Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 19 6月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      timer: Reduce timer migration overhead if disabled · bc7a34b8
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Eric reported that the timer_migration sysctl is not really nice
performance wise as it needs to check at every timer insertion whether
the feature is enabled or not. Further the check does not live in the
timer code, so we have an extra function call which checks an extra
cache line to figure out that it is disabled.

We can do better and store that information in the per cpu (hr)timer
bases. I pondered to use a static key, but that's a nightmare to
update from the nohz code and the timer base cache line is hot anyway
when we select a timer base.

The old logic enabled the timer migration unconditionally if
CONFIG_NO_HZ was set even if nohz was disabled on the kernel command
line.

With this modification, we start off with migration disabled. The user
visible sysctl is still set to enabled. If the kernel switches to NOHZ
migration is enabled, if the user did not disable it via the sysctl
prior to the switch. If nohz=off is on the kernel command line,
migration stays disabled no matter what.

Before:
  47.76%  hog       [.] main
  14.84%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
   9.55%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
   6.71%  [kernel]  [k] mod_timer
   6.24%  [kernel]  [k] lock_timer_base.isra.38
   3.76%  [kernel]  [k] detach_if_pending
   3.71%  [kernel]  [k] del_timer
   2.50%  [kernel]  [k] internal_add_timer
   1.51%  [kernel]  [k] get_nohz_timer_target
   1.28%  [kernel]  [k] __internal_add_timer
   0.78%  [kernel]  [k] timerfn
   0.48%  [kernel]  [k] wake_up_nohz_cpu

After:
  48.10%  hog       [.] main
  15.25%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
   9.76%  [kernel]  [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
   6.50%  [kernel]  [k] mod_timer
   6.44%  [kernel]  [k] lock_timer_base.isra.38
   3.87%  [kernel]  [k] detach_if_pending
   3.80%  [kernel]  [k] del_timer
   2.67%  [kernel]  [k] internal_add_timer
   1.33%  [kernel]  [k] __internal_add_timer
   0.73%  [kernel]  [k] timerfn
   0.54%  [kernel]  [k] wake_up_nohz_cpu
Reported-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Wenbo Wang <wenbo.wang@memblaze.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150526224512.127050787@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      bc7a34b8
  5. 28 5月, 2015 12 次提交
  7. 22 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  9. 13 3月, 2015 3 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Process offlining and onlining only at grace-period start · 0aa04b05
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Races between CPU hotplug and grace periods can be difficult to resolve,
so the ->onoff_mutex is used to exclude the two events.  Unfortunately,
this means that it is impossible for an outgoing CPU to perform the
last bits of its offlining from its last pass through the idle loop,
because sleeplocks cannot be acquired in that context.

This commit avoids these problems by buffering online and offline events
in a new ->qsmaskinitnext field in the leaf rcu_node structures.  When a
grace period starts, the events accumulated in this mask are applied to
the ->qsmaskinit field, and, if needed, up the rcu_node tree.  The special
case of all CPUs corresponding to a given leaf rcu_node structure being
offline while there are still elements in that structure's ->blkd_tasks
list is handled using a new ->wait_blkd_tasks field.  In this case,
propagating the offline bits up the tree is deferred until the beginning
of the grace period after all of the tasks have exited their RCU read-side
critical sections and removed themselves from the list, at which point
the ->wait_blkd_tasks flag is cleared.  If one of that leaf rcu_node
structure's CPUs comes back online before the list empties, then the
->wait_blkd_tasks flag is simply cleared.

