- 26 3月, 2018 31 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
The options alloc_start and subvolrootid are deprecated, comment them in the tokens list. And leave them as it is. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
As the commit mount option is unsigned so manage it as %u for token verifications, instead of %d. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
As check_int_print_mask mount option is unsigned so manage it as %u for token verifications, instead of %d. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
As metadata_ratio mount option is unsinged so manage it as %u for token verifications, instead of %d. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
The mount option thread_pool is always unsigned. Manage it that way all around. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
extent_buffer_uptodate() is a trivial wrapper around test_bit() and nothing else. So make it static and inline, save on code space and call indirection. Before: text data bss dec hex filename 1131257 82898 18992 1233147 12d0fb fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko After: text data bss dec hex filename 1131090 82898 18992 1232980 12d054 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass btrfs_trans_handle which contains a reference to the fs_info so use that. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass the btrfs_transaction which references fs_info so no need to pass the later as an argument. Also use the opportunity to shorten transaction->trans. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass the trans handle which has a reference to fs_info to create_pending_snapshot so we can refer to it directly. Doing this obviates the need to pass the fs_info to create_pending_snapshots as well. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already have the fs_info from the passed transaction so use it directly. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The only thing the passed root is used for is: 1. get a reference to the fs_info and to 2. call trace_btrfs_transaction_commit. We can achieve 1) by simply referring to the fs_info from passed trans object. As far as 2) is concerned cleanup_transaction is called from only one place and the 'root' argument passed is the one from the trans handle. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass a transaction handle which refrences the fs_info so we can grab it from there. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass the transaction handle which has a reference to the fs_info. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass the transaction which has a reference to the fs_info, so use that. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
We already pass the transaction handle, which contains a refrence to the fs_info so grab it from there. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaction so no point in passing it as a function argument. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It can be referenced from the passed transaciton so no point in passing it as function argument. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
All current callers of this function just get a reference to the trans->fs_info member and pass it as the second argument. Collapse this into the function itself. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction is essentially a wrapper of btrfs_write_and_wait_marked_extents with the addition of calling clear_btree_io_tree. Having the code split doesn't really bring any benefit. Open code the later into the former and add proper documentation header. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ reformat comment ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function is only ever used in __btrfs_end_transaction and btrfs_commit_transaction so there is no need to export it via header. Let's move it closer to where it's used, make it static and remove it from the header. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev_for_resume() initializes replace target device in a few simple steps, so do it at the parent function. Moreover, there isn't any other caller so just open code it. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Current u64 return from btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() was probably done to match the btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace_args::result. However as our actual return value fits in int, and it further gets typecast to u64, so just return int. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Remove __ which is for the special functions. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() calls __btrfs_dev_replace_cancel() for the actual cancel so just open code it. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Currently the function uses a hardcoded value for the checksum size of a sector. This is fine, given that we currently support only a single algorithm, whose checksum is 4 bytes == sizeof(u32). Despite not having other algorithms, btrfs' design supports using a different algorithm whith different space requirements. To future-proof the code query the size of the currently used algorithm from the in-memory copy of the super block. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
