- 05 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Capper 提交于
[ Upstream commit a96a33b1ca57dbea4285893dedf290aeb8eb090b ] For cases where there is a mismatch in ARMv8.2-LVA support between CPUs we have to be careful in allowing secondary CPUs to boot if 52-bit virtual addresses have already been enabled on the boot CPU. This patch adds code to the secondary startup path. If the boot CPU has enabled 52-bit VAs then ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1 is checked to see if the secondary can also enable 52-bit support. If not, the secondary is prevented from booting and an error message is displayed indicating why. Technically this patch could be implemented using the cpufeature code when considering 52-bit userspace support. However, we employ low level checks here as the cpufeature code won't be able to run if we have mismatched 52-bit kernel va support. Signed-off-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Murzin 提交于
[ Upstream commit 74698f6971f25d045301139413578865fc2bd8f9 ] Updates to the GIC architecture allow ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.GIC to have values other than 0 or 1. At the moment, Linux is quite strict in the way it handles this field at early boot stage (cpufeature is fine) and will refuse to use the system register CPU interface if it doesn't find the value 1. Fixes: 021f6537 ("irqchip: gic-v3: Initial support for GICv3") Reported-by: NChase Conklin <Chase.Conklin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 23 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
[ Upstream commit 4eaed6aa2c628101246bcabc91b203bfac1193f8 ] In KVM we define the configuration of HCR_EL2 for a VHE HOST in HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS, but we don't have a similar definition for the non-VHE host flags, and open-code HCR_RW. Further, in head.S we open-code the flags for VHE and non-VHE configurations. In future, we're going to want to configure more flags for the host, so lets add a HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS defintion, and consistently use both HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS and HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS in the kvm code and head.S. We now use mov_q to generate the HCR_EL2 value, as we use when configuring other registers in head.S. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NRichard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- 26 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
We don't currently limit guest accesses to the LOR registers, which we neither virtualize nor context-switch. As such, guests are provided with unusable information/controls, and are not isolated from each other (or the host). To prevent these issues, we can trap register accesses and present the illusion LORegions are unssupported by the CPU. To do this, we mask ID_AA64MMFR1.LO, and set HCR_EL2.TLOR to trap accesses to the following registers: * LORC_EL1 * LOREA_EL1 * LORID_EL1 * LORN_EL1 * LORSA_EL1 ... when trapped, we inject an UNDEFINED exception to EL1, simulating their non-existence. As noted in D7.2.67, when no LORegions are implemented, LoadLOAcquire and StoreLORelease must behave as LoadAcquire and StoreRelease respectively. We can ensure this by clearing LORC_EL1.EN when a CPU's EL2 is first initialized, as the host kernel will not modify this. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Signed-off-by: NChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
-
- 07 2月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
The identity map is mapped as both writeable and executable by the SWAPPER_MM_MMUFLAGS and this is relied upon by the kpti code to manage a synchronisation flag. Update the .pushsection flags to reflect the actual mapping attributes. Reported-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
pte_to_phys lives in assembler.h and takes its destination register as the first argument. Move phys_to_pte out of head.S to sit with its counterpart and rejig it to follow the same calling convention. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Since AArch64 assembly instructions take the destination register as their first operand, do the same thing for the phys_to_ttbr macro. Acked-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Shanker Donthineni 提交于
The ARM architecture defines the memory locations that are permitted to be accessed as the result of a speculative instruction fetch from an exception level for which all stages of translation are disabled. Specifically, the core is permitted to speculatively fetch from the 4KB region containing the current program counter 4K and next 4K. When translation is changed from enabled to disabled for the running exception level (SCTLR_ELn[M] changed from a value of 1 to 0), the Falkor core may errantly speculatively access memory locations outside of the 4KB region permitted by the architecture. The errant memory access may lead to one of the following unexpected behaviors. 1) A System Error Interrupt (SEI) being raised by the Falkor core due to the errant memory access attempting to access a region of memory that is protected by a slave-side memory protection unit. 2) Unpredictable device behavior due to a speculative read from device memory. This behavior may only occur if the instruction cache is disabled prior to or coincident with translation being changed from enabled to disabled. The conditions leading to this erratum will not occur when either of the following occur: 1) A higher exception level disables translation of a lower exception level (e.g. EL2 changing SCTLR_EL1[M] from a value of 1 to 0). 2) An exception level disabling its stage-1 translation if its stage-2 translation is enabled (e.g. EL1 changing SCTLR_EL1[M] from a value of 1 to 0 when HCR_EL2[VM] has a value of 1). To avoid the errant behavior, software must execute an ISB immediately prior to executing the MSR that will change SCTLR_ELn[M] from 1 to 0. Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Morse 提交于
