ACPI can be used to enumerate PNP devices, but the code does not
handle this in the right way currently.  Namely, if an ACPI device
object
 1. Has a _CRS method,
 2. Has an identification of
    "three capital characters followed by four hex digits",
 3. Is not in the excluded IDs list,
it will be enumerated to PNP bus (that is, a PNP device object will
be create for it).  This means that, actually, the PNP bus type is
used as the default bus type for enumerating _HID devices in ACPI.

However, more and more _HID devices need to be enumerated to the
platform bus instead (that is, platform device objects need to be
created for them).  As a result, the device ID list in acpi_platform.c
is used to enforce creating platform device objects rather than PNP
device objects for matching devices.  That list has been continuously
growing recently, unfortunately, and it is pretty much guaranteed to
grow even more in the future.

To address that problem it is better to enumerate _HID devices
as platform devices by default.  To this end, change the way of
enumerating PNP devices by adding a PNP ACPI scan handler that
will use a device ID list to create PNP devices for the ACPI
device objects whose device IDs are present in that list.

The initial device ID list in the PNP ACPI scan handler contains
all of the pnp_device_id strings from all the existing PNP drivers,
so this change should be transparent to the PNP core and all of the
PNP drivers.  Still, in the future it should be possible to reduce
its size by converting PNP drivers that need not be PNP for any
technical reasons into platform drivers.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[rjw: Rewrote the changelog, modified the PNP ACPI scan handler code]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to
use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary.  That is needed
for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular.

This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices
during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.)
if that isn't necessary.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is
acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core,
simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the
ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to
acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to
the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h.  Modify the
definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is
an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of
struct acpi_hp_work accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost()
everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug
_OST is supported unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions
of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock
operations using register_hotplug_dock_device().

That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI
dock operations to be dropped in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock
operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to
struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that
callback if available.  Also rename the existing .event() callback
in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible
confusion in the future.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Use device name "LNXSYBUS:xx" instead  of "device.xx" for ACPI objects
\_SB and \_TZ.

BTW, the original check of "handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT" in statment
"else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT)"
is always false because of the code at the begin of that block.
                if (handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
                        acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SYSTEM_HID);
                        break;
                }
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since we already know what the device's PNP IDs are when
acpi_device_is_battery() is called, it is not necessary to run
acpi_get_object_info() for the device in that function.  Instead, if
acpi_device_is_battery() is passed a pointer to a struct acpi_device
object, it can use the list of PNP IDs from that object, so make that
happen and modify the function's header accordingly
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan
before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock
device objects.  Then, it registers a notify handler for each of
them for handling dock events.

However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront.  They
very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase
of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI
drivers to ACPI device objects.  Then, the dependent devices can be
added to the in the second phase.  That makes it possible to drop
the extra namespace scan, so do it.

Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all
of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may
be dispatched from the global notify handler for them.  Do that and
drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb()
and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more.

Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the
ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects
and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea,
because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway.
For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI
device objects representing dock stations and the container scan
handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup
operations on a device object representing a physical device after
it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or
before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(),
respectively.  If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the
given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there
are executed for these purposes.  However, an analogous mechanism will
be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding
struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers.

For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct
acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify()
right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI
comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling
acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively.

To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their
.attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the
ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the
scan handler at hand.

This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all
devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all
hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to
the same function for all hotplug devices.

This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device
hotplug code.  Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does
significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler,
or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices
had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed
before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any
more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler()
can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

To avoid the need to install a hotplug notify handler for each ACPI
namespace node representing a device and having a matching scan
handler, move the check whether or not the ejection of the given
device is enabled through its scan handler from acpi_hotplug_notify_cb()
to acpi_generic_hotplug_event().  Also, move the execution of
ACPI_OST_SC_EJECT_IN_PROGRESS _OST to acpi_generic_hotplug_event(),
because in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() or in acpi_eject_store() we really
don't know whether or not the eject is going to be in progress (for
example, acpi_hotplug_execute() may still fail without queuing up the
work item).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its
hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing
hotplug devices.  However, after recent changes causing struct
acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a
device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more.
Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI
handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and
hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a
result of a concurrent table unload).

In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty
release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to
acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that
function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn().  For this reason, it's
better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to
struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it
use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler.  At the same
time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new
.hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI
device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic
ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan
handlers.

This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the
ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device
hotplug consolidation possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock
protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of
the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to
by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the
acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference
of that pointer under get_device().  Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device()
runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn()
queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after
a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify().

An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device
pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before
it subsequent dereference in the "if" block.

To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function,
acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device()
except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned
by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex.  Then,
make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use
acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to
ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one
point.

In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper
around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device()
and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device()
too.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

When an eject request is sent to an ejected ACPI device, the following
panic occurs:

 ACPI: \_SB_.SCK3.CPU3: ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST event
 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070
 IP: [<ffffffff813a7cfe>] acpi_device_hotplug+0x10b/0x33b
	:
 Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff813a24da>] acpi_hotplug_work_fn+0x1c/0x27
 [<ffffffff8109cbe5>] process_one_work+0x175/0x430
 [<ffffffff8109d7db>] worker_thread+0x11b/0x3a0

This is becase device->handler is NULL in acpi_device_hotplug().
This case was used to fail in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as the target
had no acpi_deivce.  However, acpi_device now exists after ejection.

