1. 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  2. 07 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 26 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 20 12月, 2012 10 次提交
  5. 29 11月, 2012 3 次提交
  6. 13 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 22 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  8. 21 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  9. 19 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  10. 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  12. 06 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  13. 26 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  14. 18 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 26 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 13 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  17. 08 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  18. 29 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  19. 15 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 09 7月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      hwmon: (it87) Fix in7 on IT8720F · 436cad2a
      Jean Delvare 提交于
      The IT8720F has no VIN7 pin, so VCCH should always be routed
      internally to VIN7 with an internal divider. Curiously, there still
      is a configuration bit to control this, which means it can be set
      incorrectly. And even more curiously, many boards out there are
      improperly configured, even though the IT8720F datasheet claims that
      the internal routing of VCCH to VIN7 is the default setting. So we
      force the internal routing in this case.
      
      It turns out that all boards with the wrong setting are from Gigabyte,
      so I suspect a BIOS bug. But it's easy enough to workaround in the
      driver, so let's do it.
      Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
      Cc: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
      Cc: stable@kernel.org
      436cad2a
  21. 14 4月, 2010 3 次提交
  22. 06 3月, 2010 2 次提交
    • J
      hwmon: (it87) Validate auto pwm settings · cccfc9c4
      Jean Delvare 提交于
      Before switching to automatic fan control mode, make sure that all the
      trip points make sense. Otherwise, the control loop could lead to
      weird fan behavior.
      Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
      cccfc9c4
    • J
      hwmon: (it87) Add support for old automatic fan speed control · 4f3f51bc
      Jean Delvare 提交于
      Add support for the automatic fan speed control interface as
      implemented by IT8705F chips up to revision F and IT8712F chips up to
      revision G. This implementation fits very well in our standard sysfs
      interface.
      
      I implemented the old and not the new interface because the only chip
      I have at hand is an old one, and the new interface is more difficult
      to map to the standard sysfs interface. Adding support later should be
      possible though, if someone with a supported chip is interested.
      Signed-off-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
      4f3f51bc