- 19 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Now that nobody uses max_shift and min_shift, we can safely remove them. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch adds the parameters max_size and min_size which are meant to replace max_shift and min_shift. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Keeping both size and shift is silly. We only need one. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
Caching the lock pointer avoids having to hash on the object again to unlock the bucket locks. Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
Fixes the following sparse warnings: lib/rhashtable.c:767:5: warning: context imbalance in 'rhashtable_walk_start' - wrong count at exit lib/rhashtable.c:849:6: warning: context imbalance in 'rhashtable_walk_stop' - unexpected unlock Fixes: f2dba9c6 ("rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*") Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
The commit 9d901bc0 ("rhashtable: Free bucket tables asynchronously after rehash") causes gratuitous failures in rhashtable_remove. The reason is that it inadvertently introduced multiple rehashing from the perspective of readers. IOW it is now possible to see more than two tables during a single RCU critical section. Fortunately the other reader rhashtable_lookup already deals with this correctly thanks to c4db8848 ("rhashtable: rhashtable: Move future_tbl into struct bucket_table") so only rhashtable_remove is broken by this change. This patch fixes this by looping over every table from the first one to the last or until we find the element that we were trying to delete. Incidentally the simple test for detecting rehashing to prevent starting another shrinking no longer works. Since it isn't needed anyway (the work queue and the mutex serves as a natural barrier to unnecessary rehashes) I've simply killed the test. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
The commit c4db8848 ("rhashtable: Move future_tbl into struct bucket_table") introduced a use-after- free bug in rhashtable_walk_stop because it dereferences tbl after droping the RCU read lock. This patch fixes it by moving the RCU read unlock down to the bottom of rhashtable_walk_stop. In fact this was how I had it originally but it got dropped while rearranging patches because this one depended on the async freeing of bucket_table. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 3月, 2015 6 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch moves future_tbl to open up the possibility of having multiple rehashes on the same table. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch adds a rehash counter to bucket_table to indicate the last bucket that has been rehashed. This serves two purposes: 1. Any bucket that has been rehashed can never gain a new object. 2. If the rehash counter reaches the size of the table, the table will forever remain empty. This patch also downsizes bucket_table->size to an unsigned int since we do not support sizes greater than 32 bits yet. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
There is in fact no need to wait for an RCU grace period in the rehash function, since all insertions are guaranteed to go into the new table through spin locks. This patch uses call_rcu to free the old/rehashed table at our leisure. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
It seems that I have already made every rehash redo the random seed even though my commit message indicated otherwise :) Since we have already taken that step, this patch goes one step further and moves the seed initialisation into bucket_table_alloc. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
We only nest one level deep there is no need to roll our own subclasses. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Previously whenever the walker encountered a resize it simply snaps back to the beginning and starts again. However, this only works if the rehash started and completed while the walker was idle. If the walker attempts to restart while the rehash is still ongoing, we may miss objects that we shouldn't have. This patch fixes this by making the walker walk the old table followed by the new table just like all other readers. If a rehash is detected we will still signal our caller of the fact so they can prepare for duplicates but we will simply continue the walk onto the new table after the old one is finished either by us or by the rehasher. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 3月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch fixes a typo rhashtable_lookup_compare where we fail to recompute the hash when looking up the new table. This causes elements to be missed and potentially a crash during a resize. Reported-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Commit c0c09bfd ("rhashtable: avoid unnecessary wakeup for worker queue") changed ht->shift to be atomic, which is actually unnecessary. Instead of leaving the current shift in the core rhashtable structure, it can be cached inside the individual bucket tables. There, it will only be initialized once during a new table allocation in the shrink/expansion slow path, and from then onward it stays immutable for the rest of the bucket table liftime. That allows shift to be non-atomic. The patch also moves hash_rnd management into the table setup. The rhashtable structure now consumes 3 instead of 4 cachelines. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
