Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 5月, 2009 7 次提交
  3. 27 5月, 2009 4 次提交
  5. 23 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  7. 11 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • Y
      x86: mtrr: Fix high_width computation when phys-addr is >= 44bit · 917a0153
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      found one system where cpu address line is 44bits, mtrr printout
is not right:

 [    0.000000] MTRR variable ranges enabled:
 [    0.000000]   0 base 0   00000000 mask FF0 00000000 write-back
 [    0.000000]   1 base 10  00000000 mask FFF 80000000 write-back
 [    0.000000]   2 base 0   80000000 mask FFF 80000000 uncachable
 [    0.000000]   3 base 0   7F800000 mask FFF FF800000 uncachable

Li Zefan and Frederic pointed out the high_width could be -4 some how.

It turns out when phys_addr is 44bit, size_or_mask will be
ffffffff,00000000 so ffs(size_or_mask) will be 0.

Try to check low 32 bit, to get correct high_width.
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kerne.org>
Also-analyzed-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Also-analyzed-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Zhaolei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4A026540.8060504@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      917a0153
  9. 08 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: MCE: make cmci_discover_lock irq-safe · e5299926
      由 Hidetoshi Seto 提交于 
      Lockdep reports the warning below when Li tries to offline one cpu:

[  110.835487] =================================
[  110.835616] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[  110.835688] 2.6.30-rc4-00336-g8c9ed899 #52
[  110.835757] ---------------------------------
[  110.835828] inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
[  110.835908] swapper/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
[  110.835982]  (cmci_discover_lock){?.+...}, at: [<ffffffff80236dc0>] cmci_clear+0x30/0x9b

cmci_clear() can be called via smp_call_function_single().

It is better to disable interrupt while holding cmci_discover_lock,
to turn it into an irq-safe lock - we can deadlock otherwise.

[ Impact: fix possible deadlock in the MCE code ]
Reported-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NHidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4A03ED38.8000700@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Reported-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com>
      e5299926
  11. 05 5月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      x86: show number of core_siblings instead of thread_siblings in /proc/cpuinfo · 35d11680
      由 Andreas Herrmann 提交于 
      Commit 7ad728f9
(cpumask: x86: convert cpu_sibling_map/cpu_core_map to cpumask_var_t)
changed the output of /proc/cpuinfo for siblings:

Example on an AMD Phenom:

  physical id   : 0
  siblings : 1
  core id	   : 3
  cpu cores  : 4

Before that commit it was:

  physical id	: 0
  siblings : 4
  core id	   : 3
  cpu cores  : 4

Instead of cpu_core_mask it now uses cpu_sibling_mask to count siblings.
This is due to the following hunk of above commit:

|  --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
|  +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
|  @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinf
|          if (c->x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
|                  seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
|                  seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
|  -                          cpus_weight(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu)));
|  +                          cpumask_weight(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)));
|                  seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
|                  seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
|                  seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);

This was a mistake, because the impact line shows that this side-effect
was not anticipated:

   Impact: reduce per-cpu size for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y

So revert the respective hunk to restore the old behavior.

[ Impact: fix sibling-info regression in /proc/cpuinfo ]
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
LKML-Reference: <20090504182859.GA29045@alberich.amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      35d11680
  13. 02 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  15. 23 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  17. 20 4月, 2009 4 次提交
    • T
      acpi-cpufreq: Do not let get_measured perf depend on internal variable · d876dfbb
      由 Thomas Renninger 提交于 
      Take already available policy->cpuinfo.max_freq and get rid of acpi-cpufreq
specific max_freq variable.

This implies that P0 is always the highest frequency which should always
be true as ACPI spec says:
As a result, the zeroth entry describes the highest performance state
Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Acked-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d876dfbb
    • T
      acpi-cpufreq: style-only: add parens to math expression · d91758f5
      由 Thomas Renninger 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      d91758f5
    • T
      acpi-cpufreq: Cleanup: Use printk_once · e0e8c4e5
      由 Thomas Renninger 提交于 
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      e0e8c4e5
    • P
      x86, acpi_cpufreq: Fix the NULL pointer dereference in get_measured_perf · 093f13e2
      由 Pallipadi, Venkatesh 提交于 
      Fix for a regression that was introduced by earlier commit
18b2646f on Mon Apr 6 11:26:08 2009

Regression resulted in the below error happened on systems with
software coordination where per_cpu acpi data will not be initiated for
secondary CPUs in a P-state domain.

On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:01 -0700, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
 My machine hanged with kernel 2.6.30-rc2 when script read
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor.
>
> opps happens in get_measured_perf:
>
>         cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
>                                 per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)->saved_aperf;
>
> Because per_cpu(drv_data, cpu)=NULL.
>
> So function get_measured_perf should check if (per_cpu(drv_data,
> cpu)==NULL)
> and return 0 if it's NULL.

