1. 11 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  2. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
      makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
      
      By default all files without license information are under the default
      license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
      
      Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
      SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
      shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
      
      This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
      Philippe Ombredanne.
      
      How this work was done:
      
      Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
      the use cases:
       - file had no licensing information it it.
       - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
       - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
      
      Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
      where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
      had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
      
      The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
      a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
      output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
      tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
      base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
      
      The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
      assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
      results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
      to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
      immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
       - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
       - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
         lines of source
       - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
         lines).
      
      All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
      
      The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
      identifiers to apply.
      
       - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
         considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
         COPYING file license applied.
      
         For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0                                              11139
      
         and resulted in the first patch in this series.
      
         If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
         Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930
      
         and resulted in the second patch in this series.
      
       - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
         of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
         any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
         it (per prior point).  Results summary:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
         GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
         LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
         GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
         ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
         LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
         LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1
      
         and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
      
       - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
         the concluded license(s).
      
       - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
         license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
         licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
      
       - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
         resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
         which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
      
       - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
         confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
       - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
         the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
         in time.
      
      In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
      spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
      source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
      by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
      FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
      disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
      Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
      they are related.
      
      Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
      for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
      files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
      in about 15000 files.
      
      In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
      copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
      correct identifier.
      
      Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
      inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
      version early this week with:
       - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
         license ids and scores
       - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
         files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
       - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
         was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
         SPDX license was correct
      
      This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
      worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
      different types of files to be modified.
      
      These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
      parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
      format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
      based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
      distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
      comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
      generate the patches.
      Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318
  3. 14 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 21 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 09 5月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      nfs: per-name sillyunlink exclusion · 884be175
      Al Viro 提交于
      use d_alloc_parallel() for sillyunlink/lookup exclusion and
      explicit rwsem (nfs_rmdir() being a writer and nfs_call_unlink() -
      a reader) for rmdir/sillyunlink one.
      
      That ought to make lookup/readdir/!O_CREAT atomic_open really
      parallel on NFS.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      884be175
  6. 03 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 18 3月, 2014 3 次提交
  9. 29 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 22 8月, 2013 2 次提交
  13. 05 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Don't allow NFS silly-renamed files to be deleted, no signal · 5a7a613a
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Commit 73ca1001 broke the code that prevents the client from deleting
      a silly renamed dentry.  This affected "delete on last close"
      semantics as after that commit, nothing prevented removal of
      silly-renamed files.  As a result, a process holding a file open
      could easily get an ESTALE on the file in a directory where some
      other process issued 'rm -rf some_dir_containing_the_file' twice.
      Before the commit, any attempt at unlinking silly renamed files would
      fail inside may_delete() with -EBUSY because of the
      DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED flag.  The following testcase demonstrates
      the problem:
        tail -f /nfsmnt/dir/file &
        rm -rf /nfsmnt/dir
        rm -rf /nfsmnt/dir
        # second removal does not fail, 'tail' process receives ESTALE
      
      The problem with the above commit is that it unhashes the old and
      new dentries from the lookup path, even in the normal case when
      a signal is not encountered and it would have been safe to call
      d_move.  Unfortunately the old dentry has the special
      DCACHE_NFSFS_RENAMED flag set on it.  Unhashing has the
      side-effect that future lookups call d_alloc(), allocating a new
      dentry without the special flag for any silly-renamed files.  As a
      result, subsequent calls to unlink silly renamed files do not fail
      but allow the removal to go through.  This will result in ESTALE
      errors for any other process doing operations on the file.
      
      To fix this, go back to using d_move on success.
      For the signal case, it's unclear what we may safely do beyond d_drop.
      Reported-by: NDave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      5a7a613a
  15. 18 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 01 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • W
      NFS: add nfs_sb_deactive_async to avoid deadlock · 324d003b
      Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
      Use nfs_sb_deactive_async instead of nfs_sb_deactive when in a workqueue
      context.  This avoids a deadlock where rpc_shutdown_client loops forever
      in a workqueue kworker context, trying to kill all RPC tasks associated with
      the client, while one or more of these tasks have already been assigned to the
      same kworker (and will never run rpc_exit_task).
      
