Skip to content

cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel

openanolis / cloud-kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 160
Star 36
Fork 7
cloud-kernel
cloud-kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 3月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      x86/ACPI/PCI: Recognize that Interrupt Line 255 means "not connected" · e237a551
      由 Chen Fan 提交于 
      Per the x86-specific footnote to PCI spec r3.0, sec 6.2.4, the value 255 in
the Interrupt Line register means "unknown" or "no connection."
Previously, when we couldn't derive an IRQ from the _PRT, we fell back to
using the value from Interrupt Line as an IRQ.  It's questionable whether
we should do that at all, but the spec clearly suggests we shouldn't do it
for the value 255 on x86.

Calling request_irq() with IRQ 255 may succeed, but the driver won't
receive any interrupts.  Or, if IRQ 255 is shared with another device, it
may succeed, and the driver's ISR will be called at random times when the
*other* device interrupts.  Or it may fail if another device is using IRQ
255 with incompatible flags.  What we *want* is for request_irq() to fail
predictably so the driver can fall back to polling.

On x86, assume 255 in the Interrupt Line means the INTx line is not
connected.  In that case, set dev->irq to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED so request_irq()
will fail gracefully with -ENOTCONN.

We found this problem on a system where Secure Boot firmware assigned
Interrupt Line 255 to an i801_smbus device and another device was already
using MSI-X IRQ 255.  This was in v3.10, where i801_probe() fails if
request_irq() fails:

  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143)
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI
  genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa)
  CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1
  Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
    __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570
    request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170
    i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801]
    local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0
  i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16
  i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16

After aeb8a3d1 ("i2c: i801: Check if interrupts are disabled"),
i801_probe() will fall back to polling if request_irq() fails.  But we
still need this patch because request_irq() may succeed or fail depending
on other devices in the system.  If request_irq() fails, i801_smbus will
work by falling back to polling, but if it succeeds, i801_smbus won't work
because it expects interrupts that it may not receive.
Signed-off-by: NChen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      e237a551
  3. 14 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Prevent chip buslock deadlock · abc7e40c
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      If a interrupt chip utilizes chip->buslock then free_irq() can
deadlock in the following way:

CPU0				CPU1
				interrupt(X) (Shared or spurious)
free_irq(X)			interrupt_thread(X)
chip_bus_lock(X)
				   irq_finalize_oneshot(X)
				     chip_bus_lock(X)
synchronize_irq(X)
	
synchronize_irq() waits for the interrupt thread to complete,
i.e. forever.

Solution is simple: Drop chip_bus_lock() before calling
synchronize_irq() as we do with the irq_desc lock. There is nothing to
be protected after the point where irq_desc lock has been released.

This adds chip_bus_lock/unlock() to the remove_irq() code path, but
that's actually correct in the case where remove_irq() is called on
such an interrupt. The current users of remove_irq() are not affected
as none of those interrupts is on a chip which requires buslock.
Reported-by: NFredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      abc7e40c
  5. 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Implement irq_percpu_is_enabled() · f0cb3220
      由 Thomas Petazzoni 提交于 
      Certain interrupt controller drivers have a register set that does not
make it easy to save/restore the mask of enabled/disabled interrupts
at suspend/resume time. At resume time, such drivers rely on the core
kernel irq subsystem to tell whether such or such interrupt is enabled
or not, in order to restore the proper state in the interrupt
controller register.

While the irqd_irq_disabled() provides the relevant information for
global interrupts, there is no similar function to query the
enabled/disabled state of a per-CPU interrupt.

Therefore, this commit complements the percpu_irq API with an
irq_percpu_is_enabled() function.

[ tglx: Simplified the implementation and added kerneldoc ]
Signed-off-by: NThomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>
Cc: Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445347435-2333-2-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      f0cb3220
  7. 11 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Add flag to force mask in disable_irq[_nosync]() · e9849777
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      If an irq chip does not implement the irq_disable callback, then we
use a lazy approach for disabling the interrupt. That means that the
interrupt is marked disabled, but the interrupt line is not
immediately masked in the interrupt chip. It only becomes masked if
the interrupt is raised while it's marked disabled. We use this to avoid
possibly expensive mask/unmask operations for common case operations.