Added a check to verify if acpi_device->handler is valid for an
eject request in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb().  Note that handler passed
from an argument is still valid while acpi_device->handler is NULL.

Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace)
Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Drivers should not bind to struct acpi_device objects that
acpi_bus_trim() has been called for, so make that function
clear flags.match_driver for those objects.

If that is not done, an ACPI driver may theoretically try to operate
a device that is not physically present.

Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

An ACPI enumerated device may have its compatible id strings.

To support the compatible ACPI ids (acpi_device->pnp.ids),
we introduced acpi_driver_match_device() to match
the driver->acpi_match_table and acpi_device->pnp.ids.

For those drivers, MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx) is used to
exports the driver module alias in the format of
"acpi:device_compatible_ids".
But in the mean time, the current code does not export the
ACPI compatible strings as part of the module_alias for the
ACPI enumerated devices, which will break the module autoloading.

Take the following piece of code for example,
static const struct acpi_device_id xxx_acpi_match[] = {
        { "INTABCD", 0 },
        { }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xxx_acpi_match);

If this piece of code is used in a platform driver for
an ACPI enumerated platform device, the platform driver module_alias
is "acpi:INTABCD", but the uevent attribute of its platform device node
is "platform:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:platform_device->name).
If this piece of code is used in an i2c driver for an ACPI enumerated
i2c device, the i2c driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but
the uevent of its i2c device node is "i2c:INTABCD:00" (PREFIX:i2c_client->name).
If this piece of code is used in an spi driver for an ACPI enumerated
spi device, the spi driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but
the uevent of its spi device node is "spi:INTABCD" (PREFIX:spi_device->modalias).

The reason why the module autoloading is not broken for now is that
the uevent file of the ACPI device node is "acpi:INTABCD".
Thus it is the ACPI device node creation that loads the platform/i2c/spi driver.

So this is a problem that will affect us the day when the ACPI bus
is removed from device model.

This patch introduces two new APIs,
one for exporting ACPI ids in uevent MODALIAS field,
and another for exporting ACPI ids in device' modalias sysfs attribute.

For any bus that supports ACPI enumerated devices, it needs to invoke
these two functions for their uevent and modalias attribute.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Currently, create_modalias() handles the output truncated case in
an improper way (return -EINVAL).
Plus, acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show() do
improper check for the create_modalias() return value as well.

This patch fixes create_modalias() to
return -EINVAL if there is an output error,
return -ENOMEM if the output is truncated,
and also fixes both acpi_device_uevent() and acpi_device_modalias_show()
to do proper return value check.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch adds a "status" attribute for an ACPI device. This status
attribute shows the value of the _STA object. The _STA object returns
current status of an ACPI device: enabled, disabled, functioning,
present.
Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[rjw: Subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

ACPI container devices require special hotplug handling, at least
on some systems, since generally user space needs to carry out
system-specific cleanup before it makes sense to offline devices in
the container.  However, the current ACPI hotplug code for containers
first attempts to offline devices in the container and only then it
notifies user space of the container offline.

Moreover, after commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device
objects for all device nodes in the namespace), ACPI device objects
representing containers are present as long as the ACPI namespace
nodes corresponding to them are present, which may be forever, even
if the container devices are physically detached from the system (the
return values of the corresponding _STA methods change in those
cases, but generally the namespace nodes themselves are still there).
Thus it is useful to introduce entities representing containers that
will go away during container hot-unplug.

The goal of this change is to address both the above issues.

The idea is to create a "companion" container system device for each
of the ACPI container device objects during the initial namespace
scan or on a hotplug event making the container present.  That system
device will be unregistered on container removal.  A new bus type
for container devices is added for this purpose, because device
offline and online operations need to be defined for them.  The
online operation is a trivial function that is always successful
and the offline uses a callback pointed to by the container device's
offline member.

For ACPI containers that callback simply walks the list of ACPI
device objects right below the container object (its children) and
checks if all of their physical companion devices are offline.  If
that's not the case, it returns -EBUSY and the container system
devivce cannot be put offline.  Consequently, to put the container
system device offline, it is necessary to put all of the physical
devices depending on its ACPI companion object offline beforehand.

Container system devices created for ACPI container objects are
initially online.  They are created by the container ACPI scan
handler whose hotplug.demand_offline flag is set.  That causes
acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if the companion container system
device is offline before attempting to remove an ACPI container or
any devices below it.  If the check fails, a KOBJ_CHANGE uevent is
emitted for the container system device in question and user space
is expected to offline all devices below the container and the
container itself in response to it.  Then, user space can finalize
the removal of the container with the help of its ACPI device
object's eject attribute in sysfs.
Tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if
set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause
acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical
companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that
is not the case.

That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on
some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup
operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified
of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline
devices in the container.  In those cases the current implementation
of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries
to offline the devices in the container and only if that is
suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself.  As a result,
the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space
at the right time.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
<acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
necessary.

