Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 161
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 6月, 2020 7 次提交
  3. 08 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 28 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 26 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 07 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 06 5月, 2020 2 次提交
  13. 01 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 26 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  17. 24 4月, 2020 9 次提交
  19. 23 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      mm, compaction: capture a page under direct compaction · 35d915be
      由 Mel Gorman 提交于 
      to #26255339

commit 5e1f0f098b4649fad53011246bcaeff011ffdf5d upstream

Compaction is inherently race-prone as a suitable page freed during
compaction can be allocated by any parallel task.  This patch uses a
capture_control structure to isolate a page immediately when it is freed
by a direct compactor in the slow path of the page allocator.  The
intent is to avoid redundant scanning.

                                     5.0.0-rc1              5.0.0-rc1
                               selective-v3r17          capture-v3r19
Amean     fault-both-1         0.00 (   0.00%)        0.00 *   0.00%*
Amean     fault-both-3      2582.11 (   0.00%)     2563.68 (   0.71%)
Amean     fault-both-5      4500.26 (   0.00%)     4233.52 (   5.93%)
Amean     fault-both-7      5819.53 (   0.00%)     6333.65 (  -8.83%)
Amean     fault-both-12     9321.18 (   0.00%)     9759.38 (  -4.70%)
Amean     fault-both-18     9782.76 (   0.00%)    10338.76 (  -5.68%)
Amean     fault-both-24    15272.81 (   0.00%)    13379.55 *  12.40%*
Amean     fault-both-30    15121.34 (   0.00%)    16158.25 (  -6.86%)
Amean     fault-both-32    18466.67 (   0.00%)    18971.21 (  -2.73%)

Latency is only moderately affected but the devil is in the details.  A
closer examination indicates that base page fault latency is reduced but
latency of huge pages is increased as it takes creater care to succeed.
Part of the "problem" is that allocation success rates are close to 100%
even when under pressure and compaction gets harder

                                5.0.0-rc1              5.0.0-rc1
                          selective-v3r17          capture-v3r19
Percentage huge-3        96.70 (   0.00%)       98.23 (   1.58%)
Percentage huge-5        96.99 (   0.00%)       95.30 (  -1.75%)
Percentage huge-7        94.19 (   0.00%)       97.24 (   3.24%)
Percentage huge-12       94.95 (   0.00%)       97.35 (   2.53%)
Percentage huge-18       96.74 (   0.00%)       97.30 (   0.58%)
Percentage huge-24       97.07 (   0.00%)       97.55 (   0.50%)
Percentage huge-30       95.69 (   0.00%)       98.50 (   2.95%)
Percentage huge-32       96.70 (   0.00%)       99.27 (   2.65%)

And scan rates are reduced as expected by 6% for the migration scanner
and 29% for the free scanner indicating that there is less redundant
work.

Compaction migrate scanned    20815362    19573286
Compaction free scanned       16352612    11510663

[mgorman@techsingularity.net: remove redundant check]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190201143853.GH9565@techsingularity.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190118175136.31341-23-mgorman@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
      35d915be
  21. 22 4月, 2020 4 次提交
    • C
      sysctl: handle overflow in proc_get_long · 662ef34f
      由 Christian Brauner 提交于 
      fix #27124689

commit 7f2923c4f73f21cfd714d12a2d48de8c21f11cfe upstream.

proc_get_long() is a funny function.  It uses simple_strtoul() and for a
good reason.  proc_get_long() wants to always succeed the parse and
return the maybe incorrect value and the trailing characters to check
against a pre-defined list of acceptable trailing values.  However,
simple_strtoul() explicitly ignores overflows which can cause funny
things like the following to happen:

  echo 18446744073709551616 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max
  cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
  0

(Which will cause your system to silently die behind your back.)

On the other hand kstrtoul() does do overflow detection but does not
return the trailing characters, and also fails the parse when anything
other than '\n' is a trailing character whereas proc_get_long() wants to
be more lenient.

