Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 15 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 23 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • L
      drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core · ab78029e
      由 Linus Walleij 提交于 
      This makes the device core auto-grab the pinctrl handle and set
the "default" (PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT) state for every device
that is present in the device model right before probe. This will
account for the lion's share of embedded silicon devcies.

A modification of the semantics for pinctrl_get() is also done:
previously if the pinctrl handle for a certain device was already
taken, the pinctrl core would return an error. Now, since the
core may have already default-grabbed the handle and set its
state to "default", if the handle was already taken, this will
be disregarded and the located, previously instanitated handle
will be returned to the caller.

This way all code in drivers explicitly requesting their pinctrl
handlers will still be functional, and drivers that want to
explicitly retrieve and switch their handles can still do that.
But if the desired functionality is just boilerplate of this
type in the probe() function:

struct pinctrl  *p;

p = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&dev);
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
   if (PTR_ERR(p) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
        return -EPROBE_DEFER;
        dev_warn(&dev, "no pinctrl handle\n");
}

The discussion began with the addition of such boilerplate
to the omap4 keypad driver:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-input&m=135091157719300&w=2

A previous approach using notifiers was discussed:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135263661110528&w=2
This failed because it could not handle deferred probes.

This patch alone does not solve the entire dilemma faced:
whether code should be distributed into the drivers or
if it should be centralized to e.g. a PM domain. But it
solves the immediate issue of the addition of boilerplate
to a lot of drivers that just want to grab the default
state. As mentioned, they can later explicitly retrieve
the handle and set different states, and this could as
well be done by e.g. PM domains as it is only related
to a certain struct device * pointer.

ChangeLog v4->v5 (Stephen):
- Simplified the devicecore grab code.
- Deleted a piece of documentation recommending that pins
  be mapped to a device rather than hogged.
ChangeLog v3->v4 (Linus):
- Drop overzealous NULL checks.
- Move kref initialization to pinctrl_create().
- Seeking Tested-by from Stephen Warren so we do not disturb
  the Tegra platform.
- Seeking ACK on this from Greg (and others who like it) so I
  can merge it through the pinctrl subsystem.
ChangeLog v2->v3 (Linus):
- Abstain from using IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in the driver core,
  Russell recently sent a patch to remove it. Handle the
  NULL case explicitly even though it's a bogus case.
- Make sure we handle probe deferral correctly in the device
  core file. devm_kfree() the container on error so we don't
  waste memory for devices without pinctrl handles.
- Introduce reference counting into the pinctrl core using
  <linux/kref.h> so that we don't release pinctrl handles
  that have been obtained for two or more places.
ChangeLog v1->v2 (Linus):
- Only store a pointer in the device struct, and only allocate
  this if it's really used by the device.

Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Rickard Andersson <rickard.andersson@stericsson.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[swarren: fixed and simplified error-handling in pinctrl_bind_pins(), to
correctly handle deferred probe. Removed admonition from docs not to use
pinctrl hogs for devices]
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      ab78029e
  5. 21 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  7. 18 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 12 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 21 11月, 2012 3 次提交
  13. 12 11月, 2012 3 次提交
    • L
      gpiolib: separation of pin concerns · 1e63d7b9
      由 Linus Walleij 提交于 
      The fact that of_gpiochip_add_pin_range() and
gpiochip_add_pin_range() share too much code is fragile and
will invariably mean that bugs need to be fixed in two places
instead of one.

So separate the concerns of gpiolib.c and gpiolib-of.c and
have the latter call the former as back-end. This is necessary
also when going forward with other device descriptions such
as ACPI.

This is done by:

- Adding a return code to gpiochip_add_pin_range() so we can
  reliably check whether this succeeds.

- Get rid of the custom of_pinctrl_add_gpio_range() from
  pinctrl. Instead create of_pinctrl_get() to just retrive the
  pin controller per se from an OF node. This composite
  function was just begging to be deleted, it was way to
  purpose-specific.

- Use pinctrl_dev_get_name() to get the name of the retrieved
  pin controller and use that to call back into the generic
  gpiochip_add_pin_range().

Now the pin range is only allocated and tied to a pin
controller from the core implementation in gpiolib.c.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      1e63d7b9
    • S
      gpiolib: provide provision to register pin ranges · f23f1516
      由 Shiraz Hashim 提交于 
      pinctrl subsystem needs gpio chip base to prepare set of gpio
pin ranges, which a given pinctrl driver can handle. This is
important to handle pinctrl gpio request calls in order to
program a given pin properly for gpio operation.

As gpio base is allocated dynamically during gpiochip
registration, presently there exists no clean way to pass this
information to the pinctrl subsystem.

After few discussions from [1], it was concluded that may be
gpio controller reporting the pin range it supports, is a
better way than pinctrl subsystem directly registering it.

[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/184816

Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NShiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>
[Edited documentation a bit]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      f23f1516
    • V
      Revert "pinctrl: remove pinctrl_remove_gpio_range" · 7e10ee68
      由 Viresh Kumar 提交于 
      This reverts earlier commit which removed
pinctrl_remove_gpio_range(), because at that time there
weren't any more users of that routine. It was removed as the
removal of ranges was done in unregister of pinctrl.

