1. 10 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      libata-acpi: implement ata_acpi_associate() · fafbae87
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      * Add acpi_handle to ata_host and ata_port.  Rename
        ata_device->obj_handle to ->acpi_handle and move it above such that
        it doesn't get cleared on reconfiguration.
      
      * Replace ACPI node association which ata_acpi_associate() which is
        called once during host initialization.  Unlike the previous
        implementation, ata_acpi_associate() uses ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA to
        choose between IDE or SATA ACPI hierarchy and uses simple child look
        up instead of recursive walk to match the nodes.  This is way safer
        and simpler.  Please read the following message for more info.
      
        http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17554Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
      fafbae87
  2. 16 5月, 2007 1 次提交
    • T
      libata-acpi: add ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA port flag · 3cadbcc0
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      Whether a controller needs IDE or SATA ACPI hierarchy is determined by
      the programming interface of the controller not by whether the
      controller is SATA or PATA, or it supports slave device or not.  This
      patch adds ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA port flags which tells libata-acpi that
      the port needs SATA ACPI nodes, and sets the flag for ahci and
      sata_sil24.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
      3cadbcc0
  3. 12 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 10 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 28 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  6. 10 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 09 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  8. 25 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 23 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  10. 17 2月, 2007 3 次提交