- 09 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The function can just create the instance of it on its own and bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot. This renames device_add_property_set() to device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct property_entry as its parameter instead of struct property_set. Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
If the boot firmware does not support ACPI we need a way to pass device configuration information to the drivers. The unified device properties API already supports passing platform data via properties so let's take advantage of that and allow probe drivers to pass set of properties to the host controller driver. In order to do that we need to be able to modify the MFD cell corresponding the host controller, so make the core driver to take copy of the cell instead of using it directly. Then we can assign info->pset to the resulting copy of a cell and let the MFD core to assign that to the resulting device. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Jim Davis reported the compilation error with a random configuration which apparently has CONFIG_PM=y and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n. With that conditions we have missed definition of INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS macro. Add it here. Reported-by: NJim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
-
- 28 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
The new coming Intel platforms such as Skylake will contain Sunrisepoint PCH. The main difference to the previous platforms is that the LPSS devices are compound devices where usually main (SPI, HSUART, or I2C) and DMA IPs are present. This patch brings the driver for such devices found on Sunrisepoint PCH. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
-