- 04 11月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_cleanup_after_idle() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This moves the smp_processor_id() from the caller to rcu_cleanup_after_idle(), saving argument-passing overhead. Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_prepare_for_idle() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This in turn allows two of the uses of "cpu" in this function to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr() and the third by smp_processor_id(), replacing that of the call to rcu_prepare_for_idle(). Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_needs_cpu() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This in turn allows the "cpu" argument to rcu_cpu_has_callbacks() to be removed, which allows the uses of "cpu" in both functions to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr(). Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The "cpu" argument to rcu_note_context_switch() is always the current CPU, so drop it. This in turn allows the "cpu" argument to rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() to be removed, which allows the sole use of "cpu" in both functions to be replaced with a this_cpu_ptr(). Again, the anticipated cross-CPU uses of these functions has been replaced by NO_HZ_FULL. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Because rcu_preempt_check_callbacks()'s argument is guaranteed to always be the current CPU, drop the argument and replace per_cpu() with __this_cpu_read(). Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
由 Christoph Lameter 提交于
For some functions in kernel/rcu/tree* the rdtp parameter is always this_cpu_ptr(rdtp). Remove the parameter if constant and calculate the pointer in function. This will have the advantage that it is obvious that the address are all per cpu offsets and thus it will enable the use of this_cpu_ops in the future. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> [ paulmck: Forward-ported to rcu/dev, whitespace adjustment. ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
-
- 30 10月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 35ce7f29 (rcu: Create rcuo kthreads only for onlined CPUs) contains checks for the case where CPUs are brought online out of order, re-wiring the rcuo leader-follower relationships as needed. Unfortunately, this rewiring was broken. This apparently went undetected due to the tendency of systems to bring CPUs online in order. This commit nevertheless fixes the rewiring. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
PREEMPT_RCU and TREE_PREEMPT_RCU serve the same function after TINY_PREEMPT_RCU has been removed. This patch removes TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and uses PREEMPT_RCU config option in its place. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Clark Williams 提交于
Rename CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_PRIO to CONFIG_RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO and use this value for both the per-CPU kthreads (rcuc/N) and the rcu boosting threads (rcub/n). Also, create the module_parameter rcutree.kthread_prio to be used on the kernel command line at boot to set a new value (rcutree.kthread_prio=N). Signed-off-by: NClark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com> [ paulmck: Ported to rcu/dev, applied Paul Bolle and Peter Zijlstra feedback. ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
There are some RCU_BOOST-specific per-CPU variable declarations that are needlessly defined under #ifdef in kernel/rcu/tree.c. This commit therefore moves these declarations into a pre-existing #ifdef in kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE Kconfig parameter causes preemptible RCU's CPU stall warnings to dump out any preempted tasks that are blocking the current RCU grace period. This information is useful, and the default has been CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE=y for some years. It is therefore time for this commit to remove this Kconfig parameter, so that future kernel builds will always act as if CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE=y. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 35ce7f29 (rcu: Create rcuo kthreads only for onlined CPUs) avoids creating rcuo kthreads for CPUs that never come online. This fixes a bug in many instances of firmware: Instead of lying about their age, these systems instead lie about the number of CPUs that they have. Before commit 35ce7f29, this could result in huge numbers of useless rcuo kthreads being created. It appears that experience indicates that I should have told the people suffering from this problem to fix their broken firmware, but I instead produced what turned out to be a partial fix. The missing piece supplied by this commit makes sure that rcu_barrier() knows not to post callbacks for no-CBs CPUs that have not yet come online, because otherwise rcu_barrier() will hang on systems having firmware that lies about the number of CPUs. It is tempting to simply have rcu_barrier() refuse to post a callback on any no-CBs CPU that does not have an rcuo kthread. This unfortunately does not work because rcu_barrier() is required to wait for all pending callbacks. It is therefore required to wait even for those callbacks that cannot possibly be invoked. Even if doing so hangs the system. Given that posting a callback to a no-CBs CPU that does not yet have an rcuo kthread can hang rcu_barrier(), It is tempting to report an error in this case. Unfortunately, this will result in false positives at boot time, when it is perfectly legal to post callbacks to the boot CPU before the scheduler has started, in other words, before it is legal to invoke rcu_barrier(). So this commit instead has rcu_barrier() avoid posting callbacks to CPUs having neither rcuo kthread nor pending callbacks, and has it complain bitterly if it finds CPUs having no rcuo kthread but some pending callbacks. And when rcu_barrier() does find CPUs having no rcuo kthread but pending callbacks, as noted earlier, it has no choice but to hang indefinitely. Reported-by: NYanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Reported-by: NJay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com> Reported-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Reported-by: NEric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NEric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com> Tested-by: NJay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com> Tested-by: NYanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com> Tested-by: NKevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> Tested-by: NMeelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