Add a missing void parameter to function btrfs_test_extent_map, fixes sparse warning: warning: non-ANSI function declaration of function 'btrfs_test_extent_map' Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
The check for a non-zero ret is redundant as the goto will jump to the very next statement anyway. Remove this extraneous code. Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1463784 ("Identical code for different branches") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Commit 0e8c36a9 ("Btrfs: fix lots of orphan inodes when the space is not enough") changed the way transaction reservation is made in btrfs_evict_node and as a result this function became unused. This has been the status quo for 5 years in which time no one noticed, so I'd say it's safe to assume it's unlikely it will ever be used again. Historical note: there were more attempts to remove the function, the reasoning was missing and only based on some static analysis tool reports. Other reason for rejection was that there seemed to be connection to BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT and that would need to be removeed to. This was not correct so removing the function is all we can do. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> [ add the note ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Howard McLauchlan 提交于
Presently, failing a primary super block write but succeeding in at least one super block write in general will appear to users as if nothing important went wrong. However, upon unmounting and re-mounting, the file system will be in a rolled back state. This was discovered with a BCC program that uses bpf_override_return() to fail super block writes. This patch outputs an error clarifying that the primary super block write has failed, so users can expect potentially erroneous behaviour. It also forces wait_dev_supers() to return an error to its caller if the primary super block write fails. Signed-off-by: NHoward McLauchlan <hmclauchlan@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This prints out eb->bflags since it contains some useful information, e.g. whether eb is dirty. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 16 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
This reverts commit 3c181c12. The offending patch was merged in 4.16-rc4 and was promptly applied to stable kernels 4.14.25 and 4.15.8. The patch causes a corruption in several superblock items on big-endian machines because of messed up endianity conversions. The damage is manually repairable. A filesystem cannot be mounted again after it has been unmounted once. We do a full revert and not a fixup so stable can pick that patch ASAP. Fixes: 3c181c12 ("btrfs: use proper endianness accessors for super_copy") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1521139304@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: NChristoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@manchmal.in-ulm.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Edmund Nadolski 提交于
This patch addresses an issue that causes fiemap to falsely report a shared extent. The test case is as follows: xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -b 16k 0 64k" -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5 sync xfs_io -c "fiemap -v" /media/scratch/file5 which gives the resulting output: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (121.359 MiB/sec and 7766.9903 ops/sec) /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x2001 /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 This is because btrfs_check_shared calls find_parent_nodes repeatedly in a loop, passing a share_check struct to report the count of shared extent. But btrfs_check_shared does not re-initialize the count value to zero for subsequent calls from the loop, resulting in a false share count value. This is a regressive behavior from 4.13. With proper re-initialization the test result is as follows: wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0 64 KiB, 4 ops; 0.0000 sec (110.035 MiB/sec and 7042.2535 ops/sec) /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 /media/scratch/file5: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..127]: 24576..24703 128 0x1 which corrects the regression. Fixes: 3ec4d323 ("btrfs: allow backref search checks for shared extents") Signed-off-by: NEdmund Nadolski <enadolski@suse.com> [ add text from cover letter to changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Dmitriy Gorokh 提交于
