Now that also the last in-tree user of the xdp_adjust_head bit has
been removed, we can remove the flag from struct bpf_prog altogether.

This, at the same time, also makes sure that any future driver for
XDP comes with bpf_xdp_adjust_head() support right away.

A rejection based on this flag would also mean that tail calls
couldn't be used with such driver as per c2002f98 ("bpf: fix
checking xdp_adjust_head on tail calls") fix, thus lets not allow
for it in the first place.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, the verifier doesn't reject unaligned access for map_value_adj
register types. Commit 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value
arrays") added logic to check_ptr_alignment() extending it from PTR_TO_PACKET
to also PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ, but for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ no enforcement
is in place, because reg->id for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ reg types is never
non-zero, meaning, we can cause BPF_H/_W/_DW-based unaligned access for
architectures not supporting efficient unaligned access, and thus worst
case could raise exceptions on some archs that are unable to correct the
unaligned access or perform a different memory access to the actual
requested one and such.

i) Unaligned load with !CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
   on r0 (map_value_adj):

   0: (bf) r2 = r10
   1: (07) r2 += -8
   2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0
   3: (18) r1 = 0x42533a00
   5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
   6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+11
    R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
   7: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)
   8: (35) if r1 >= 0xb goto pc+9
    R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=10 R10=fp
   9: (07) r0 += 3
  10: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)
    R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=3 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=10 R10=fp
  11: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r0 +2)
    R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=3 R1=inv,min_value=0,max_value=10 R7=inv R10=fp
  [...]

ii) Unaligned store with !CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
    on r0 (map_value_adj):

   0: (bf) r2 = r10
   1: (07) r2 += -8
   2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0
   3: (18) r1 = 0x4df16a00
   5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
   6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+19
    R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
   7: (07) r0 += 3
   8: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 42
    R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=3 R10=fp
   9: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +2) = 43
    R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=3 R10=fp
  10: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 -2) = 44
    R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=3,max_value=3 R10=fp
  [...]

For the PTR_TO_PACKET type, reg->id is initially zero when skb->data
was fetched, it later receives a reg->id from env->id_gen generator
once another register with UNKNOWN_VALUE type was added to it via
check_packet_ptr_add(). The purpose of this reg->id is twofold: i) it
is used in find_good_pkt_pointers() for setting the allowed access
range for regs with PTR_TO_PACKET of same id once verifier matched
on data/data_end tests, and ii) for check_ptr_alignment() to determine
that when not having efficient unaligned access and register with
UNKNOWN_VALUE was added to PTR_TO_PACKET, that we're only allowed
to access the content bytewise due to unknown unalignment. reg->id
was never intended for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ} types and thus is
always zero, the only marking is in PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL that
was added after 48461135 via 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers"). Above tests will fail for
non-root environment due to prohibited pointer arithmetic.

The fix splits register-type specific checks into their own helper
instead of keeping them combined, so we don't run into a similar
issue in future once we extend check_ptr_alignment() further and
forget to add reg->type checks for some of the checks.

Fixes: 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

While looking into map_value_adj, I noticed that alu operations
directly on the map_value() resp. map_value_adj() register (any
alu operation on a map_value() register will turn it into a
map_value_adj() typed register) are not sufficiently protected
against some of the operations. Two non-exhaustive examples are
provided that the verifier needs to reject:

 i) BPF_AND on r0 (map_value_adj):

  0: (bf) r2 = r10
  1: (07) r2 += -8
  2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0
  3: (18) r1 = 0xbf842a00
  5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
  6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2
   R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
  7: (57) r0 &= 8
  8: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 22
   R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=8 R10=fp
  9: (95) exit

  from 6 to 9: R0=inv,min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
  9: (95) exit
  processed 10 insns

ii) BPF_ADD in 32 bit mode on r0 (map_value_adj):

  0: (bf) r2 = r10
  1: (07) r2 += -8
  2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r2 +0) = 0
  3: (18) r1 = 0xc24eee00
  5: (85) call bpf_map_lookup_elem#1
  6: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2
   R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
  7: (04) (u32) r0 += (u32) 0
  8: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +0) = 22
   R0=map_value_adj(ks=8,vs=48,id=0),min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
  9: (95) exit

  from 6 to 9: R0=inv,min_value=0,max_value=0 R10=fp
  9: (95) exit
  processed 10 insns

Issue is, while min_value / max_value boundaries for the access
are adjusted appropriately, we change the pointer value in a way
that cannot be sufficiently tracked anymore from its origin.
Operations like BPF_{AND,OR,DIV,MUL,etc} on a destination register
that is PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ} was probably unintended, in fact,
all the test cases coming with 48461135 ("bpf: allow access
into map value arrays") perform BPF_ADD only on the destination
register that is PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ.