-
- 19 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, the expedited grace-period primitives do get_online_cpus(). This greatly simplifies their implementation, but means that calls to them holding locks that are acquired by CPU-hotplug notifiers (to say nothing of calls to these primitives from CPU-hotplug notifiers) can deadlock. But this is starting to become inconvenient, as can be seen here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/5/754. The problem in this case is that some developers need to acquire a mutex from a CPU-hotplug notifier, but also need to hold it across a synchronize_rcu_expedited(). As noted above, this currently results in deadlock. This commit avoids the deadlock and retains the simplicity by creating a try_get_online_cpus(), which returns false if the get_online_cpus() reference count could not immediately be incremented. If a call to try_get_online_cpus() returns true, the expedited primitives operate as before. If a call returns false, the expedited primitives fall back to normal grace-period operations. This falling back of course results in increased grace-period latency, but only during times when CPU hotplug operations are actually in flight. The effect should therefore be negligible during normal operation. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Tested-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2014 14 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The NOCB follower wakeup ordering depends on the store to the tail pointer happening before the wakeup. However, because atomic_long_add() does not return a value, it does not provide ordering guarantees, and the locking in wake_up() only guarantees that the store will happen before the unlock, which might be too late. Even though this is only a theoretical issue, this commit adds a smp_mb__after_atomic() after the final atomic_long_add() to provide the needed ordering guarantee. Reported-by: NAmit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
If an RCU callback is queued on a no-CBs CPU from idle code with irqs disabled, and if that CPU stays idle forever after, the callback will never be invoked. This commit therefore adds a check for this situation in ____call_rcu_nocb(), invoking the RCU core solely for the purpose of the ensuing return-to-idle transition. (If the CPU doesn't return to idle, the next scheduling-clock interrupt will fix things up.) Reported-by: NAmit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The NOCB leader wakeup ordering depends on the store to the header happening before the check for the leader already being awake. However, because atomic_long_add() does not return a value, it does not provide ordering guarantees, the incorrect comment in wake_nocb_leader() notwithstanding. This commit therefore adds a smp_mb__after_atomic() after the final atomic_long_add() to provide the needed ordering guarantee. Reported-by: NAmit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
If there are no nohz_full= CPUs, then there is currently no reason to track sysidle state. This commit therefore short-circuits this state tracking if !tick_nohz_full_enabled(). Note that these checks will need to be revisited if nohz_full= state can ever be changed at runtime. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a separate rcu_sysidle_state variable. This commit therefore eliminates rcu_preempt_state in favor of rcu_state_p. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Acked-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL. Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for have_rcu_nocb_mask. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
RCU currently uses for_each_possible_cpu() to spawn rcuo kthreads, which can result in more rcuo kthreads than one would expect, for example, derRichard reported 64 CPUs worth of rcuo kthreads on an 8-CPU image. This commit therefore creates rcuo kthreads only for those CPUs that actually come online. This was reported by derRichard on the OFTC IRC network. Reported-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, RCU spawns kthreads from several different early_initcall() functions. Although this has served RCU well for quite some time, as more kthreads are added a more deterministic approach is required. This commit therefore causes all of RCU's early-boot kthreads to be spawned from a single early_initcall() function. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Return false instead of 0 in rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs() as this has bool as return type. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Return false instead of 0 in __call_rcu_nocb() as this has bool as return type. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Return true/false in rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs() instead of 0/1 as this function has return type of bool. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Return true/false instead of 0/1 in __call_rcu_nocb() as this returns a bool type. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
This commit checks the return value of the zalloc_cpumask_var() used for allocating cpumask for rcu_nocb_mask. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit b58cc46c (rcu: Don't offload callbacks unless specifically requested) failed to adjust the callback lists of the CPUs that are known to be no-CBs CPUs only because they are also nohz_full= CPUs. This failure can result in callbacks that are posted during early boot getting stranded on nxtlist for CPUs whose no-CBs property becomes apparent late, and there can also be spurious warnings about offline CPUs posting callbacks. This commit fixes these problems by adding an early-boot rcu_init_nohz() that properly initializes the no-CBs CPUs. Note that kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y or with CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU=n do not exhibit this bug. Neither do kernels booted without the nohz_full= boot parameter. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Tested-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
