1. 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: remove btrfs_sector_sum structure · f51a4a18
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Using the structure btrfs_sector_sum to keep the checksum value is
      unnecessary, because the extents that btrfs_sector_sum points to are
      continuous, we can find out the expected checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's
      bytenr and the offset, so we can remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr. After
      removing bytenr, there is only one member in the structure, so it makes
      no sense to keep the structure, just remove it, and use a u32 array to
      store the checksum value.
      
      By this change, we don't use the while loop to get the checksums one by
      one. Now, we can get several checksum value at one time, it improved the
      performance by ~74% on my SSD (31MB/s -> 54MB/s).
      
      test command:
       # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/file0 bs=1M count=1024 oflag=sync
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      f51a4a18
  2. 01 7月, 2013 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix not being able to find skinny extents during relocate · aee68ee5
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We unconditionally search for the EXTENT_ITEM_KEY for metadata during balance,
      and then check the key that we found to see if it is actually a
      METADATA_ITEM_KEY, but this doesn't work right because METADATA is a higher key
      value, so if what we are looking for happens to be the first item in the leaf
      the search will dump us out at the previous leaf, and we won't find our item.
      So instead do what we do everywhere else, search for the skinny extent first and
      if we don't find it go back and re-search for the extent item.  This patch fixes
      the panic I was hitting when balancing a large file system with skinny extents.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      aee68ee5
    • M
      Btrfs: fix broken nocow after balance · 5bc7247a
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Balance will create reloc_root for each fs root, and it's going to
      record last_snapshot to filter shared blocks.  The side effect of
      setting last_snapshot is to break nocow attributes of files.
      
      Since the extents are not shared by the relocation tree after the balance,
      we can recover the old last_snapshot safely if no one snapshoted the
      source tree. We fix the above problem by this way.
      Reported-by: NKyle Gates <kylegates@hotmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      5bc7247a
  3. 14 6月, 2013 3 次提交
  4. 09 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 18 5月, 2013 2 次提交
  6. 07 5月, 2013 6 次提交
    • D
      34c2b290
    • E
      btrfs: make static code static & remove dead code · 48a3b636
      Eric Sandeen 提交于
      Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which
      are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout.
      
      removed functions:
      
      btrfs_iref_to_path()
      __btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item()
      __btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item()
      __btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item()
      find_eb_for_page()
      btrfs_find_block_group()
      range_straddles_pages()
      extent_range_uptodate()
      btrfs_file_extent_length()
      btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid()
      btrfs_start_transaction_lflush()
      
      btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging.
      btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are
      left for symmetry.
      
      ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      48a3b636
    • J
      Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block · 416bc658
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We kept leaking extent buffers when mounting a broken file system and it turns
      out it's because not everybody uses read_tree_block properly.  You need to check
      and make sure the extent_buffer is uptodate before you use it.  This patch fixes
      everybody who calls read_tree_block directly to make sure they check that it is
      uptodate and free it and return an error if it is not.  With this we no longer
      leak EB's when things go horribly wrong.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      416bc658
    • J
      Btrfs: fix bad extent logging · 09a2a8f9
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      A user sent me a btrfs-image of a file system that was panicing on mount during
      the log recovery.  I had originally thought these problems were from a bug in
      the free space cache code, but that was just a symptom of the problem.  The
      problem is if your application does something like this
      