Now, before adding another kstrtoul() function let's simply add a static
parse strtoul_lenient() which:
 - fails on overflow with -ERANGE
 - returns the trailing characters to the caller

The reason why we should fail on ERANGE is that we already do a partial
fail on overflow right now.  Namely, when the TMPBUFLEN is exceeded.  So
we already reject values such as 184467440737095516160 (21 chars) but
accept values such as 18446744073709551616 (20 chars) but both are
overflows.  So we should just always reject 64bit overflows and not
special-case this based on the number of chars.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190107222700.15954-2-christian@brauner.ioSigned-off-by: NChristian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NShile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NJoseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
      662ef34f
    • M
      sched: Avoid scale real weight down to zero · 9b83fd88
      由 Michael Wang 提交于 
      fix #26198889

commit 26cf52229efc87e2effa9d788f9b33c40fb3358a linux-next

During our testing, we found a case that shares no longer
working correctly, the cgroup topology is like:

  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A		(shares=102400)
  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B	(shares=2)
  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/A/B/C	(shares=1024)

  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D		(shares=1024)
  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E	(shares=1024)
  /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/D/E/F	(shares=1024)

The same benchmark is running in group C & F, no other tasks are
running, the benchmark is capable to consumed all the CPUs.

We suppose the group C will win more CPU resources since it could
enjoy all the shares of group A, but it's F who wins much more.

The reason is because we have group B with shares as 2, since
A->cfs_rq.load.weight == B->se.load.weight == B->shares/nr_cpus,
so A->cfs_rq.load.weight become very small.

And in calc_group_shares() we calculate shares as:

  load = max(scale_load_down(cfs_rq->load.weight),
cfs_rq->avg.load_avg);
  shares = (tg_shares * load) / tg_weight;

Since the 'cfs_rq->load.weight' is too small, the load become 0
after scale down, although 'tg_shares' is 102400, shares of the se
which stand for group A on root cfs_rq become 2.

While the se of D on root cfs_rq is far more bigger than 2, so it
wins the battle.

Thus when scale_load_down() scale real weight down to 0, it's no
longer telling the real story, the caller will have the wrong
information and the calculation will be buggy.

This patch add check in scale_load_down(), so the real weight will
be >= MIN_SHARES after scale, after applied the group C wins as
expected.
Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38e8e212-59a1-64b2-b247-b6d0b52d8dc1@linux.alibaba.comAcked-by: NShanpei Chen <shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NYihao Wu <wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
      9b83fd88
    • H
      sched/fair: Fix race between runtime distribution and assignment · 70a23044
      由 Huaixin Chang 提交于 
      fix #25892693

commit 26a8b12747c975b33b4a82d62e4a307e1c07f31b upstream

Currently, there is a potential race between distribute_cfs_runtime()
and assign_cfs_rq_runtime(). Race happens when cfs_b->runtime is read,
distributes without holding lock and finds out there is not enough
runtime to charge against after distribution. Because
assign_cfs_rq_runtime() might be called during distribution, and use
cfs_b->runtime at the same time.

Fibtest is the tool to test this race. Assume all gcfs_rq is throttled
and cfs period timer runs, slow threads might run and sleep, returning
unused cfs_rq runtime and keeping min_cfs_rq_runtime in their local
pool. If all this happens sufficiently quickly, cfs_b->runtime will drop
a lot. If runtime distributed is large too, over-use of runtime happens.

A runtime over-using by about 70 percent of quota is seen when we
test fibtest on a 96-core machine. We run fibtest with 1 fast thread and
95 slow threads in test group, configure 10ms quota for this group and
see the CPU usage of fibtest is 17.0%, which is far from than the
expected 10%.

On a smaller machine with 32 cores, we also run fibtest with 96
threads. CPU usage is more than 12%, which is also more than expected
10%. This shows that on similar workloads, this race do affect CPU
bandwidth control.

Solve this by holding lock inside distribute_cfs_runtime().

Fixes: c06f04c7 ("sched: Fix potential near-infinite distribute_cfs_runtime() loop")
Signed-off-by: NHuaixin Chang <changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200325092602.22471-1-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com/Signed-off-by: NYihao Wu <wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
      70a23044
    • X
      alinux: cgroup: Fix task_css_check rcu warnings · 798cfa76
      由 Xunlei Pang 提交于 
      to #26424323

task_css() should be protected by rcu, fix several callers.

Fixes: 1f49a738 ("alinux: psi: Support PSI under cgroup v1")
Acked-by: NMichael Wang <yun.wany@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NXunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: NYihao Wu <wuyihao@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: NYang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
      798cfa76
  23. 17 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 18 3月, 2020 9 次提交