Only for UNKNOWN_VALUE register types such operations make sense,
f.e. with unknown memory content fetched initially from a constant
offset from the map value memory into a register. That register is
then later tested against lower / upper bounds, so that the verifier
can then do the tracking of min_value / max_value, and properly
check once that UNKNOWN_VALUE register is added to the destination
register with type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ}. This is also what the
original use-case is solving. Note, tracking on what is being
added is done through adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and later access
to the map value enforced with these boundaries and the given offset
from the insn through check_map_access_adj().

Tests will fail for non-root environment due to prohibited pointer
arithmetic, in particular in check_alu_op(), we bail out on the
is_pointer_value() check on the dst_reg (which is false in root
case as we allow for pointer arithmetic via env->allow_ptr_leaks).

Similarly to PTR_TO_PACKET, one way to fix it is to restrict the
allowed operations on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE{,_ADJ} registers to 64 bit
mode BPF_ADD. The test_verifier suite runs fine after the patch
and it also rejects mentioned test cases.

Fixes: 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

llvm can optimize the 'if (ptr > data_end)' checks to be in the order
slightly different than the original C code which will confuse verifier.
Like:
if (ptr + 16 > data_end)
  return TC_ACT_SHOT;
// may be followed by
if (ptr + 14 > data_end)
  return TC_ACT_SHOT;
while llvm can see that 'ptr' is valid for all 16 bytes,
the verifier could not.
Fix verifier logic to account for such case and add a test.
Reported-by: NHuapeng Zhou <hzhou@fb.com>
Fixes: 969bf05e ("bpf: direct packet access")
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch adds hash of maps support (hashmap->bpf_map).
BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS is added.

A map-in-map contains a pointer to another map and lets call
this pointer 'inner_map_ptr'.

Notes on deleting inner_map_ptr from a hash map:

1. For BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC map-in-map, when deleting
   an inner_map_ptr, the htab_elem itself will go through
   a rcu grace period and the inner_map_ptr resides
   in the htab_elem.

2. For pre-allocated htab_elem (!BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC),
   when deleting an inner_map_ptr, the htab_elem may
   get reused immediately.  This situation is similar
   to the existing prealloc-ated use cases.

   However, the bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() calls bpf_map_put() which calls
   inner_map->ops->map_free(inner_map) which will go
   through a rcu grace period (i.e. all bpf_map's map_free
   currently goes through a rcu grace period).  Hence,
   the inner_map_ptr is still safe for the rcu reader side.

This patch also includes BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS to the
check_map_prealloc() in the verifier.  preallocation is a
must for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT.  Hence, even we don't expect
heavy updates to map-in-map, enforcing BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC for map-in-map
is impossible without disallowing BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT from using
map-in-map first.
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch adds a few helper funcs to enable map-in-map
support (i.e. outer_map->inner_map).  The first outer_map type
BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS is also added in this patch.
The next patch will introduce a hash of maps type.

Any bpf map type can be acted as an inner_map.  The exception
is BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY because the extra level of
indirection makes it harder to verify the owner_prog_type
and owner_jited.

Multi-level map-in-map is not supported (i.e. map->map is ok
but not map->map->map).

When adding an inner_map to an outer_map, it currently checks the
map_type, key_size, value_size, map_flags, max_entries and ops.
The verifier also uses those map's properties to do static analysis.
map_flags is needed because we need to ensure BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT
is using a preallocated hashtab for the inner_hash also.  ops and
max_entries are needed to generate inlined map-lookup instructions.
For simplicity reason, a simple '==' test is used for both map_flags
and max_entries.  The equality of ops is implied by the equality of
map_type.

During outer_map creation time, an inner_map_fd is needed to create an
outer_map.  However, the inner_map_fd's life time does not depend on the
outer_map.  The inner_map_fd is merely used to initialize
the inner_map_meta of the outer_map.

Also, for the outer_map:

* It allows element update and delete from syscall
* It allows element lookup from bpf_prog

The above is similar to the current fd_array pattern.
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fix in verifier:
For the same bpf_map_lookup_elem() instruction (i.e. "call 1"),
a broken case is "a different type of map could be used for the
same lookup instruction". For example, an array in one case and a
hashmap in another.  We have to resort to the old dynamic call behavior
in this case.  The fix is to check for collision on insn_aux->map_ptr.
If there is collision, don't inline the map lookup.

Please see the "do_reg_lookup()" in test_map_in_map_kern.c in the later
patch for how-to trigger the above case.

