- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Olsa 提交于
The only way to get the event ID is by reading the event fd, followed by parsing the ID value out of the returned data. While this is ok for current read format used by perf tool, it is not ok when we use PERF_FORMAT_GROUP format. With this format the data are returned for the whole group and there's no way to find out what ID belongs to our fd (if we are not group leader event). Adding a simple ioctl that returns event primary ID for given fd. Signed-off-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Acked-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-v1bn5cto707jn0bon34afqr1@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
For modern CPUs, perf clock is directly related to TSC. TSC can be calculated from perf clock and vice versa using a simple calculation. Two of the three componenets of that calculation are already exported in struct perf_event_mmap_page. This patch exports the third. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372425741-1676-3-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Adrian Hunter 提交于
The capabilities bits must not be "union'ed" together. Put them in a separate struct. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372425741-1676-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于
Due to a discussion with Adrian I had a good look at the perf_event_type record layout and found the documentation to be somewhat unclear. Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130716150907.GL23818@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.netSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 19 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
Haswell has two additional LBR from flags for TSX: in_tx and abort_tx, implemented as a new "v4" version of the LBR format. Handle those in and adjust the sign extension code to still correctly extend. The flags are exported similarly in the LBR record to the existing misprediction flag Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.jf.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1371515812-9646-6-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 08 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephane Eranian 提交于
This small patch fixes a mistake in the comments for the PERF_MEM_LVL_* events. The L2, L3 bits simply represent cache levels, not hits or misses. That is encoded in PERF_MEM_LVL_MISS/PERF_MEM_LVL_HIT. Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: jolsa@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130405144941.GA30503@quadSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 01 4月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stephane Eranian 提交于
Type of mapping was lost and made it hard for a tool to distinguish code vs. data mmaps. Perf has the ability to distinguish the two. Use a bit in the header->misc bitmask to keep track of the mmap type. If PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA is set then the mapping is not executable (!VM_EXEC). If not set, then the mapping is executable. Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jolsa@redhat.com Cc: namhyung.kim@lge.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359040242-8269-16-git-send-email-eranian@google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
由 Stephane Eranian 提交于
This patch adds PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC. PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC collects the data source, i.e., where did the data associated with the sampled instruction come from. Information is stored in a perf_mem_data_src structure. It contains opcode, mem level, tlb, snoop, lock information, subject to availability in hardware. Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jolsa@redhat.com Cc: namhyung.kim@lge.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359040242-8269-8-git-send-email-eranian@google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
For some events it's useful to weight sample with a hardware provided number. This expresses how expensive the action the sample represent was. This allows the profiler to scale the samples to be more informative to the programmer. There is already the period which is used similarly, but it means something different, so I chose to not overload it. Instead a new sample type for WEIGHT is added. Can be used for multiple things. Initially it is used for TSX abort costs and profiling by memory latencies (so to make expensive load appear higher up in the histograms). The concept is quite generic and can be extended to many other kinds of events or architectures, as long as the hardware provides suitable auxillary values. In principle it could be also used for software tracepoints. This adds the generic glue. A new optional sample format for a 64-bit weight value. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: peterz@infradead.org Cc: acme@redhat.com Cc: jolsa@redhat.com Cc: namhyung.kim@lge.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359040242-8269-5-git-send-email-eranian@google.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vince Weaver 提交于
While trying to write a perf_event/mmap test for my perf_event test-suite I came across a missing field description in the PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE documentation in perf_event.h Signed-off-by: NVince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.02.1301081439300.24507@vincent-weaver-1.um.maine.eduSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
-
- 13 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Acked-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
-