1. 15 10月, 2008 5 次提交
  2. 15 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 05 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  4. 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 22 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  6. 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  8. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
    • R
      Freezer: make kernel threads nonfreezable by default · 83144186
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, the freezer treats all tasks as freezable, except for the kernel
      threads that explicitly set the PF_NOFREEZE flag for themselves.  This
      approach is problematic, since it requires every kernel thread to either
      set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly, or call try_to_freeze(), even if it doesn't
      care for the freezing of tasks at all.
      
      It seems better to only require the kernel threads that want to or need to
      be frozen to use some freezer-related code and to remove any
      freezer-related code from the other (nonfreezable) kernel threads, which is
      done in this patch.
      
      The patch causes all kernel threads to be nonfreezable by default (ie.  to
      have PF_NOFREEZE set by default) and introduces the set_freezable()
      function that should be called by the freezable kernel threads in order to
      unset PF_NOFREEZE.  It also makes all of the currently freezable kernel
      threads call set_freezable(), so it shouldn't cause any (intentional)
      change of behaviour to appear.  Additionally, it updates documentation to
      describe the freezing of tasks more accurately.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NNigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
      Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
      Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
      Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      83144186
  9. 08 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  10. 11 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  11. 09 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  12. 29 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  13. 23 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  14. 27 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  15. 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  16. 20 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  17. 16 10月, 2006 2 次提交
  18. 29 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  19. 13 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  20. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  21. 09 11月, 2005 1 次提交
  22. 29 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  23. 09 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  24. 26 4月, 2005 2 次提交
    • A
      [NET]: kill gratitious includes of major.h · 5523662c
      Al Viro 提交于
      	A lot of places in there are including major.h for no reason
      whatsoever.  Removed.  And yes, it still builds.
      
      	The history of that stuff is often amusing.  E.g. for net/core/sock.c
      the story looks so, as far as I've been able to reconstruct it: we used to
      need major.h in net/socket.c circa 1.1.early.  In 1.1.13 that need had
      disappeared, along with register_chrdev(SOCKET_MAJOR, "socket", &net_fops)
      in sock_init().  Include had not.  When 1.2 -> 1.3 reorg of net/* had moved
      a lot of stuff from net/socket.c to net/core/sock.c, this crap had followed...
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5523662c
    • A
      [PATCH] kill gratitious includes of major.h under net/* · b453257f
      Al Viro 提交于
      A lot of places in there are including major.h for no reason whatsoever.
      Removed.  And yes, it still builds. 
      
      The history of that stuff is often amusing.  E.g.  for net/core/sock.c
      the story looks so, as far as I've been able to reconstruct it: we used
      to need major.h in net/socket.c circa 1.1.early.  In 1.1.13 that need
      had disappeared, along with register_chrdev(SOCKET_MAJOR, "socket",
      &net_fops) in sock_init().  Include had not.  When 1.2 -> 1.3 reorg of
      net/* had moved a lot of stuff from net/socket.c to net/core/sock.c,
      this crap had followed... 
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b453257f
  25. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4