But as we are now registering stuff from gpiolib, we may
remove and insert a gpio module multiple times. So, we
need this routine again.
Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      7e10ee68
  15. 03 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 01 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 03 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 17 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 04 7月, 2012 2 次提交
  25. 11 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 10 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 27 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  31. 25 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  33. 18 4月, 2012 6 次提交
  35. 11 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  37. 13 3月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      pinctrl: introduce generic pin config · 394349f7
      由 Linus Walleij 提交于 
      This is a split-off from the earlier patch set which adds generic
pin configuration for the pin controllers that want it. Since
we may have a system with mixed generic and custom pin controllers,
we pass a boolean in the pin controller ops vtable to indicate
if it is generic.

ChangeLog v1->v5:
- Follow parent patch versioning number system.
- Document the semantic meaning of return values from pin config
  get functions, so we can iterate over pins and check their
  properties from debugfs as part of the generic config code.
- Use proper cast functions in the generic debugfs pin config
  file.
- Expand generic config to optionally cover groups too.
ChangeLog v5->v6:
- Update to match underlying changes.
ChangeLog v6->v7:
- Drop DRIVE_OFF parameter, use bias high impedance for this
- Delete argument for drive modes push-pull, od and os. These
  are now just state transitions.
- Delete slew rate rising/falling due to discussions on on
  proper semantics
- Drop config wakeup, struct irq_chip does this for now, add
  back if need be.
- Set PIN_CONFIG_END to 0x7fff making room for custom config
  parameters from 0x8000 and up.
- Prefix accessor functions with pinconf_
      394349f7
  39. 07 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  41. 05 3月, 2012 3 次提交
    • S
      pinctrl: enhance mapping table to support pin config operations · 1e2082b5
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      The pinctrl mapping table can now contain entries to:
* Set the mux function of a pin group
* Apply a set of pin config options to a pin or a group

This allows pinctrl_select_state() to apply pin configs settings as well
as mux settings.

v3: Fix find_pinctrl() to iterate over the correct list.
   s/_MUX_CONFIGS_/_CONFIGS_/ in mapping table macros.
   Fix documentation to use correct mapping table macro.
v2: Added numerous extra PIN_MAP_*() special-case macros.
   Fixed kerneldoc typo. Delete pinctrl_get_pin_id() and
   replace it with pin_get_from_name(). Various minor fixes.
   Updates due to rebase.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      1e2082b5
    • S
      pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device · 6e5e959d
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      The API model is changed from:

p = pinctrl_get(dev, "state1");
pinctrl_enable(p);
...
pinctrl_disable(p);
pinctrl_put(p);
p = pinctrl_get(dev, "state2");
pinctrl_enable(p);
...
pinctrl_disable(p);
pinctrl_put(p);

to this:

p = pinctrl_get(dev);
s1 = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, "state1");
s2 = pinctrl_lookup_state(p, "state2");
pinctrl_select_state(p, s1);
...
pinctrl_select_state(p, s2);
...
pinctrl_put(p);

This allows devices to directly transition between states without
disabling the pin controller programming and put()/get()ing the
configuration data each time. This model will also better suit pinconf
programming, which doesn't have a concept of "disable".

The special-case hogging feature of pin controllers is re-written to use
the regular APIs instead of special-case code. Hence, the pinmux-hogs
debugfs file is removed; see the top-level pinctrl-handles files for
equivalent data.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: NDong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      6e5e959d
    • S
      pinctrl: fix and simplify locking · 57b676f9
      由 Stephen Warren 提交于 
      There are many problems with the current pinctrl locking:

struct pinctrl_dev's gpio_ranges_lock isn't effective;
pinctrl_match_gpio_range() only holds this lock while searching for a gpio
range, but the found range is return and manipulated after releading the
lock. This could allow pinctrl_remove_gpio_range() for that range while it
is in use, and the caller may very well delete the range after removing it,
causing pinctrl code to touch the now-free range object.

Solving this requires the introduction of a higher-level lock, at least
a lock per pin controller, which both gpio range registration and
pinctrl_get()/put() will acquire.

There is missing locking on HW programming; pin controllers may pack the
configuration for different pins/groups/config options/... into one
register, and hence have to read-modify-write the register. This needs to
be protected, but currently isn't. Related, a future change will add a
"complete" op to the pin controller drivers, the idea being that each
state's programming will be programmed into the pinctrl driver followed
by the "complete" call, which may e.g. flush a register cache to HW. For
this to work, it must not be possible to interleave the pinctrl driver
calls for different devices.

As above, solving this requires the introduction of a higher-level lock,
at least a lock per pin controller, which will be held for the duration
of any pinctrl_enable()/disable() call.

However, each pinctrl mapping table entry may affect a different pin
controller if necessary. Hence, with a per-pin-controller lock, almost
any pinctrl API may need to acquire multiple locks, one per controller.
To avoid deadlock, these would need to be acquired in the same order in
all cases. This is extremely difficult to implement in the case of
pinctrl_get(), which doesn't know which pin controllers to lock until it
has parsed the entire mapping table, since it contains somewhat arbitrary
data.

The simplest solution here is to introduce a single lock that covers all
pin controllers at once. This will be acquired by all pinctrl APIs.

This then makes struct pinctrl's mutex irrelevant, since that single lock
will always be held whenever this mutex is currently held.
Signed-off-by: NStephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      57b676f9
  43. 02 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  45. 01 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  47. 24 2月, 2012 1 次提交