- 08 10月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Use assert_spin_locked() macro instead of hand-made BUG_ON statements. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474537439-18919-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Suggested-by: NHeiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When freeing permission events by fsnotify_destroy_event(), the warning WARN_ON(!list_empty(&event->list)); may falsely hit. This is because although fanotify_get_response() saw event->response set, there is nothing to make sure the current CPU also sees the removal of the event from the list. Add proper locking around the WARN_ON() to avoid the false warning. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-7-git-send-email-jack@suse.czReported-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
notification_mutex is used to protect the list of pending events. As such there's no reason to use a sleeping lock for it. Convert it to a spinlock. [jack@suse.cz: fixed version] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474031567-1831-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-5-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Tested-by: NGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify_flush_notify() and fanotify_release() destroy notification event while holding notification_mutex. The destruction of fanotify event includes a path_put() call which may end up calling into a filesystem to delete an inode if we happen to be the last holders of dentry reference which happens to be the last holder of inode reference. That in turn may violate lock ordering for some filesystems since notification_mutex is also acquired e. g. during write when generating fanotify event. Also this is the only thing that forces notification_mutex to be a sleeping lock. So drop notification_mutex before destroying a notification event. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-4-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fanotify_get_response() calls fsnotify_remove_event() when it finds that group is being released from fanotify_release() (bypass_perm is set). However the event it removes need not be only in the group's notification queue but it can have already moved to access_list (userspace read the event before closing the fanotify instance fd) which is protected by a different lock. Thus when fsnotify_remove_event() races with fanotify_release() operating on access_list, the list can get corrupted. Fix the problem by moving all the logic removing permission events from the lists to one place - fanotify_release(). Fixes: 5838d444 ("fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Tested-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Implement a function that can be called when a group is being shutdown to stop queueing new events to the group. Fanotify will use this. Fixes: 5838d444 ("fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473797711-14111-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 85816794 ("fanotify: Fix use after free for permission events") introduced a double free issue for permission events which are pending in group's notification queue while group is being destroyed. These events are freed from fanotify_handle_event() but they are not removed from groups notification queue and thus they get freed again from fsnotify_flush_notify(). Fix the problem by removing permission events from notification queue before freeing them if we skip processing access response. Also expand comments in fanotify_release() to explain group shutdown in detail. Fixes: 85816794Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NDouglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Tested-by: NDouglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Reported-by: NHeinrich Schuchard <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Rename fsnotify_add_notify_event() to fsnotify_add_event() since the "notify" part is duplicit. Rename fsnotify_remove_notify_event() and fsnotify_peek_notify_event() to fsnotify_remove_first_event() and fsnotify_peek_first_event() respectively since "notify" part is duplicit and they really look at the first event in the queue. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 25 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit 7053aee2 "fsnotify: do not share events between notification groups" used overflow event statically allocated in a group with the size of the generic notification event. This causes problems because some code looks at type specific parts of event structure and gets confused by a random data it sees there and causes crashes. Fix the problem by allocating overflow event with type corresponding to the group type so code cannot get confused. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
If the event queue overflows when we are handling permission event, we will never get response from userspace. So we must avoid waiting for it. Change fsnotify_add_notify_event() to return whether overflow has happened so that we can detect it in fanotify_handle_event() and act accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently we didn't initialize event's list head when we removed it from the event list. Thus a detection whether overflow event is already queued wasn't working. Fix it by always initializing the list head when deleting event from a list. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
The event returned from fsnotify_add_notify_event() cannot ever be used safely as the event may be freed by the time the function returns (after dropping notification_mutex). So change the prototype to just return whether the event was added or merged into some existing event. Reported-and-tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NDave Jones <davej@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 22 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently fsnotify framework creates one event structure for each notification event and links this event into all interested notification groups. This is done so that we save memory when several notification groups are interested in the event. However the need for event structure shared between inotify & fanotify bloats the event structure so the result is often higher memory consumption. Another problem is that fsnotify framework keeps path references with outstanding events so that fanotify can return