- 18 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure, split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is supposed to bubble up to userland. For a while it did so, but along the way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we hit IO errors during the directory insertion. Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case was dropped. The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we catch a directory hash bucket overflow. This fixes a few problem spots. First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the places where we can safely just return the error up the chain. btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename was going to overwrite. Rather than adding very complex logic, I added a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe to bail out. Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using the new helper now too. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Reported-by: NPascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
-
- 17 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If the id of the existed transaction is more than the one we specified, it means the specified transaction was commited, so we should return 0, not EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If there is no running transaction in the fs, we needn't start a new one when we want to start sync. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This commit contains all the essential changes to the core code of Btrfs for support of the device replace procedure. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
- 'nr' is no more used. - btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() and __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() can share a bunch of code. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Julia Lawall 提交于
Use WARN rather than printk followed by WARN_ON(1), for conciseness. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this transformation is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression list es; @@ -printk( +WARN(1, es); -WARN_ON(1); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Consider the following case: Task1 Task2 start_transaction commit_transaction check pending snapshots list and the list is empty. add pending snapshot into list skip the delalloc flush end_transaction ... And then the problem that the snapshot is different with the source subvolume happen. This patch fixes the above problem by flush all pending stuffs when all the other tasks end the transaction. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we flush inodes with pending delalloc in a transaction, we may join the same transaction handler more than 2 times. The reason is: Task use_count of trans handle commit_transaction 1 |-> btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes 1 |-> run_delalloc_nocow 1 |-> join_transaction 2 |-> cow_file_range 2 |-> join_transaction 3 In fact, cow_file_range needn't join the transaction again because the caller have joined the transaction, so we fix this problem by this way. Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The process of the ordered operations is similar to the delalloc inode flush, so we handle them by flush workers. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch introduce a new worker pool named "flush_workers", and if we want to force all the inode with pending delalloc to the disks, we can queue those inodes into the work queue of the worker pool, in this way, those inodes will be flushed by multi-task. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem. We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL. If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used, and we will flush all things. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
On a really full file system I was getting ENOSPC back from btrfs_update_inode when trying to update the parent inode when creating a snapshot. Just use the fallback method so we can update the inode and not have to worry about having a delayed ref. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Everytime we write out dirty pages we search for an offset in the tree, convert the bits in the state, and then when we wait we search for the offset again and clear the bits. So for every dirty range in the io tree we are doing 4 rb searches, which is suboptimal. With this patch we are only doing 2 searches for every cycle (modulo weird things happening). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
With the following debug patch: static int btrfs_freeze(struct super_block *sb) { + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb); + struct btrfs_transaction *trans; + + spin_lock(&fs_info->trans_lock); + trans = fs_info->running_transaction; + if (trans) { + printk("Transid %llu, use_count %d, num_writer %d\n", + trans->transid, atomic_read(&trans->use_count), + atomic_read(&trans->num_writers)); + } + spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock); return 0; } I found there was a orphan transaction after the freeze operation was done. It is because the transaction may not be committed when the transaction handle end even though it is the last handle of the current transaction. This design avoid committing the transaction frequently, but also introduce the above problem. So I add btrfs_attach_transaction() which can catch the current transaction and commit it. If there is no transaction, it will return ENOENT, and do not anything. This function also can be used to instead of btrfs_join_transaction_freeze() because it don't increase the writer counter and don't start a new transaction, so it also can fix the deadlock between sync and freeze. Besides that, it is used to instead of btrfs_join_transaction() in transaction_kthread(), because if there is no transaction, the transaction kthread needn't anything. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch add a type field into the transaction handle structure, in this way, we needn't implement various end-transaction functions and can make the code more simple and readable. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch fixes memory leak of the transaction handle which happened when starting transaction failed on a freezed fs. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The macro btrfs_abort_transaction() can get the line number of the code where the problem happens, so we should invoke it in the place that the error occurs, or we will lose the line number. Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we start our freeze, somebody comes in and does an fsync() on a file where we have to commit a transaction for whatever reason, and we will deadlock because the freeze is waiting on FS_FREEZE people to stop writing to the file system, but the transaction is waiting for its free space inodes to be written out, which are in turn waiting on sb_start_intwrite while trying to write the file extents. To fix this we'll just skip the sb_start_intwrite() if we TRANS_JOIN_NOLOCK since we're being waited on by a transaction commit so we're safe wrt to freeze and this will keep us from deadlocking. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