      This approach is needed because RPC tasks that have already been assigned
      to a kworker by queue_work cannot be canceled, as explained in the comment
      for workqueue.c:insert_wq_barrier.
      Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
      [Trond: add module_get/put.]
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      324d003b
  18. 29 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 21 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  20. 12 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • T
      NFS: Fix a number of sparse warnings · 17280175
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Fix a number of "warning: symbol 'foo' was not declared. Should it be
      static?" conditions.
      
      Fix 2 cases of "warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer"
      
      fs/nfs/delegation.c:263:31: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer
        - We want to allow upgrades to a WRITE delegation, but should otherwise
          consider servers that hand out duplicate delegations to be borken.
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      17280175
  21. 01 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  22. 20 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  23. 26 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      nfs: don't use d_move in nfs_async_rename_done · 73ca1001
      Jeff Layton 提交于
      If the task that initiated the sillyrename ends up being killed by a
      fatal signal, then it will eventually return back to userspace and end
      up releasing the i_mutex. d_move however needs to be done while holding
      the i_mutex.
      
      Instead of using d_move here, just unhash the old and new dentries to
      prevent them from being found by lookups. With this change though, the
      dentries are now incorrect post-rename and do not reflect the actual
      name of the file on the server. I'm proceeding under the assumption
      that since they are unhashed that this isn't really a problem.
      
      In order for the sillydelete to still work though, the dname must be
      copied earlier when setting up the sillydelete info, and the name must
      be recopied if the sillydelete info has to be moved to a new dentry.
      Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      73ca1001
  24. 16 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  25. 17 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • A
      nfs: store devname at disconnected NFS roots · b1942c5f
      Al Viro 提交于
      part 2: make sure that disconnected roots have corresponding mnt_devname
      values stashed into them.
      
      Have nfs*_get_root() stuff a copy of devname into ->d_fsdata of the
      found root, provided that it is disconnected.
      
      Have ->d_release() free it when dentry goes away.
      
      Have the places where NFS uses ->d_fsdata for sillyrename (and that
      can *never* happen to a disconnected root - dentry will be attached
      to its parent) free old devname copies if they find those.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      b1942c5f
  26. 11 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      SUNRPC: Close a race in __rpc_wait_for_completion_task() · bf294b41
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      Although they run as rpciod background tasks, under normal operation
      (i.e. no SIGKILL), functions like nfs_sillyrename(), nfs4_proc_unlck()
      and nfs4_do_close() want to be fully synchronous. This means that when we
      exit, we want all references to the rpc_task to be gone, and we want
      any dentry references etc. held by that task to be released.
      
      For this reason these functions call __rpc_wait_for_completion_task(),
      followed by rpc_put_task() in the expectation that the latter will be
      releasing the last reference to the rpc_task, and thus ensuring that the
      callback_ops->rpc_release() has been called synchronously.
      
      This patch fixes a race which exists due to the fact that
      rpciod calls rpc_complete_task() (in order to wake up the callers of
      __rpc_wait_for_completion_task()) and then subsequently calls
      rpc_put_task() without ensuring that these two steps are done atomically.
      
      In order to avoid adding new spin locks, the patch uses the existing
      waitqueue spin lock to order the rpc_task reference count releases between
      the waiting process and rpciod.
      The common case where nobody is waiting for completion is optimised for by
      checking if the RPC_TASK_ASYNC flag is cleared and/or if the rpc_task
      reference count is 1: in those cases we drop trying to grab the spin lock,
      and immediately free up the rpc_task.
      
      Those few processes that need to put the rpc_task from inside an
      asynchronous context and that do not care about ordering are given a new
      helper: rpc_put_task_async().
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
      bf294b41
  27. 07 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  28. 22 12月, 2010 1 次提交
  29. 29 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  30. 24 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  31. 22 9月, 2010 1 次提交
  32. 18 9月, 2010 2 次提交
  33. 23 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  34. 15 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  35. 07 12月, 2009 1 次提交