This patch ensures that the memory passed from parse_setup_data() is
large enough to cover the complete data structure. That means that the
conditional mapping in parse_e820_ext() can go.

While here, I also attempt not to map two pages if the address is not
aligned to a page boundary.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NDirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>
Cc: sodaville@linutronix.de
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
LKML-Reference: <1298405266-1624-2-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

This prevents allocation of the last 2MB before 4GB.

The experiment described here shows Windows 7 ignoring the last 1MB:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23542#c27

This patch ignores the top 2MB instead of just 1MB because H. Peter Anvin
says "There will be ROM at the top of the 32-bit address space; it's a fact
of the architecture, and on at least older systems it was common to have a
shadow 1 MiB below."
Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

memblock_memory_size() will return memory size in memblock.memory.region.
memblock_free_memory_size() will return free memory size in memblock.memory.region.

So We can get exact reseved size in specified range.

Set the size right after initmem_init(), because later bootmem API will
get area above 16M. (except some fallback).

Later after we remove the bootmem, We could call that just before paging_init().
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

and some functions in e820.c that are not used anymore
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
   replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
   so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
   -- corruption_check and mptable_update

-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
    Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
    that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
    memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
    memblock.memory.region array.
    and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
    So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
    To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
    in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
    memblock.reserved already..
    use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
    active_region for 32bit does include high pages
    need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline
Suggested-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

This patch adds support for S3 memory integrity protection within an Intel(R)
TXT launched kernel, for all kernel and userspace memory.  All RAM used by the
kernel and userspace, as indicated by memory ranges of type E820_RAM and
E820_RESERVED_KERN in the e820 table, will be integrity protected.

The MAINTAINERS file is also updated to reflect the maintainers of the
TXT-related code.

All MACing is done in tboot, based on a complexity analysis and tradeoff.

v3: Compared with v2, this patch adds a check of array size in
tboot.c, and a note to specify which c/s of tboot supports this kind
of MACing in intel_txt.txt.
Signed-off-by: NShane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <4B973DDA.6050902@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

This makes the range reservation feature available to other
architectures.

-v2: add get_max_mapped, max_pfn_mapped only defined in x86...
     to fix PPC compiling
-v3: according to hpa, add CONFIG_HAVE_EARLY_RES
-v4: fix typo about EARLY_RES in config
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4B7B5723.4070009@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Makes early_res.c more clean, so later could move it to /kernel.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-23-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

... to make e820.c smaller.

-v2: fix 32bit compiling with MAX_DMA32_PFN
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1265793639-15071-21-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Finally we can use early_res to replace bootmem for x86_64 now.

Still can use CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM to enable it or not.

-v2: fix 32bit compiling about MAX_DMA32_PFN
-v3: folded bug fix from LKML message below
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4B747239.4070907@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

The semantics the PAT code expect of is_untracked_pat_range() is "is
this range completely contained inside the untracked region."  This
means that checkin 8a271389 was
technically wrong, because the implementation needlessly confusing.

The sane interface is for it to take a semiclosed range like just
about everything else (as evidenced by the sheer number of "- 1"'s
removed by that patch) so change the actual implementation to match.
Reported-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>

Change is_ISA_range() from a macro to an inline function.  This makes
it type safe, and also allows it to be assigned to a function pointer
if necessary.
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>

memory_setup is overridden by x86_quirks and by paravirts with weak
functions and quirks. Unify the whole mess and make it an
unconditional x86_init_ops function which defaults to the standard
function and can be overridden by the early platform code.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Impact: cleanup

This fixed various signedness issues in setup.c and e820.c:
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53:    expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:455:53:    got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53:    expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:639:53:    got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54:    expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:820:54:    got unsigned int extern [toplevel] *<noident>

arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different signedness)
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53:    expected int *pnr_map
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c:670:53:    got unsigned int [toplevel] *<noident>
Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>

fix the following 'make headers_check' warning:

  usr/include/asm/e820.h:44: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h>
Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>

Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:

a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

so could let BAR res register at first, or even pnp.

v2: insert e820 reserve resources before pnp_system_init
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Add support for the E820_UNUSABLE memory type, which is defined in
Revision 3.0b (Oct.  10, 2006) of the ACPI Specification on p.  394 Table
14-1:

  AddressRangeUnusuable This range of address contains memory in which
  errors have been detected.  This range must not be used by the OSPM.
Signed-off-by: NJoseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NShane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

This patch is the result of an automatic script that consolidates the
format of all the headers in include/asm-x86/.