--------------sys log------------------

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
0000000000000020
IP: [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
PGD a7dd88067 PUD a7ccf5067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
CPU 0
Modules linked in: video output
Pid: 2091, comm: kondemand/0 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc2 #1 MP Server
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8021af75>]  [<ffffffff8021af75>]
get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
RSP: 0018:ffff880a7d56de20  EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000046241a42b6 RCX: ffff88004d219000
RDX: 000000000000b660 RSI: 0000000000000020 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff880a7f052000 R08: 00000046241a42b6 R09: ffffffff807639f0
R10: 00000000ffffffea R11: ffffffff802207f4 R12: ffff880a7f052000
R13: ffff88004d20e460 R14: 0000000000ddd5a6 R15: 0000000000000001
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004d200000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000000000020 CR3: 0000000a7f1bf000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kondemand/0 (pid: 2091, threadinfo ffff880a7d56c000, task
ffff880a7d4d18c0)
Stack:
 ffff880a7f052078 ffffffff803efd54 00000046241a42b6 000000462ffa9e95
 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 00000000ffffffea ffffffff8064f41a
 0000000000000012 0000000000000012 ffff880a7f052000 ffffffff80650547
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff803efd54>] ? kobject_get+0x12/0x17
 [<ffffffff8064f41a>] ? __cpufreq_driver_getavg+0x42/0x57
 [<ffffffff80650547>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x147/0x272
 [<ffffffff80650400>] ? do_dbs_timer+0x0/0x272
 [<ffffffff802474ca>] ? worker_thread+0x15b/0x1f5
 [<ffffffff8024a02c>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
 [<ffffffff8024736f>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x1f5
 [<ffffffff80249f0d>] ? kthread+0x54/0x83
 [<ffffffff8020c87a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff80249eb9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x83
 [<ffffffff8020c870>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Code: 99 a6 03 00 31 c9 85 c0 0f 85 c3 00 00 00 89 df 4c 8b 44 24 10 48
c7 c2 60 b6 00 00 48 8b 0c fd e0 30 a5 80 4c 89 c3 48 8b 04 0a <48> 2b
58 20 48 8b 44 24 18 48 89 1c 24 48 8b 34 0a 48 2b 46 28
RIP  [<ffffffff8021af75>] get_measured_perf+0x4a/0xf9
 RSP <ffff880a7d56de20>
CR2: 0000000000000020
---[ end trace 2b8fac9a49e19ad4 ]---
Tested-by: N"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
      093f13e2
  19. 15 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • L
      acpi-cpufreq: fix 'smp_call_function_many()' confusion · ea34f43a
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      It turns out that 'smp_call_function_many()' doesn't work at all like
'smp_call_function_single()', and my change to Andrew's patch to use it
rather than a loop over all CPU's acpi-cpufreq doesn't work.

My bad.

'smp_call_function_many()' has two "features" (aka "documented bugs"):

 (a) it needs to be called with preemption disabled, because it uses
     smp_processor_id() without guarding the CPU lookup with 'get_cpu()'
     and 'put_cpu()' like the 'single' variant does.

 (b) even if the current CPU is part of the CPU mask, it won't do the
     call on that CPU.

Still, we're better off trying to use 'smp_call_function_many()' than
looping over CPU's, since it at least in theory allows us to use a
broadcast IPI and do it all in parallel.  So let's just work around the
silly semantic bugs in that function.
Reported-and-tested-by: NAli Gholami Rudi <ali@rudi.ir>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ea34f43a
  21. 14 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  23. 09 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 08 4月, 2009 3 次提交
  27. 07 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 04 4月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      x86, mtrr: remove debug message · c5c67c7c
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      The MTRR code grew a new debug message which triggers commonly:

[   40.142276]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg00 base=0000000000 size=0000080000 write-back
[   40.142280]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg01 base=0000080000 size=0000040000 write-back
[   40.142284]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg02 base=0000100000 size=0000040000 write-back
[   40.142311]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg00 base=0000000000 size=0000080000 write-back
[   40.142314]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg01 base=0000080000 size=0000040000 write-back
[   40.142317]   get_mtrr: cpu0 reg02 base=0000100000 size=0000040000 write-back

Remove this annoyance.
Reported-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      c5c67c7c
  31. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner · 99b76233
      由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于 
      Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
in module refcount underflow.

We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
and ->data.

But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
some thoughts.

->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
protection.

rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
We definitely don't want such modular code.

Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.

So, let's nuke it.

Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
      99b76233
  33. 28 3月, 2009 2 次提交
  35. 23 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  37. 18 3月, 2009 3 次提交
  39. 17 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  41. 16 3月, 2009 1 次提交