- 20 2月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Filipe Brandenburger 提交于
The header file will then be installed under /usr/include/linux so that userspace applications can refer to Btrfs ioctls by name and use the same structs used internally in the kernel. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Kusanagi Kouichi 提交于
CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH overrides read and search permission check on file and directory. It seems fit for BTRFS_IOC_INO_PATHS. Signed-off-by: NKusanagi Kouichi <slash@ac.auone-net.jp> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This patch fixes the following problem: - improper return value - unnecessary read-only check Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Dave Sterba triggered a lockdep complaint about lock ordering between the sb_internal lock and the cleaner semaphore. btrfs_lookup_dentry() checks for orphans if we're looking up the inode for a subvolume, and subvolume creation is triggering the lookup with a transaction running. This commit moves the d_instantiate after the transaction closes. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Operation-specific check (whether subvol is readonly or not) should go after the mutual exclusiveness check. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(). Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Fix unlock order in btrfs_ioctl_resize(). Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
The error code that is returned in response to starting a mutually exclusive operation when there is one already running got silently changed from EINVAL to EINPROGRESS by 5ac00add. Returning EINPROGRESS to, say, add_dev, when rm_dev is running is misleading. Furthermore, the operation itself may want to use EINPROGRESS for other purposes. Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
由 Ilya Dryomov 提交于
Balance pause/resume logic got broken by 5ac00add (went in into 3.8-rc1 as part of dev-replace merge). Offending commit took a stab at making mutually exclusive volume operations (add_dev, rm_dev, resize, balance, replace_dev) not block behind volume_mutex if another such operation is in progress and instead return an error right away. Balancing front-end relied on the blocking behaviour, so the fix is ugly, but short of a complete rework, it's the best we can do. Reported-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We forget to give up the write access after we find some device operation is going on. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We should not resize a readonly device, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Step to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs <disk> # mount <disk> <mnt> # btrfs sub create <mnt>/subv0 # btrfs sub snap <mnt> <mnt>/subv0/snap0 # change <mnt>/subv0 from R/W to R/O # btrfs sub del <mnt>/subv0/snap0 We deleted the snapshot successfully. I think we should not be able to delete the snapshot since the parent subvolume is R/O. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Qgroup id 0 is a special number, we should set the id of a qgroup to 0. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 18 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Users report a bug, the reproducer is: $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs/ $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/dir $ chattr +C /mnt/btrfs/dir/ $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=10; $ lsattr /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo ---------------C- /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 1 extent found ---> an extent $ dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/dir/foo bs=4K count=1 seek=5 conv=notrunc,nocreat; sync $ filefrag /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo /mnt/btrfs/dir/foo: 3 extents found ---> with nocow, btrfs breaks the extent into three parts The new created file should not only inherit the NODATACOW flag, but also honor NODATASUM flag, because we must do COW on a file extent with checksum. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
The handling for directory crc hash overflows was fairly obscure, split_leaf returns EOVERFLOW when we try to extend the item and that is supposed to bubble up to userland. For a while it did so, but along the way we added better handling of errors and forced the FS readonly if we hit IO errors during the directory insertion. Along the way, we started testing only for EEXIST and the EOVERFLOW case was dropped. The end result is that we may force the FS readonly if we catch a directory hash bucket overflow. This fixes a few problem spots. First I add tests for EOVERFLOW in the places where we can safely just return the error up the chain. btrfs_rename is harder though, because it tries to insert the new directory item only after it has already unlinked anything the rename was going to overwrite. Rather than adding very complex logic, I added a helper to test for the hash overflow case early while it is still safe to bail out. Snapshot and subvolume creation had a similar problem, so they are using the new helper now too. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Reported-by: NPascal Junod <pascal@junod.info>
-
- 17 12月, 2012 8 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We need get write access for qgroup operations, or we will modify the R/O fs. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We need get write access for scrub, or we will modify the R/O fs. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -d single -m single <disk0> <disk1> # mount -o ro <disk0> <mnt0> # mount -o ro <disk0> <mnt1> # mount -o remount,rw <mnt0> # umount <mnt0> # btrfs device delete <disk1> <mnt1> We can remove a device from a R/O filesystem. The reason is that we just check the R/O flag of the super block object. It is not enough, because the kernel may set the R/O flag only for the mount point. We need invoke mnt_want_write_file() to do a full check. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs <partition> # mount -o ro <partition> <mnt0> # mount -o ro <partition> <mnt1> # mount -o remount,rw <mnt0> # umount <mnt0> # btrfs fi resize 10g <mnt1> We re-sized a R/O filesystem. The reason is that we just check the R/O flag of the super block object. It is not enough, because the kernel may set the R/O flag only for the mount point. We need invoke mnt_want_write_file() to do a full check. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When wen want to set the default subvolume, we must get write access, or we will change the R/O file system. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If there is no running transaction in the fs, we needn't start a new one when we want to start sync. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Since we have gotten the root in the caller, just pass it into btrfs_ioctl_{start, wait}_sync() directly. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This is the commit that allows to start the device replace procedure. An ioctl() interface is added that supports starting and canceling the device replace procedure, and to retrieve the status and progress. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This patch adds some code to disallow operations on the device that is used as the target for the device replace operation. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
