- 28 8月, 2015 12 次提交
-
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
A source (or multiplexer) is a tuple addr+mask+shift which allows to control a block of signals. The maximum number of sources that a signal can define is arbitrary limited to 8 and this should be large enough. This patch allows to define multi-level of sources for a signal. Each different sources are stored to a global list and will be exposed to the userspace through the nvif interface in order to avoid conflicts. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
16 bits is large enough to store the maximum number of signals available for one domain (i.e. 256). Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
This will allow to configure performance counters with hardware signal indexes instead of user-readable names in an upcoming patch. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
This allows to query the number of available domains, including the number of hardware counter and the number of signals per domain. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
This commit introduces the NVIF_IOCTL_NEW_V0_PERFMON class which will be used in order to query domains, signals and sources. This separates the querying and the counting interface. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Samuel Pitoiset 提交于
PDAEMON signals don't have to be exposed by the perfmon engine. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Roy Spliet 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Roy Spliet 提交于
Some of the bits in there are similar to the bits in the gt215 rammap. Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Roy Spliet 提交于
Might need some generalisation to < GT200. For those: use at your own risk! Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Roy Spliet 提交于
In preparation of NV50 reclocking, where there is no version Signed-off-by: NRoy Spliet <rspliet@eclipso.eu> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This was merged with core/device.h in an earlier commit, but somehow never got removed. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lars Seipel 提交于
Commit 3740c825 ("drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: add symbolic names for classes") introduced a wrong macro definition causing acceleration setup to fail. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NLars Seipel <ls@slrz.net> Fixes: 3740c825 ("drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: add symbolic names for classes") Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2015 8 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Uncertain whether the GPC pack change is due to a newer driver version, or a legitimate difference from GM204. My GM204 has broken vram, so can't currently try a newer binary driver on it to confirm. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Turns out the PTHERM part of this dance is bracketed by the same PMU fiddling that occurs on GK104/6, let's assume it's also PGOB. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于
GK20A does not have dedicated RAM, thus having a RAM device for it does not make sense. Move the contiguous physical memory allocation to instmem. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 22 1月, 2015 19 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The namespace of NVKM is being changed to nvkm_ instead of nouveau_, which will be used for the DRM part of the driver. This is being done in order to make it very clear as to what part of the driver a given symbol belongs to, and as a minor step towards splitting the DRM driver out to be able to stand on its own (for virt). Because there's already a large amount of churn here anyway, this is as good a time as any to also switch to NVIDIA's device and chipset naming to ease collaboration with them. A comparison of objdump disassemblies proves no code changes. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-