Simplifications on array_map_gen_lookup():
1. Calculate elem_size from map->value_size.  It removes the
   need for 'struct bpf_array' which makes the later map-in-map
   implementation easier.
2. Remove the 'elem_size == 1' test

Fixes: 81ed18ab ("bpf: add helper inlining infra and optimize map_array lookup")
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Optimize bpf_call -> bpf_map_lookup_elem() -> array_map_lookup_elem()
into a sequence of bpf instructions.
When JIT is on the sequence of bpf instructions is the sequence
of native cpu instructions with significantly faster performance
than indirect call and two function's prologue/epilogue.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

convert_ctx_accesses() replaces single bpf instruction with a set of
instructions. Adjust corresponding insn_aux_data while patching.
It's needed to make sure subsequent 'for(all insn)' loops
have matching insn and insn_aux_data.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

reduce indent and make it iterate over instructions similar to
convert_ctx_accesses(). Also convert hard BUG_ON into soft verifier error.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

no functional change.
move fixup_bpf_calls() to verifier.c
it's being refactored in the next patch
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Commit 07016151 ("bpf, verifier: further improve search
pruning") increased the limit of processed instructions from
32k to 64k, but the comment still mentioned the 32k limit.
This commit updates the comment to reflect the change.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NGary Lin <glin@suse.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

trivial fix to spelling mistake in verbose log message
Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fixes the following warnings:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘may_access_direct_pkt_data’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:702:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if (t == BPF_WRITE)
      ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:704:2: note: here
  case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
  ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘reg_set_min_max_inv’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2057:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   true_reg->min_value = 0;
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2058:2: note: here
  case BPF_JSGT:
  ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2068:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   true_reg->min_value = 0;
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2069:2: note: here
  case BPF_JSGE:
  ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function ‘reg_set_min_max’:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2009:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   false_reg->min_value = 0;
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2010:2: note: here
  case BPF_JSGT:
  ^~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2019:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   false_reg->min_value = 0;
   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:2020:2: note: here
  case BPF_JSGE:
  ^~~~
Reported-by: NDavid Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Alemayhu <alexander@alemayhu.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The patch fixes the case when adding a zero value to the packet
pointer.  The zero value could come from src_reg equals type
BPF_K or CONST_IMM.  The patch fixes both, otherwise the verifer
reports the following error:
  [...]
    R0=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0
    R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=4)
    R2=pkt_end R3=fp-12
    R4=imm4,min_value=4,max_value=4
    R5=pkt(id=0,off=4,r=4)
  269: (bf) r2 = r0     // r2 becomes imm0
  270: (77) r2 >>= 3
  271: (bf) r4 = r1     // r4 becomes pkt ptr
  272: (0f) r4 += r2    // r4 += 0
  addition of negative constant to packet pointer is not allowed
Signed-off-by: NWilliam Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMihai Budiu <mbudiu@vmware.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

William reported couple of issues in relation to direct packet
access. Typical scheme is to check for data + [off] <= data_end,
where [off] can be either immediate or coming from a tracked
register that contains an immediate, depending on the branch, we
can then access the data. However, in case of calculating [off]
for either the mentioned test itself or for access after the test
in a more "complex" way, then the verifier will stop tracking the
CONST_IMM marked register and will mark it as UNKNOWN_VALUE one.

Adding that UNKNOWN_VALUE typed register to a pkt() marked
register, the verifier then bails out in check_packet_ptr_add()
as it finds the registers imm value below 48. In the first below
example, that is due to evaluate_reg_imm_alu() not handling right
shifts and thus marking the register as UNKNOWN_VALUE via helper
__mark_reg_unknown_value() that resets imm to 0.

In the second case the same happens at the time when r4 is set
to r4 &= r5, where it transitions to UNKNOWN_VALUE from
evaluate_reg_imm_alu(). Later on r4 we shift right by 3 inside
evaluate_reg_alu(), where the register's imm turns into 3. That
is, for registers with type UNKNOWN_VALUE, imm of 0 means that
we don't know what value the register has, and for imm > 0 it
means that the value has [imm] upper zero bits. F.e. when shifting
an UNKNOWN_VALUE register by 3 to the right, no matter what value
it had, we know that the 3 upper most bits must be zero now.
This is to make sure that ALU operations with unknown registers
don't overflow. Meaning, once we know that we have more than 48
upper zero bits, or, in other words cannot go beyond 0xffff offset
with ALU ops, such an addition will track the target register
as a new pkt() register with a new id, but 0 offset and 0 range,
so for that a new data/data_end test will be required. Is the source
register a CONST_IMM one that is to be added to the pkt() register,
or the source instruction is an add instruction with immediate
value, then it will get added if it stays within max 0xffff bounds.
>From there, pkt() type, can be accessed should reg->off + imm be
within the access range of pkt().

