After submitting a GO_IDLE bundle, one must wait for GR to effectively
be idle before submitting the next bundle. Failure to do so may result
in undefined behavior in some rare cases.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: NKary Jin <karyj@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Uncertain whether the GPC pack change is due to a newer driver version,
or a legitimate difference from GM204.  My GM204 has broken vram, so
can't currently try a newer binary driver on it to confirm.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

On some of these chipsets, reading NV_PGRAPH_GPC_GPM_PD_PES_TPC_ID_MASK
can trigger a PRI fault and return an error code instead of a TPC mask,
unless PGOB has been disabled first.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU
fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_,
which will be used for the DRM part of the driver.  This is being
done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a
given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the
DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt).

Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is
as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset
naming to ease collaboration with them.

A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes.
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>