First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
should not be included directly from any files that are built for
CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds.  For CONFIG_ACPI set,
<linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.

Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
have to be met.  Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
latter depends on are always there.  And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds.  That also is taken care of including
<linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rework acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_device_attach(), which is
renamed as acpi_bus_attach(), to walk the list of each device
object's children directly and call themselves recursively for
each child instead of using acpi_walk_namespace().  This
simplifies the code quite a bit and avoids the overhead of
callbacks and the ACPICA's internal processing which are not
really necessary for these two routines.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field
of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number,
acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible
horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable.  Having done
that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The generic ACPI hotplug code used for several types of device
doesn't handle surprise removals, mostly because those devices
currently cannot be removed by surprise in the majority of systems.
However, surprise removals should be handled by that code as well
as surprise additions of devices, so make it do that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the
container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks.

This way the core will not have to special-case containers and
the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container
is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable
for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan
handler to using the common hotplug code.

This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more
to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes
arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug
and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory.

Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Modify the common ACPI device hotplug code to always queue up the
same function, acpi_device_hotplug(), using acpi_hotplug_execute()
and make the PCI host bridge hotplug code use that function too for
device hot removal.

This allows some code duplication to be reduced and a race condition
where the relevant ACPI handle may become invalid between the
notification handler and the function queued up by it via
acpi_hotplug_execute() to be avoided.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If the scan handler for the given device has hotplug.enabled
unset, it doesn't really make sense to fail bus check and device
check notifications.

First, bus check may not have anything to do with the device it is
signaled for, but it may concern another device on the bus below
this one.  For this reason, bus check notifications should not be
failed if hotplug is disabled for the target device.

Second, device check notifications are signaled only after a device
has already appeared (or disappeared), so failing it can only prevent
scan handlers and drivers from attaching to that (already existing)
device, which is not very useful.

Consequently, if device hotplug is disabled through the device's
scan handler, fail eject request notifications only.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct
acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device,
processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace
node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA.

There are multiple reasons to do that.  First of all, it avoids
quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are
deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again
by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the
namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time
(which always is the case on a vast majority of systems).

Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace
nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may
be added to the system.  It will also allow user space to evaluate
_SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing"
devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs
attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be
useful for thermal management on some systems).

Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among
subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information
in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way.

Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the
deletion of ACPI namespace nodes.  Namely, namespace nodes may be
deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK.
If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered
right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback
via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that
callback may be stale when the callback actually runs.  One way
to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers
to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in
question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI
handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(),
so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

If an ACPI namespace node is removed (usually, as a result of a
table unload), and there is a data object attached to that node,
acpi_ns_delete_node() executes the removal handler submitted to
acpi_attach_data() for that object.  That handler is currently empty
for struct acpi_device objects, so it is necessary to detach those
objects from the corresponding ACPI namespace nodes in advance every
time a table unload may happen.  That is cumbersome and inefficient
and leads to some design constraints that turn out to be quite
inconvenient (in particular, struct acpi_device objects cannot be
registered for namespace nodes representing devices that are not
reported as present or functional by _STA).

For this reason, introduce a non-empty removal handler for ACPI
device objects that will unregister them when their ACPI namespace
nodes go away.

This code modification alone should not change functionality except
for the ordering of the ACPI hotplug workqueue which should not
matter (without subsequent code changes).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler,
handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself.  Nevertheless, the ACPI
hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler,
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges.  This causes
acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported
error as hotplug.enabled is not set.

To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which
indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by
itself.  The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common
notify handler when this flag is set.
Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
[rjw: Changed the name of the new flag]
Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Before commit 6931007c (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers
after trying scan handlers) the match_driver flag for all devices
was set in acpi_add_single_object(), but now it is set by
acpi_bus_device_attach() which is not called for the "fixed"
devices added by acpi_bus_scan_fixed().  This means that
flags.match_driver is never set for those devices now, so make
acpi_bus_scan_fixed() set it before calling device_attach().

Fixes: 6931007c (ACPI / scan: Start matching drivers after trying scan handlers)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled,
the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the
root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef
(ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines).  However, that
check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject()
users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same
check by themselves before executing that function.

For this reason, remove the scan handler check from
acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work
again.

Fixes: a3b1b1ef (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines)
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

Since acpi_bus_get_device() returns a plain int and not acpi_status,
ACPI_FAILURE() should not be used for checking its return value.  Fix
that.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.

The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
the execution details.

The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().

Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.

For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
friendly to its users than any of the two.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

According to the ACPI spec (5.0, Section 6.3.5), the "Device
insertion in progress (pending)" (0x80) _OST status code is
reserved for the "Insertion Processing" (0x200) source event
which is "a result of an OSPM action".  Specifically, it is not
a notification, so that status code should not be used during
notification processing, which unfortunately is done by
acpi_scan_bus_device_check().

For this reason, drop the ACPI_OST_SC_INSERT_IN_PROGRESS _OST
status evaluation from there (it was a mistake to put it in there
in the first place).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>