  [...]
  from 28 to 30: R0=imm1,min_value=1,max_value=1
    R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=22) R2=pkt_end
    R3=imm144,min_value=144,max_value=144
    R4=imm0,min_value=0,max_value=0
    R5=inv48,min_value=2054,max_value=2054 R10=fp
  30: (bf) r5 = r3
  31: (07) r5 += 23
  32: (77) r5 >>= 3
  33: (bf) r6 = r1
  34: (0f) r6 += r5
  cannot add integer value with 0 upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet

  [...]
  from 52 to 80: R0=imm1,min_value=1,max_value=1
    R1=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=34) R2=pkt_end R3=inv
    R4=imm272 R5=inv56,min_value=17,max_value=17
    R6=pkt(id=0,off=26,r=34) R10=fp
  80: (07) r4 += 71
  81: (18) r5 = 0xfffffff8
  83: (5f) r4 &= r5
  84: (77) r4 >>= 3
  85: (0f) r1 += r4
  cannot add integer value with 3 upper zero bits to ptr_to_packet

Thus to get above use-cases working, evaluate_reg_imm_alu() has
been extended for further ALU ops. This is fine, because we only
operate strictly within realm of CONST_IMM types, so here we don't
care about overflows as they will happen in the simulated but also
real execution and interaction with pkt() in check_packet_ptr_add()
will check actual imm value once added to pkt(), but it's irrelevant
before.

With regards to 06c1c049 ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable
memory") that works on UNKNOWN_VALUE registers, the verifier becomes
now a bit smarter as it can better resolve ALU ops, so we need to
adapt two test cases there, as min/max bound tracking only becomes
necessary when registers were spilled to stack. So while mask was
set before to track upper bound for UNKNOWN_VALUE case, it's now
resolved directly as CONST_IMM, and such contructs are only necessary
when f.e. registers are spilled.

For commit 6b173873 ("bpf: recognize 64bit immediate loads as
consts") that initially enabled dw load tracking only for nfp jit/
analyzer, I did couple of tests on large, complex programs and we
don't increase complexity badly (my tests were in ~3% range on avg).
I've added a couple of tests similar to affected code above, and
it works fine with verifier now.
Reported-by: NWilliam Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Cc: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Commit 7bd509e3 ("bpf: add prog_digest and expose it via
fdinfo/netlink") was recently discussed, partially due to
admittedly suboptimal name of "prog_digest" in combination
with sha1 hash usage, thus inevitably and rightfully concerns
about its security in terms of collision resistance were
raised with regards to use-cases.

The intended use cases are for debugging resp. introspection
only for providing a stable "tag" over the instruction sequence
that both kernel and user space can calculate independently.
It's not usable at all for making a security relevant decision.
So collisions where two different instruction sequences generate
the same tag can happen, but ideally at a rather low rate. The
"tag" will be dumped in hex and is short enough to introspect
in tracepoints or kallsyms output along with other data such
as stack trace, etc. Thus, this patch performs a rename into
prog_tag and truncates the tag to a short output (64 bits) to
make it obvious it's not collision-free.

Should in future a hash or facility be needed with a security
relevant focus, then we can think about requirements, constraints,
etc that would fit to that situation. For now, rework the exposed
parts for the current use cases as long as nothing has been
released yet. Tested on x86_64 and s390x.

Fixes: 7bd509e3 ("bpf: add prog_digest and expose it via fdinfo/netlink")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When structs are used to store temporary state in cb[] buffer that is
used with programs and among tail calls, then the generated code will
not always access the buffer in bpf_w chunks. We can ease programming
of it and let this act more natural by allowing for aligned b/h/w/dw
sized access for cb[] ctx member. Various test cases are attached as
well for the selftest suite. Potentially, this can also be reused for
other program types to pass data around.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, when calling convert_ctx_access() callback for the various
program types, we pass in insn->dst_reg, insn->src_reg, insn->off from
the original instruction. This information is needed to rewrite the
instruction that is based on the user ctx structure into a kernel
representation for the ctx. As we'd like to allow access size beyond
just BPF_W, we'd need also insn->code for that in order to decode the
original access size. Given that, lets just pass insn directly to the
convert_ctx_access() callback and work on that to not clutter the
callback with even more arguments we need to pass when everything is
already contained in insn. So lets go through that once, no functional
change.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

since ARG_PTR_TO_STACK is no longer just pointer to stack
rename it to ARG_PTR_TO_MEM and adjust comment.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Currently, helpers that read and write from/to the stack can do so using
a pair of arguments of type ARG_PTR_TO_STACK and ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE.
ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE accepts a constant register of type CONST_IMM, so
that the verifier can safely check the memory access. However, requiring
the argument to be a constant can be limiting in some circumstances.

Since the current logic keeps track of the minimum and maximum value of
a register throughout the simulated execution, ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE can
be changed to also accept an UNKNOWN_VALUE register in case its
boundaries have been set and the range doesn't cause invalid memory
accesses.