__cpu_setup() configures SCTLR_EL1 using some hard coded hex masks, and el2_setup() duplicates some this when setting RES1 bits. Lets make this the same as KVM's hyp_init, which uses named bits. First, we add definitions for all the SCTLR_EL{1,2} bits, the RES{1,0} bits, and those we want to set or clear. Add a build_bug checks to ensures all bits are either set or clear. This means we don't need to preserve endian-ness configuration generated elsewhere. Finally, move the head.S and proc.S users of these hard-coded masks over to the macro versions. Signed-off-by: NJames Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Capper 提交于
Currently the early assembler page table code assumes that precisely 1xpgd, 1xpud, 1xpmd are sufficient to represent the early kernel text mappings. Unfortunately this is rarely the case when running with a 16KB granule, and we also run into limits with 4KB granule when building much larger kernels. This patch re-writes the early page table logic to compute indices of mappings for each level of page table, and if multiple indices are required, the next-level page table is scaled up accordingly. Also the required size of the swapper_pg_dir is computed at link time to cover the mapping [KIMAGE_ADDR + VOFFSET, _end]. When KASLR is enabled, an extra page is set aside for each level that may require extra entries at runtime. Tested-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NSteve Capper <steve.capper@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kristina Martsenko 提交于
Currently, when using VA_BITS < 48, if the ID map text happens to be placed in physical memory above VA_BITS, we increase the VA size (up to 48) and create a new table level, in order to map in the ID map text. This is okay because the system always supports 48 bits of VA. This patch extends the code such that if the system supports 52 bits of VA, and the ID map text is placed that high up, then we increase the VA size accordingly, up to 52. One difference from the current implementation is that so far the condition of VA_BITS < 48 has meant that the top level table is always "full", with the maximum number of entries, and an extra table level is always needed. Now, when VA_BITS = 48 (and using 64k pages), the top level table is not full, and we simply need to increase the number of entries in it, instead of creating a new table level. Tested-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: reduce arguments to __create_hyp_mappings()] [catalin.marinas@arm.com: reworked/renamed __cpu_uses_extended_idmap_level()] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Kristina Martsenko 提交于
The top 4 bits of a 52-bit physical address are positioned at bits 12..15 of a page table entry. Introduce macros to convert between a physical address and its placement in a table entry, and change all macros/functions that access PTEs to use them. Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Tested-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: some long lines wrapped] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Kristina Martsenko 提交于
The top 4 bits of a 52-bit physical address are positioned at bits 12..15 in page table entries. Introduce a macro to move the bits there, and change the early ID map and swapper table setup code to use it. Tested-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: additional comments for clarification] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Kristina Martsenko 提交于
The top 4 bits of a 52-bit physical address are positioned at bits 2..5 in the TTBR registers. Introduce a couple of macros to move the bits there, and change all TTBR writers to use them. Leave TTBR0 PAN code unchanged, to avoid complicating it. A system with 52-bit PA will have PAN anyway (because it's ARMv8.1 or later), and a system without 52-bit PA can only use up to 48-bit PAs. A later patch in this series will add a kconfig dependency to ensure PAN is configured. In addition, when using 52-bit PA there is a special alignment requirement on the top-level table. We don't currently have any VA_BITS configuration that would violate the requirement, but one could be added in the future, so add a compile-time BUG_ON to check for it. Tested-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NSuzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Tested-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NBob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com> [catalin.marinas@arm.com: added TTBR_BADD_MASK_52 comment] Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 12 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shanker Donthineni 提交于
