1. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  2. 30 10月, 2017 14 次提交
  3. 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 24 8月, 2017 2 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: fix blk_status_t/errno confusion · 58efbc9f
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      This fixes several instances of blk_status_t and bare errno ints being
      mixed up, some of which are real bugs.
      
      In the normal case, 0 matches BLK_STS_OK, so we don't observe any
      effects of the missing conversion, but in case of errors or passes
      through the repair/retry paths, the errors get mixed up.
      
      The changes were identified using 'sparse', we don't have reports of the
      buggy behaviour.
      
      Fixes: 4e4cbee9 ("block: switch bios to blk_status_t")
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      58efbc9f
    • C
      block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk pointer and partitions index · 74d46992
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      This way we don't need a block_device structure to submit I/O.  The
      block_device has different life time rules from the gendisk and
      request_queue and is usually only available when the block device node
      is open.  Other callers need to explicitly create one (e.g. the lightnvm
      passthrough code, or the new nvme multipathing code).
      
      For the actual I/O path all that we need is the gendisk, which exists
      once per block device.  But given that the block layer also does
      partition remapping we additionally need a partition index, which is
      used for said remapping in generic_make_request.
      
      Note that all the block drivers generally want request_queue or
      sometimes the gendisk, so this removes a layer of indirection all
      over the stack.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      74d46992
  5. 22 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  6. 21 8月, 2017 3 次提交
  7. 18 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  8. 16 8月, 2017 13 次提交
  9. 24 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  10. 17 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) · bc98a42c
      David Howells 提交于
      Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch:
      
      	@@ expression SB; @@
      	-SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      
      to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-A != (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A == (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-!(sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A && (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A && sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A || (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A || sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) != A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) == A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) || A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) || A
      	)
      
      	@@ expression A, B, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B
      	)
      
      to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	)
      
      to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool)
      work correctly.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      bc98a42c