1. 07 9月, 2017 2 次提交
    • N
      SUNRPC: remove some dead code. · f1ecbc21
      NeilBrown 提交于
      RPC_TASK_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT is set when cl_noretranstimeo
      is set, which happens when  RPC_CLNT_CREATE_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT is set,
      which happens when NFS_CS_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT is set.
      
      This flag means "don't resend on a timeout, only resend if the
      connection gets broken for some reason".
      
      cl_discrtry is set when RPC_CLNT_CREATE_DISCRTRY is set, which
      happens when NFS_CS_DISCRTRY is set.
      
      This flag means "always disconnect before resending".
      
      NFS_CS_NO_RETRANS_TIMEOUT and NFS_CS_DISCRTRY are both only set
      in nfs4_init_client(), and it always sets both.
      
      So we will never have a situation where only one of the flags is set.
      So this code, which tests if timeout retransmits are allowed, and
      disconnection is required, will never run.
      
      So it makes sense to remove this code as it cannot be tested and
      could confuse people reading the code (like me).
      
      (alternately we could leave it there with a comment saying
       it is never actually used).
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      f1ecbc21
    • N
      NFS: don't expect errors from mempool_alloc(). · 237f8306
      NeilBrown 提交于
      Commit fbe77c30 ("NFS: move rw_mode to nfs_pageio_header")
      reintroduced some pointless code that commit 518662e0 ("NFS: fix
      usage of mempools.") had recently removed.
      
      Remove it again.
      
      Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      237f8306
  2. 06 9月, 2017 2 次提交
    • C
      xprtrdma: Use xprt_pin_rqst in rpcrdma_reply_handler · 9590d083
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      Adopt the use of xprt_pin_rqst to eliminate contention between
      Call-side users of rb_lock and the use of rb_lock in
      rpcrdma_reply_handler.
      
      This replaces the mechanism introduced in 431af645 ("xprtrdma:
      Fix client lock-up after application signal fires").
      
      Use recv_lock to quickly find the completing rqst, pin it, then
      drop the lock. At that point invalidation and pull-up of the Reply
      XDR can be done. Both are often expensive operations.
      
      Finally, take recv_lock again to signal completion to the RPC
      layer. It also protects adjustment of "cwnd".
      
      This greatly reduces the amount of time a lock is held by the
      reply handler. Comparing lock_stat results shows a marked decrease
      in contention on rb_lock and recv_lock.
      Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      [trond.myklebust@primarydata.com: Remove call to rpcrdma_buffer_put() from
         the "out_norqst:" path in rpcrdma_reply_handler.]
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      9590d083
    • T
      Merge tag 'nfs-rdma-for-4.14-1' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/anna/linux-nfs into linux-next · f9773b22
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      NFS-over-RDMA client updates for Linux 4.14
      
      Bugfixes and cleanups:
      - Constify rpc_xprt_ops
      - Harden RPC call encoding and decoding
      - Clean up rpc call decoding to use xdr_streams
      - Remove unused variables from various structures
      - Refactor code to remove imul instructions
      - Rearrange rx_stats structure for better cacheline sharing
      f9773b22
  3. 23 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 21 8月, 2017 4 次提交
    • T
      Merge branch 'bugfixes' · 7af7a596
      Trond Myklebust 提交于
      7af7a596
    • C
      NFS: Fix NFSv2 security settings · 53a75f22
      Chuck Lever 提交于
      For a while now any NFSv2 mount where sec= is specified uses
      AUTH_NULL. If sec= is not specified, the mount uses AUTH_UNIX.
      Commit e68fd7c8 ("mount: use sec= that was specified on the
      command line") attempted to address a very similar problem with
      NFSv3, and should have fixed this too, but it has a bug.
      
      The MNTv1 MNT procedure does not return a list of security flavors,
      so our client makes up a list containing just AUTH_NULL. This should
      enable nfs_verify_authflavors() to assign the sec= specified flavor,
      but instead, it incorrectly sets it to AUTH_NULL.
      
      I expect this would also be a problem for any NFSv3 server whose
      MNTv3 MNT procedure returned a security flavor list containing only
      AUTH_NULL.
      
      Fixes: e68fd7c8 ("mount: use sec= that was specified on ... ")
      BugLink: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      53a75f22
    • N
      NFSv4.1: don't use machine credentials for CLOSE when using 'sec=sys' · b79e87e0
      NeilBrown 提交于
      An NFSv4.1 client might close a file after the user who opened it has
      logged off.  In this case the user's credentials may no longer be
      valid, if they are e.g. kerberos credentials that have expired.
      
      NFSv4.1 has a mechanism to allow the client to use machine credentials
      to close a file.  However due to a short-coming in the RFC, a CLOSE
      with those credentials may not be possible if the file in question
      isn't exported to the same security flavor - the required PUTFH must
      be rejected when this is the case.
      
      Specifically if a server and client support kerberos in general and
      have used it to form a machine credential, but the file is only
      exported to "sec=sys", a PUTFH with the machine credentials will fail,
      so CLOSE is not possible.
      
      As RPC_AUTH_UNIX (used by sec=sys) credentials can never expire, there
      is no value in using the machine credential in place of them.
      So in that case, just use the users credentials for CLOSE etc, as you would
      in NFSv4.0
      Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      b79e87e0
    • N
      SUNRPC: ECONNREFUSED should cause a rebind. · fd01b259
      NeilBrown 提交于
      If you
       - mount and NFSv3 filesystem
       - do some file locking which requires the server
         to make a GRANT call back
       - unmount
       - mount again and do the same locking
      
      then the second attempt at locking suffers a 30 second delay.
      Unmounting and remounting causes lockd to stop and restart,
      which causes it to bind to a new port.
      The server still thinks the old port is valid and gets ECONNREFUSED
      when trying to contact it.
      ECONNREFUSED should be seen as a hard error that is not worth
      retrying.  Rebinding is the only reasonable response.
      
      This patch forces a rebind if that makes sense.
      Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
      fd01b259
  5. 20 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  6. 19 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 17 8月, 2017 4 次提交
  8. 16 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 15 8月, 2017 21 次提交