Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We still have wrappers, but nowhere near as scary as they used to be.
I'm not sure how necessary that flushw is now, TBH...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

The majority of this patch was created by the following script:

***
ASM=arch/sparc/include/asm
mkdir -p $ASM
git mv include/asm-sparc64/ftrace.h $ASM
git rm include/asm-sparc64/*
git mv include/asm-sparc/* $ASM
sed -ie 's/asm-sparc64/asm/g' $ASM/*
sed -ie 's/asm-sparc/asm/g' $ASM/*
***

The rest was an update of the top-level Makefile to use sparc
for header files when sparc64 is being build.
And a small fixlet to pick up the correct unistd.h from
sparc64 code.
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

Used the following script to copy the files:
cd include
set -e
SPARC64=`ls asm-sparc64`
for FILE in ${SPARC64}; do
	if [ -f asm-sparc/$FILE ]; then
		echo $FILE exist in asm-sparc
	else
		git mv asm-sparc64/$FILE asm-sparc/$FILE
		printf "#include <asm-sparc/$FILE>\n" > asm-sparc64/$FILE
		git add asm-sparc64/$FILE
	fi
done
Signed-off-by: NSam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>

arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c:504:17: warning: symbol 'sparc_do_fork' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c:655:5: warning: symbol 'dump_fpu' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/sparc64/kernel/process.c:708:16: warning: symbol 'sparc_execve' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>