The ARM architecture defines the memory locations that are permitted to be accessed as the result of a speculative instruction fetch from an exception level for which all stages of translation are disabled. Specifically, the core is permitted to speculatively fetch from the 4KB region containing the current program counter 4K and next 4K. When translation is changed from enabled to disabled for the running exception level (SCTLR_ELn[M] changed from a value of 1 to 0), the Falkor core may errantly speculatively access memory locations outside of the 4KB region permitted by the architecture. The errant memory access may lead to one of the following unexpected behaviors. 1) A System Error Interrupt (SEI) being raised by the Falkor core due to the errant memory access attempting to access a region of memory that is protected by a slave-side memory protection unit. 2) Unpredictable device behavior due to a speculative read from device memory. This behavior may only occur if the instruction cache is disabled prior to or coincident with translation being changed from enabled to disabled. The conditions leading to this erratum will not occur when either of the following occur: 1) A higher exception level disables translation of a lower exception level (e.g. EL2 changing SCTLR_EL1[M] from a value of 1 to 0). 2) An exception level disabling its stage-1 translation if its stage-2 translation is enabled (e.g. EL1 changing SCTLR_EL1[M] from a value of 1 to 0 when HCR_EL2[VM] has a value of 1). To avoid the errant behavior, software must execute an ISB immediately prior to executing the MSR that will change SCTLR_ELn[M] from 1 to 0. Signed-off-by: NShanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 03 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Martin 提交于
To enable the kernel to use SVE, SVE traps from EL1 to EL2 must be disabled. To take maximum advantage of the hardware, the full available vector length also needs to be enabled for EL1 by programming ZCR_EL2.LEN. (The kernel will program ZCR_EL1.LEN as required, but this cannot override the limit set by ZCR_EL2.) This patch makes the appropriate changes to the EL2 early setup code. Signed-off-by: NDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
When booting at EL2, ensure that we permit the EL1 host to sample physical addresses and physical counter values using SPE. Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 27 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
When the kernel is entered at EL2 on an ARMv8.0 system, we construct the EL1 pstate and make sure this uses the the EL1 stack pointer (we perform an exception return to EL1h). But if the kernel is either entered at EL1 or stays at EL2 (because we're on a VHE-capable system), we fail to set SPsel, and use whatever stack selection the higher exception level has choosen for us. Let's not take any chance, and make sure that SPsel is set to one before we decide the mode we're going to run in. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
In the KASLR setup routine, we ensure that the early virtual mapping of the kernel image does not cover more than a single table entry at the level above the swapper block level, so that the assembler routines involved in setting up this mapping can remain simple. In this calculation we add the proposed KASLR offset to the values of the _text and _end markers, and reject it if they would end up falling in different swapper table sized windows. However, when taking the addresses of _text and _end, the modulo offset (the physical displacement modulo 2 MB) is already accounted for, and so adding it again results in incorrect results. So disregard the modulo offset from the calculation. Fixes: 08cdac61 ("arm64: relocatable: deal with physically misaligned ...") Reviewed-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Tested-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
As it turns out, the unwind code is slightly broken, and probably has been for a while. The problem is in the dumping of the exception stack, which is intended to dump the contents of the pt_regs struct at each level in the call stack where an exception was taken and routed to a routine marked as __exception (which means its stack frame is right below the pt_regs struct on the stack). 'Right below the pt_regs struct' is ill defined, though: the unwind code assigns 'frame pointer + 0x10' to the .sp member of the stackframe struct at each level, and dump_backtrace() happily dereferences that as the pt_regs pointer when encountering an __exception routine. However, the actual size of the stack frame created by this routine (which could be one of many __exception routines we have in the kernel) is not known, and so frame.sp is pretty useless to figure out where struct pt_regs really is. So it seems the only way to ensure that we can find our struct pt_regs when walking the stack frames is to put it at a known fixed offset of the stack frame pointer that is passed to such __exception routines. The simplest way to do that is to put it inside pt_regs itself, which is the main change implemented by this patch. As a bonus, doing this allows us to get rid of a fair amount of cruft related to walking from one stack to the other, which is especially nice since we intend to introduce yet another stack for overflow handling once we add support for vmapped stacks. It also fixes an inconsistency where we only add a stack frame pointing to ELR_EL1 if we are executing from the IRQ stack but not when we are executing from the task stack. To consistly identify exceptions regs even in the presence of exceptions taken from entry code, we must check whether the next frame was created by entry text, rather than whether the current frame was crated by exception text. To avoid backtracing using PCs that fall in the idmap, or are controlled by userspace, we must explcitly zero the FP and LR in startup paths, and must ensure that the frame embedded in pt_regs is zeroed upon entry from EL0. To avoid these NULL entries showin in the backtrace, unwind_frame() is updated to avoid them. Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [Mark: compare current frame against .entry.text, avoid bogus PCs] Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Robin Murphy 提交于
