This commit improves the messages of the recursive dependency.
Currently, sym->dir_dep.expr is not checked.  Hence, any dependency
in property visibility is regarded as the dependency of the symbol.

[Test Code 1]

  config A
          bool "a"
          depends on B

  config B
          bool "b"
          depends on A

[Test Code 2]

  config A
          bool "a" if B

  config B
          bool "b"
          depends on A

For both cases above, the same message is displayed:

        symbol B depends on A
        symbol A depends on B

This commit changes the message for the latter, like this:

        symbol B depends on A
        symbol A prompt is visible depending on B

Also, 'select' and 'imply' are distinguished.
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>

Currently, Kconfig does not complain about the recursive dependency
where 'imply' keywords are involved.

[Test Code]

  config A
          bool "a"

  config B
          bool "b"
          imply A
          depends on A

In the code above, Kconfig cannot calculate the symbol values correctly
due to the circular dependency.  For example, allyesconfig followed by
syncconfig results in an odd behavior because CONFIG_B becomes visible
in syncconfig.

  $ make allyesconfig
  scripts/kconfig/conf  --allyesconfig Kconfig
  #
  # configuration written to .config
  #
  $ cat .config
  #
  # Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
  # Main menu
  #
  CONFIG_A=y
  $ make syncconfig
  scripts/kconfig/conf  --syncconfig Kconfig
  *
  * Restart config...
  *
  *
  * Main menu
  *
  a (A) [Y/n/?] y
    b (B) [N/y/?] (NEW)

To detect this correctly, sym_check_expr_deps() should recurse to
not only sym->rev_dep.expr but also sym->implied.expr .

At this moment, sym_check_print_recursive() cannot distinguish
'select' and 'imply' since it does not know the precise context
where the recursive dependency has been hit.  This will be solved
by the next commit.

In fact, even the document and the unit-test are confused.  Using
'imply' does not solve recursive dependency since 'imply' addresses
the unmet direct dependency, which 'select' could cause.
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>

Originally, recursive dependency was a fatal error for Kconfig
because Kconfig cannot compute symbol values in such a situation.

Commit d595cea6 ("kconfig: print more info when we see a recursive
dependency") changed it to a warning, which I guess was not intentional.

Get it back to an error again.

Also, rename the unit test directory "warn_recursive_dep" to
"err_recursive_dep" so that it matches to the behavior.
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Tested-by: NDirk Gouders <dirk@gouders.net>

Recursive dependency should be detected and warned.  Test this.

This indirectly tests the line number increments.
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: NUlf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com>