Btrfs admin operations that are manually started from user mode and that cannot be executed at the same time return -EINPROGRESS. A common way to enter and leave this locked section is introduced since it used to be specific to the balance operation. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
A small number of functions that are used in a device replace procedure when the operation is resumed at mount time are unable to pass the same root pointer that would be used in the regular (ioctl) context. And since the root pointer is not required, only the fs_info is, the root pointer argument is replaced with the fs_info pointer argument. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
When creating a snapshot, failing to commit a transaction can end up with aborting the transaction, following by doing a cleanup for it, where we'll free all snapshots pending to disk. So we check it and avoid double free on pending snapshots. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 jeff.liu 提交于
Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev(). The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size). Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev(). Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 26 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We BUG if we fail to commit the transaction when creating a snapshot, which is just obnoxious. Remove the BUG_ON(). Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently if len argument in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim() is smaller than one FSB we will continue and finally return 0 bytes discarded. However if the length to discard is smaller then file system block we should really return EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
-
- 12 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
In order to accomodate retrying path-based syscalls, we need to add a new "type" argument to audit_inode_child. This will tell us whether we're looking for a child entry that represents a create or a delete. If we find a parent, don't automatically assume that we need to create a new entry. Instead, use the information we have to try to find an existing entry first. Update it if one is found and create a new one if not. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Most of the callers get called with an inode and dentry in the reverse order. The compiler then has to reshuffle the arg registers and/or stack in order to pass them on to audit_inode_child. Reverse those arguments for a micro-optimization. Reported-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
So far the return code of barrier_all_devices() is ignored, which means that errors are ignored. The result can be a corrupt filesystem which is not consistent. This commit adds code to evaluate the return code of barrier_all_devices(). The normal btrfs_error() mechanism is used to switch the filesystem into read-only mode when errors are detected. In order to decide whether barrier_all_devices() should return error or success, the number of disks that are allowed to fail the barrier submission is calculated. This calculation accounts for the worst RAID level of metadata, system and data. If single, dup or RAID0 is in use, a single disk error is already considered to be fatal. Otherwise a single disk error is tolerated. The calculation of the number of disks that are tolerated to fail the barrier operation is performed when the filesystem gets mounted, when a balance operation is started and finished, and when devices are added or removed. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Btrfs uses inclusive range end for lock_extent(), unlock_extent() and related functions, so we made off-by-one errors in file clone. This fixes it and also fixes some style problems. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Hi, the patch si simple, but it has user visible impact and I'm not quite sure how to resolve it. In short, $subj says it, chattr -C supports it and we want to use it. The conditions that acutally allow to change the NOCOW flag are clear. What if I try to set the flag on a file that is not empty? Options: 1) whole ioctl will fail, EINVAL 2.1) ioctl will succeed, the NOCOW flag will be silently removed, but the file will stay COW-ed and checksummed 2.2) ioctl will succeed, flag will not be removed and a syslog message will warn that the COW flag has not been changed 2.2.1) dtto, no syslog message Man page of chattr states that "If it is set on a file which already has data blocks, it is undefined when the blocks assigned to the file will be fully stable." Yes, it's undefined and with current implementation it'll never happen. So from this end, the user cannot expect anything. I'm trying to find a reasonable behaviour, so that a command like 'chattr -R -aijS +C' to tweak a broad set of flags in a deep directory does not fail unnecessarily and does not pollute the log. My personal preference is 2.2.1, but my dev's oppinion is skewed, not counting the fact that I know the code and otherwise would look there before consulting the documentation. The patch implements 2.2.1. david -------------8<------------------- From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> It's safe to turn off checksums for a zero sized file. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/18030 "We cannot switch on NODATASUM for a file that already has extents that are checksummed. The invariant here is that either all the extents or none are checksummed. Theoretically it's possible to add/remove all checksums from a given file, but it's a potentially longtime operation, the file has to be in some intermediate state where the checksums partially exist but have to be ignored (for the csum->nocsum) until the file is fully converted, this brings more special cases to extent handling, it has to survive power failure and remain consistent, and probably needs to be restarted after next mount." Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
This is the change of the kernel side. Translation of logical to inode used to have an upper limit 4k on inode container's size, but the limit is not large enough for a data with a great many of refs, so when resolving logical address, we can end up with "ioctl ret=0, bytes_left=0, bytes_missing=19944, cnt=510, missed=2493" This changes to regard 64k as the upper limit and use vmalloc instead of kmalloc to get memory more easily. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We already have a helper, iterate_inodes_from_logical(), for logical resolve, so just use it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag. It is possible to lose our errors because (-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true. I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is. I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors. Acked-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We're going to use this flag EXTENT_DEFRAG to indicate which range belongs to defragment so that we can implement snapshow-aware defrag: We set the EXTENT_DEFRAG flag when dirtying the extents that need defragmented, so later on writeback thread can differentiate between normal writeback and writeback started by defragmentation. Original-Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We should insert/update 6 items(root ref, root backref, dir item, dir index, root item and parent inode) when creating a snapshot, not 5 items, fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-