1. 16 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks after buffered append writes · e3b8a485
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      The patch from commit a7e3b975 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode
      blocks") introduced a regression where if we do a buffered write starting
      at position equal to or greater than the file's size and then stat(2) the
      file before writeback is triggered, the number of used blocks does not
      change (unless there's a prealloc/unwritten extent). Example:
      
        $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" foobar
        $ du -h foobar
        0	foobar
        $ sync
        $ du -h foobar
        64K	foobar
      
      The first version of that patch didn't had this regression and the second
      version, which was the one committed, was made only to address some
      performance regression detected by the intel test robots using fs_mark.
      
      This fixes the regression by setting the new delaloc bit in the range, and
      doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() while setting the regular dealloc bit as
      well, so that this way we set both bits at once avoiding navigation of the
      inode's io tree twice. Doing it at btrfs_dirty_pages() is also the most
      meaninful place, as we should set the new dellaloc bit when if we set the
      delalloc bit, which happens only if we copied bytes into the pages at
      __btrfs_buffered_write().
      
      This was making some of LTP's du tests fail, which can be quickly run
      using a command line like the following:
      
        $ ./runltp -q -p -l /ltp.log -f commands -s du -d /mnt
      
      Fixes: a7e3b975 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of inode blocks")
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e3b8a485
  2. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents · 8b62f87b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Right now we do a lot of weird hoops around outstanding_extents in order
      to keep the extent count consistent.  This is because we logically
      transfer the outstanding_extent count from the initial reservation
      through the set_delalloc_bits.  This makes it pretty difficult to get a
      handle on how and when we need to mess with outstanding_extents.
      
      Fix this by revamping the rules of how we deal with outstanding_extents.
      Now instead everybody that is holding on to a delalloc extent is
      required to increase the outstanding extents count for itself.  This
      means we'll have something like this
      
      btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata	- outstanding_extents = 1
       btrfs_set_extent_delalloc	- outstanding_extents = 2
      btrfs_release_delalloc_extents	- outstanding_extents = 1
      
      for an initial file write.  Now take the append write where we extend an
      existing delalloc range but still under the maximum extent size
      
      btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata - outstanding_extents = 2
        btrfs_set_extent_delalloc
          btrfs_set_bit_hook		- outstanding_extents = 3
          btrfs_merge_extent_hook	- outstanding_extents = 2
      btrfs_delalloc_release_extents	- outstanding_extnets = 1
      
      In order to make the ordered extent transition we of course must now
      make ordered extents carry their own outstanding_extent reservation, so
      for cow_file_range we end up with
      
      btrfs_add_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 2
      clear_extent_bit		- outstanding_extents = 1
      btrfs_remove_ordered_extent	- outstanding_extents = 0
      
      This makes all manipulations of outstanding_extents much more explicit.
      Every successful call to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata _must_ now be
      combined with btrfs_release_delalloc_extents, even in the error case, as
      that is the only function that actually modifies the
      outstanding_extents counter.
      
      The drawback to this is now we are much more likely to have transient
      cases where outstanding_extents is much larger than it actually should
      be.  This could happen before as we manipulated the delalloc bits, but
      now it happens basically at every write.  This may put more pressure on
      the ENOSPC flushing code, but I think making this code simpler is worth
      the cost.  I have another change coming to mitigate this side-effect
      somewhat.
      
      I also added trace points for the counter manipulation.  These were used
      by a bpf script I wrote to help track down leak issues.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8b62f87b
  3. 30 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 21 8月, 2017 3 次提交
  6. 16 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 30 6月, 2017 3 次提交
    • C
      btrfs: fix integer overflow in calc_reclaim_items_nr · 6374e57a
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Dave Jones hit a WARN_ON(nr < 0) in btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() with
      v4.12-rc6.  This was because commit 70e7af24 made it possible for
      calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a negative number.  It's not really a
      bug in that commit, it just didn't go far enough down the stack to find
      all the possible 64->32 bit overflows.
      