Unfortunately there are devices which do not allow the interrupt to be
disabled easily at the device level. They are forced to use
disable_irq_nosync(). This can result in taking each interrupt twice.

Instead of enforcing the non lazy mode on all interrupts of a irq
chip, provide a settings flag, which can be set by the driver for that
particular interrupt line.
Reported-and-tested-by: NDuc Dang <dhdang@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1510092348370.6097@nanos
      e9849777
  9. 10 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 30 9月, 2015 2 次提交
  13. 22 9月, 2015 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Handle force threading of irqs with primary and thread handler · 2a1d3ab8
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Force threading of interrupts does not really deal with interrupts
which are requested with a primary and a threaded handler. The current
policy is to leave them alone and let the primary handler run in
interrupt context, but we set the ONESHOT flag for those interrupts as
well.

Kohji Okuno debugged a problem with the SDHCI driver where the
interrupt thread waits for a hardware interrupt to trigger, which can't
work well because the hardware interrupt is masked due to the ONESHOT
flag being set. He proposed to set the ONESHOT flag only if the
interrupt does not provide a thread handler.

Though that does not work either because these interrupts can be
shared. So the other interrupt would rightfully get the ONESHOT flag
set and therefor the same situation would happen again.

To deal with this proper, we need to force thread the primary handler
of such interrupts as well. That means that the primary interrupt
handler is treated as any other primary interrupt handler which is not
marked IRQF_NO_THREAD. The threaded handler becomes a separate thread
so the SDHCI flow logic can be handled gracefully.

The same issue was reported against 4.1-rt.
Reported-and-tested-by: NKohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
Reported-By: NMichal Smucr <msmucr@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NNathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1509211058080.5606@nanosSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      2a1d3ab8
  15. 16 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 27 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 12 7月, 2015 5 次提交
  21. 12 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      genirq: Introduce irq_set_vcpu_affinity() to target an interrupt to a VCPU · 0a4377de
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      With Posted-Interrupts support in Intel CPU and IOMMU, an external
interrupt from assigned-devices could be directly delivered to a
virtual CPU in a virtual machine. Instead of hacking KVM and Intel
IOMMU drivers, we propose a platform independent interface to target
an interrupt to a specific virtual CPU in a virtual machine, or set
virtual CPU affinity for an interrupt.

By adopting this new interface and the hierarchy irqdomain, we could
easily support posted-interrupts on Intel platforms, and also provide
flexible enough interfaces for other platforms to support similar
features.

Here is the usage scenario for this interface:
Guest update MSI/MSI-X interrupt configuration
        -->QEMU and KVM handle this
        -->KVM call this interface (passing posted interrupts descriptor
           and guest vector)
        -->irq core will transfer the control to IOMMU
        -->IOMMU will do the real work of updating IRTE (IRTE has new
           format for VT-d Posted-Interrupts)
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NFeng Wu <feng.wu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1432026437-16560-2-git-send-email-feng.wu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      0a4377de
  25. 09 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      genirq: Allow the irqchip state of an IRQ to be save/restored · 1b7047ed
      由 Marc Zyngier 提交于 
      There is a number of cases where a kernel subsystem may want to
introspect the state of an interrupt at the irqchip level:

- When a peripheral is shared between virtual machines,
  its interrupt state becomes part of the guest's state,
  and must be switched accordingly. KVM on arm/arm64 requires
  this for its guest-visible timer
- Some GPIO controllers seem to require peeking into the
  interrupt controller they are connected to to report
  their internal state

This seem to be a pattern that is common enough for the core code
to try and support this without too many horrible hacks. Introduce
a pair of accessors (irq_get_irqchip_state/irq_set_irqchip_state)
to retrieve the bits that can be of interest to another subsystem:
pending, active, and masked.