One common situation when this is useful:

int len;
char buf[BUFSIZE]; /* BUFSIZE is 128 */

if (some_condition)
	len = 42;
else
	len = 84;

some_helper(..., buf, len & (BUFSIZE - 1));

The compiler can often decide to assign the constant values 42 or 48
into a variable on the stack, instead of keeping it in a register. When
the variable is then read back from stack into the register in order to
be passed to the helper, the verifier will not be able to recognize the
register as constant (the verifier is not currently tracking all
constant writes into memory), and the program won't be valid.

However, by allowing the helper to accept an UNKNOWN_VALUE register,
this program will work because the bitwise AND operation will set the
range of possible values for the UNKNOWN_VALUE register to [0, BUFSIZE),
so the verifier can guarantee the helper call will be safe (assuming the
argument is of type ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO, otherwise one more
check against 0 would be needed). Custom ranges can be set not only with
ALU operations, but also by explicitly comparing the UNKNOWN_VALUE
register with constants.

Another very common example happens when intercepting system call
arguments and accessing user-provided data of variable size using
bpf_probe_read(). One can load at runtime the user-provided length in an
UNKNOWN_VALUE register, and then read that exact amount of data up to a
compile-time determined limit in order to fit into the proper local
storage allocated on the stack, without having to guess a suboptimal
access size at compile time.

Also, in case the helpers accepting the UNKNOWN_VALUE register operate
in raw mode, disable the raw mode so that the program is required to
initialize all memory, since there is no guarantee the helper will fill
it completely, leaving possibilities for data leak (just relevant when
the memory used by the helper is the stack, not when using a pointer to
map element value or packet). In other words, ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK will
be treated as ARG_PTR_TO_STACK.
Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

commit 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
introduces the ability to do pointer math inside a map element value via
the PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ register type.

The current support doesn't handle the case where a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ
is spilled into the stack, limiting several use cases, especially when
generating bpf code from a compiler.

Handle this case by explicitly enabling the register type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ to be spilled. Also, make sure that min_value and
max_value are reset just for BPF_LDX operations that don't result in a
restore of a spilled register from stack.
Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Enable helpers to directly access a map element value by passing a
register type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE (or PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ) to helper
arguments ARG_PTR_TO_STACK or ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK.

This enables several use cases. For example, a typical tracing program
might want to capture pathnames passed to sys_open() with:

struct trace_data {
	char pathname[PATHLEN];
};

SEC("kprobe/sys_open")
void bpf_sys_open(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
	struct trace_data data;
	bpf_probe_read(data.pathname, sizeof(data.pathname), ctx->di);

	/* consume data.pathname, for example via
	 * bpf_trace_printk() or bpf_perf_event_output()
	 */
}

Such a program could easily hit the stack limit in case PATHLEN needs to
be large or more local variables need to exist, both of which are quite
common scenarios. Allowing direct helper access to map element values,
one could do:

struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") scratch_map = {
	.type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY,
	.key_size = sizeof(u32),
	.value_size = sizeof(struct trace_data),
	.max_entries = 1,
};

SEC("kprobe/sys_open")
int bpf_sys_open(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
	int id = 0;
	struct trace_data *p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&scratch_map, &id);
	if (!p)
		return;
	bpf_probe_read(p->pathname, sizeof(p->pathname), ctx->di);

	/* consume p->pathname, for example via
	 * bpf_trace_printk() or bpf_perf_event_output()
	 */
}

And wouldn't risk exhausting the stack.

Code changes are loosely modeled after commit 6841de8b ("bpf: allow
helpers access the packet directly"). Unlike with PTR_TO_PACKET, these
changes just work with ARG_PTR_TO_STACK and ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK (not
ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, ...): adding those would be
trivial, but since there is not currently a use case for that, it's
reasonable to limit the set of changes.

Also, add new tests to make sure accesses to map element values from
helpers never go out of boundary, even when adjusted.
Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Move the logic to check memory accesses to a PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ from
check_mem_access() to a separate helper check_map_access_adj(). This
enables to use those checks in other parts of the verifier as well,
where boundaries on PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_ADJ might need to be checked, for
example when checking helper function arguments. The same thing is
already happening for other types such as PTR_TO_PACKET and its
check_packet_access() helper.

The code has been copied verbatim, with the only difference of removing
the "off += reg->max_value" statement and moving the sum into the call
statement to check_map_access(), as that was only needed due to the
earlier common check_map_access() call.
Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Martin reported a verifier issue that hit the BUG_ON() for his
test case in the mark_reg_unknown_value() function:

