To make the code more understandable it makes sense to use the new HCI
defines for connection role instead of a "bool master" parameter. This
makes it immediately clear when looking at the function calls what the
last parameter is describing.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Having a dedicated u8 role variable in the hci_conn struct greatly
simplifies tracking of the role, since this is the native way that it's
represented on the HCI level.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

In the case that the key distribution bits cause us not to generate a
local LTK we should not try to re-encrypt if we're currently encrypted
with an STK. This patch fixes the check for this in the
smp_sufficient_security function.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

If the remote device tries to initiate bonding with us and we don't have
HCI_PAIRABLE set we should just flat out reject the request. This brings
SMP in line with how the flag is used for BR/EDR SSP.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

When the SMP context is created all flags default to zero. To determine
that we are the initiators it's therefore best to simply change the flag
value when we know we're sending the first SMP PDU. Clearing the flag
when receiving a Pairing Request is not correct since the request may be
a response to a previous Security Request from us (for which we would
already have correctly set the flag). Same goes for receiving a Security
Request which may be coming after us already starting pairing by sending
a Pairing Request.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Whether we bond or not should not have any impact on the user
interaction model. This patch removes an incorrect fall-back from
JUST_CFM to JUST_WORKS in case we're not bonding.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

For incoming requests we want to let the user know that pairing is
happening since otherwise there could be access to MEDIUM security
services without any user interaction at all. Therefore, set the
selected method to JUST_CFM instead of JUST_WORKS and let it be
converted back to JUST_WORKS later if we are the initators.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

If we're encrypted with the STK we should allow re-encryption with an
LTK even though the achieved security level is the same. This patch adds
the necessary logic to the smp_sufficient_security function which is
used to determine whether to proceed with encryption or not.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

There are certain subtle differences in behavior when we're encrypted
with the STK, such as allowing re-encryption even though the security
level stays the same. Because of this, add a flag to track whether we're
encrypted with an STK or not.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

If we're already encrypted with a good enough LTK we should just ignore
an incoming SMP Security Request. The code was already taking care of
this in the smp_conn_security function before calling smp_ltk_encrypt
but failed to do the same in smp_cmd_security_req. This patch fixes the
issue by moving up the smp_sufficient_security function and using it in
the Security Request handler before trying to request encryption.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The return value of smp_ltk_encrypt is simple boolean, so just use
bool and make the code a bit more readable.
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>

The smp_conn member of struct hci_conn was simply a pointer to the
l2cap_conn object. Since we already have hcon->l2cap_data that points to
the same thing there's no need to have this second variable. This patch
removes it and changes the single place that was using it to use
hcon->l2cap_data instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The smp_user_confirm_reply() function is called whenever user space
sends a user confirmation reply mgmt command. In case of a misbehaving
user space, or if the SMP session was removed by the time the command
comes it is important that we return an appropriate error and do not try
to access the non-existent SMP context. This patch adds the appropriate
check for the HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND flag before proceeding further.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Passing the full SMP context instead of just the crypto context lets us
use the crypto handle from the context which in turn removes the need to
lock the hci_dev. Passing the SMP context instead of just the crypto
handle allows a bit more detailed logging which is helpful in
multi-adapter scenarios.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Many places have to be extra careful to not hold the hdev lock when
calling into the SMP code. This is because the SMP crypto functions use
the crypto handle that's part of the hci_dev struct. Giving the SMP
context its own handle helps simplifying the locking logic and removes
the risk for deadlocks.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The hdev lock must be held before calling into smp_distribute_keys. Also
things such as hci_add_irk() require the lock. This patch fixes the
issue by adding the necessary locking into the smp_cmd_ident_addr_info
function.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Since the link_mode member of the hci_conn struct is a bit field and we
already have a flags member as well it makes sense to merge these two
together. This patch moves all used link_mode bits into corresponding
flags. To keep backwards compatibility with user space we still need to
provide a get_link_mode() helper function for the ioctl's that expect a
link_mode style value.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Since the SMP code needs to swap ordering of variable length buffers add
a convenience function that can be used for any length buffer.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

There's no reason to have explicit values for these flags. Convert them
to an enum to be consistent with other similar flags.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The LTK type has really nothing to do with HCI so it makes more sense to
have these in smp.h than hci.h. This patch moves the defines to smp.h
and removes the HCI_ prefix in the same go.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

