These are mostly long lines and wrong indentation warning
fixes. But also there are two volatile variables and
checkpatch.pl complains about them:

WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
+       volatile int gc_seq;

WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt
+       volatile int gced_lnum;

Well, we anyway use smp_wmb() for c->gc_seq and c->gced_lnum, so
these 'volatile' modifiers can be just dropped.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

fs/ubifs/compress.c:111:8: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different signedness)
fs/ubifs/compress.c:111:8:    expected unsigned int *dlen
fs/ubifs/compress.c:111:8:    got int *out_len
fs/ubifs/compress.c:175:10: warning: incorrect type in argument 5 (different signedness)
fs/ubifs/compress.c:175:10:    expected unsigned int *dlen
fs/ubifs/compress.c:175:10:    got int *out_len

Fix this by adding a cast to (unsigned int *). We guarantee that
our lengths are small and no overflow is possible.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

The 'make_free_space()' function was too complex and this patch
simplifies it. It also fixes a bug - the freespace test failed
straight away on UBI volumes with 512 bytes LEB size.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Do not force UBIFS return 0 used space when it is empty. It leads
to a situation when creating any file immediately produces tens of
used blocks, which looks very weird. It is better to be honest and
say that some blocks are used even if the FS is empty. And ext2
does the same.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

UBIFS stores uncommitted index size in c->budg_uncommitted_idx,
and this affect budgeting calculations. When mounting and
replaying, this variable is not updated, so we may end up
with "over-budgeting". This patch fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

UBIFS commits on unmount to make the next mount faster. Currently,
it commits only if there is more than LEB size bytes in the
journal. This is not very good, because journal size may be
large (512KiB). And there may be few deletions in the journal
which do not take much journal space, but which do introduce
a lot of TNC changes and make mount slow.

Thus, jurt remove this condition and always commit.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

UBI now has (fake for now, though) synchronization call - use
it.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Always run commit in sync_fs, because even if the journal seems
to be almost empty, there may be a deletion which removes a large
file, which affects the index greatly. And because we want
better free space predictions after 'sync_fs()', we have to
commit.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Argh. The ->sync_fs call is called _before_ all inodes are flushed.
This means we first sync write buffers and commit, then all
inodes are synced, and we end up with unflushed write buffers!

Fix this by forcing synching all indoes from 'ubifs_sync_fs()'.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

The c->min_idx_lebs constant depends on c->old_idx_sz, which
is read from the master node. This means that we have to
initialize c->min_idx_lebs only after we have read the master
node.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Do not calculate min_idx_lebs, because it is available in
c->min_idx_lebs
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

When we commit, but before we try to write anything to the flash
media, @c->min_idx_size is inaccurate, because we do not re-calculate
it after the commit. Do not forget to do this.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Instead of using do_div(), use better primitives from
linux/math64.h.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Take into account that 2 eraseblocks are never available because
they are reserved for the index. This gives more realistic count
of FS blocks.

To avoid future confusions like this, introduce a constant.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Dump available space calculated by budgeting subsystem.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

debugfs tnc dumping was broken because of an obvious typo.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

It has high bits set, not low bits set as the UBIFS code
assumed.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

This patch fixes the following section mismatch:

WARNING: fs/ubifs/ubifs.o(.init.text+0xec): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_module() to the function .exit.text:ubifs_compressors_exit()
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

It is useful to know how we got to the checking function when
hunting the bugs.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Do not forget to check whether lpt debugging is enabled before
running the check functions. This commit also makes some spelling
fixes.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

We need to have a possibility to see various UBIFS variables
and ask UBIFS to dump various information. Debugfs is what
we need.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Introduce a new data structure which contains all debugging
stuff inside. This is cleaner than having debugging stuff
directly in 'c'.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

I have a habit of compiling kernel with
EXTRA_CFLAGS="-Wextra -Wno-unused -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-missing-field-initializers"
and so fs/ubifs/key.h give lots (~10) of these every time:

CC      fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.o
In file included from fs/ubifs/ubifs.h:1725,
from fs/ubifs/tnc_misc.c:30:
fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_r5_hash':
fs/ubifs/key.h:64: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true
fs/ubifs/key.h: In function 'key_test_hash':
fs/ubifs/key.h:81: warning: comparison of unsigned expression >= 0 is always true

This patch fixes the warnings.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

It is very handy to be able to change default UBIFS compressor
via mount options. Introduce -o compr=<name> mount option support.
Currently only "none", "lzo" and "zlib" compressors are supported.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Save a 4 bytes of RAM per 'struct inode' by stroring inode
compression type in bit-filed, instead of using 'int'.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

If data does not compress, it is better to leave it uncompressed
because we'll read it faster then. So do not compress data if we
save less than 64 bytes.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

To avoid memory allocation failure during bulk-read, pre-allocate
a bulk-read buffer, so that if there is only one bulk-reader at
a time, it would just use the pre-allocated buffer and would not
do any memory allocation. However, if there are more than 1 bulk-
reader, then only one reader would use the pre-allocated buffer,
while the other reader would allocate the buffer for itself.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Bulk-read allocates 128KiB or more using kmalloc. The allocation
starts failing often when the memory gets fragmented. UBIFS still
works fine in this case, because it falls-back to standard
(non-optimized) read method, though. This patch teaches bulk-read
to allocate exactly the amount of memory it needs, instead of
allocating 128KiB every time.

This patch is also a preparation to the further fix where we'll
have a pre-allocated bulk-read buffer as well. For example, now
the @bu object is prepared in 'ubifs_bulk_read()', so we could
path either pre-allocated or allocated information to
'ubifs_do_bulk_read()' later. Or teaching 'ubifs_do_bulk_read()'
not to allocate 'bu->buf' if it is already there.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Bulk-read allocates a lot of memory with 'kmalloc()', and when it
is/gets fragmented 'kmalloc()' fails with a scarry warning. But
because bulk-read is just an optimization, UBIFS keeps working fine.
Supress the warning by passing __GFP_NOWARN option to 'kmalloc()'.

This patch also introduces a macro for the magic 128KiB constant.
This is just neater.

Note, this is not really fixes the problem we had, but just hides
the warnings. The further patches fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

The LPT may have gaps in it because initially empty LEBs
are not added by mkfs.ubifs - because it does not know how
many there are.  Then UBIFS allocates empty LEBs in the
reverse order that they are discovered i.e. they are
added to, and removed from, the front of a list.  That
creates a gap in the middle of the LPT.

The function dirtying the LPT tree (for the purpose of
small model garbage collection) assumed that a gap could
only occur at the very end of the LPT and stopped dirtying
prematurely, which in turn resulted in the LPT running
out of space - something that is designed to be impossible.
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>

We print 'ino_t' type using '%lu' printk() placeholder, but this
results in many warnings when compiling for Alpha platform. Fix
this by adding (unsingned long) casts.

Fixes these warnings:

fs/ubifs/journal.c:693: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/journal.c:1131: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/dir.c:163: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/tnc.c:2700: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/replay.c:1066: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 7 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:108: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:135: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:142: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:154: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:159: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:451: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:539: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:612: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:843: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/orphan.c:856: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1438: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1443: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1475: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:1495: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:105: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:110: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:114: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:118: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1591: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1671: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1674: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1680: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1699: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1788: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1821: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1833: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1924: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1932: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1938: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1945: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1953: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1960: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1967: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1973: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1988: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:1991: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'ino_t'
fs/ubifs/debug.c:2009: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'ino_t'
Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Noticed by sparse:
fs/ubifs/file.c:75:2: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/file.c:629:4: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer
fs/ubifs/dir.c:431:3: warning: restricted __le64 degrades to integer

This should be checked to ensure the ubifs_assert is working as
intended, I've done the suggested annotation in this patch.

fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6:    expected int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:298:6:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] <noident>
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19:    expected restricted __le64 [usertype] atime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:299:19:    got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19:    expected restricted __le64 [usertype] ctime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:300:19:    got int [signed] [assigned] tmp
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19:    expected restricted __le64 [usertype] mtime_sec
fs/ubifs/sb.c:301:19:    got int [signed] [assigned] tmp