On detaching of a disk which is a part of a RAID6 filesystem, the following kernel OOPS may happen: [63122.680461] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.719584] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.719587] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.803516] BTRFS warning (device sdo): lost page write due to IO error on /dev/sdo [63122.803519] BTRFS error (device sdo): bdev /dev/sdo errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 1, corrupt 0, gen 0 [63122.863902] BTRFS critical (device sdo): fatal error on device /dev/sdo [63122.935338] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000080 [63122.946554] IP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63122.958185] PGD 9ecda067 P4D 9ecda067 PUD b2b37067 PMD 0 [63122.971202] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP [63123.006760] CPU: 0 PID: 3979 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G W 4.14.2-16-scst34x+ #8 [63123.007091] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS VirtualBox 12/01/2006 [63123.007402] Workqueue: btrfs-worker btrfs_worker_helper [btrfs] [63123.007595] task: ffff880036ea4040 task.stack: ffffc90006384000 [63123.007796] RIP: 0010:fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] [63123.007968] RSP: 0018:ffffc90006387ad8 EFLAGS: 00010287 [63123.008140] RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffff88004beaa0b8 RCX: ffff8800b2bd5690 [63123.008359] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88007bb43500 RDI: ffff88004beaa000 [63123.008621] RBP: ffffc90006387ae8 R08: 0000000099100000 R09: ffff8800b2bd5600 [63123.008840] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000010000 R12: ffff88007bb43500 [63123.009059] R13: 00000000fffffffb R14: ffff880036fc5180 R15: 0000000000000004 [63123.009278] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8800b7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [63123.009564] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [63123.009748] CR2: 0000000000000080 CR3: 00000000b0866000 CR4: 00000000000406f0 [63123.009969] Call Trace: [63123.010085] raid_write_end_io+0x7e/0x80 [btrfs] [63123.010251] bio_endio+0xa1/0x120 [63123.010378] generic_make_request+0x218/0x270 [63123.010921] submit_bio+0x66/0x130 [63123.011073] finish_rmw+0x3fc/0x5b0 [btrfs] [63123.011245] full_stripe_write+0x96/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.011428] raid56_parity_write+0x117/0x170 [btrfs] [63123.011604] btrfs_map_bio+0x2ec/0x320 [btrfs] [63123.011759] ? ___cache_free+0x1c5/0x300 [63123.011909] __btrfs_submit_bio_done+0x26/0x50 [btrfs] [63123.012087] run_one_async_done+0x9c/0xc0 [btrfs] [63123.012257] normal_work_helper+0x19e/0x300 [btrfs] [63123.012429] btrfs_worker_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] [63123.012656] process_one_work+0x14d/0x350 [63123.012888] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3a0 [63123.013026] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x15/0x20 [63123.013192] kthread+0x109/0x140 [63123.013315] ? process_scheduled_works+0x40/0x40 [63123.013472] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110 [63123.013610] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [63123.014469] RIP: fail_bio_stripe+0x58/0xa0 [btrfs] RSP: ffffc90006387ad8 [63123.014678] CR2: 0000000000000080 [63123.016590] ---[ end trace a295ea7259c17880 ]— This is reproducible in a cycle, where a series of writes is followed by SCSI device delete command. The test may take up to few minutes. Fixes: 74d46992 ("block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk pointer and partitions index") [ no signed-off-by provided ] Author: Dmitriy Gorokh <Dmitriy.Gorokh@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we have a file with 2 (or more) hard links in the same directory, remove one of the hard links, create a new file (or link an existing file) in the same directory with the name of the removed hard link, and then finally fsync the new file, we end up with a log that fails to replay, causing a mount failure. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ touch /mnt/testdir/foo $ ln /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar $ sync $ unlink /mnt/testdir/bar $ touch /mnt/testdir/bar $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/bar <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt mount: mount(2) failed: /mnt: No such file or directory When replaying the log, for that example, we also see the following in dmesg/syslog: [71813.671307] BTRFS info (device dm-0): failed to delete reference to bar, inode 258 parent 257 [71813.674204] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [71813.675694] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [71813.677236] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13231 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:4128 __btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs] [71813.679669] Modules linked in: btrfs xfs f2fs dm_flakey dm_mod dax ghash_clmulni_intel ppdev pcbc aesni_intel aes_x86_64 crypto_simd cryptd glue_helper evdev psmouse i2c_piix4 parport_pc i2c_core pcspkr sg serio_raw parport button sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod ata_generic sd_mod virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel floppy virtio e1000 scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs] [71813.679669] CPU: 1 PID: 13231 Comm: mount Tainted: G W 4.15.0-rc9-btrfs-next-56+ #1 [71813.679669] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.10.2-0-g5f4c7b1-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [71813.679669] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17b/0x355 [btrfs] [71813.679669] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001cef738 EFLAGS: 