- 18 5月, 2018 40 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
GM20B now also shares the same code, as NVGPU shows it doesn't need special treatment. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Deliberately removed from non-GP100, as RM doesn't touch it. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Pulled some init out of main per-GPC/TPC loops to match RM. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
The value for GF100 has changed here, but it matches RM now. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
RM does this for some reason, and is enforced in HW on Volta. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
RM does this for some reason. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Newer HW doesn't appear to send this event, which will cause long delays in runlist updates if they don't complete immediately. RM doesn't use these events anywhere, and an NVGPU commit message notes that polling is the preferred method even on HW that supports the event. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This will be required to support features on newer hardware. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
We didn't used to be aware that runlist/engine IDs weren't the same thing, or that there was such variability in configuration between GPUs. By exposing this information to a client, and giving it explicit control of which runlist it's allocating a channel on, we're able to make better choices. The immediate effect of this is that on GPUs where CE0 is the "GRCE", we will now be allocating a copy engine running asynchronously to GR for BO migrations - as intended. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
Will be used to improve channel runlist selection. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
由 Ben Skeggs 提交于
This will be required to support Volta. Signed-off-by: NBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-