There is a potential race condition between readers and the rehasher. In particular, the rehasher could have started a rehash while the reader finishes a scan of the old table but fails to see the new table pointer. This patch closes this window by adding smp_wmb/smp_rmb. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Now that the only caller of obj_raw_hashfn is head_hashfn, we can simply kill it and fold it into the latter. This patch also moves the common shift from head_hashfn/key_hashfn into rht_bucket_index. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
key_hashfn has only one caller and it doesn't really need to supply the key length as an extra parameter. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Now that we don't have cross-table hashes, we no longer need to keep the entire hash value so all users of obj_raw_hashfn can use head_hashfn instead. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch reverts commit c88455ce ("rhashtable: key_hashfn() must return full hash value") because the only user of it always masks the hash value. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 3月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Commit aa34a6cb ("rhashtable: Add arbitrary rehash function") killed the annotation on the nested lock which leads to bitching from lockdep. Reported-by: NFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
This patch adds a rehash function that supports the use of any hash function for the new table. This is needed to support changing the random seed value during the lifetime of the hash table. However for now the random seed value is still constant and the rehash function is simply used to replace the existing expand/shrink functions. [ ASSERT_BUCKET_LOCK() and thus debug_dump_table() + debug_dump_buckets() are not longer used, so delete them entirely. -DaveM ] Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert.xu@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Currently hash_rnd is a parameter that users can set. However, no existing users set this parameter. It is also something that people are unlikely to want to set directly since it's just a random number. In preparation for allowing the reseeding/rehashing of rhashtable, this patch moves hash_rnd into bucket_table so that it's now an internal state rather than a parameter. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 2月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
If a hash table has 128 slots and 16384 elems, expand to 256 slots takes more than one second. For larger sets, a soft lockup is detected. Holding cpu for that long, even in a work queue is a show stopper for non preemptable kernels. cond_resched() at strategic points to allow process scheduler to reschedule us. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Currently, all real users of rhashtable default their grow and shrink decision functions to rht_grow_above_75() and rht_shrink_below_30(), so that there's currently no need to have this explicitly selectable. It can/should be generic and private inside rhashtable until a real use case pops up. Since we can make this private, we'll save us this additional indirection layer and can improve insertion/deletion time as well. Reference: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/443040/Suggested-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
While commit c0c09bfd ("rhashtable: avoid unnecessary wakeup for worker queue") rightfully moved part of the decision making of whether we should expand or shrink from the expand/shrink functions themselves into insert/delete functions in order to avoid unnecessary worker wake-ups, it however introduced a regression by doing so. Before that change, if no max_shift was specified (= 0) on rhashtable initialization, rhashtable_expand() would just grow unconditionally and lets the available memory be the limiting factor. After that change, if no max_shift was specified, there would be _no_ expansion step at all. Given that netlink and tipc have a max_shift specified, it was not visible there, but Josh Hunt reported that if nft that starts out with a default element hint of 3 if not otherwise provided, would slow i.e. inserts down trememdously as it cannot grow larger to relax table occupancy. Given that the test case verifies shrinks/expands manually, we also must remove pointer to the helper functions to explicitly avoid parallel resizing on insertions/deletions. test_bucket_stats() and test_rht_lookup() could also be wrapped around rhashtable mutex to explicitly synchronize a walk from resizing, but I think that defeats the actual test case which intended to have explicit test steps, i.e. 1) inserts, 2) expands, 3) shrinks, 4) deletions, with object verification after each stage. Reported-by: NJosh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com> Fixes: c0c09bfd ("rhashtable: avoid unnecessary wakeup for worker queue") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Cc: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 24 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sasha Levin 提交于
Commit f2dba9c6 ("rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*") forgot to initialize the members of struct rhashtable_walker after allocating it, which caused an undefined value for 'resize' which is used later on. Fixes: f2dba9c6 ("rhashtable: Introduce rhashtable_walk_*") Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
