1. 29 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  2. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  3. 22 3月, 2016 4 次提交
  4. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace · 73beece9
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,
      
      [ 1226.649039] =========================================================
      [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
      [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
      [ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
      [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}
      
      and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
      
      [ 1226.652955]
      other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
        &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock
      
      [ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
      [ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
      [ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
      [ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
      [ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
      to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
      run to this.
      
      The above lock chain comes from
      btrfs_commit_transaction
        ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
          ...
          ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
            ...
            ->__btrfs_cow_block
               ...
               ->find_free_extent
                  ->cache_block_group
                    ->load_free_space_cache
                      ->btrfs_readpages
                        ->submit_one_bio
                          ...
                          ->__btrfs_map_block
                            ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock
      
      However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
      be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
      by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
      to
      
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700
      
      delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
      to a ABBA deadlock.
      
      To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
      things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.
      
      With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73beece9
  7. 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  8. 12 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  9. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 30 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • B
      x86/cpufeature: Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant · bc696ca0
      Borislav Petkov 提交于
      So the old one didn't work properly before alternatives had run.
      And it was supposed to provide an optimized JMP because the
      assumption was that the offset it is jumping to is within a
      signed byte and thus a two-byte JMP.
      
      So I did an x86_64 allyesconfig build and dumped all possible
      sites where static_cpu_has() was used. The optimization amounted
      to all in all 12(!) places where static_cpu_has() had generated
      a 2-byte JMP. Which has saved us a whopping 36 bytes!
      
      This clearly is not worth the trouble so we can remove it. The
      only place where the optimization might count - in __switch_to()
      - we will handle differently. But that's not subject of this
      patch.
      Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
      Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
      Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
      Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
      Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453842730-28463-6-git-send-email-bp@alien8.deSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      bc696ca0
  11. 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      Revert "btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread()" · 80ad623e
      David Sterba 提交于
      This reverts commit 69624913. The
      cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in
      progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs
      provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages:
      
      kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
      kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done.
      kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
      kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
      kernel: btrfs-cleaner   D ffff88033dd13bc0     0   152      2 0x00000000
      kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff
      kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451
      kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020
      kernel: Call Trace:
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8
      kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e
      kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73
      kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72
      kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a
      kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45
      kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b
      kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a
      kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736
      kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7
      kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae
      kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167
      kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b
      kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
      kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
      kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
      
      As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for
      stable kernels.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: NMartin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de>
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4
      CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      80ad623e
  12. 25 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 20 1月, 2016 2 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: Enhance super validation check · 319e4d06
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points:
      1) Restrict sector/node size check
         Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2.
         So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now.
      
      2) Super flag check
         For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and
         btrfs-progs super flags.
         And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this
         check will only output warning.
      
      3) Better root alignment check
         Now root bytenr is checked against sector size.
      
      4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid().
         Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check.
         And magic number check.
      Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      319e4d06
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock running delayed iputs at transaction commit time · c2d6cb16
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
      iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:
      
      [  886.399989] =============================================
      [  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
      [  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
      [  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
      [  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
      [  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
      [  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]        CPU0
      [  886.403568]        ----
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
      [  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.403568]
      [  886.403568] stack backtrace:
      [  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
      [  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
      [  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
      [  886.403568] Call Trace:
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
      [  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
      [ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
      [ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
      [ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
      [ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
      [ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
      [ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
      [ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
      [ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
      [ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
      [ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
      [ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
      [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
      [ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
      [ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
      [ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
      [ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
      [ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
      [ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
      [ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
      [ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
      [ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
      [ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
      [ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
      [ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
      [ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
      [ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
      [ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
      [ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
      [ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
      [ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
      [ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
      [ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
      [ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
      
      This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
      fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
      a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
      a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
      delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
      an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
      and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
      delayed iput operations.
      This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
      semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
      class for each level of recursion.
      
      Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
      is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
      instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
      run from anywhere.
      
      Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      c2d6cb16
  14. 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: Initialize btrfs_root->highest_objectid when loading tree root and subvolume roots · f32e48e9
      Chandan Rajendra 提交于
      The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop,
      
      [  158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea()
      [  158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
      [  158.664774] Modules linked in:
      [  158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2
      [  158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
      [  158.667392]  ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930
      [  158.668515]  ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000
      [  158.669647]  ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980
      [  158.670769] Call Trace:
      [  158.671153]  [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c
      [  158.671884]  [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
      [  158.672769]  [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
      [  158.673620]  [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea
      [  158.674440]  [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520
      [  158.675376]  [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50
      [  158.676235]  [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180
      [  158.677268]  [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70
      [  158.678183]  [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90
      [  158.678975]  [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300
      [  158.679751]  [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170
      [  158.680599]  [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70
      [  158.681686]  [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0
      [  158.682581]  [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490
      [  158.683399]  [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60
      [  158.684297]  [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
      [  158.685051]  [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
      [  158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]---
      [  158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry
      [  158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly
      [  158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
      [  158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed
      [  158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30
      
      This occurs because,
      
      Mount filesystem
      Create subvol with ID 257
      Unmount filesystem
      Mount filesystem
      Delete subvol with ID 257
        btrfs_drop_snapshot()
          Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into
          btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list
      Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol())
        257 is returned as the next free objectid
        btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name()
          Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257
          in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix.
          Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0.
      
      To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's
      highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk.
      Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f32e48e9
  15. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
  16. 30 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 19 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  18. 18 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: add free space tree mount option · 70f6d82e
      Omar Sandoval 提交于
      Now we can finally hook up everything so we can actually use free space
      tree. The free space tree is enabled by passing the space_cache=v2 mount
      option. On the first mount with the this option set, the free space tree
      will be created and the FREE_SPACE_TREE read-only compat bit will be
      set. Any time the filesystem is mounted from then on, we must use the
      free space tree. The clear_cache option will also clear the free space
      tree.
      Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      70f6d82e
  19. 07 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  20. 03 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep... · d0164adc
      Mel Gorman 提交于
      mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd
      
      __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
      spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
      have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
      to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
      lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".
      
      Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
      were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
      an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
      reserves.
      
      This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
      cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
      __GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
      are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
      callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
      redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
      kswapd for background reclaim.
      
      This patch then converts a number of sites
      
      o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
        pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.
      
      o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
        __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
        into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
        are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.
      
      o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
        helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
        checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
        positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
        is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
        flag manipulations.
      
      o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
        and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.
      
      The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
      and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
      In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.
      
      The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
      GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
      now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
      if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
      Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
      Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
      Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d0164adc
  22. 05 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: qgroup: exit the rescan worker during umount · 7343dd61
      Justin Maggard 提交于
      I was hitting a consistent NULL pointer dereference during shutdown that
      showed the trace running through end_workqueue_bio().  I traced it back to
      the endio_meta_workers workqueue being poked after it had already been
      destroyed.
      
      Eventually I found that the root cause was a qgroup rescan that was still
      in progress while we were stopping all the btrfs workers.
      
      Currently we explicitly pause balance and scrub operations in
      close_ctree(), but we do nothing to stop the qgroup rescan.  We should
      probably be doing the same for qgroup rescan, but that's a much larger
      change.  This small change is good enough to allow me to unmount without
      crashing.
      Signed-off-by: NJustin Maggard <jmaggard@netgear.com>
      Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      7343dd61
  23. 27 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: clear PF_NOFREEZE in cleaner_kthread() · 69624913
      Jiri Kosina 提交于
      cleaner_kthread() kthread calls try_to_freeze() at the beginning of every
      cleanup attempt. This operation can't ever succeed though, as the kthread
      hasn't marked itself as freezable.
      
      Before (hopefully eventually) kthread freezing gets converted to fileystem
      freezing, we'd rather mark cleaner_kthread() freezable (as my
      understanding is that it can generate filesystem I/O during suspend).
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      69624913
  24. 22 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  25. 11 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  26. 08 10月, 2015 3 次提交
  27. 06 10月, 2015 1 次提交