff can be eliminated. This can simplify things in the cache as the information is still available, even after the cache has relinquished the cookie. (2) Simplifies the locking requirements of accessing the information as we don't have to worry about the netfs object going away on us. (3) The cache can do lazy updating of the coherency information on disk. As long as the cache is flushed before reboot/poweroff, there's no need to update the coherency info on disk every time it changes. (4) Cookies can be hashed or put in a tree as the index key is easily available. This allows: (a) Checks for duplicate cookies can be made at the top fscache layer rather than down in the bowels of the cache backend. (b) Caching can be added to a netfs object that has a cookie if the cache is brought online after the netfs object is allocated. A certain amount of space is made in the cookie for inline copies of the data, but if it won't fit there, extra memory will be allocated for it. The downside of this is that live cache operation requires more memory. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAnna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com> Tested-by: NSteve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill Tkhai 提交于
Synchronous pernet_operations are not allowed anymore. All are asynchronous. So, drop the structure member. Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-