We never store the "master" type of STKs since we request encryption
directly with them so we only need one STK type (the one that's
looked-up on the slave side). Simply remove the unnecessary define and
rename the _SLAVE one to the shorter form.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The smp_chan_create function may return NULL, e.g. in the case of memory
allocation failure, so we always need to check for this.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

If we need an MITM protected connection but the local and remote IO
capabilities cannot provide it we should reject the pairing attempt in
the appropriate way. This patch adds the missing checks for such a
situation to the smp_cmd_pairing_req() and smp_cmd_pairing_rsp()
functions.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

We'll need to do authentication method lookups from more than one place,
so refactor the lookup into its own function.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

When we receive a pairing request or an internal request to start
pairing we shouldn't blindly overwrite the existing pending_sec_level
value as that may actually be higher than the new one. This patch fixes
the SMP code to only overwrite the value in case the new one is higher
than the old.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

When we store the STK in slave role we should set the correct
authentication information for it. If the pairing is producing a HIGH
security level the STK is considered authenticated, and otherwise it's
considered unauthenticated. This patch fixes the value passed to the
hci_add_ltk() function when adding the STK on the slave side.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Tested-by: NMarcin Kraglak <marcin.kraglak@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Due to recent changes to the way that the MITM requirement is set for
outgoing pairing attempts we can no longer rely on the hcon->auth_type
variable (which is actually good since it was formed from BR/EDR
concepts that don't really exist for SMP).

To match the logic that BR/EDR now uses simply rely on the local IO
capability and/or needed security level to set the MITM requirement for
outgoing pairing requests.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Now that smp_confirm() is called "inline" we can have it return a
response code and have the sending of it be done in the shared place for
command handlers. One exception is when we're entering smp.c from mgmt.c
when user space responds to authentication, in which case we still need
our own code to call smp_failure().
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Since we're now calling smp_random() "inline" we can have it directly
return a response code and have the shared command handler send the
response.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

There's no reason to have "smp" in this variable name since it is
already part of the SMP struct which provides sufficient context.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

When the SMP code was initially created (mid-2011) parts of the
Bluetooth subsystem were still not converted to use workqueues. This
meant that the crypto calls, which could sleep, couldn't be called
directly. Because of this the "confirm" and "random" work structs were
introduced.

These days the entire Bluetooth subsystem runs through workqueues which
makes these structs unnecessary. This patch removes them and converts
the calls to queue them to use direct function calls instead.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

There is no reason to have the initial local value conditional to
whether the remote value has bonding set or not. We can either way start
off with the value we received.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

There are no users of the smp_chan struct outside of smp.c so move it
away from smp.h. The addition of the l2cap.h include to hci_core.c,
hci_conn.c and mgmt.c is something that should have been there already
previously to avoid warnings of undeclared struct l2cap_conn, but the
compiler warning was apparently shadowed away by the mention of
l2cap_conn in the struct smp_chan definition.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The Invalid Parameters error code is used to indicate that the command
length is invalid or that a parameter is outside of the specified range.
This error code wasn't clearly specified in the Bluetooth 4.0
specification but since 4.1 this has been fixed.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The smp variable in smp_conn_security is not used anywhere before the
smp = smp_chan_create() call in the smp_conn_security function so it
makes no sense to assign any other value to it before that.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

The smp pointer might not be initialized for jumps to the "done" label
in the smp_conn_security function. Furthermore doing the set_bit after
done might "overwrite" a previous value of the flag in case pairing was
already in progress. This patch moves the call to set_bit before the
label so that it is only done for a newly created smp context (as
returned by smp_chan_create).
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

Due to several devices being unable to handle this procedure reliably
(resulting in forced disconnections before pairing completes) it's
better to remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

In the case that the just-works model would be triggered we only want to
confirm remotely initiated pairings (i.e. those triggered by a Security
Request or Pairing Request). This patch adds the necessary check to the
tk_request function to fall back to the JUST_WORKS method in the case of
a locally initiated pairing.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

For remotely initiated just-works pairings we want to show the user a
confirmation dialog for the pairing. However, we can only know which
side was the initiator by tracking which side sends the first Security
Request or Pairing Request PDU. This patch adds a new SMP flag to
indicate whether our side was the initiator for the pairing.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>

In the case that a local pairing confirmation (JUST_CFM) has been
selected as the method we need to use the user confirm request mgmt
event for it with the confirm_hint set to 1 (to indicate confirmation
without any specific passkey value). Without this (if passkey_notify was
used) the pairing would never proceed. This patch adds the necessary
call to mgmt_user_confirm_request in this scenario.
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>