- irq_get_irqchip_state returns the state of the interrupt according
  to a parameter set to IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, IRQCHIP_STATE_ACTIVE,
  IRQCHIP_STATE_MASKED or IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL.
- irq_set_irqchip_state similarly sets the state of the interrupt.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Tested-by: NBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Phong Vo <pvo@apm.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
Cc: Y Vo <yvo@apm.com>
Cc: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@kryo.se>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426676484-21812-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      1b7047ed
  27. 05 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      genirq / PM: Add flag for shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines · 17f48034
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ or the
WARN_ON_ONCE() in irq_pm_install_action() will trigger.  That is
done to warn about situations in which unprepared interrupt handlers
may be run unnecessarily for suspended devices and may attempt to
access those devices by mistake.  However, it may cause drivers
that have no technical reasons for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to set
that flag just because they happen to share the interrupt line
with something like a timer.

Moreover, the generic handling of wakeup interrupts introduced by
commit 9ce7a258 (genirq: Simplify wakeup mechanism) only works
for IRQs without any NO_SUSPEND users, so the drivers of wakeup
devices needing to use shared NO_SUSPEND interrupt lines for
signaling system wakeup generally have to detect wakeup in their
interrupt handlers.  Thus if they happen to share an interrupt line
with a NO_SUSPEND user, they also need to request that their
interrupt handlers be run after suspend_device_irqs().

In both cases the reason for using IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is not because
the driver in question has a genuine need to run its interrupt
handler after suspend_device_irqs(), but because it happens to
share the line with some other NO_SUSPEND user.  Otherwise, the
driver would do without IRQF_NO_SUSPEND just fine.

To make it possible to specify that condition explicitly, introduce
a new IRQ action handler flag for shared IRQs, IRQF_COND_SUSPEND,
that, when set, will indicate to the IRQ core that the interrupt
user is generally fine with suspending the IRQ, but it also can
tolerate handler invocations after suspend_device_irqs() and, in
particular, it is capable of detecting system wakeup and triggering
it as appropriate from its interrupt handler.

That will allow us to work around a problem with a shared timer
interrupt line on at91 platforms.

Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142252777602084&w=2
Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011&r=1&w=2
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/552Reported-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
      17f48034
  29. 18 2月, 2015 1 次提交
    • P
      genirq: Provide disable_hardirq() · 02cea395
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      For things like netpoll there is a need to disable an interrupt from
atomic context. Currently netpoll uses disable_irq() which will
sleep-wait on threaded handlers and thus forced_irqthreads breaks
things.

Provide disable_hardirq(), which uses synchronize_hardirq() to only wait
for active hardirq handlers; also change synchronize_hardirq() to
return the status of threaded handlers.

This will allow one to try-disable an interrupt from atomic context, or
in case of request_threaded_irq() to only wait for the hardirq part.
Suggested-by: NSabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eyal Perry <eyalpe@mellanox.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150205130623.GH5029@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
[ Fixed typos and such. ]
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      02cea395
  31. 10 2月, 2015 1 次提交
  33. 23 1月, 2015 1 次提交
    • J
      genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint() · e2e64a93
      由 Jesse Brandeburg 提交于 
      Problem:
The default behavior of the kernel is somewhat undesirable as all
requested interrupts end up on CPU0 after registration.  A user can
run irqbalance daemon, or can manually configure smp_affinity via the
proc filesystem, but the default affinity of the interrupts for all
devices is always CPU zero, this can cause performance problems or
very heavy cpu use of only one core if not noticed and fixed by the
user.

Solution:
Enable the setting of the initial affinity directly when the driver
sets a hint.

This enabling means that kernel drivers can include an initial
affinity setting for the interrupt, instead of all interrupts starting
out life on CPU0. Of course if irqbalance is still running then the
interrupts will get moved as before.

This function is currently called by drivers in block, crypto,
infiniband, ethernet and scsi trees, but only a handful, so these will
be the devices affected by this change.

