- 13 8月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The values in these two fields need to be preserved independently and so a union cannot be used. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Every time anything is deleted, UBIFS writes the deletion inode node twice - once in 'ubifs_jnl_update()' and the second time in 'ubifs_jnl_write_inode()'. However, the second write is not needed if no commit happened after 'ubifs_jnl_update()'. This patch checks that condition and avoids writing the deletion inode for the second time. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Increment the commit number at the beginnig of the commit, instead of doing this after the commit. This is needed for further optimizations. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Simplify 'ubifs_jnl_write_inode()' by removing the 'deletion' parameter which is not really needed because we may test inode->i_nlink and check whether this is a deletion or not. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
We use ubifs_ro_mode() quite a lot, and not in fast-path, so there is no reason to blow the code up by having it inlined. Also, we usually want R/O mode change to be seen to other CPUs as soon as possible, so when we make this a function call, we will automatically have a memory barrier. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This is a new flash file system. See http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/ubifs.htmlSigned-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
-