This of course means that RCU's notion of which CPUs are offline can be
out of date.  This is OK because RCU need only wait on CPUs that were
online at the time that the grace period started.  In addition, RCU's
force-quiescent-state actions will handle the case where a CPU goes
offline after the grace period starts.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      0aa04b05
    • P
      rcu: Move rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code · cc99a310
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      The rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() function is invoked when the
last task blocking the current grace period exits its outermost
RCU read-side critical section.  Previously, this was called only
from rcu_read_unlock_special(), and was therefore defined only when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=y.  However, this function will be invoked even when
CONFIG_RCU_PREEMPT=n once CPU-hotplug operations are processed only at
the beginnings of RCU grace periods.  The reason for this change is that
the last task on a given leaf rcu_node structure's ->blkd_tasks list
might well exit its RCU read-side critical section between the time that
recent CPU-hotplug operations were applied and when the new grace period
was initialized.  This situation could result in RCU waiting forever on
that leaf rcu_node structure, because if all that structure's CPUs were
already offline, there would be no quiescent-state events to drive that
structure's part of the grace period.

This commit therefore moves rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() to common code
that is built unconditionally so that the quiescent-state-forcing code
can clean up after this situation, avoiding the grace-period stall.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      cc99a310
    • P
      rcu: Rework preemptible expedited bitmask handling · 8eb74b2b
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Currently, the rcu_node tree ->expmask bitmasks are initially set to
reflect the online CPUs.  This is pointless, because only the CPUs
preempted within RCU read-side critical sections by the preceding
synchronize_sched_expedited() need to be tracked.  This commit therefore
instead sets up these bitmasks based on the state of the ->blkd_tasks
lists.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      8eb74b2b
  11. 12 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  13. 04 3月, 2015 4 次提交
  15. 27 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  17. 14 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 12 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Clear need_qs flag to prevent splat · c0135d07
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      If the scheduling-clock interrupt sets the current tasks need_qs flag,
but if the current CPU passes through a quiescent state in the meantime,
then rcu_preempt_qs() will fail to clear the need_qs flag, which can fool
RCU into thinking that additional rcu_read_unlock_special() processing
is needed.  This commit therefore clears the need_qs flag before checking
for additional processing.

For this problem to occur, we need rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce equal
to true and current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs also equal to true.
This condition can occur as follows:

1.	CPU 0 is aware of the current preemptible RCU grace period,
	but has not yet passed through a quiescent state.  Among other
	things, this means that rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false.

2.	Task A running on CPU 0 enters a preemptible RCU read-side
	critical section.

3.	CPU 0 takes a scheduling-clock interrupt, which notices the
	RCU read-side critical section and the need for a quiescent state,
	and thus sets current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs to true.

4.	Task A is preempted, enters the scheduler, eventually invoking
	rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() which in turn invokes
	rcu_preempt_qs().

	Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is false,
	control enters the body of the "if" statement, which sets
	rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce to true.

5.	At this point, CPU 0 takes an interrupt.  The interrupt
	handler contains an RCU read-side critical section, and
	the rcu_read_unlock() notes that current->rcu_read_unlock_special
	is nonzero, and thus invokes rcu_read_unlock_special().

6.	Once in rcu_read_unlock_special(), the fact that
	current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs is true becomes
	apparent, so rcu_read_unlock_special() invokes rcu_preempt_qs().
	Recursively, given that we interrupted out of that same
	function in the preceding step.

7.	Because rcu_preempt_data.passed_quiesce is now true,
	rcu_preempt_qs() does nothing, and simply returns.

8.	Upon return to rcu_read_unlock_special(), it is noted that
	current->rcu_read_unlock_special is still nonzero (because
	the interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() had not yet gotten around
	to clearing current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs).

9.	Execution proceeds to the WARN_ON_ONCE(), which notes that
	we are in an interrupt handler and thus duly splats.

The solution, as noted above, is to make rcu_read_unlock_special()
clear out current->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs after calling
rcu_preempt_qs().  The interrupted rcu_preempt_qs() will clear it again,
but this is harmless.  The worst that happens is that we clobber another
attempt to set this field, but this is not a problem because we just
got done reporting a quiescent state.
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Fix embarrassing build bug noted by Sasha Levin. ]
Tested-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
      c0135d07
  21. 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Optionally run grace-period kthreads at real-time priority · a94844b2
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Recent testing has shown that under heavy load, running RCU's grace-period
kthreads at real-time priority can improve performance (according to 0day
test robot) and reduce the incidence of RCU CPU stall warnings.  However,
most systems do just fine with the default non-realtime priorities for
these kthreads, and it does not make sense to expose the entire user
base to any risk stemming from this change, given that this change is
of use only to a few users running extremely heavy workloads.

