1. 30 10月, 2019 5 次提交
    • E
      ext4: adjust reserved cluster count when removing extents · eb792dc6
      Eric Whitney 提交于
      commit 9fe671496b6c286f9033aedfc1718d67721da0ae upstream.
      
      Modify ext4_ext_remove_space() and the code it calls to correct the
      reserved cluster count for pending reservations (delayed allocated
      clusters shared with allocated blocks) when a block range is removed
      from the extent tree.  Pending reservations may be found for the clusters
      at the ends of written or unwritten extents when a block range is removed.
      If a physical cluster at the end of an extent is freed, it's necessary
      to increment the reserved cluster count to maintain correct accounting
      if the corresponding logical cluster is shared with at least one
      delayed and unwritten extent as found in the extents status tree.
      
      Add a new function, ext4_rereserve_cluster(), to reapply a reservation
      on a delayed allocated cluster sharing blocks with a freed allocated
      cluster.  To avoid ENOSPC on reservation, a flag is applied to
      ext4_free_blocks() to briefly defer updating the freeclusters counter
      when an allocated cluster is freed.  This prevents another thread
      from allocating the freed block before the reservation can be reapplied.
      
      Redefine the partial cluster object as a struct to carry more state
      information and to clarify the code using it.
      
      Adjust the conditional code structure in ext4_ext_remove_space to
      reduce the indentation level in the main body of the code to improve
      readability.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
      eb792dc6
    • E
      ext4: reduce reserved cluster count by number of allocated clusters · 39ad46f5
      Eric Whitney 提交于
      commit b6bf9171ef5c37b66d446378ba63af5339a56a97 upstream.
      
      Ext4 does not always reduce the reserved cluster count by the number
      of clusters allocated when mapping a delayed extent.  It sometimes
      adds back one or more clusters after allocation if delalloc blocks
      adjacent to the range allocated by ext4_ext_map_blocks() share the
      clusters newly allocated for that range.  However, this overcounts
      the number of clusters needed to satisfy future mapping requests
      (holding one or more reservations for clusters that have already been
      allocated) and premature ENOSPC and quota failures, etc., result.
      
      Ext4 also does not reduce the reserved cluster count when allocating
      clusters for non-delayed allocated writes that have previously been
      reserved for delayed writes.  This also results in overcounts.
      
      To make it possible to handle reserved cluster accounting for
      fallocated regions in the same manner as used for other non-delayed
      writes, do the reserved cluster accounting for them at the time of
      allocation.  In the current code, this is only done later when a
      delayed extent sharing the fallocated region is finally mapped.
      
      Address comment correcting handling of unsigned long long constant
      from Jan Kara's review of RFC version of this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
      39ad46f5
    • E
      ext4: fix reserved cluster accounting at delayed write time · b834eb8a
      Eric Whitney 提交于
      commit 0b02f4c0d6d9e2c611dfbdd4317193e9dca740e6 upstream.
      
      The code in ext4_da_map_blocks sometimes reserves space for more
      delayed allocated clusters than it should, resulting in premature
      ENOSPC, exceeded quota, and inaccurate free space reporting.
      
      Fix this by checking for written and unwritten blocks shared in the
      same cluster with the newly delayed allocated block.  A cluster
      reservation should not be made for a cluster for which physical space
      has already been allocated.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
      b834eb8a
    • E
      ext4: add new pending reservation mechanism · a7fecf4b
      Eric Whitney 提交于
      commit 1dc0aa46e74a3366e12f426b7caaca477853e9c3 upstream.
      
      Add new pending reservation mechanism to help manage reserved cluster
      accounting.  Its primary function is to avoid the need to read extents
      from the disk when invalidating pages as a result of a truncate, punch
      hole, or collapse range operation.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
      a7fecf4b
    • E
      ext4: generalize extents status tree search functions · 05cc8939
      Eric Whitney 提交于
      commit ad431025aecda85d3ebef5e4a3aca5c1c681d0c7 upstream.
      
      Ext4 contains a few functions that are used to search for delayed
      extents or blocks in the extents status tree.  Rather than duplicate
      code to add new functions to search for extents with different status
      values, such as written or a combination of delayed and unwritten,
      generalize the existing code to search for caller-specified extents
      status values.  Also, move this code into extents_status.c where it
      is better associated with the data structures it operates upon, and
      where it can be more readily used to implement new extents status tree
      functions that might want a broader scope for i_es_lock.
      
      Three missing static specifiers in RFC version of patch reported and
      fixed by Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>
      05cc8939
  2. 29 10月, 2019 35 次提交