ufs super block contains some statistic about file systems, like amount of
directories, free blocks, inodes and so on.

UFS1 hold this information in one location and uses 32bit integers for such
information, UFS2 hold statistic in another location and uses 64bit integers.

There is transition variant, if UFS1 has type 44BSD and flags field in super
block has some special value this mean that we work with statistic like UFS2
does.  and this also means that nobody care about old(UFS1) statistic.

So if start fsck against such file system, after usage linux ufs driver, it
found error: at now only UFS1 like statistic is updated.

This patch should fix this.  Also it contains some minor cleanup: CodingSytle
and remove unused variables.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Super block of UFS usually has size >512, because of fragment size may be 512,
this cause some problems.

Currently, there are two methods to work with ufs super block:

1) split structure which describes ufs super blocks into structures with
   size <=512

2) use one structure which describes ufs super block, and hope that array
   of "buffer_head" which holds "super block", has such construction:

	bh[n]->b_data + bh[n]->b_size == bh[n + 1]->b_data

The second variant may cause some problems in the future, and usage of two
variants cause unnecessary code duplication.

This patch remove the second variant.  Also patch contains some CodingStyle
fixes.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

The writing to UFS file system with block/fragment!=8 may cause bogus
behaviour.  The problem in "ufs_bitmap_search" function, which doesn't work
correctly in "block/fragment!=8" case.  The idea is stolen from BSD code.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

There are two ugly macros in ufs code:
#define UCPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)ucpi)
#define USPI_UBH ((struct ufs_buffer_head *)uspi)
when uspi looks like
struct {
struct ufs_buffer_head ;
}
and USPI_UBH has some sence,
ucpi looks like
struct {
struct not_ufs_buffer_head;
}

To prevent bugs in future, this patch convert macros to inline function and
fix "ucpi" structure.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Currently, ufs write support have two sets of problems: work with files and
work with directories.

This series of patches should solve the first problem.

This patch is similar to http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/17/61 this patch
complements it.

The situation the same: in ufs_trunc_(not direct), we read block, check if
count of links to it is equal to one, if so we finish cycle, if not
continue.  Because of "count of links" always >=2 this operation cause
infinite cycle and hang up the kernel.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Here is update of ufs cleanup patch, brought on by the recently fixed
ubh_get_usb_second() bug that made some ugly code rather painfully
obvious.  It also includes

 - fix compilation warnings which appears if debug mode turn on
 - remove unnecessary duplication of code to support UFS2

I tested it on ufs1 and ufs2 file-systems.
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

There's a lack of parenthesis in fs/ufs/utils.h, so instead of the 512th
byte of buffer, the usb2 pointer will point to the nth structure of type
ufs_super_block_second.

This can cause a mount-time oops if you're unlucky (especially with
DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, which is how Alexey Dobriyan saw this problem)
Signed-off-by: NEvgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Acked-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!