The format:

1. No leading underscore. Names with leading underscores are reserved.
2. Pathname components are separated by two underscores. So we can
   distinguish between mm_types.h and mm/types.h.
3. Everything except letters and numbers are turned into single
   underscores.
Signed-off-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh <jaswinder@infradead.org>

it's separate functionality that deserves its own file.

This also prepares 32-bit memtest support.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

asm-x86/e820.h is included from userspace.  'x86: make e820.c to have
common functions' (b79cd8f1) broke it:

	make -C Documentation/lguest
	cc -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -O3 -I../../include
lguest.c  -lz -o lguest
	In file included from ../../include/asm-x86/bootparam.h:8,
	                 from lguest.c:45:
	../../include/asm/e820.h:66: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
	../../include/asm/e820.h:67: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
	../../include/asm/e820.h:68: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘start’
	../../include/asm/e820.h:72: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’
or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e820_update_range’
	...
Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

when more than 4g memory is installed, don't map the big hole below 4g.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

When system have 4g less ram installed, and acpi table sit
near end of ram, make max_pfn cover them too,
so 64bit kernel don't need to mess up fixmap.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

This patch uses the /sys/firmware/memmap interface provided in the last patch
on the x86 architecture when E820 is used. The patch copies the E820
memory map very early, and registers the E820 map afterwards via
firmware_map_add_early().
Signed-off-by: NBernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Acked-by: NGreg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Acked-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org
Cc: yhlu.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

so it has a more meaningful name.
also change it to static.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

e820_search_gap also take a end_addr parameter to limit search from
start_addr to end_addr.
Signed-off-by: NAloK N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Ying Huang would like setup_data to be reserved, but not included in the
no save range.

Here we try to modify the e820 table to reserve that range early.
also add that in early_res in case bootloader messes up with the ramdisk.

other solution would be
1. add early_res_to_highmem...
2. early_res_to_e820...
but they could reserve another type memory wrongly, if early_res has some
resource reserved early, and not needed later, but it is not removed from
early_res in time. Like the RAMDISK (already handled).
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org
Tested-by: NHuang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

This is a preparatory patch for the next patch in series.
Moves some code from e820_setup_gap to a new function e820_search_gap.
This patch is a part of a bug fix where we walk the ACPI table to calculate
a gap for PCI optional devices.

v1->v2: Patch on top of tip/master.
	Fixes a bug introduced in the last patch about the typeof "last".
	Also the new function e820_search_gap now returns if we found a gap in
	e820_map.
Signed-off-by: NAlok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Add support for overlapping early memory reservations.

In general, they still can't overlap, and will panic
with "Overlapping early reservations" if they do overlap.

But if a memory range is reserved with the new call:
    reserve_early_overlap_ok()
rather than with the usual call:
    reserve_early()
then subsequent early reservations are allowed to overlap.

This new reserve_early_overlap_ok() call is only used in one
place so far, which is the "BIOS reserved" reservation for the
the EBDA region, which out of Paranoia reserves more than what
the BIOS might have specified, and which thus might overlap with
another legitimate early memory reservation (such as, perhaps,
the EFI memmap.)
Signed-off-by: NPaul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jack Steiner" <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: "Mike Travis" <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: "Huang
Cc: Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

... so could add real hole in e820

agp check is using request_mem_region, and could fail if e820 is reserved...
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1. let 64bit support 88 and e801 too
2. introduce default_machine_specific_memory_setup, and reuse it
   for voyager

v2: fix 64 bit compiling
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

... and kill e820_32/64.c and e820_32/64.h
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

and make 32-bit resource registration more like 64 bit.

also move probe_roms back to setup_32.c
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Because of the size limits of struct boot_params (zero page), the
maximum number of E820 memory map entries can be passed to kernel is
128. As pointed by Paul Jackson, there is some machine produced by SGI
with so many nodes that the number of E820 memory map entries is more
than 128. To enabling Linux kernel on these system, a new setup data
type named SETUP_E820_EXT is defined to pass additional memory map
entries to Linux kernel.

This patch is based on x86/auto-latest branch of git-x86 tree and has
been tested on x86_64 and i386 platform.
Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

use early_node_map to init high pages, so we can remove page_is_ram() and
page_is_reserved_early() in the big loop with add_one_highpage

also remove page_is_reserved_early(), it is not needed anymore.

v2: fix the build of other platforms
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

rename update_memory_range to e820_update_range
rename add_memory_region to e820_add_region

to make it more clear that they are about e820 map operations.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

since we now have 32-bit support for e820_register_active_regions(),
we can merge the parsing of the mem=/memmap= boot parameters.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>