Tested on i40e, and default interrupts were spread across the CPUs
according to the hint.

drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c:3
drivers/block/nvme-core.c:2
drivers/crypto/qat/qat_dh895xcc/adf_isr.c:3
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_iba7322.c:2
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c:3
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c:3
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:3
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_cq.c:2
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c:3
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:3
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c:8
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_acc.c:1
drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c:2
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:2
Signed-off-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141219012206.4220.27491.stgit@jbrandeb-cp2.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      e2e64a93
  35. 23 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      genirq: Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE to support stacked irqchip · 2cb62547
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE in addition to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK and
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY to support stacked irqchip. IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE
is the same as IRQ_SET_MASK_OK to irq core. To stacked irqchip, it means
that ascendant irqchips have done all the work and no more handling
needed in descendant irqchips.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      2cb62547
  37. 01 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  39. 01 8月, 2014 2 次提交
  41. 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  43. 15 7月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      PM / sleep / irq: Do not suspend wakeup interrupts · d709f7bc
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      If an IRQ has been configured for wakeup via enable_irq_wake(), the
driver who has done that must be prepared for receiving interrupts
after suspend_device_irqs() has returned, so there is no need to
"suspend" such IRQs.  Moreover, if drivers using enable_irq_wake()
actually want to receive interrupts after suspend_device_irqs() has
returned, they need to add IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to the IRQ flags while
requesting the IRQs, which shouldn't be necessary (it also goes a bit
too far, as IRQF_NO_SUSPEND causes the IRQ to be ignored by
suspend_device_irqs() all the time regardless of whether or not it
has been configured for signaling wakeup).

For the above reasons, make __disable_irq() ignore IRQ descriptors
with IRQD_WAKEUP_STATE set when its suspend argument is true which
effectively causes them to behave like IRQs with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
set.

This also allows IRQs configured for wakeup via enable_irq_wake()
to work as wakeup interrupts for the "freeze" (suspend-to-idle)
sleep mode automatically just like for any other sleep states.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4679574.kGUnqAuNl9@vostro.rjw.lanSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      d709f7bc
  45. 04 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Sanitize spurious interrupt detection of threaded irqs · 1e77d0a1
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Till reported that the spurious interrupt detection of threaded
interrupts is broken in two ways:

- note_interrupt() is called for each action thread of a shared
  interrupt line. That's wrong as we are only interested whether none
  of the device drivers felt responsible for the interrupt, but by
  calling multiple times for a single interrupt line we account
  IRQ_NONE even if one of the drivers felt responsible.

- note_interrupt() when called from the thread handler is not
  serialized. That leaves the members of irq_desc which are used for
  the spurious detection unprotected.

To solve this we need to defer the spurious detection of a threaded
interrupt to the next hardware interrupt context where we have
implicit serialization.

If note_interrupt is called with action_ret == IRQ_WAKE_THREAD, we
check whether the previous interrupt requested a deferred check. If
not, we request a deferred check for the next hardware interrupt and
return. 

If set, we check whether one of the interrupt threads signaled
success. Depending on this information we feed the result into the
spurious detector.

If one primary handler of a shared interrupt returns IRQ_HANDLED we
disable the deferred check of irq threads on the same line, as we have
found at least one device driver who cared.
Reported-by: NTill Straumann <strauman@slac.stanford.edu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NAustin Schuh <austin@peloton-tech.com>
Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1303071450130.22263@ionos
      1e77d0a1
  47. 18 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      genirq: Allow forcing cpu affinity of interrupts · 01f8fa4f
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      The current implementation of irq_set_affinity() refuses rightfully to
route an interrupt to an offline cpu.

But there is a special case, where this is actually desired. Some of
the ARM SoCs have per cpu timers which require setting the affinity
during cpu startup where the cpu is not yet in the online mask.

If we can't do that, then the local timer interrupt for the about to
become online cpu is routed to some random online cpu.

The developers of the affected machines tried to work around that
issue, but that results in a massive mess in that timer code.

We have a yet unused argument in the set_affinity callbacks of the irq
chips, which I added back then for a similar reason. It was never
required so it got not used. But I'm happy that I never removed it.

That allows us to implement a sane handling of the above scenario. So
the affected SoC drivers can add the required force handling to their
interrupt chip, switch the timer code to irq_force_affinity() and
things just work.

