Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

There were several issues if a memreserve range existed and happened
to be in highmem:

* The bootmem allocator is only aware of lowmem so calling
  reserve_bootmem with a highmem address would cause a BUG_ON
* All highmem pages were provided to the buddy allocator

Added a lmb_is_reserved() api that we now use to determine if a highem
page should continue to be PageReserved or provided to the buddy
allocator.

Also, we incorrectly reported the amount of pages reserved since all
highmem pages are initally marked reserved and we clear the
PageReserved flag as we "free" up the highmem pages.
Signed-off-by: NKumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>

This file was protected by _PPC64_LMB_H, which is confusing, as the
32-bit code also uses the lmb these days.  Changed to
_ASM_POWERPC_LMB_H.
Signed-off-by: NBecky Bruce <becky.bruce@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

In mm_init_ppc64() we calculate the location of the "IO hole", but then
no one ever looks at the value. So don't bother.

That's actually all mm_init_ppc64() does, so get rid of it too.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

Prototypes aren't so useful without parameter names, add them to lmb.h based
on the names in lmb.c
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE doesn't need to be part of the API, it's only used in
lmb.c - so move it out of the header file.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

Currently most callers of lmb_alloc() don't check if it worked or not, if it
ever does weird bad things will probably happen. The few callers who do check
just panic or BUG_ON.

So make lmb_alloc() panic internally, to catch bugs at the source. The few
callers who did check the result no longer need to.

The only caller that did anything interesting with the return result was
careful_allocation(). For it we create __lmb_alloc_base() which _doesn't_ panic
automatically, a little messy, but passable.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

include/asm-ppc/ had #ifdef __KERNEL__ in all header files that
are not meant for use by user space, include/asm-powerpc does
not have this yet.

This patch gets us a lot closer there. There are a few cases
where I was not sure, so I left them out. I have verified
that no CONFIG_* symbols are used outside of __KERNEL__
any more and that there are no obvious compile errors when
including any of the headers in user space libraries.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

This brings in the ppc64 version of prom_init.c, prom.c and btext.c
and makes them work for ppc32.  This also brings in the new calling
convention, where the first entry to the kernel (with r5 != 0) goes
to the prom_init code, which then restarts from the beginning (with
r5 == 0) after it has done its stuff.

For now this also brings in the ppc32 version of setup.c.  It also
merges lmb.h.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

A new option for SPARSEMEM is ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME.  Architecture
platforms with a very sparse physical address space would likely want to
select this option.  For those architecture platforms that don't select the
option, the code generated is equivalent to SPARSEMEM currently in -mm.
I'll be posting a patch on ia64 ml which uses this new SPARSEMEM feature.

ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME makes mem_section a one dimensional array of
pointers to mem_sections.  This two level layout scheme is able to achieve
smaller memory requirements for SPARSEMEM with the tradeoff of an
additional shift and load when fetching the memory section.  The current
SPARSEMEM -mm implementation is a one dimensional array of mem_sections
which is the default SPARSEMEM configuration.  The patch attempts isolates
the implementation details of the physical layout of the sparsemem section
array.

ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME depends on 64BIT and is by default boolean false.

I've boot tested under aim load ia64 configured for ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME.
 I've also boot tested a 4 way Opteron machine with !ARCH_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
and tested with aim.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Signed-off-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

We no longer need the lmb code to know about abs and phys addresses, so
remove the physbase variable from the lmb_property struct.
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!