1. 05 4月, 2014 5 次提交
  2. 03 4月, 2014 15 次提交
  3. 31 3月, 2014 5 次提交
  4. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • S
      ocfs2: check if cluster name exists before deref · d9060742
      Sasha Levin 提交于
      Commit c74a3bdd ("ocfs2: add clustername to cluster connection") is
      trying to strlcpy a string which was explicitly passed as NULL in the
      very same patch, triggering a NULL ptr deref.
      
        BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at           (null)
        IP: strlcpy (lib/string.c:388 lib/string.c:151)
        CPU: 19 PID: 19426 Comm: trinity-c19 Tainted: G        W     3.14.0-rc7-next-20140325-sasha-00014-g9476368-dirty #274
        RIP:  strlcpy (lib/string.c:388 lib/string.c:151)
        Call Trace:
         ocfs2_cluster_connect (fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c:350)
         ocfs2_cluster_connect_agnostic (fs/ocfs2/stackglue.c:396)
         user_dlm_register (fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/userdlm.c:679)
         dlmfs_mkdir (fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c:503)
         vfs_mkdir (fs/namei.c:3467)
         SyS_mkdirat (fs/namei.c:3488 fs/namei.c:3472)
         tracesys (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:749)
      
      akpm: this patch probably disables the feature.  A temporary thing to
      avoid triviel oopses.
      Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
      Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
      Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
      Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d9060742
  5. 28 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 26 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 23 3月, 2014 4 次提交
    • A
      rcuwalk: recheck mount_lock after mountpoint crossing attempts · b37199e6
      Al Viro 提交于
      We can get false negative from __lookup_mnt() if an unrelated vfsmount
      gets moved.  In that case legitimize_mnt() is guaranteed to fail,
      and we will fall back to non-RCU walk... unless we end up running
      into a hard error on a filesystem object we wouldn't have reached
      if not for that false negative.  IOW, delaying that check until
      the end of pathname resolution is wrong - we should recheck right
      after we attempt to cross the mountpoint.  We don't need to recheck
      unless we see d_mountpoint() being true - in that case even if
      we have just raced with mount/umount, we can simply go on as if
      we'd come at the moment when the sucker wasn't a mountpoint; if we
      run into a hard error as the result, it was a legitimate outcome.
      __lookup_mnt() returning NULL is different in that respect, since
      it might've happened due to operation on completely unrelated
      mountpoint.
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      b37199e6
    • A
      make prepend_name() work correctly when called with negative *buflen · e825196d
      Al Viro 提交于
      In all callchains leading to prepend_name(), the value left in *buflen
      is eventually discarded unused if prepend_name() has returned a negative.
      So we are free to do what prepend() does, and subtract from *buflen
      *before* checking for underflow (which turns into checking the sign
      of subtraction result, of course).
      
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      e825196d
    • E
      vfs: Don't let __fdget_pos() get FMODE_PATH files · 99aea681
      Eric Biggers 提交于
      Commit bd2a31d5 ("get rid of fget_light()") introduced the
      __fdget_pos() function, which returns the resulting file pointer and
      fdput flags combined in an 'unsigned long'.  However, it also changed the
      behavior to return files with FMODE_PATH set, which shouldn't happen
      because read(), write(), lseek(), etc. aren't allowed on such files.
      This commit restores the old behavior.
      
      This regression actually had no effect on read() and write() since
      FMODE_READ and FMODE_WRITE are not set on file descriptors opened with
      O_PATH, but it did cause lseek() on a file descriptor opened with O_PATH
      to fail with ESPIPE rather than EBADF.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      99aea681
    • E
      vfs: atomic f_pos access in llseek() · d7a15f8d
      Eric Biggers 提交于
      Commit 9c225f26 ("vfs: atomic f_pos accesses as per POSIX") changed
      several system calls to use fdget_pos() instead of fdget(), but missed
      sys_llseek().  Fix it.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      d7a15f8d
  8. 11 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 10 3月, 2014 3 次提交
    • A
      get rid of fget_light() · bd2a31d5
      Al Viro 提交于
      instead of returning the flags by reference, we can just have the
      low-level primitive return those in lower bits of unsigned long,
      with struct file * derived from the rest.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      bd2a31d5
    • L
      vfs: atomic f_pos accesses as per POSIX · 9c225f26
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Our write() system call has always been atomic in the sense that you get
      the expected thread-safe contiguous write, but we haven't actually
      guaranteed that concurrent writes are serialized wrt f_pos accesses, so
      threads (or processes) that share a file descriptor and use "write()"
      concurrently would quite likely overwrite each others data.
      
      This violates POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4 Section XSI 2.9.7 that says:
      
       "2.9.7 Thread Interactions with Regular File Operations
      
        All of the following functions shall be atomic with respect to each
        other in the effects specified in POSIX.1-2008 when they operate on
        regular files or symbolic links: [...]"
      
      and one of the effects is the file position update.
      
      This unprotected file position behavior is not new behavior, and nobody
      has ever cared.  Until now.  Yongzhi Pan reported unexpected behavior to
      Michael Kerrisk that was due to this.
      
      This resolves the issue with a f_pos-specific lock that is taken by
      read/write/lseek on file descriptors that may be shared across threads
      or processes.
      Reported-by: NYongzhi Pan <panyongzhi@gmail.com>
      Reported-by: NMichael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      9c225f26
    • A
      ocfs2 syncs the wrong range... · 1b56e989
      Al Viro 提交于
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      1b56e989
  10. 06 3月, 2014 2 次提交