Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 153
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 21 7月, 2016 3 次提交
    • T
      block: add QUEUE_FLAG_DAX for devices to advertise their DAX support · 163d4baa
      由 Toshi Kani 提交于 
      Currently, presence of direct_access() in block_device_operations
indicates support of DAX on its block device.  Because
block_device_operations is instantiated with 'const', this DAX
capablity may not be enabled conditinally.

In preparation for supporting DAX to device-mapper devices, add
QUEUE_FLAG_DAX to request_queue flags to advertise their DAX
support.  This will allow to set the DAX capability based on how
mapped device is composed.
Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Acked-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      163d4baa
    • J
      dm thin: fix a race condition between discarding and provisioning a block · 2a0fbffb
      由 Joe Thornber 提交于 
      The discard passdown was being issued after the block was unmapped,
which meant the block could be reprovisioned whilst the passdown discard
was still in flight.

We can only identify unshared blocks (safe to do a passdown a discard
to) once they're unmapped and their ref count hits zero.  Block ref
counts are now used to guard against concurrent allocation of these
blocks that are being discarded.  So now we unmap the block, issue
passdown discards, and the immediately increment ref counts for regions
that have been discarded via passed down (this is safe because
allocation occurs within the same thread).  We then decrement ref counts
once the passdown discard IO is complete -- signaling these blocks may
now be allocated.

This fixes the potential for corruption that was reported here:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2016-June/msg00311.htmlReported-by: NDennis Yang <dennisyang@qnap.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
      2a0fbffb
    • J
      dm btree: fix a bug in dm_btree_find_next_single() · e7e0f730
      由 Joe Thornber 提交于 
      dm_btree_find_next_single() can short-circuit the search for a block
with a return of -ENODATA if all entries are higher than the search key
passed to lower_bound().

This hasn't been a problem because of the way the btree has been used by
DM thinp.  But it must be fixed now in preparation for fixing the race
in DM thinp's handling of simultaneous block discard vs allocation.
Otherwise, once that fix is in place, some of the blocks in a discard
would not be unmapped as expected.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
      e7e0f730
  3. 19 7月, 2016 30 次提交
  5. 06 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 02 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 01 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  11. 17 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 15 6月, 2016 2 次提交