      This switches calc_reclaim_items_nr() to return a u64 and changes everyone
      that uses the results of that math to u64 as well.
      Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
      Fixes: 70e7af24 ("Btrfs: fix delalloc accounting leak caused by u32 overflow")
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6374e57a
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges · bc42bda2
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      For the following case, btrfs can underflow qgroup reserved space
      at an error path:
      (Page size 4K, function name without "btrfs_" prefix)
      
               Task A                  |             Task B
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      Buffered_write [0, 2K)           |
      |- check_data_free_space()       |
      |  |- qgroup_reserve_data()      |
      |     Range aligned to page      |
      |     range [0, 4K)          <<< |
      |     4K bytes reserved      <<< |
      |- copy pages to page cache      |
                                       | Buffered_write [2K, 4K)
                                       | |- check_data_free_space()
                                       | |  |- qgroup_reserved_data()
                                       | |     Range alinged to page
                                       | |     range [0, 4K)
                                       | |     Already reserved by A <<<
                                       | |     0 bytes reserved      <<<
                                       | |- delalloc_reserve_metadata()
                                       | |  And it *FAILED* (Maybe EQUOTA)
                                       | |- free_reserved_data_space()
                                            |- qgroup_free_data()
                                               Range aligned to page range
                                               [0, 4K)
                                               Freeing 4K
      (Special thanks to Chandan for the detailed report and analyse)
      
      [CAUSE]
      Above Task B is freeing reserved data range [0, 4K) which is actually
      reserved by Task A.
      
      And at writeback time, page dirty by Task A will go through writeback
      routine, which will free 4K reserved data space at file extent insert
      time, causing the qgroup underflow.
      
      [FIX]
      For btrfs_qgroup_free_data(), add @reserved parameter to only free
      data ranges reserved by previous btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data().
      So in above case, Task B will try to free 0 byte, so no underflow.
      Reported-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Tested-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bc42bda2
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Introduce extent changeset for qgroup reserve functions · 364ecf36
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      Introduce a new parameter, struct extent_changeset for
      btrfs_qgroup_reserved_data() and its callers.
      
      Such extent_changeset was used in btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() to record
      which range it reserved in current reserve, so it can free it in error
      paths.
      
      The reason we need to export it to callers is, at buffered write error
      path, without knowing what exactly which range we reserved in current
      allocation, we can free space which is not reserved by us.
      
      This will lead to qgroup reserved space underflow.
      Reviewed-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      364ecf36
  8. 20 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 28 2月, 2017 4 次提交
  10. 17 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  11. 14 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  12. 06 12月, 2016 5 次提交
  13. 30 11月, 2016 4 次提交
  14. 19 11月, 2016 2 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: remove unused code when creating and merging reloc trees · 001895b3
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      In commit 5bc7247a (Btrfs: fix broken nocow after balance) we started
      abusing the rtransid and otransid fields of root items from relocation
      trees to fix some issues with nodatacow mode. However later in commit
      ba8b0289 (Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocation) we
      dropped the code that made use of those fields but did not remove
      the code that sets those fields.
      
      So just remove them to avoid confusion.
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      001895b3
    • F
      Btrfs: fix relocation incorrectly dropping data references · 054570a1
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      During relocation of a data block group we create a relocation tree
      for each fs/subvol tree by making a snapshot of each tree using
      btrfs_copy_root() and the tree's commit root, and then setting the last
      snapshot field for the fs/subvol tree's root to the value of the current
      transaction id minus 1. However this can lead to relocation later
      dropping references that it did not create if we have qgroups enabled,
      leaving the filesystem in an inconsistent state that keeps aborting
      transactions.
      
      Lets consider the following example to explain the problem, which requires
      qgroups to be enabled.
      
      We are relocating data block group Y, we have a subvolume with id 258 that
      has a root at level 1, that subvolume is used to store directory entries
      for snapshots and we are currently at transaction 3404.
      