  [  202.861380] kernel BUG at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:467!
  [...]
  [  203.291109] Call Trace:
  [  203.296501]  [<ffffffff811364d5>] mark_map_reg+0x45/0x50
  [  203.308225]  [<ffffffff81136558>] mark_map_regs+0x78/0x90
  [  203.320140]  [<ffffffff8113938d>] do_check+0x226d/0x2c90
  [  203.331865]  [<ffffffff8113a6ab>] bpf_check+0x48b/0x780
  [  203.343403]  [<ffffffff81134c8e>] bpf_prog_load+0x27e/0x440
  [  203.355705]  [<ffffffff8118a38f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x11af/0x1230
  [  203.369158]  [<ffffffff812d8188>] ? security_capable+0x48/0x60
  [  203.382035]  [<ffffffff811351a4>] SyS_bpf+0x124/0x960
  [  203.393185]  [<ffffffff810515f6>] ? __do_page_fault+0x276/0x490
  [  203.406258]  [<ffffffff816db320>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x13/0x94

This issue got uncovered after the fix in a08dd0da ("bpf: fix
regression on verifier pruning wrt map lookups"). The reason why it
wasn't noticed before was, because as mentioned in a08dd0da,
mark_map_regs() was doing the id matching incorrectly based on the
uncached regs[regno].id. So, in the first loop, we walked all regs
and as soon as we found regno == i, then this reg's id was cleared
when calling mark_reg_unknown_value() thus that every subsequent
register was probed against id of 0 (which, in combination with the
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL type is an invalid condition that no other
register state can hold), and therefore wasn't type transitioned such
as in the spilled register case for the second loop.

Now since that got fixed, it turned out that 57a09bf0 ("bpf:
Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers") used
mark_reg_unknown_value() incorrectly for the spilled regs, and thus
hitting the BUG_ON() in some cases due to regno >= MAX_BPF_REG.

Although spilled regs have the same type as the non-spilled regs
for the verifier state, that is, struct bpf_reg_state, they are
semantically different from the non-spilled regs. In other words,
there can be up to 64 (MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE) spilled regs
in the stack, for example, register R<x> could have been spilled by
the program to stack location X, Y, Z, and in mark_map_regs() we
need to scan these stack slots of type STACK_SPILL for potential
registers that we have to transition from PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL.
Therefore, depending on the location, the spilled_regs regno can
be a lot higher than just MAX_BPF_REG's value since we operate on
stack instead. The reset in mark_reg_unknown_value() itself is
just fine, only that the BUG_ON() was inappropriate for this. Fix
it by making a __mark_reg_unknown_value() version that can be
called from mark_map_reg() generically; we know for the non-spilled
case that the regno is always < MAX_BPF_REG anyway.

Fixes: 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers")
Reported-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Geert rightfully complained that 7bd509e3 ("bpf: add prog_digest
and expose it via fdinfo/netlink") added a too large allocation of
variable 'raw' from bss section, and should instead be done dynamically:

  # ./scripts/bloat-o-meter kernel/bpf/core.o.1 kernel/bpf/core.o.2
  add/remove: 3/0 grow/shrink: 0/0 up/down: 33291/0 (33291)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  raw                                            -   32832  +32832
  [...]

Since this is only relevant during program creation path, which can be
considered slow-path anyway, lets allocate that dynamically and be not
implicitly dependent on verifier mutex. Move bpf_prog_calc_digest() at
the beginning of replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr() and also error handling
stays straight forward.
Reported-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Commit 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL
registers") introduced a regression where existing programs stopped
loading due to reaching the verifier's maximum complexity limit,
whereas prior to this commit they were loading just fine; the affected
program has roughly 2k instructions.

What was found is that state pruning couldn't be performed effectively
anymore due to mismatches of the verifier's register state, in particular
in the id tracking. It doesn't mean that 57a09bf0 is incorrect per
se, but rather that verifier needs to perform a lot more work for the
same program with regards to involved map lookups.

Since commit 57a09bf0 is only about tracking registers with type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL, the id is only needed to follow registers
until they are promoted through pattern matching with a NULL check to
either PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE or UNKNOWN_VALUE type. After that point, the
id becomes irrelevant for the transitioned types.

For UNKNOWN_VALUE, id is already reset to 0 via mark_reg_unknown_value(),
but not so for PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE where id is becoming stale. It's even
transferred further into other types that don't make use of it. Among
others, one example is where UNKNOWN_VALUE is set on function call
return with RET_INTEGER return type.

states_equal() will then fall through the memcmp() on register state;
note that the second memcmp() uses offsetofend(), so the id is part of
that since d2a4dd37 ("bpf: fix state equivalence"). But the bisect
pointed already to 57a09bf0, where we really reach beyond complexity
limit. What I found was that states_equal() often failed in this
case due to id mismatches in spilled regs with registers in type
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE. Unlike non-spilled regs, spilled regs just perform
a memcmp() on their reg state and don't have any other optimizations
in place, therefore also id was relevant in this case for making a
pruning decision.

We can safely reset id to 0 as well when converting to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE.
For the affected program, it resulted in a ~17 fold reduction of
complexity and let the program load fine again. Selftest suite also
runs fine. The only other place where env->id_gen is used currently is
through direct packet access, but for these cases id is long living, thus
a different scenario.