This does not affect any existing user of irq_set_affinity().

Tagged for stable to allow a simple fix of the affected SoC clock
event drivers.
Reported-and-tested-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140416143315.717251504@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      01f8fa4f
  49. 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  51. 12 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  53. 27 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • C
      genirq: Remove racy waitqueue_active check · c685689f
      由 Chuansheng Liu 提交于 
      We hit one rare case below:

T1 calling disable_irq(), but hanging at synchronize_irq()
always;
The corresponding irq thread is in sleeping state;
And all CPUs are in idle state;

After analysis, we found there is one possible scenerio which
causes T1 is waiting there forever:
CPU0                                       CPU1
 synchronize_irq()
  wait_event()
    spin_lock()
                                           atomic_dec_and_test(&threads_active)
      insert the __wait into queue
    spin_unlock()
                                           if(waitqueue_active)
    atomic_read(&threads_active)
                                             wake_up()

Here after inserted the __wait into queue on CPU0, and before
test if queue is empty on CPU1, there is no barrier, it maybe
cause it is not visible for CPU1 immediately, although CPU0 has
updated the queue list.
It is similar for CPU0 atomic_read() threads_active also.

So we'd need one smp_mb() before waitqueue_active.that, but removing
the waitqueue_active() check solves it as wel l and it makes
things simple and clear.
Signed-off-by: NChuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Xiaoming Wang <xiaoming.wang@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393212590-32543-1-git-send-email-chuansheng.liu@intel.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      c685689f
  55. 20 2月, 2014 3 次提交
    • C
      genirq: Update the a comment typo · b04c644e
      由 Chuansheng Liu 提交于 
      Change the comment "chasnge" to "change".
Signed-off-by: NChuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1392020037-5484-2-git-send-email-chuansheng.liu@intel.comSigned-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      b04c644e
    • T
      genirq: Provide irq_wake_thread() · a92444c6
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      In course of the sdhci/sdio discussion with Russell about killing the
sdio kthread hackery we discovered the need to be able to wake an
interrupt thread from software.

The rationale for this is, that sdio hardware can lack proper
interrupt support for certain features. So the driver needs to poll
the status registers, but at the same time it needs to be woken up by
an hardware interrupt.

To be able to get rid of the home brewn kthread construct of sdio we
need a way to wake an irq thread independent of an actual hardware
interrupt.

Provide an irq_wake_thread() function which wakes up the thread which
is associated to a given dev_id. This allows sdio to invoke the irq
thread from the hardware irq handler via the IRQ_WAKE_THREAD return
value and provides a possibility to wake it via a timer for the
polling scenarios. That allows to simplify the sdio logic
significantly.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140215003823.772565780@linutronix.de
      a92444c6
    • T
      genirq: Provide synchronize_hardirq() · 18258f72
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      synchronize_irq() waits for hard irq and threaded handlers to complete
before returning. For some special cases we only need to make sure
that the hard interrupt part of the irq line is not in progress when
we disabled the - possibly shared - interrupt at the device level.

A proper use case for this was provided by Russell. The sdhci driver
requires some irq triggered functions to be run in thread context. The
current implementation of the thread context is a sdio private kthread
construct, which has quite some shortcomings. These can be avoided
when the thread is directly associated to the device interrupt via the
generic threaded irq infrastructure.

Though there is a corner case related to run time power management
where one side disables the device interrupts at the device level and
needs to make sure, that an already running hard interrupt handler has
completed before proceeding further. Though that hard interrupt
handler might wake the associated thread, which in turn can request
the runtime PM to reenable the device. Using synchronize_irq() leads
to an immediate deadlock of the irq thread waiting for the PM lock and
the synchronize_irq() waiting for the irq thread to complete.

Due to the fact that it is sufficient for this case to ensure that no
hard irq handler is executing a new function which avoids the check
for the thread is required.

Add a function, which just monitors the hard irq parts and ignores the
threaded handlers.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: NRussell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140215003823.653236081@linutronix.de
      18258f72
  57. 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  59. 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  61. 28 6月, 2013 1 次提交