      When committing transaction 3404, we have a pending snapshot and therefore
      we call btrfs_run_delayed_items() at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot()
      in order to create its dentry at subvolume 258. This results in COWing
      leaf A from root 258 in order to add the dentry. Note that leaf A
      also contains file extent items referring to extents from some other
      block group X (we are currently relocating block group Y). Later on, still
      at create_pending_snapshot() we call qgroup_account_snapshot(), which
      switches the commit root for root 258 when it calls switch_commit_roots(),
      so now the COWed version of leaf A, lets call it leaf A', is accessible
      from the commit root of tree 258. At the end of qgroup_account_snapshot(),
      we call record_root_in_trans() with 258 as its argument, which results
      in btrfs_init_reloc_root() being called, which in turn calls
      relocation.c:create_reloc_root() in order to create a relocation tree
      associated to root 258, which results in assigning the value of 3403
      (which is the current transaction id minus 1 = 3404 - 1) to the
      last_snapshot field of root 258. When creating the relocation tree root
      at ctree.c:btrfs_copy_root() we add a shared reference for leaf A',
      corresponding to the relocation tree's root, when we call btrfs_inc_ref()
      against the COWed root (a copy of the commit root from tree 258), which
      is at level 1. So at this point leaf A' has 2 references, one normal
      reference corresponding to root 258 and one shared reference corresponding
      to the root of the relocation tree.
      
      Transaction 3404 finishes its commit and transaction 3405 is started by
      relocation when calling merge_reloc_root() for the relocation tree
      associated to root 258. In the meanwhile leaf A' is COWed again, in
      response to some filesystem operation, when we are still at transaction
      3405. However when we COW leaf A', at ctree.c:update_ref_for_cow(), we
      call btrfs_block_can_be_shared() in order to figure out if other trees
      refer to the leaf and if any such trees exists, add a full back reference
      to leaf A' - but btrfs_block_can_be_shared() incorrectly returns false
      because the following condition is false:
      
        btrfs_header_generation(buf) <= btrfs_root_last_snapshot(&root->root_item)
      
      which evaluates to 3404 <= 3403. So after leaf A' is COWed, it stays with
      only one reference, corresponding to the shared reference we created when
      we called btrfs_copy_root() to create the relocation tree's root and
      btrfs_inc_ref() ends up not being called for leaf A' nor we end up setting
      the flag BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF in leaf A'. This results in not
      adding shared references for the extents from block group X that leaf A'
      refers to with its file extent items.
      
      Later, after merging the relocation root we do a call to to
      btrfs_drop_snapshot() in order to delete the relocation tree. This ends
      up calling do_walk_down() when path->slots[1] points to leaf A', which
      results in calling btrfs_lookup_extent_info() to get the number of
      references for leaf A', which is 1 at this time (only the shared reference
      exists) and this value is stored at wc->refs[0]. After this walk_up_proc()
      is called when wc->level is 0 and path->nodes[0] corresponds to leaf A'.
      Because the current level is 0 and wc->refs[0] is 1, it does call
      btrfs_dec_ref() against leaf A', which results in removing the single
      references that the extents from block group X have which are associated
      to root 258 - the expectation was to have each of these extents with 2
      references - one reference for root 258 and one shared reference related
      to the root of the relocation tree, and so we would drop only the shared
      reference (because leaf A' was supposed to have the flag
      BTRFS_BLOCK_FLAG_FULL_BACKREF set).
      
      This leaves the filesystem in an inconsistent state as we now have file
      extent items in a subvolume tree that point to extents from block group X
      without references in the extent tree. So later on when we try to decrement
      the references for these extents, for example due to a file unlink operation,
      truncate operation or overwriting ranges of a file, we fail because the
      expected references do not exist in the extent tree.
      