When trying to allocate future tables via bucket_table_alloc(), it seems overkill on large table shifts that we probe for kzalloc() unconditionally first, as it's likely to fail. Only probe with kzalloc() for more reasonable table sizes and use vzalloc() either as a fallback on failure or directly in case of large table sizes. Fixes: 7e1e7763 ("lib: Resizable, Scalable, Concurrent Hash Table") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Restore pre 54c5b7d3 behaviour and only probe for expansions on inserts and shrinks on deletes. Currently, it will happen that on initial inserts into a sparse hash table, we may i.e. shrink it first simply because it's not fully populated yet, only to later realize that we need to grow again. This however is counter intuitive, e.g. an initial default size of 64 elements is already small enough, and in case an elements size hint is given to the hash table by a user, we should avoid unnecessary expansion steps, so a shrink is clearly unintended here. Fixes: 54c5b7d3 ("rhashtable: introduce rhashtable_wakeup_worker helper function") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Rothwell 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 07 2月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
The remove logic properly searched the remaining chain for a matching entry with an identical hash but it did this while searching from both the old and new table. Instead in order to not leave stale references behind we need to: 1. When growing and searching from the new table: Search remaining chain for entry with same hash to avoid having the new table directly point to a entry with a different hash. 2. When shrinking and searching from the old table: Check if the element after the removed would create a cross reference and avoid it if so. These bugs were present from the beginning in nft_hash. Also, both insert functions calculated the hash based on the mask of the new table. This worked while growing. Wwhile shrinking, the mask of the inew table is smaller than the mask of the old table. This lead to a bit not being taken into account when selecting the bucket lock and thus caused the wrong bucket to be locked eventually. Fixes: 7e1e7763 ("lib: Resizable, Scalable, Concurrent Hash Table") Fixes: 97defe1e ("rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking") Reported-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
During a resize, when two buckets in the larger table map to a single bucket in the smaller table and the new table has already been (partially) linked to the old table. Removal of an element may result the bucket in the larger table to point to entries which all hash to a different value than the bucket index. Thus causing two buckets to point to the same sub chain after unzipping. This is not illegal *during* the resize phase but after it has completed. Keep the old table around until all of the unzipping is done to allow the removal code to only search for matching hashed entries during this special period. Reported-by: NYing Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Fixes: 97defe1e ("rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking") Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
Catch hash miscalculations which result in hard to track down race conditions. Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
This simplifies debugging of locking violations if compiled with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING. Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
We need to wait for all RCU readers to complete after the last bit of unzipping has been completed. Otherwise the old table is freed up prematurely. Fixes: 7e1e7763 ("lib: Resizable, Scalable, Concurrent Hash Table") Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
rhashtable currently allows to use a bucket lock per bucket. This requires multiple levels of complicated nested locking because when resizing, a single bucket of the smaller table will map to two buckets in the larger table. So far rhashtable has explicitly locked both buckets in the larger table. By excluding the highest bit of the hash from the bucket lock map and thus only allowing locks to buckets in a ratio of 1:2, the locking can be simplified a lot without losing the benefits of multiple locks. Larger tables which benefit from multiple locks will not have a single lock per bucket anyway. Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Thomas Graf 提交于
The value computed by key_hashfn() is used by rhashtable_lookup_compare() to traverse both tables during a resize. key_hashfn() must therefore return the hash value without the buckets mask applied so it can be masked to the size of each individual table. Fixes: 97defe1e ("rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking") Signed-off-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 2月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
Some existing rhashtable users get too intimate with it by walking the buckets directly. This prevents us from easily changing the internals of rhashtable. This patch adds the helpers rhashtable_walk_init/exit/start/next/stop which will replace these custom walkers. They are meant to be usable for both procfs seq_file walks as well as walking by a netlink dump. The iterator structure should fit inside a netlink dump cb structure, with at least one element to spare. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
The current being_destroyed check in rhashtable_expand is not enough since if we start a shrinking process after freeing all elements in the table that's also going to crash. This patch adds a being_destroyed check to the deferred worker thread so that we bail out as soon as we take the lock. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Geert Uytterhoeven 提交于
Allow the selftest on the resizable hash table to be built modular, just like all other tests that do not depend on DEBUG_KERNEL. Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: NThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-