1. 07 11月, 2009 2 次提交
    • J
      cifs: don't use CIFSGetSrvInodeNumber in is_path_accessible · f475f677
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      Because it's lighter weight, CIFS tries to use CIFSGetSrvInodeNumber to
      verify the accessibility of the root inode and then falls back to doing a
      full QPathInfo if that fails with -EOPNOTSUPP. I have at least a report
      of a server that returns NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR rather than something
      that translates to EOPNOTSUPP.
      
      Rather than trying to be clever with that call, just have
      is_path_accessible do a normal QPathInfo. That call is widely
      supported and it shouldn't increase the overhead significantly.
      
      Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      f475f677
    • J
      cifs: clean up handling when server doesn't consistently support inode numbers · ec06aedd
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      It's possible that a server will return a valid FileID when we query the
      FILE_INTERNAL_INFO for the root inode, but then zeroed out inode numbers
      when we do a FindFile with an infolevel of
      SMB_FIND_FILE_ID_FULL_DIR_INFO.
      
      In this situation turn off querying for server inode numbers, generate a
      warning for the user and just generate an inode number using iunique.
      Once we generate any inode number with iunique we can no longer use any
      server inode numbers or we risk collisions, so ensure that we don't do
      that in cifs_get_inode_info either.
      
      Cc: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
      Reported-by: NTimothy Normand Miller <theosib@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      ec06aedd
  2. 06 11月, 2009 13 次提交
  3. 05 11月, 2009 5 次提交
  4. 04 11月, 2009 20 次提交