nocow_only is now an obsolete argument. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I screwed this up, there is a race between checking if there is a running transaction and actually starting a transaction in sync where we could race with a freezer and get ourselves into trouble. To fix this we need to make a new join type to only do the try lock on the freeze stuff. If it fails we'll return EPERM and just return from sync. This fixes a hang Liu Bo reported when running xfstest 68 in a loop. Thanks, Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
So we have lots of places where we try to preallocate chunks in order to make sure we have enough space as we make our allocations. This has historically meant that we're constantly tweaking when we should allocate a new chunk, and historically we have gotten this horribly wrong so we way over allocate either metadata or data. To try and keep this from happening we are going to make it so that the block group item insertion is done out of band at the end of a transaction. This will allow us to create chunks even if we are trying to make an allocation for the extent tree. With this patch my enospc tests run faster (didn't expect this) and more efficiently use the disk space (this is what I wanted). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Sage reported the following lockdep backtrace ===================================== [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ] 3.6.0-rc2-ceph-00171-gc7ed62d #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------- btrfs-cleaner/7607 is trying to release lock (sb_internal) at: [<ffffffffa00422ae>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by btrfs-cleaner/7607: #0: (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa003b405>] cleaner_kthread+0x95/0x120 [btrfs] stack backtrace: Pid: 7607, comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 3.6.0-rc2-ceph-00171-gc7ed62d #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa00422ae>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810afa9e>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xfe/0x110 [<ffffffff810b289e>] lock_release_non_nested+0x1ee/0x310 [<ffffffff81172f9b>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x7b/0x160 [<ffffffffa004106c>] ? put_transaction+0x8c/0x130 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00422ae>] ? btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810b2a95>] lock_release+0xd5/0x220 [<ffffffff81173071>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x151/0x160 [<ffffffff8117d9ed>] __sb_end_write+0x7d/0x90 [<ffffffffa00422ae>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6e/0xb20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81079850>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60 [<ffffffff81634c6b>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40 [<ffffffffa0042758>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x368/0x3c0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0042808>] btrfs_end_transaction_throttle+0x18/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa00318f0>] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x410/0x600 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8132babd>] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x5d/0xb0 [<ffffffffa00430ef>] btrfs_clean_old_snapshots+0xaf/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b405>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x95/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b419>] cleaner_kthread+0xa9/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa003b370>] ? btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs.isra.102+0x220/0x220 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810791ee>] kthread+0xae/0xc0 [<ffffffff810b379d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [<ffffffff8163e744>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff81635430>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13 [<ffffffff81079140>] ? flush_kthread_work+0x1a0/0x1a0 [<ffffffff8163e740>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13 This is because the throttle stuff can commit the transaction, which expects to be the one stopping the intwrite stuff, but we've already done it in the __btrfs_end_transaction. Moving the sb_end_intewrite after this logic makes the lockdep go away. Thanks, Tested-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we delete a inode, we will remove all the delayed items including delayed inode update, and then truncate all the relative metadata. If there is lots of metadata, we will end the current transaction, and start a new transaction to truncate the left metadata. In this way, we will leave a inode item that its link counter is > 0, and also may leave some directory index items in fs/file tree after the current transaction ends. In other words, the metadata in this fs/file tree is inconsistent. If we create a snapshot for this tree now, we will find a inode with corrupted metadata in the new snapshot, and we won't continue to drop the left metadata, because its link counter is not 0. We fix this problem by updating the inode item before the current transaction ends. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The snapshot should be the image of the fs tree before it was created, so the metadata of the snapshot should not exist in the its tree. But now, we found the directory item and directory name index is in both the snapshot tree and the fs tree. It introduces some problems and makes the users feel strange: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda1 # mount /dev/sda1 /mnt # mkdir /mnt/1 # cd /mnt/1 # btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt snap0 # ls -a /mnt/1/snap0/1 . .. [no other file/dir] # ll /mnt/1/snap0/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10 Ju1 24 12:11 1 ^^^ There is no file/dir in it, but it's size is 10 # cd /mnt/1/snap0/1/snap0 [Enter a unexisted directory successfully...] There is nothing in the directory 1 in snap0, but btrfs told the length of this directory is 10. Beside that, we can enter an unexisted directory, it is very strange to the users. # btrfs subvolume snapshot /mnt/1/snap0 /mnt/snap1 # ll /mnt/1/snap0/1/ total 0 [None] # ll /mnt/snap1/1/ total 0 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Ju1 24 12:14 snap0 And the source of snap1 did have any directory in Directory 1, but snap1 have a snap0, it is different between the source and the snapshot. So I think we should insert directory item and directory name index and update the parent inode as the last step of snapshot creation, and do not leave the useless metadata in the file tree. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we create several snapshots at the same time, the following BUG_ON() will be triggered. kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6047! Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs <partition> # mount <partition> <mnt> # cd <mnt> # for ((i=0;i<2400;i++)); do touch long_name_to_make_tree_more_deep$i; done # for ((i=0; i<4; i++)) > do > mkdir $i > for ((j=0; j<200; j++)) > do > btrfs sub snap . $i/$j > done & > done The reason is: Before transaction commit, some operations changed the fs tree and new tree blocks were allocated because of COW. We used the implicit non-shared back reference for those newly allocated tree blocks because they were not shared by two or more trees. And then we created the first snapshot for the fs tree, according to the back reference rules, we also used implicit back refs for the child tree blocks of the root node of the fs tree, now those child nodes/leaves were shared by two trees. Then We didn't deal with the delayed references, and continued to change the fs tree(created the second snapshot and inserted the dir item of the new snapshot into the fs tree). According to the rules of the back reference, we added full back refs for those tree blocks whose parents have be shared by two trees. Now some newly allocated tree blocks had two types of the references. As we know, the delayed reference system handles these delayed references from back to front, and the full delayed reference is inserted after the implicit ones. So when we dealt with the back references of those newly allocated tree blocks, the full references was dealt with at first. And if the first reference is a shared back reference and the tree block that the reference points to is newly allocated, It would be considered as a tree block which is shared by two or more trees when it is allocated and should be a full back reference not a implicit one, the flag of its reference also should be set to FULL_BACKREF. But in fact, it was a non-shared tree block with a implicit reference at beginning, so it was not compulsory to set the flags to FULL_BACKREF. So BUG_ON was triggered. We have several methods to fix this bug: 1. deal with delayed references after the snapshot is created and before we change the source tree of the snapshot. This is the easiest and safest way. 2. modify the sort method of the delayed reference tree, make the full delayed references be inserted before the implicit ones. It is also very easy, but I don't know if it will introduce some problems or not. 3. modify select_delayed_ref() and make it select the implicit delayed reference at first. This way is not so good because it may wastes CPU time if we have lots of delayed references. 4. set the flags to FULL_BACKREF, this method is a little complex comparing with the 1st way. I chose the 1st way to fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch fixes the following problem: - If we failed to deal with the delayed dir items, we should abort transaction, just as its comment said. Fix it. - If root reference or root back reference insertion failed, we should abort transaction. Fix it. - Fix the double free problem of pending->inherit. - Do not restore the trans->rsv if we doesn't change it. - make the error path more clearly. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
We expect current->journal_info to point to the trans handle we are committing. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Sage Weil 提交于
The freeze rwsem is taken by sb_start_intwrite() and dropped during the commit_ or end_transaction(). In the async case, that happens in a worker thread. Tell lockdep the calling thread is releasing ownership of the rwsem and the async thread is picking it up. XFS plays the same trick in fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c. Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
- 29 8月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we created a new snapshot, the mtime and ctime of its parent directory were not updated. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
"trans->transid" is cpu endian but we want to store the data as little endian. "item->ctime.nsec" is only 32 bits, not 64. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We convert btrfs_file_aio_write() to use new freeze check. We also add proper freeze protection to btrfs_page_mkwrite(). We also add freeze protection to the transaction mechanism to avoid starting transactions on frozen filesystem. At minimum this is necessary to stop iput() of unlinked file to change frozen filesystem during truncation. Checks in cleaner_kthread() and transaction_kthread() can be safely removed since btrfs_freeze() will lock the mutexes and thus block the threads (and they shouldn't have anything to do anyway). CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Block 提交于
This patch introduces uuids for subvolumes. Each subvolume has it's own uuid. In case it was snapshotted, it also contains parent_uuid. In case it was received, it also contains received_uuid. It also introduces subvolume ctime/otime/stime/rtime. The first two are comparable to the times found in inodes. otime is the origin/creation time and ctime is the change time. stime/rtime are only valid on received subvolumes. stime is the time of the subvolume when it was sent. rtime is the time of the subvolume when it was received. Additionally to the times, we have a transid for each time. They are updated at the same place as the times. btrfs receive uses stransid and rtransid to find out if a received subvolume changed in the meantime. If an older kernel mounts a filesystem with the extented fields, all fields become invalid. The next mount with a new kernel will detect this and reset the fields. Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz> Reviewed-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Reviewed-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Reviewed-by: NAlex Lyakas <alex.bolshoy.btrfs@gmail.com>
-
- 24 7月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There is weird logic I had to put in place to make sure that when we were adding csums that we'd used the delalloc block rsv instead of the global block rsv. Part of this meant that we had to free up our transaction reservation before we ran the delayed refs since csum deletion happens during the delayed ref work. The problem with this is that when we release a reservation we will add it to the global reserve if it is not full in order to keep us going along longer before we have to force a transaction commit. By releasing our reservation before we run delayed refs we don't get the opportunity to drain down the global reserve for the work we did, so we won't refill it as often. This isn't a problem per-se, it just results in us possibly committing transactions more and more often, and in rare cases could cause those WARN_ON()'s to pop in use_block_rsv because we ran out of space in our block rsv. This also helps us by holding onto space while the delayed refs run so we don't end up with as many people trying to do things at the same time, which again will help us not force commits or hit the use_block_rsv warnings. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
"root->fs_info" and "fs_info" are the same, but "fs_info" is prefered because it is shorter and that's what is used in the rest of the function. Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Waiting on spindles improves performance, but ssds want all the IO as quickly as we can push it down. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 12 7月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
When creating a subvolume or snapshot, it is necessary to initialize the qgroup account with a copy of some other (tracking) qgroup. This patch adds parameters to the ioctls to pass the information from which qgroup to inherit. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Like block reserves, reserve a small piece of space on each transaction start and for delalloc. These are the hooks that can actually return EDQUOT to the user. The amount of space reserved is tracked in the transaction handle. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Hooks into qgroup code to record refs and into transaction commit. This is the main entry point for qgroup. Basically every change in extent backrefs got accounted to the appropriate qgroups. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Jan Schmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-