Therefore, this commit allows users to specify realtime priorities
for the grace-period kthreads, but leaves them running SCHED_OTHER
by default.  The realtime priority may be specified at build time
via the RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO Kconfig parameter, or at boot time via the
rcutree.kthread_prio parameter.  Either way, 0 says to continue the
default SCHED_OTHER behavior and values from 1-99 specify that priority
of SCHED_FIFO behavior.  Note that a value of 0 is not permitted when
the RCU_BOOST Kconfig parameter is specified.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      a94844b2
  23. 11 1月, 2015 2 次提交
    • P
      rcutorture: Check from beginning to end of grace period · 917963d0
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Currently, rcutorture's Reader Batch checks measure from the end of
the previous grace period to the end of the current one.  This commit
tightens up these checks by measuring from the start and end of the same
grace period.  This involves adding rcu_batches_started() and friends
corresponding to the existing rcu_batches_completed() and friends.

We leave SRCU alone for the moment, as it does not yet have a way of
tracking both ends of its grace periods.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      917963d0
    • P
      rcu: Make _batches_completed() functions return unsigned long · 9733e4f0
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Long ago, the various ->completed fields were of type long, but now are
unsigned long due to signed-integer-overflow concerns.  However, the
various _batches_completed() functions remained of type long, even though
their only purpose in life is to return the corresponding ->completed
field.  This patch cleans this up by changing these functions' return
types to unsigned long.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      9733e4f0
  25. 07 1月, 2015 7 次提交
    • P
      rcu: Handle gpnum/completed wrap while dyntick idle · e3663b10
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Subtle race conditions can result if a CPU stays in dyntick-idle mode
long enough for the ->gpnum and ->completed fields to wrap.  For
example, consider the following sequence of events:

o	CPU 1 encounters a quiescent state while waiting for grace period
	5 to complete, but then enters dyntick-idle mode.

o	While CPU 1 is in dyntick-idle mode, the grace-period counters
	wrap around so that the grace period number is now 4.

o	Just as CPU 1 exits dyntick-idle mode, grace period 4 completes
	and grace period 5 begins.

o	The quiescent state that CPU 1 passed through during the old
	grace period 5 looks like it applies to the new grace period
	5.  Therefore, the new grace period 5 completes without CPU 1
	having passed through a quiescent state.

This could clearly be a fatal surprise to any long-running RCU read-side
critical section that happened to be running on CPU 1 at the time.  At one
time, this was not a problem, given that it takes significant time for
the grace-period counters to overflow even on 32-bit systems.  However,
with the advent of NO_HZ_FULL and SMP embedded systems, arbitrarily long
idle periods are now becoming quite feasible.  It is therefore time to
close this race.

This commit therefore avoids this race condition by having the
quiescent-state forcing code detect when a CPU is falling too far
behind, and setting a new rcu_data field ->gpwrap when this happens.
Whenever this new ->gpwrap field is set, the CPU's ->gpnum and ->completed
fields are known to be untrustworthy, and can be ignored, along with
any associated quiescent states.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      e3663b10
    • P
      rcu: Make RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO include number of fqs attempts · fc908ed3
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      One way that an RCU CPU stall warning can happen is if the grace-period
kthread is not allowed to execute.  One proxy for this kthread's
forward progress is the number of force-quiescent-state (fqs) scans.
This commit therefore adds the number of fqs scans to the RCU CPU stall
warning printouts when CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO=y.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      fc908ed3
    • L
      rcu: Revert "Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex" to avoid priority-inversion · abaf3f9d
      由 Lai Jiangshan 提交于 
      The patch dfeb9765 ("Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex")
ensured rcu-boost safe even the rt_mutex has post-unlock reference.