open file descriptors with its events. This has the undesirable effect that filesystem cannot be unmounted while there are outstanding events - a regression for inotify compared to a situation before it was converted to fsnotify framework. For fanotify this problem is hard to avoid and users of fanotify should kind of expect this behavior when they ask for file descriptors from notified files. This patch changes fsnotify and its users to create separate event structure for each group. This allows for much simpler code (~400 lines removed by this patch) and also smaller event structures. For example on 64-bit system original struct fsnotify_event consumes 120 bytes, plus additional space for file name, additional 24 bytes for second and each subsequent group linking the event, and additional 32 bytes for each inotify group for private data. After the conversion inotify event consumes 48 bytes plus space for file name which is considerably less memory unless file names are long and there are several groups interested in the events (both of which are uncommon). Fanotify event fits in 56 bytes after the conversion (fanotify doesn't care about file names so its events don't have to have it allocated). A win unless there are four or more fanotify groups interested in the event. The conversion also solves the problem with unmount when only inotify is used as we don't have to grab path references for inotify events. [hughd@google.com: fanotify: fix corruption preventing startup] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify is supposed to support async signal notification when information is available on the inotify fd. This patch moves that support to generic fsnotify functions so it can be used by all notification mechanisms. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 19 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Buchbinder 提交于
"Asynchronous" is misspelled in some comments. No code changes. Signed-off-by: NAdam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 24 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 H Hartley Sweeten 提交于
Signed-off-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arun Sharma 提交于
This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h> (atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h> Signed-off-by: NArun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 13 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit 3bcf3860 (and the accompanying commit c1e5c954 "vfs/fsnotify: fsnotify_close can delay the final work in fput" that was a horribly ugly hack to make it work at all). The 'struct file' approach not only causes that disgusting hack, it somehow breaks pulseaudio, probably due to some other subtlety with f_count handling. Fix up various conflicts due to later fsnotify work. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 28 7月, 2010 14 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify almost works like so: user context calls fsnotify_* function with a struct file. fsnotify takes a reference on the struct path user context goes about it's buissiness at some later point in time the fsnotify listener gets the struct path fanotify listener calls dentry_open() to create a file which userspace can deal with listener drops the reference on the struct path at some later point the listener calls close() on it's new file With the switch from struct path to struct file this presents a problem for fput() and fsnotify_close(). fsnotify_close() is called when the filp has already reached 0 and __fput() wants to do it's cleanup. The solution presented here is a bit odd. If an event is created from a struct file we take a reference on the file. We check however if the f_count was already 0 and if so we take an EXTRA reference EVEN THOUGH IT WAS ZERO. In __fput() (where we know the f_count hit 0 once) we check if the f_count is non-zero and if so we drop that 'extra' ref and return without destroying the file. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Al explains that calling dentry_open() with a mnt/dentry pair is only garunteed to be safe if they are already used in an open struct file. To make sure this is the case don't store and use a struct path in fsnotify, always use a struct file. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Rather than the horrific void ** argument and such just to pass the fanotify_merge event back to the caller of fsnotify_add_notify_event() have those things return an event if it was different than the event suggusted to be added. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
It can be hard to debug fsnotify since there are so few printks. Use pr_debug to allow for dynamic debugging. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify was using char * when it passed around the d_name.name string internally but it is actually an unsigned char *. This patch switches fsnotify to use unsigned and should silence some pointer signess warnings which have popped out of xfs. I do not add -Wpointer-sign to the fsnotify code as there are still issues with kstrdup and strlen which would pop out needless warnings. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Each group can define their own notification (and secondary_q) merge function. Inotify does tail drop, fanotify does matching and drop which can actually allocate a completely new event. But for fanotify to properly deal with permissions events it needs to know the new event which was ultimately added to the notification queue. This patch just implements a void ** argument which is passed to the merge function. fanotify can use this field to pass the new event back to higher layers. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> for fanotify to properly deal with permissions events
