1. 10 5月, 2018 17 次提交
  2. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • J
      bdi: Fix oops in wb_workfn() · b8b78495
      Jan Kara 提交于
      Syzbot has reported that it can hit a NULL pointer dereference in
      wb_workfn() due to wb->bdi->dev being NULL. This indicates that
      wb_workfn() was called for an already unregistered bdi which should not
      happen as wb_shutdown() called from bdi_unregister() should make sure
      all pending writeback works are completed before bdi is unregistered.
      Except that wb_workfn() itself can requeue the work with:
      
      	mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0);
      
      and if this happens while wb_shutdown() is waiting in:
      
      	flush_delayed_work(&wb->dwork);
      
      the dwork can get executed after wb_shutdown() has finished and
      bdi_unregister() has cleared wb->bdi->dev.
      
      Make wb_workfn() use wakeup_wb() for requeueing the work which takes all
      the necessary precautions against racing with bdi unregistration.
      
      CC: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
      CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Fixes: 839a8e86Reported-by: Nsyzbot <syzbot+9873874c735f2892e7e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      b8b78495
  3. 03 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 02 5月, 2018 2 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: send, fix missing truncate for inode with prealloc extent past eof · a6aa10c7
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      An incremental send operation can miss a truncate operation when an inode
      has an increased size in the send snapshot and a prealloc extent beyond
      its size.
      
      Consider the following scenario where a necessary truncate operation is
      missing in the incremental send stream:
      
      1) In the parent snapshot an inode has a size of 1282957 bytes and it has
         no prealloc extents beyond its size;
      
      2) In the the send snapshot it has a size of 5738496 bytes and has a new
         extent at offsets 1884160 (length of 106496 bytes) and a prealloc
         extent beyond eof at offset 6729728 (and a length of 339968 bytes);
      
      3) When processing the prealloc extent, at offset 6729728, we end up at
         send.c:send_write_or_clone() and set the @len variable to a value of
         18446744073708560384 because @offset plus the original @len value is
         larger then the inode's size (6729728 + 339968 > 5738496). We then
         call send_extent_data(), with that @offset and @len, which in turn
         calls send_write(), and then the later calls fill_read_buf(). Because
         the offset passed to fill_read_buf() is greater then inode's i_size,
         this function returns 0 immediately, which makes send_write() and
         send_extent_data() do nothing and return immediately as well. When
         we get back to send.c:send_write_or_clone() we adjust the value
         of sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset to @offset plus @len, which
         corresponds to 6729728 + 18446744073708560384 = 5738496, which is
         precisely the the size of the inode in the send snapshot;
      
      4) Later when at send.c:finish_inode_if_needed() we determine that
         we don't need to issue a truncate operation because the value of
         sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset corresponds to the inode's new
         size, 5738496 bytes. This is wrong because the last write operation
         that was issued started at offset 1884160 with a length of 106496
         bytes, so the correct value for sctx->cur_inode_next_write_offset
         should be 1990656 (1884160 + 106496), so that a truncate operation
         with a value of 5738496 bytes would have been sent to insert a
         trailing hole at the destination.
      
      So fix the issue by making send.c:send_write_or_clone() not attempt
      to send write or clone operations for extents that start beyond the
      inode's size, since such attempts do nothing but waste time by
      calling helper functions and allocating path structures, and send
      currently has no fallocate command in order to create prealloc extents
      at the destination (either beyond a file's eof or not).
      
      The issue was found running the test btrfs/007 from fstests using a seed
      value of 1524346151 for fsstress.
      Reported-by: NGu, Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Fixes: ffa7c429 ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations")
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a6aa10c7
    • E
      btrfs: Take trans lock before access running trans in check_delayed_ref · 998ac6d2
      ethanwu 提交于
      In preivous patch:
      Btrfs: kill trans in run_delalloc_nocow and btrfs_cross_ref_exist
      We avoid starting btrfs transaction and get this information from
      fs_info->running_transaction directly.
      
      When accessing running_transaction in check_delayed_ref, there's a
      chance that current transaction will be freed by commit transaction
      after the NULL pointer check of running_transaction is passed.
      
      After looking all the other places using fs_info->running_transaction,
      they are either protected by trans_lock or holding the transactions.
      
      Fix this by using trans_lock and increasing the use_count.
      
      Fixes: e4c3b2dc ("Btrfs: kill trans in run_delalloc_nocow and btrfs_cross_ref_exist")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
      Signed-off-by: Nethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      998ac6d2
  5. 27 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  6. 26 4月, 2018 5 次提交
  7. 24 4月, 2018 3 次提交
  8. 23 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 21 4月, 2018 9 次提交