      This leads to warnings and transaction aborts like the following:
      
      [  588.965795] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  588.965815] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2479 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1625 lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x432/0x5b0 [btrfs]
      [  588.965816] Modules linked in: af_packet iscsi_ibft iscsi_boot_sysfs xfs libcrc32c ppdev acpi_cpufreq button tpm_tis e1000 i2c_piix4 pcspkr parport_pc
      parport tpm qemu_fw_cfg joydev btrfs xor raid6_pq sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci bochs_drm virtio_ring drm_kms_helper syscopyarea
      sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops virtio ttm serio_raw drm floppy sg
      [  588.965831] CPU: 2 PID: 2479 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Not tainted 4.7.3-3-default-fdm+ #1
      [  588.965832] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [  588.965844] Workqueue: btrfs-extent-refs btrfs_extent_refs_helper [btrfs]
      [  588.965845]  0000000000000000 ffff8802263bfa28 ffffffff813af542 0000000000000000
      [  588.965847]  0000000000000000 ffff8802263bfa68 ffffffff81081e8b 0000065900000000
      [  588.965848]  ffff8801db2af000 000000012bbe2000 0000000000000000 ffff880215703b48
      [  588.965849] Call Trace:
      [  588.965852]  [<ffffffff813af542>] dump_stack+0x63/0x81
      [  588.965854]  [<ffffffff81081e8b>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
      [  588.965855]  [<ffffffff81081f7d>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
      [  588.965863]  [<ffffffffa0175042>] lookup_inline_extent_backref+0x432/0x5b0 [btrfs]
      [  588.965865]  [<ffffffff81143220>] ? trace_clock_local+0x10/0x30
      [  588.965867]  [<ffffffff8114c5df>] ? rb_reserve_next_event+0x6f/0x460
      [  588.965875]  [<ffffffffa0175215>] insert_inline_extent_backref+0x55/0xd0 [btrfs]
      [  588.965882]  [<ffffffffa017531f>] __btrfs_inc_extent_ref.isra.55+0x8f/0x240 [btrfs]
      [  588.965890]  [<ffffffffa017acea>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x74a/0x1260 [btrfs]
      [  588.965892]  [<ffffffff810cb046>] ? cpuacct_charge+0x86/0xa0
      [  588.965900]  [<ffffffffa017e74f>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x9f/0x2c0 [btrfs]
      [  588.965908]  [<ffffffffa017ea04>] delayed_ref_async_start+0x94/0xb0 [btrfs]
      [  588.965918]  [<ffffffffa01c799a>] btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0xca/0x350 [btrfs]
      [  588.965928]  [<ffffffffa01c7c5e>] btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
      [  588.965930]  [<ffffffff8109b323>] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4e0
      [  588.965931]  [<ffffffff8109b658>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
      [  588.965932]  [<ffffffff8109b610>] ? process_one_work+0x4e0/0x4e0
      [  588.965934]  [<ffffffff810a1659>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
      [  588.965936]  [<ffffffff816f2f1f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
      [  588.965937]  [<ffffffff810a1590>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x170/0x170
      [  588.965938] ---[ end trace 34e5232c933a1749 ]---
      [  588.966187] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  588.966196] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2479 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2966 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x28c/0x2c0 [btrfs]
      [  588.966196] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -5)
      [  588.966197] Modules linked in: af_packet iscsi_ibft iscsi_boot_sysfs xfs libcrc32c ppdev acpi_cpufreq button tpm_tis e1000 i2c_piix4 pcspkr parport_pc
      parport tpm qemu_fw_cfg joydev btrfs xor raid6_pq sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix virtio_pci bochs_drm virtio_ring drm_kms_helper syscopyarea
      sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops virtio ttm serio_raw drm floppy sg
      [  588.966206] CPU: 2 PID: 2479 Comm: kworker/u8:7 Tainted: G        W       4.7.3-3-default-fdm+ #1
      [  588.966207] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
      [  588.966217] Workqueue: btrfs-extent-refs btrfs_extent_refs_helper [btrfs]
      [  588.966217]  0000000000000000 ffff8802263bfc98 ffffffff813af542 ffff8802263bfce8
      [  588.966219]  0000000000000000 ffff8802263bfcd8 ffffffff81081e8b 00000b96345ee000
      [  588.966220]  ffffffffa021ae1c ffff880215703b48 00000000000005fe ffff8802345ee000
      [  588.966221] Call Trace:
      [  588.966223]  [<ffffffff813af542>] dump_stack+0x63/0x81
      [  588.966224]  [<ffffffff81081e8b>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
      [  588.966225]  [<ffffffff81081eff>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
      [  588.966233]  [<ffffffffa017e93c>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x28c/0x2c0 [btrfs]
      [  588.966241]  [<ffffffffa017ea04>] delayed_ref_async_start+0x94/0xb0 [btrfs]
      [  588.966250]  [<ffffffffa01c799a>] btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0xca/0x350 [btrfs]
      [  588.966259]  [<ffffffffa01c7c5e>] btrfs_extent_refs_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
      [  588.966260]  [<ffffffff8109b323>] process_one_work+0x1f3/0x4e0
      [  588.966261]  [<ffffffff8109b658>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4e0
      [  588.966263]  [<ffffffff8109b610>] ? process_one_work+0x4e0/0x4e0
      [  588.966264]  [<ffffffff810a1659>] kthread+0xc9/0xe0
      [  588.966265]  [<ffffffff816f2f1f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
      [  588.966267]  [<ffffffff810a1590>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x170/0x170
      [  588.966268] ---[ end trace 34e5232c933a174a ]---
      [  588.966269] BTRFS: error (device sda2) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2966: errno=-5 IO failure
      [  588.966270] BTRFS info (device sda2): forced readonly
      