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Pass the process identifiers of the triggering processes to fanotify listeners: this information is useful for event filtering and logging. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Some fsnotify operations send a struct file. This is more information than we technically need. We instead send a struct path in all cases instead of sometimes a path and sometimes a file. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify_replace_event need to lock both the old and the new event. This causes lockdep to get all pissed off since it dosn't know this is safe. It's safe in this case since the new event is impossible to be reached from other places in the kernel. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify would like to clone events already on its notification list, make changes to the new event, and then replace the old event on the list with the new event. This patch implements the replace functionality of that process. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify_clone_event will take an event, clone it, and return the cloned event to the caller. Since events may be in use by multiple fsnotify groups simultaneously certain event entries (such as the mask) cannot be changed after the event was created. Since fanotify would like to merge events happening on the same file it needs a new clean event to work with so it can change any fields it wishes. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify only wishes to merge a new event with the last event on the notification fifo. fanotify is willing to merge any events including by means of bitwise OR masks of multiple events together. This patch moves the inotify event merging logic out of the generic fsnotify notification.c and into the inotify code. This allows each use of fsnotify to provide their own merge functionality. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify event initialization is done entry by entry with almost everything set to either 0 or NULL. Use kmem_cache_zalloc and only initialize things that need non-zero initialization. Also means we don't have to change initialization entries based on the config options. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Currently fsnotify defines a static fsnotify event which is sent when a group overflows its allotted queue length. This patch just allocates that event from the event cache rather than defining it statically. There is no known reason that the current implementation is wrong, but this makes sure the event is initialized and created like any other. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 19 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
If we do rename a dir entry, like this: rename("/tmp/ino7UrgoJ.rename1", "/tmp/ino7UrgoJ.rename2") rename("/tmp/ino7UrgoJ.rename2", "/tmp/ino7UrgoJ") The duplicate events should be coalesced into a single event. But those two events do not be coalesced into a single event, due to some bad check in event_compare(). It can not match the two NULL inodes as the same event. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
In f44aebcc the tail drop logic of events with no file backing (q_overflow and in_ignored) was reversed so IN_IGNORED events would never be tail dropped. This now means that Q_OVERFLOW events are NOT tail dropped. The fix is to not tail drop IN_IGNORED, but to tail drop Q_OVERFLOW. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify decides if private data it passed to get added to an event was used by checking list_empty(). But it's possible that the event may have been dequeued and the private event removed so it would look empty. The fix is to use the return code from fsnotify_add_notify_event rather than looking at the list. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify can have a watchs removed under filesystem reclaim. ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 2.6.31-rc2 #16 --------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage. khubd/217 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: (iprune_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<c10ba899>] invalidate_inodes+0x20/0xe3 {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at: [<c10536ab>] __lock_acquire+0x2c9/0xac4 [<c1053f45>] lock_acquire+0x9f/0xc2 [<c1308872>] __mutex_lock_common+0x2d/0x323 [<c1308c00>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2e/0x36 [<c10ba6ff>] shrink_icache_memory+0x38/0x1b2 [<c108bfb6>] shrink_slab+0xe2/0x13c [<c108c3e1>] kswapd+0x3d1/0x55d [<c10449b5>] kthread+0x66/0x6b [<c1003fdf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff Two things are needed to fix this. First we need a method to tell fsnotify_create_event() to use GFP_NOFS and second we need to stop using one global IN_IGNORED event and allocate them one at a time. This solves current issues with multiple IN_IGNORED on a queue having tail drop problems and simplifies the allocations since we don't have to worry about two tasks opperating on the IGNORED event concurrently. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify drops new events when they are the same as the tail event on the queue to be sent to userspace. The problem is that if the event comes with a path we forget to break out of the switch statement and fall into the code path which matches on events that do not have any type of file backed information (things like IN_UNMOUNT and IN_Q_OVERFLOW). The problem is that this code thinks all such events should be dropped. Fix is to add a break. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify drops events if the last event on the queue is the same as the current event. But it does 2 things wrong. First it is comparing old->inode with new->inode. But after an event if put on the queue the ->inode is no longer allowed to be used. It's possible between the last event and this new event the inode could be reused and we would falsely match the inode's memory address between two differing events. The second problem is that when a file is removed fsnotify is passed the negative dentry for the removed object rather than the postive dentry from immediately before the removal. This mean the (broken) inotify tail drop code was matching the NULL ->inode of differing events. The fix is to check the file name which is stored with events when doing the tail drop instead of wrongly checking the address of the stored ->inode. Reported-by: NScott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify needs per group information attached to events. This patch allows groups to attach private information and implements a callback so that information can be freed when an event is being destroyed. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
As part of the standard inotify events it includes a correlation cookie between two dentry move operations. This patch includes the same behaviour in fsnotify events. It is needed so that inotify userspace can be implemented on top of fsnotify. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-