But rt_mutex allowing post-unlock reference is definitely a bug and it was
fixed by the commit 27e35715 ("rtmutex: Plug slow unlock race").
This fix made the previous patch (dfeb9765) useless.

And even worse, the priority-inversion introduced by the the previous
patch still exists.

rcu_read_unlock_special() {
	rt_mutex_unlock(&rnp->boost_mtx);
	/* Priority-Inversion:
	 * the current task had been deboosted and preempted as a low
	 * priority task immediately, it could wait long before reschedule in,
	 * and the rcu-booster also waits on this low priority task and sleeps.
	 * This priority-inversion makes rcu-booster can't work
	 * as expected.
	 */
	complete(&rnp->boost_completion);
}

Just revert the patch to avoid it.

Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      abaf3f9d
    • P
      rcu: Don't bother affinitying rcub kthreads away from offline CPUs · 5d0b0249
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      When rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity() sees that all CPUs for a given
rcu_node structure are now offline, it affinities the corresponding
RCU-boost ("rcub") kthread away from those CPUs.  This is pointless
because the kthread cannot run on those offline CPUs in any case.
This commit therefore removes this unneeded code.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      5d0b0249
    • P
      rcu: Don't spawn rcub kthreads on root rcu_node structure · 3e9f5c70
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Now that offlining CPUs no longer moves leaf rcu_node structures'
->blkd_tasks lists to the root, there is no way for the root rcu_node
structure's ->blkd_task list to be nonempty, unless the root node is also
the sole leaf node.  This commit therefore refrains from creating an rcub
kthread for the root rcu_node structure unless it is also the sole leaf.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      3e9f5c70
    • P
      rcu: Make use of rcu_preempt_has_tasks() · 96e92021
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      Given that there is now arcu_preempt_has_tasks() function that checks
to see if the ->blkd_tasks list is non-empty, this commit makes use of it.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      96e92021
    • P
      rcu: Don't migrate blocked tasks even if all corresponding CPUs offline · d19fb8d1
      由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于 
      When the last CPU associated with a given leaf rcu_node structure
goes offline, something must be done about the tasks queued on that
rcu_node structure.  Each of these tasks has been preempted on one of
the leaf rcu_node structure's CPUs while in an RCU read-side critical
section that it have not yet exited.  Handling these tasks is the job of
rcu_preempt_offline_tasks(), which migrates them from the leaf rcu_node
structure to the root rcu_node structure.

Unfortunately, this migration has to be done one task at a time because
each tasks allegiance must be shifted from the original leaf rcu_node to
the root, so that future attempts to deal with these tasks will acquire
the root rcu_node structure's ->lock rather than that of the leaf.
Worse yet, this migration must be done with interrupts disabled, which
is not so good for realtime response, especially given that there is
no bound on the number of tasks on a given rcu_node structure's list.
(OK, OK, there is a bound, it is just that it is unreasonably large,
especially on 64-bit systems.)  This was not considered a problem back
when rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() was first written because realtime
systems were assumed not to do CPU-hotplug operations while real-time
applications were running.  This assumption has proved of dubious validity
given that people are starting to run multiple realtime applications
on a single SMP system and that it is common practice to offline then
online a CPU before starting its real-time application in order to clear
extraneous processing off of that CPU.  So we now need CPU hotplug
operations to avoid undue latencies.

This commit therefore avoids migrating these tasks, instead letting
them be dequeued one by one from the original leaf rcu_node structure
by rcu_read_unlock_special().  This means that the clearing of bits
from the upper-level rcu_node structures must be deferred until the
last such task has been dequeued, because otherwise subsequent grace
periods won't wait on them.  This commit has the beneficial side effect
of simplifying the CPU-hotplug code for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, especially in
CONFIG_RCU_BOOST builds.
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      d19fb8d1