This looks like a bugfix as your tmp was a u32 so there was truncation in
the atime, mtime, ctime value, probably not intentional, add a tmp_le64
and use it here.

fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:348:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/key.h:419:9: warning: cast to restricted __le32

Read from the annotated union member instead.

fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13:    expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:175:13:    got restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13:    expected restricted __le32 [usertype] flags
fs/ubifs/recovery.c:186:13:    got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] save_flags

Do byteshifting at compile time of the flag value.  Annotate the saved_flags
as le32.

fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast to restricted __le32
fs/ubifs/debug.c:368:10: warning: cast from restricted __le64

Should be checked if the truncation was intentional, I've changed the
printk to print the full width.
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Remove the "UBIFS background thread ubifs_bgd0_0 started" message.
We kill the background thread when we switch to R/O mode, and
start it again whan we switch to R/W mode. OLPC is doing this
many times during boot, and we see this message many times as
well, which is irritating. So just kill the message.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Update the comment for ubifs_compress(), which incorrectly states that it
returnsa success/failure indicator.
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

It is better to print "Reserved for root" than
"Reserved pool size", because it is more obvious for users
what this means.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

Fixes the following Oops:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at f8d24000
IP: [<f8ff0657>] :ubifs:ubifs_unpack_bits+0xcd/0x231
*pde = 34333067 *pte = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: deflate zlib_deflate lzo lzo_decompress lzo_compress
ubifs ubi nandsim nand nand_ids nand_ecc mtd nfsd lockd sunrpc exportfs
[last unloaded: nand_ecc]

Pid: 7450, comm: sync Not tainted (2.6.27-rc8-ubifs-2.6 #27)
EIP: 0060:[<f8ff0657>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0
EIP is at ubifs_unpack_bits+0xcd/0x231 [ubifs]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: d7e43dc0 EDX: 0000ff00
ESI: 00000004 EDI: f8d23ffe EBP: d7e43db4 ESP: d7e43d8c
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process sync (pid: 7450, ti=d7e42000 task=eb6f9530 task.ti=d7e42000)
Stack: 00000400 c0103db4 dc5e8090 d7e43dc0 d7e43dc0 d7e43dc4 0000001c 00000004
      f496d1e0 f8d23ffc d7e43dd4 f8ffac7e f8d23ffe 00000000 f8d23ffe f2b7af68
      f496d1e0 f8d23ffc d7e43e2c f8ffadc5 00000000 0001f000 00000000 c03b10a7
Call Trace:
[<c0103db4>] ? restore_nocheck_notrace+0x0/0xe
[<f8ffac7e>] ? is_a_node+0x43/0x92 [ubifs]
[<f8ffadc5>] ? dbg_check_ltab+0xf8/0x5c9 [ubifs]
[<c03b10a7>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b2/0x2a0
[<f8ffc86e>] ? ubifs_lpt_start_commit+0x49/0xecb [ubifs]
[<c03b0ef3>] ? mutex_unlock+0xd/0xf
[<f8fef017>] ? ubifs_tnc_start_commit+0x1cf/0xef8 [ubifs]
[<f8fe65d8>] ? do_commit+0x18f/0x52d [ubifs]
[<f8fe69f6>] ? ubifs_run_commit+0x80/0xca [ubifs]
[<f8fd8d35>] ? ubifs_sync_fs+0xdb/0xf6 [ubifs]
[<c0181a07>] ? sync_filesystems+0xc6/0x10c
[<c019f279>] ? do_sync+0x3b/0x6a
[<c019f2ba>] ? sys_sync+0x12/0x18
[<c0103ced>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x35
=======================
Code: 4d ec 89 01 8b 45 e8 89 10 89 d8 89 f1 d3 e8 85 c0 74 07 29 d6 83 fe
20 75 2a 89 d8 83 c4 1c 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 0f b6 57 01 c1 e2 08 <0f> b6 47 02
c1 e0 10 09 c2 0f b6 07 09 c2 0f b
EIP: [<f8ff0657>] ubifs_unpack_bits+0xcd/0x231 [ubifs] SS:ESP 0068:d7e43d8c
---[ end trace 1bbb4c407a6dd816 ]---
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>

This is a much better version of a previous patch to make the parser
tables constant. Rather than changing the typedef, we put the "const" in
all the various places where its required, allowing the __initconst
exception for nfsroot which was the cause of the previous trouble.