      [prealloc][prealloc][prealloc]
      
      the internal extent maps will merge those all together into one extent map, even
      though on disk they are 3 separate extents.  So if you go to write into one of
      these ranges the extent map will be right since we use the physical extent when
      doing the write, but when we log the extents they will use the wrong sizes for
      the remainder prealloc space.  If this doesn't happen to trip up the free space
      cache (which it won't in a lot of cases) then you will get bogus entries in your
      extent tree which will screw stuff up later.  The data and such will still work,
      but everything else is broken.  This patch fixes this by not allowing extents
      that are on the modified list to be merged.  This has the side effect that we
      are no longer adding everything to the modified list all the time, which means
      we now have to call btrfs_drop_extents every time we log an extent into the
      tree.  So this allows me to drop all this speciality code I was using to get
      around calling btrfs_drop_extents.  With this patch the testcase I've created no
      longer creates a bogus file system after replaying the log.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      09a2a8f9
    • D
      btrfs: clean snapshots one by one · 9d1a2a3a
      David Sterba 提交于
      Each time pick one dead root from the list and let the caller know if
      it's needed to continue. This should improve responsiveness during
      umount and balance which at some point waits for cleaning all currently
      queued dead roots.
      
      A new dead root is added to the end of the list, so the snapshots
      disappear in the order of deletion.
      
      The snapshot cleaning work is now done only from the cleaner thread and the
      others wake it if needed.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      9d1a2a3a
    • J
      Btrfs: add a incompatible format change for smaller metadata extent refs · 3173a18f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We currently store the first key of the tree block inside the reference for the
      tree block in the extent tree.  This takes up quite a bit of space.  Make a new
      key type for metadata which holds the level as the offset and completely removes
      storing the btrfs_tree_block_info inside the extent ref.  This reduces the size
      from 51 bytes to 33 bytes per extent reference for each tree block.  In practice
      this results in a 30-35% decrease in the size of our extent tree, which means we
      COW less and can keep more of the extent tree in memory which makes our heavy
      metadata operations go much faster.  This is not an automatic format change, you
      must enable it at mkfs time or with btrfstune.  This patch deals with having
      metadata stored as either the old format or the new format so it is easy to
      convert.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      3173a18f
  7. 05 3月, 2013 5 次提交
  8. 20 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 09 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 13 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 12 12月, 2012 2 次提交
    • M
      Btrfs: make delalloc inodes be flushed by multi-task · 8ccf6f19
      Miao Xie 提交于
      This patch introduce a new worker pool named "flush_workers", and if we
      want to force all the inode with pending delalloc to the disks, we can
      queue those inodes into the work queue of the worker pool, in this way,
      those inodes will be flushed by multi-task.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      8ccf6f19
    • M
      Btrfs: improve the noflush reservation · 08e007d2
      Miao Xie 提交于
      In some places(such as: evicting inode), we just can not flush the reserved
      space of delalloc, flushing the delayed directory index and delayed inode
      is OK, but we don't try to flush those things and just go back when there is
      no enough space to be reserved. This patch fixes this problem.
      
      We defined 3 types of the flush operations: NO_FLUSH, FLUSH_LIMIT and FLUSH_ALL.
      If we can in the transaction, we should not flush anything, or the deadlock
      would happen, so use NO_FLUSH. If we flushing the reserved space of delalloc
      would cause deadlock, use FLUSH_LIMIT. In the other cases, FLUSH_ALL is used,
      and we will flush all things.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      08e007d2
  12. 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: cache extent state when writing out dirty metadata pages · e6138876
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Everytime we write out dirty pages we search for an offset in the tree,
      convert the bits in the state, and then when we wait we search for the
      offset again and clear the bits.  So for every dirty range in the io tree we
      are doing 4 rb searches, which is suboptimal.  With this patch we are only
      doing 2 searches for every cycle (modulo weird things happening).  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      e6138876
  13. 04 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  14. 02 10月, 2012 2 次提交
  15. 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  16. 24 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 28 4月, 2012 2 次提交
  18. 22 3月, 2012 6 次提交
  19. 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add a delalloc mutex to inodes for delalloc reservations · f248679e
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I was using i_mutex for this, but we're getting bogus lockdep warnings by doing
      that and theres no real way to get rid of those, so just stop using i_mutex to
      protect delalloc metadata reservations and use a delalloc mutex instead.  This
      shouldn't be contended often at all, only if you are writing and mmap writing to
      the file at the same time.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      f248679e