-
- 08 9月, 2014 9 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_bh_qs(), rcu_preempt_qs(), and rcu_sched_qs() functions use old-style per-CPU variable access and write to ->passed_quiesce even if it is already set. This commit therefore updates to use the new-style per-CPU variable access functions and avoids the spurious writes. This commit also eliminates the "cpu" argument to these functions because they are always invoked on the indicated CPU. Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
The rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() function is on a scheduling fast path, so it would be good to avoid disabling irqs. The reason that irqs are disabled is to synchronize process-level and irq-handler access to the task_struct ->rcu_read_unlock_special bitmask. This commit therefore makes ->rcu_read_unlock_special instead be a union of bools with a short allowing single-access checks in RCU's __rcu_read_unlock(). This results in the process-level and irq-handler accesses being simple loads and stores, so that irqs need no longer be disabled. This commit therefore removes the irq disabling from rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(). Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently TASKS_RCU would ignore a CPU running a task in nohz_full= usermode execution. There would be neither a context switch nor a scheduling-clock interrupt to tell TASKS_RCU that the task in question had passed through a quiescent state. The grace period would therefore extend indefinitely. This commit therefore makes RCU's dyntick-idle subsystem record the task_struct structure of the task that is running in dyntick-idle mode on each CPU. The TASKS_RCU grace period can then access this information and record a quiescent state on behalf of any CPU running in dyntick-idle usermode. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
RCU-tasks requires the occasional voluntary context switch from CPU-bound in-kernel tasks. In some cases, this requires instrumenting cond_resched(). However, there is some reluctance to countenance unconditionally instrumenting cond_resched() (see http://lwn.net/Articles/603252/), so this commit creates a separate cond_resched_rcu_qs() that may be used in place of cond_resched() in locations prone to long-duration in-kernel looping. This commit currently instruments only RCU-tasks. Future possibilities include also instrumenting RCU, RCU-bh, and RCU-sched in order to reduce IPI usage. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Currently, when RCU awakens from a wait_event_interruptible() that might have awakened prematurely, it does a flush_signals(). This is done on the off-chance that someone figured out how to deliver a signal to a kthread, which is supposed to be impossible. Given that this is supposed to be impossible, this commit changes the flush_signals() calls into WARN_ON(signal_pending()). Reported-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
Commit 96d3fd0d (rcu: Break call_rcu() deadlock involving scheduler and perf) covered the case where __call_rcu_nocb_enqueue() needs to wake the rcuo kthread due to the queue being initially empty, but did not do anything for the case where the queue was overflowing. This commit therefore also defers wakeup for the overflow case. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Return a bool type instead of 0 in rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(). Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
fix sparse warning about rcu_batches_completed_preempt() being non-static by marking it as static Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
Change the remaining uses of ACCESS_ONCE() so that each ACCESS_ONCE() either does a load or a store, but not both. Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
The nocb callbacks generated before the nocb kthreads are spawned are enqueued in the nocb queue for later processing. Commit fbce7497 ("rcu: Parallelize and economize NOCB kthread wakeups") introduced nocb leader kthreads which checked the nocb_leader_wake flag to see if there were any such pending callbacks. A case was reported in which newly spawned leader kthreads were not processing the pending callbacks as this flag was not set, which led to a boot hang. The following commit ensures that the newly spawned nocb kthreads process the pending callbacks by allowing the kthreads to run immediately after spawning instead of waiting. This is done by inverting the logic of nocb_leader_wake tests to nocb_leader_sleep which allows us to use the default initialization of this flag to 0 to let the kthreads run. Reported-by: NAmit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Link: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1802899.html [ paulmck: Backported to v3.17-rc2. ] Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: NAmit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
-
- 17 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul E. McKenney 提交于
If there isn't a nohz_full= kernel parameter specified, then tick_nohz_full_mask can legitimately be NULL. This can cause problems when RCU's boot code tries to cpumask_or() this value into rcu_nocb_mask. In addition, if NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y, there is no point in doing the cpumask_or() in the first place because this will cause RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y, which in turn will have all bits already set in rcu_nocb_mask. This commit therefore avoids the cpumask_or() if NO_HZ_FULL_ALL=y and checks for !tick_nohz_full_running otherwise, this latter check catching cases when there was no nohz_full= kernel parameter specified. Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 10 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
This commit annotates rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() in order to fix the following sparse warning: kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:990:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp' - unexpected unlock Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Pranith Kumar 提交于
This commit annotates rcu_initiate_boost() fixes the following sparse warning: kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:1494:13: warning: context imbalance in 'rcu_initiate_boost' - unexpected unlock Signed-off-by: NPranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
-