Also, the current logic in mark_map_regs() is not fully correct when
marking NULL branch with UNKNOWN_VALUE. We need to cache the destination
reg's id in any case. Otherwise, once we marked that reg as UNKNOWN_VALUE,
it's id is reset and any subsequent registers that hold the original id
and are of type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL won't be marked UNKNOWN_VALUE
anymore, since mark_map_reg() reuses the uncached regs[regno].id that
was just overridden. Note, we don't need to cache it outside of
mark_map_regs(), since it's called once on this_branch and the other
time on other_branch, which are both two independent verifier states.
A test case for this is added here, too.

Fixes: 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This patch allows XDP prog to extend/remove the packet
data at the head (like adding or removing header).  It is
done by adding a new XDP helper bpf_xdp_adjust_head().

It also renames bpf_helper_changes_skb_data() to
bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() to better reflect
that XDP prog does not work on skb.

This patch adds one "xdp_adjust_head" bit to bpf_prog for the
XDP-capable driver to check if the XDP prog requires
bpf_xdp_adjust_head() support.  The driver can then decide
to error out during XDP_SETUP_PROG.
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Commmits 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers")
and 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays") by themselves
are correct, but in combination they make state equivalence ignore 'id' field
of the register state which can lead to accepting invalid program.

Fixes: 57a09bf0 ("bpf: Detect identical PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers")
Fixes: 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

General assumption is that single program can hold up to BPF_MAXINSNS,
that is, 4096 number of instructions. It is the case with cBPF and
that limit was carried over to eBPF. When recently testing digest, I
noticed that it's actually not possible to feed 4096 instructions
via bpf(2).

The check for > BPF_MAXINSNS was added back then to bpf_check() in
cbd35700 ("bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log)").
However, 09756af4 ("bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload")
added yet another check that comes before that into bpf_prog_load(),
but this time bails out already in case of >= BPF_MAXINSNS.

Fix it up and perform the check early in bpf_prog_load(), so we can drop
the second one in bpf_check(). It makes sense, because also a 0 insn
program is useless and we don't want to waste any resources doing work
up to bpf_check() point. The existing bpf(2) man page documents E2BIG
as the official error for such cases, so just stick with it as well.

Fixes: 09756af4 ("bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When loading a BPF program via bpf(2), calculate the digest over
the program's instruction stream and store it in struct bpf_prog's
digest member. This is done at a point in time before any instructions
are rewritten by the verifier. Any unstable map file descriptor
number part of the imm field will be zeroed for the hash.

fdinfo example output for progs:

  # cat /proc/1590/fdinfo/5
  pos:          0
  flags:        02000002
  mnt_id:       11
  prog_type:    1
  prog_jited:   1
  prog_digest:  b27e8b06da22707513aa97363dfb11c7c3675d28
  memlock:      4096

When programs are pinned and retrieved by an ELF loader, the loader
can check the program's digest through fdinfo and compare it against
one that was generated over the ELF file's program section to see
if the program needs to be reloaded. Furthermore, this can also be
exposed through other means such as netlink in case of a tc cls/act
dump (or xdp in future), but also through tracepoints or other
facilities to identify the program. Other than that, the digest can
also serve as a base name for the work in progress kallsyms support
of programs. The digest doesn't depend/select the crypto layer, since
we need to keep dependencies to a minimum. iproute2 will get support
for this facility.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Occasionally, clang (e.g. version 3.8.1) translates a sum between two
constant operands using a BPF_OR instead of a BPF_ADD. The verifier is
currently not handling this scenario, and the destination register type
becomes UNKNOWN_VALUE even if it's still storing a constant. As a result,
the destination register cannot be used as argument to a helper function
expecting a ARG_CONST_STACK_*, limiting some use cases.

Modify the verifier to handle this case, and add a few tests to make sure
all combinations are supported, and stack boundaries are still verified
even with BPF_OR.
Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Registers new BPF program types which correspond to the LWT hooks:
  - BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN   => dst_input()
  - BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT  => dst_output()
  - BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT => lwtunnel_xmit()

The separate program types are required to differentiate between the
capabilities each LWT hook allows:

 * Programs attached to dst_input() or dst_output() are restricted and
   may only read the data of an skb. This prevent modification and
   possible invalidation of already validated packet headers on receive
   and the construction of illegal headers while the IP headers are
   still being assembled.

 * Programs attached to lwtunnel_xmit() are allowed to modify packet
   content as well as prepending an L2 header via a newly introduced
   helper bpf_skb_change_head(). This is safe as lwtunnel_xmit() is
   invoked after the IP header has been assembled completely.