__inval_cache_range() is already the odd one out among our data cache maintenance routines as the only remaining range-based one; as we're going to want an invalidation routine to call from C code for the pmem API, let's tweak the prototype and name to bring it in line with the clean operations, and to make its relationship with __dma_inv_area() neatly mirror that of __clean_dcache_area_poc() and __dma_clean_area(). The loop clearing the early page tables gets mildly massaged in the process for the sake of consistency. Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRobin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
After having split off the PE header, clean up the bits that remain: use .long consistently, merge two adjacent #ifdef CONFIG_EFI blocks, fix the offset of the PE header pointer and remove the redundant .align that follows it. Also, since we will be eliminating all open coded constants from the EFI header in subsequent patches, let's replace the open coded "ARM\x64" magic number with its .ascii equivalent. No changes to the resulting binary image are intended. Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
In preparation of yet another round of modifications to the PE/COFF header, macroize it and move the definition into a separate source file. Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
We only need to initialise sctlr_el1 if we're installing an EL2 stub, so we may as well defer this until we're doing so. Similarly, we can defer intialising CPTR_EL2 until then, as we do not access any trapped functionality as part of el2_setup. This patch modified el2_setup accordingly, allowing us to remove a branch and simplify the code flow. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
The early el2_setup code is a little convoluted, with two branches where one would do. This makes the code more painful to read than is necessary. We can remove a branch and simplify the logic by moving the early return in the booted-at-EL1 case earlier in the function. This separates it from all the setup logic that only makes sense for EL2. Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 09 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Unlike most sysreg defintiions, the GICv3 definitions don't have a SYS_ prefix, and they don't live in <asm/sysreg.h>. Additionally, some definitions are duplicated elsewhere (e.g. in the KVM save/restore code). For consistency, and to make it possible to share a common definition for these sysregs, this patch moves the definitions to <asm/sysreg.h>, adding a SYS_ prefix, and sorting the registers per their encoding. Existing users of the definitions are fixed up so that this change is not problematic. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 10 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
The SPE architecture requires each exception level to enable access to the SPE controls for the exception level below it, since additional context-switch logic may be required to handle the buffer safely. This patch allows EL1 (host) access to the SPE controls when entered at EL2. Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 03 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
When building with debugging symbols, take the absolute path to the vmlinux binary and add it to the special PE/COFF debug table entry. This allows a debug EFI build to find the vmlinux binary, which is very helpful in debugging, given that the offset where the Image is first loaded by EFI is highly unpredictable. On implementations of UEFI that choose to implement it, this information is exposed via the EFI debug support table, which is a UEFI configuration table that is accessible both by the firmware at boot time and by the OS at runtime, and lists all PE/COFF images loaded by the system. The format of the NB10 Codeview entry is based on the definition used by EDK2, which is our primary reference when it comes to the use of PE/COFF in the context of UEFI firmware. Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [will: use realpath instead of shell invocation, as discussed on list] Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Some places in the kernel open-code sequences using ADRP for a symbol another instruction using a :lo12: relocation for that same symbol. These sequences are easy to get wrong, and more painful to read than is necessary. For these reasons, it is preferable to use the {adr,ldr,str}_l macros for these cases. This patch makes use of adr_l these in head.S, removing an open-coded sequence using adrp. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 10 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
In commit 23c8a500 ("arm64: kernel: use ordinary return/argument register for el2_setup()"), we stopped using w20 as a global stash of the boot mode flag, and instead pass this around in w0 as a function parameter. Unfortunately, we missed a couple of comments, which still refer to the old convention of using w20/x20. This patch fixes up the comments to describe the code as it currently works. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jintack 提交于