      This was happening often on openSUSE and SLE systems using btrfs as the
      root filesystem (with its default layout where multiple subvolumes are
      used) where balance happens in the background triggered by a cron job and
      snapshots are automatically created before/after package installations,
      upgrades and removals. The issue could be triggered simply by running the
      following loop on the first system boot post installation:
      
        while true; do
           zypper -n in nfs-kernel-server
           zypper -n rm nfs-kernel-server
        done
      
      (If we were fast enough and made that loop before the cron job triggered
      a balance operation and the balance finished)
      
      So fix by setting the last_snapshot field of the root to the value of the
      generation of its commit root. Like this btrfs_block_can_be_shared()
      behaves correctly for the case where the relocation root is created during
      a transaction commit and for the case where it's created before a
      transaction commit.
      
      Fixes: 6426c7ad (btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot)
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 4.7+
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      054570a1
  15. 17 10月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: kill BUG_ON in do_relocation · 4547f4d8
      Liu Bo 提交于
      While updating btree, we try to push items between sibling
      nodes/leaves in order to keep height as low as possible.
      But we don't memset the original places with zero when
      pushing items so that we could end up leaving stale content
      in nodes/leaves.  One may read the above stale content by
      increasing btree blocks' @nritems.
      
      One case I've come across is that in fs tree, a leaf has two
      parent nodes, hence running balance ends up with processing
      this leaf with two parent nodes, but it can only reach the
      valid parent node through btrfs_search_slot, so it'd be like,
      
      do_relocation
          for P in all parent nodes of block A:
              if !P->eb:
                  btrfs_search_slot(key);   --> get path from P to A.
              if lowest:
                  BUG_ON(A->bytenr != bytenr of A recorded in P);
              btrfs_cow_block(P, A);   --> change A's bytenr in P.
      
      After btrfs_cow_block, P has the new bytenr of A, but with the
      same @key, we get the same path again, and get panic by BUG_ON.
      