All BPF programs receive an skb with L3 headers attached and may return
one of the following error codes:

 BPF_OK - Continue routing as per nexthop
 BPF_DROP - Drop skb and return EPERM
 BPF_REDIRECT - Redirect skb to device as per redirect() helper.
                (Only valid in lwtunnel_xmit() context)

The return codes are binary compatible with their TC_ACT_
relatives to ease compatibility.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

If we have a branch that looks something like this

int foo = map->value;
if (condition) {
  foo += blah;
} else {
  foo = bar;
}
map->array[foo] = baz;

We will incorrectly assume that the !condition branch is equal to the condition
branch as the register for foo will be UNKNOWN_VALUE in both cases.  We need to
adjust this logic to only do this if we didn't do a varlen access after we
processed the !condition branch, otherwise we have different ranges and need to
check the other branch as well.

Fixes: 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

I made some invalid assumptions with BPF_AND and BPF_MOD that could result in
invalid accesses to bpf map entries.  Fix this up by doing a few things

1) Kill BPF_MOD support.  This doesn't actually get used by the compiler in real
life and just adds extra complexity.

2) Fix the logic for BPF_AND, don't allow AND of negative numbers and set the
minimum value to 0 for positive AND's.

3) Don't do operations on the ranges if they are set to the limits, as they are
by definition undefined, and allowing arithmetic operations on those values
could make them appear valid when they really aren't.

This fixes the testcase provided by Jann as well as a few other theoretical
problems.
Reported-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Remove the unused but set variables min_set and max_set in
adjust_reg_min_max_vals to fix the following warning when building with
'W=1':

  kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1483:7: warning: variable ‘min_set’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

There is no warning about max_set being unused, but since it is only
used in the assignment of min_set it can be removed as well.

They were introduced in commit 48461135 ("bpf: allow access into map
value arrays") but seem to have never been used.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NTobias Klauser <tklauser@distanz.ch>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

The verifier currently prints raw function ids when printing CALL
instructions or when complaining:

	5: (85) call 23
	unknown func 23

print a meaningful function name instead:

	5: (85) call bpf_redirect#23
	unknown func bpf_redirect#23

Moves the function documentation to a single comment and renames all
helpers names in the list to conform to the bpf_ prefix notation so
they can be greped in the kernel source.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

A BPF program is required to check the return register of a
map_elem_lookup() call before accessing memory. The verifier keeps
track of this by converting the type of the result register from
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE after a conditional
jump ensures safety. This check is currently exclusively performed
for the result register 0.

In the event the compiler reorders instructions, BPF_MOV64_REG
instructions may be moved before the conditional jump which causes
them to keep their type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL to which the
verifier objects when the register is accessed:

0: (b7) r1 = 10
1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r1
2: (bf) r2 = r10
3: (07) r2 += -8
4: (18) r1 = 0x59c00000
6: (85) call 1
7: (bf) r4 = r0
8: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
 R0=map_value(ks=8,vs=8) R4=map_value_or_null(ks=8,vs=8) R10=fp
9: (7a) *(u64 *)(r4 +0) = 0
R4 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'

This commit extends the verifier to keep track of all identical
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL registers after a map_elem_lookup() by
assigning them an ID and then marking them all when the conditional
jump is observed.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Suppose you have a map array value that is something like this

struct foo {
	unsigned iter;
	int array[SOME_CONSTANT];
};

You can easily insert this into an array, but you cannot modify the contents of
foo->array[] after the fact.  This is because we have no way to verify we won't
go off the end of the array at verification time.  This patch provides a start
for this work.  We accomplish this by keeping track of a minimum and maximum
value a register could be while we're checking the code.  Then at the time we
try to do an access into a MAP_VALUE we verify that the maximum offset into that
region is a valid access into that memory region.  So in practice, code such as
this

unsigned index = 0;

if (foo->iter >= SOME_CONSTANT)
	foo->iter = index;
else
	index = foo->iter++;
foo->array[index] = bar;

would be allowed, as we can verify that index will always be between 0 and
SOME_CONSTANT-1.  If you wish to use signed values you'll have to have an extra
check to make sure the index isn't less than 0, or do something like index %=
SOME_CONSTANT.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

This prevent future potential pointer leaks when an unprivileged eBPF
program will read a pointer value from its context. Even if
is_valid_access() returns a pointer type, the eBPF verifier replace it
with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register value that contains a kernel address is
then allowed to leak. Moreover, this fix allows unprivileged eBPF
programs to use functions with (legitimate) pointer arguments.

Not an issue currently since reg_type is only set for PTR_TO_PACKET or
PTR_TO_PACKET_END in XDP and TC programs that can only be loaded as
privileged. For now, the only unprivileged eBPF program allowed is for
socket filtering and all the types from its context are UNKNOWN_VALUE.
However, this fix is important for future unprivileged eBPF programs
which could use pointers in their context.
Signed-off-by: NMickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>