This was posted for review some time ago and I believe its been in -mm
since then.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

'is_a_node()' function was reading from a buffer before
checking the buffer length, resulting in an OOPS as
follows:

BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at f8f74002
IP: [<f8f9783f>] :ubifs:ubifs_unpack_bits+0xca/0x233
*pde = 19e95067 *pte = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: ubifs ubi mtdchar bio2mtd mtd brd video output
[last unloaded: mtd]

Pid: 6414, comm: integck Not tainted (2.6.27-rc6ubifs34 #23)
EIP: 0060:[<f8f9783f>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
EIP is at ubifs_unpack_bits+0xca/0x233 [ubifs]
EAX: 00000000 EBX: f6090630 ECX: d9badcfc EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000004 EDI: f8f74002 EBP: d9badcec ESP: d9badcc0
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
Process integck (pid: 6414, ti=d9bac000 task=f727dae0 task.ti=d9bac000)
Stack: 00000006 f7306240 00000002 00000000 d9badcfc d9badd00 0000001c 00000000
       f6090630 f6090630 f8f74000 d9badd10 f8fa1cc9 00000000 f8f74002 00000000
       f8f74002 f60fe128 f6090630 f8f74000 d9badd68 f8fa1e46 00000000 0001e000
Call Trace:
 [<f8fa1cc9>] ? is_a_node+0x30/0x90 [ubifs]
 [<f8fa1e46>] ? dbg_check_ltab+0x11d/0x5bd [ubifs]
 [<f8fa388f>] ? ubifs_lpt_start_commit+0x42/0xed3 [ubifs]
 [<c038e76a>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
 [<f8f9625d>] ? ubifs_tnc_start_commit+0x1c8/0xedb [ubifs]
 [<f8f8d90b>] ? do_commit+0x187/0x523 [ubifs]
 [<c038e76a>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
 [<f8f7ca17>] ? bud_wbuf_callback+0x22/0x28 [ubifs]
 [<f8f8dd1d>] ? ubifs_run_commit+0x76/0xc0 [ubifs]
 [<f8f8032c>] ? ubifs_sync_fs+0xd2/0xe6 [ubifs]
 [<c01a2e97>] ? vfs_quota_sync+0x0/0x17e
 [<c01a5ba6>] ? quota_sync_sb+0x26/0xbb
 [<c01a2e97>] ? vfs_quota_sync+0x0/0x17e
 [<c01a5c5d>] ? sync_dquots+0x22/0x12c
 [<c0173d1b>] ? __fsync_super+0x19/0x68
 [<c0173d75>] ? fsync_super+0xb/0x19
 [<c0174065>] ? generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0xe7
 [<c01a31fc>] ? vfs_quota_off+0x0/0x5fd
 [<f8f7cf4d>] ? ubifs_kill_sb+0x31/0x35 [ubifs]
 [<c01741f9>] ? deactivate_super+0x5e/0x71
 [<c0187610>] ? mntput_no_expire+0x82/0xe4
 [<c0187905>] ? sys_umount+0x4c/0x2f6
 [<c0187bc8>] ? sys_oldumount+0x19/0x1b
 [<c0103b71>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x25
 =======================
Code: c1 f8 03 8d 04 07 8b 4d e8 89 01 8b 45 e4 89 10 89 d8 89 f1 d3 e8 85 c0
      74 07 29 d6 83 fe 20 75 2a 89 d8 83 c4 20 5b 5e 5f 5d
EIP: [<f8f9783f>] ubifs_unpack_bits+0xca/0x233 [ubifs] SS:ESP 0068:d9badcc0
---[ end trace 1f02572436518c13 ]---
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>