- 16 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Peres 提交于
v2 (Ben Skeggs): fix ramcfg strap, and remove bogus handling of perf 0x40 Signed-off-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@ensi-bourges.fr> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emil Velikov 提交于
Perf tables v 1.2 and 1.3 (seen on Geforce FX/ 5) are not long enough to store the voltage label/id v2 - Remove comment from the code Signed-off-by: NEmil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 05 10月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This was disabled previously because of some uncertainty that +2 was indeed the voltage. It appears it is, checked on a NVA8 and a NVA3M. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Francisco Jerez 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Francisco Jerez 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Francisco Jerez 提交于
Used on nv17-nv28, they contain memory clocks and timings, only one of the table entries can actually be used, depending on the RAMCFG straps, and it's usually higher than the frequency programmed on boot by the BIOS. The memory timings listed in table version 0x1x are used to init the 0x12xx range but they aren't required for reclocking to work. Signed-off-by: NFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Reported-by: NRoy Spliet <r.spliet@student.tudelft.nl> Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-