      Note that this is only happening in a corrupted fs, for a
      regular fs in which we have correct @nritems so that we won't
      read stale content in any case.
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      4547f4d8
  16. 27 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 26 9月, 2016 3 次提交
  18. 01 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 25 8月, 2016 2 次提交
    • W
      btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely · 18513091
      Wang Xiaoguang 提交于
      This patch can fix some false ENOSPC errors, below test script can
      reproduce one false ENOSPC error:
      	#!/bin/bash
      	dd if=/dev/zero of=fs.img bs=$((1024*1024)) count=128
      	dev=$(losetup --show -f fs.img)
      	mkfs.btrfs -f -M $dev
      	mkdir /tmp/mntpoint
      	mount $dev /tmp/mntpoint
      	cd /tmp/mntpoint
      	xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 $((64*1024*1024))" testfile
      
      Above script will fail for ENOSPC reason, but indeed fs still has free
      space to satisfy this request. Please see call graph:
      btrfs_fallocate()
      |-> btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
      |   bytes_may_use += 64M
      |-> btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
          |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
              |-> btrfs_add_reserved_bytes()
              |   alloc_type is RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, so it does not
              |   change bytes_may_use, and bytes_reserved += 64M. Now
              |   bytes_may_use + bytes_reserved == 128M, which is greater
              |   than btrfs_space_info's total_bytes, false enospc occurs.
              |   Note, the bytes_may_use decrease operation will be done in
              |   end of btrfs_fallocate(), which is too late.
      
      Here is another simple case for buffered write:
                          CPU 1              |              CPU 2
                                             |
      |-> cow_file_range()                   |-> __btrfs_buffered_write()
          |-> btrfs_reserve_extent()         |   |
          |                                  |   |
          |                                  |   |
          |    .....                         |   |-> btrfs_check_data_free_space()
          |                                  |
          |                                  |
          |-> extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() |
      
      In CPU 1, btrfs_reserve_extent()->find_free_extent()->
      btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() do not decrease bytes_may_use, the decrease
      operation will be delayed to be done in extent_clear_unlock_delalloc().
      Assume in this case, btrfs_reserve_extent() reserved 128MB data, CPU2's
      btrfs_check_data_free_space() tries to reserve 100MB data space.
      If
      	100MB > data_sinfo->total_bytes - data_sinfo->bytes_used -
      		data_sinfo->bytes_reserved - data_sinfo->bytes_pinned -
      		data_sinfo->bytes_readonly - data_sinfo->bytes_may_use
      btrfs_check_data_free_space() will try to allcate new data chunk or call
      btrfs_start_delalloc_roots(), or commit current transaction in order to
      reserve some free space, obviously a lot of work. But indeed it's not
      necessary as long as decreasing bytes_may_use timely, we still have
      free space, decreasing 128M from bytes_may_use.
      
      To fix this issue, this patch chooses to update bytes_may_use for both
      data and metadata in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(). For compress path, real
      extent length may not be equal to file content length, so introduce a
      ram_bytes argument for btrfs_reserve_extent(), find_free_extent() and
      btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), it's becasue bytes_may_use is increased by
      file content length. Then compress path can update bytes_may_use
      correctly. Also now we can discard RESERVE_ALLOC_NO_ACCOUNT, RESERVE_ALLOC
      and RESERVE_FREE.
      
      As we know, usually EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING is used for error path. In
      run_delalloc_nocow(), for inode marked as NODATACOW or extent marked as
      PREALLOC, we also need to update bytes_may_use, but can not pass
      EXTENT_DO_ACCOUNTING, because it also clears metadata reservation, so
      here we introduce EXTENT_CLEAR_DATA_RESV flag to indicate btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
      to update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use.
      
      Meanwhile __btrfs_prealloc_file_range() will call
      btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() internally for both sucessful and failed
      path, btrfs_prealloc_file_range()'s callers does not need to call
      btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() any more.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      18513091
    • W
      btrfs: use correct offset for reloc_inode in prealloc_file_extent_cluster() · dcb40c19
      Wang Xiaoguang 提交于
      In prealloc_file_extent_cluster(), btrfs_check_data_free_space() uses
      wrong file offset for reloc_inode, it uses cluster->start and cluster->end,
      which indeed are extent's bytenr. The correct value should be
      cluster->[start|end] minus block group's start bytenr.
      
      start bytenr   cluster->start
      |              |     extent      |   extent   | ...| extent |
      |----------------------------------------------------------------|
      |                block group reloc_inode                         |
      Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      dcb40c19