Bit positions of CNTHCTL_EL2 are changing depending on HCR_EL2.E2H bit. EL1PCEN and EL1PCTEN are 1st and 0th bits when E2H is not set, but they are 11th and 10th bits respectively when E2H is set. Current code is unintentionally setting wrong bits to CNTHCTL_EL2 with E2H set. In fact, we don't need to set those two bits, which allow EL1 and EL0 to access physical timer and counter respectively, if E2H and TGE are set for the host kernel. They will be configured later as necessary. First, we don't need to configure those bits for EL1, since the host kernel runs in EL2. It is a hypervisor's responsibility to configure them before entering a VM, which runs in EL0 and EL1. Second, EL0 accesses are configured in the later stage of boot process. Signed-off-by: NJintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> Acked-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 22 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin Marinas 提交于
This patch adds the uaccess macros/functions to disable access to user space by setting TTBR0_EL1 to a reserved zeroed page. Since the value written to TTBR0_EL1 must be a physical address, for simplicity this patch introduces a reserved_ttbr0 page at a constant offset from swapper_pg_dir. The uaccess_disable code uses the ttbr1_el1 value adjusted by the reserved_ttbr0 offset. Enabling access to user is done by restoring TTBR0_EL1 with the value from the struct thread_info ttbr0 variable. Interrupts must be disabled during the uaccess_ttbr0_enable code to ensure the atomicity of the thread_info.ttbr0 read and TTBR0_EL1 write. This patch also moves the get_thread_info asm macro from entry.S to assembler.h for reuse in the uaccess_ttbr0_* macros. Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 12 11月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
This patch moves arm64's struct thread_info from the task stack into task_struct. This protects thread_info from corruption in the case of stack overflows, and makes its address harder to determine if stack addresses are leaked, making a number of attacks more difficult. Precise detection and handling of overflow is left for subsequent patches. Largely, this involves changing code to store the task_struct in sp_el0, and acquire the thread_info from the task struct. Core code now implements current_thread_info(), and as noted in <linux/sched.h> this relies on offsetof(task_struct, thread_info) == 0, enforced by core code. This change means that the 'tsk' register used in entry.S now points to a task_struct, rather than a thread_info as it used to. To make this clear, the TI_* field offsets are renamed to TSK_TI_*, with asm-offsets appropriately updated to account for the structural change. Userspace clobbers sp_el0, and we can no longer restore this from the stack. Instead, the current task is cached in a per-cpu variable that we can safely access from early assembly as interrupts are disabled (and we are thus not preemptible). Both secondary entry and idle are updated to stash the sp and task pointer separately. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Tested-by: NLaura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Zyngier 提交于
Commit f436b2ac ("arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional access") made sure we wouldn't access unimplemented PMU registers, but also left MDCR_EL2 uninitialized in that case, leading to trap bits being potentially left set. Make sure we always write something in that register. Fixes: f436b2ac ("arm64: kernel: fix architected PMU registers unconditional access") Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 02 9月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Now that the only remaining occurrences of the use of callee saved registers are on the primary boot path, add a comment to the code which register is used for what. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Instead of stashing the value of the link register in x28 before setting up the stack and calling into C code, create an ordinary PCS compatible stack frame so that we can push the return address onto the stack. Since exception handlers require a stack as well, assign the stack pointer register before installing the vector table. Note that this accounts for the difference between THREAD_START_SP and THREAD_SIZE, given that the stack pointer is always decremented before calling into any C code. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Keeping __PHYS_OFFSET in x24 is actually less clear than simply taking the value of __PHYS_OFFSET using an adrp instruction in the three places that we need it. So change that. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
Using x27 for passing to __enable_mmu what is essentially the return address makes the code look more complicated than it needs to be. So switch to x30/lr, and update the secondary and cpu_resume call sites to simply call __enable_mmu as an ordinary function, with a bl instruction. This requires the callers to be covered by .idmap.text. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
The KASLR processing is only used by the primary boot path, and complements the processing that takes place in __primary_switch(). Move the two parts together, to make the code easier to understand. Also, fix up a minor whitespace issue. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> [will: fixed conflict with -rc3 due to lack of fd363bd4] Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
The function el2_setup() passes its return value in register w20, and in the two cases where the caller actually cares about this return value, it is passed into set_cpu_boot_mode_flag() [almost] directly, which expects its input in w20 as well. So there is no reason to use a 'special' callee saved register here, but we can simply follow the PCS for return value and first argument, respectively. Reviewed-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-