00010286 [71813.679669] RAX: 0000000000000025 RBX: ffff880217ce4708 RCX: 0000000000000001 [71813.679669] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81c14bae RDI: 00000000ffffffff [71813.679669] RBP: ffffc90001cef7c0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [71813.679669] R10: ffffc90001cef5e0 R11: ffffffff8343f007 R12: ffff880217d474c8 [71813.679669] R13: 00000000fffffffe R14: ffff88021ccf1548 R15: 0000000000000101 [71813.679669] FS: 00007f7cee84c480(0000) GS:ffff88023fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [71813.679669] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [71813.679669] CR2: 00007f7cedc1abf9 CR3: 00000002354b4003 CR4: 00000000001606e0 [71813.679669] Call Trace: [71813.679669] btrfs_unlink_inode+0x17/0x41 [btrfs] [71813.679669] drop_one_dir_item+0xfa/0x131 [btrfs] [71813.679669] add_inode_ref+0x71e/0x851 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71 [71813.679669] ? replay_one_buffer+0x53/0x53a [btrfs] [71813.679669] replay_one_buffer+0x4a4/0x53a [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3a/0x57 [71813.679669] ? __lock_is_held+0x39/0x71 [71813.679669] walk_up_log_tree+0x101/0x1d2 [btrfs] [71813.679669] walk_log_tree+0xad/0x188 [btrfs] [71813.679669] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1fa/0x31e [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? replay_one_extent+0x544/0x544 [btrfs] [71813.679669] open_ctree+0x1cf6/0x2209 [btrfs] [71813.679669] btrfs_mount_root+0x368/0x482 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2 [71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce [71813.679669] btrfs_mount+0x13e/0x772 [btrfs] [71813.679669] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14c/0x1a6 [71813.679669] ? __lockdep_init_map+0x176/0x1c2 [71813.679669] ? mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] mount_fs+0x64/0x10b [71813.679669] vfs_kern_mount+0x68/0xce [71813.679669] do_mount+0x6e5/0x973 [71813.679669] ? memdup_user+0x3e/0x5c [71813.679669] SyS_mount+0x72/0x98 [71813.679669] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0x8b [71813.679669] RIP: 0033:0x7f7cedf150ba [71813.679669] RSP: 002b:00007ffca71da688 EFLAGS: 00000206 [71813.679669] Code: 7f a0 e8 51 0c fd ff 48 8b 43 50 f0 0f ba a8 30 2c 00 00 02 72 17 41 83 fd fb 74 11 44 89 ee 48 c7 c7 7d 11 7f a0 e8 38 f5 8d e0 <0f> ff 44 89 e9 ba 20 10 00 00 eb 4d 48 8b 4d b0 48 8b 75 88 4c [71813.679669] ---[ end trace 83bd473fc5b4663b ]--- [71813.854764] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in __btrfs_unlink_inode:4128: errno=-2 No such entry [71813.886994] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_replay_log:2307: errno=-2 No such entry (Failed to recover log tree) [71813.903357] BTRFS error (device dm-0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30 [71814.128078] BTRFS error (device dm-0): open_ctree failed This happens because the log has inode reference items for both inode 258 (the first file we created) and inode 259 (the second file created), and when processing the reference item for inode 258, we replace the corresponding item in the subvolume tree (which has two names, "foo" and "bar") witht he one in the log (which only has one name, "foo") without removing the corresponding dir index keys from the parent directory. Later, when processing the inode reference item for inode 259, which has a name of "bar" associated to it, we notice that dir index entries exist for that name and for a different inode, so we attempt to unlink that name, which fails because the inode reference item for inode 258 no longer has the name "bar" associated to it, making a call to btrfs_unlink_inode() fail with a -ENOENT error. Fix this by unlinking all the names in an inode reference item from a subvolume tree that are not present in the inode reference item found in the log tree, before overwriting it with the item from the log tree. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If in the same transaction we rename a special file (fifo, character/block device or symbolic link), create a hard link for it having its old name then sync the log, we will end up with a log that can not be replayed and at when attempting to replay it, an EEXIST error is returned and mounting the filesystem fails. Example scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/testdir $ mkfifo /mnt/testdir/foo # Make sure everything done so far is durably persisted. $ sync # Create some unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to create a log # tree. The file must be in the same directory as our special file. $ touch /mnt/testdir/f1 $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/testdir/f1 # Rename our special file and then create a hard link with its old name. $ mv /mnt/testdir/foo /mnt/testdir/bar $ ln /mnt/testdir/bar /mnt/testdir/foo # Create some other unrelated file and fsync it, this is just to persist # the log tree which was modified by the previous rename and link # operations. Alternatively we could have modified file f1 and fsync it. $ touch /mnt/f2 $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/f2 <power failure> $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt mount: mount /dev/sdc on /mnt failed: File exists This happens because when both the log tree and the subvolume's tree have an entry in the directory "testdir" with the same name, that is, there is one key (258 INODE_REF 257) in the subvolume tree and another one in the log tree (where 258 is the inode number of our special file and 257 is the inode for directory "testdir"). Only the data of those two keys differs, in the subvolume tree the index field for inode reference has a value of 3 while the log tree it has a value of 5. Because the same key exists in both trees, but have different index, the log replay fails with an -EEXIST error when attempting to replay the inode reference from the log tree. Fix this by setting the last_unlink_trans field of the inode (our special file) to the current transaction id when a hard link is created, as this forces logging the parent directory inode, solving the conflict at log replay time. A new generic test case for fstests was also submitted. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When doing an incremental send of a filesystem with the no-holes feature enabled, we end up issuing a write operation when using the no data mode send flag, instead of issuing an update extent operation. Fix this by issuing the update extent operation instead. Trivial reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdc $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 32K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap1 $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 8K 8K" /mnt/sdc/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdc /mnt/sdc/snap2 $ btrfs send /mnt/sdc/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt/sdd $ btrfs send --no-data -p /mnt/sdc/snap1 /mnt/sdc/snap2 \ | btrfs receive -vv /mnt/sdd Before this change the output of the second receive command is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-fc6755918447... utimes write foobar, offset 8192, len 8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=f6922049-8c22-e544-9ff9-... After this change it is: receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... utimes update_extent foobar: offset=8192, len=8192 utimes foobar BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=564d36a3-ebc8-7343-aec9-bf6fda278e64... Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
The fs_info::super_copy is a byte copy of the on-disk structure and all members must use the accessor macros/functions to obtain the right value. This was missing in update_super_roots and in sysfs readers. Moving between opposite endianness hosts will report bogus numbers in sysfs, and mount may fail as the root will not be restored correctly. If the filesystem is always used on a same endian host, this will not be a problem. Fix this by using the btrfs_set_super...() functions to set fs_info::super_copy values, and for the sysfs, use the cached fs_info::nodesize/sectorsize values. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: df93589a ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs") Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Hans van Kranenburg 提交于
In case of using DUP, we search for enough unallocated disk space on a device to hold two stripes. The devices_info[ndevs-1].max_avail that holds the amount of unallocated space found is directly assigned to stripe_size, while it's actually twice the stripe size. Later on in the code, an unconditional division of stripe_size by dev_stripes corrects the value, but in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than half the amount of max_chunk_size. The unconditional division later tries to correct stripe_size, but will actually make sure we can't allocate more than half the max_chunk_size. Fix this by moving the division by dev_stripes before the max chunk size check, so it always contains the right value, instead of putting a duct tape division in further on to get it fixed again. Since in all other cases than DUP, dev_stripes is 1, this change only affects DUP. Other attempts in the past were made to fix this: * 37db63a4 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size check in chunk allocator" tried to fix the same problem, but still resulted in part of the code acting on a wrongly doubled stripe_size value. * 86db2578 "Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6" unintentionally broke this fix again. The real problem was already introduced with the rest of the code in 73c5de00. The user visible result however will be that the max chunk size for DUP will suddenly double, while it's actually acting according to the limits in the code again like it was 5 years ago. Reported-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg69752.html Fixes: 73c5de00 ("btrfs: quasi-round-robin for chunk allocation") Fixes: 86db2578 ("Btrfs: fix max chunk size on raid5/6") Signed-off-by: NHans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update comment ] Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Essentially duplicate the error handling from the above block which handles the !PageUptodate(page) case and additionally clear EXTENT_BOUNDARY. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-